Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package tuxpaint
This unblock fixes #775101, which is particularly important to
touchscreen users, and includes remaining missing files that
were accidentally omitted as well
Debian Live team was missed in the CC. I'm sure it was simply an
oversight ...
As for me, I'm available any of those three weekends.
Original Message
Subject: Scheduling for 7.3
Resent-Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2013 15:06:09 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-release@lists.debian.org
Date:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-build
Fixes failure to build netboot image type by removing inclusion
of loadlin for netboot.
unblock live-build/3.0.5-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release:
other packages to temporarily tweak the system while
+d-i is running. See /usr/share/debian-installer-launcher/hooks/README.
+ * Ensure that /run/lock exists in the d-i chroot (mimick what /init does
+ in the initrd).
+
+ -- Ben Armstrong Sun, 28 Apr 2013 17:15:41 -0300
+
debian-installer-l
On 28/04/13 03:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Should we expect a -2 fixing this?
Yes. I expect by tomorrow.
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/51
On 26/04/13 04:05 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Is that a particularly common use case?
We support a few users who do most, if not all of their builds this way.
It may not be common, but it's important for the few users who use it.
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.de
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-config
Includes a fix needed for fglrx/nvidia support in unofficial
non-free images.
unblock live-config/3.0.23-1
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-build
Numerous minor fixes that are nevertheless important for the
release, including wheezy release-specific updates (new wheezy-backports
address scheme, updat
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-tools
This version supports building a live image on a live system
and fixes an incorrect man page symlink. I have attached a
debdiff with */manpages/*/* filtere
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package live-config
Fixes one RC bug, #704562, which breaks upgrades from squeeze. Also
includes some translation and spelling fixes and closes a few more
bugs of lesser seve
her (16) unstable; urgency=low
+
+ * Use tmpfs and lazy unmount to ensure safe cleanup.
+Thanks to Bastian Blank . (Closes: #703979).
+ * Ensure chroot inherits DISPLAY from caller to make
+install from console possible again.
+
+ -- Ben Armstrong Sat, 30 Mar 2013 10:37:55 -0300
+
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package debian-installer-launcher
We forgot to include the new debian-installer-launcher in our list of unblocks
for live-*, so our recent build of wheezy live rc1 regressed
On 02/24/2013 04:46 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Even as a filtered diff, that's still a reasonably large set of
> changes. :-(
Sorry about that.
> A few comments / queries:
>
> --- live-tools.orig/bin/live-persistence 1970-01-01 01:00:00.0
> +0100
> +++ live-tools/bin/live-persist
%z /dev/pts)"
_DATE_LXC="$(date +%s -d"${_DATE_LXC}")"
_UPTIME_LXC="$((${_DATE_HOST} - ${_DATE_LXC}))"
diff -Naurp live-tools.orig/debian/changelog live-tools/debian/changelog
--- live-tools.orig/debian/changelog 2013-02-15 10:42:48.227306079 +0100
+++ live-tools/
Local DNS issues. Resending ...
On 12/20/2012 08:29 AM, Ben Armstrong wrote:
> On 12/19/2012 03:38 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
>> Apologies for letting this slip; what's the current status?
>
> To avoid rework, we need to settle on some final changes that themselves
> will
On 10/10/12 05:21 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> We're now up to 3.0.8, including four uploads within the space of a week
> (one for an entirely pointless standards-version tweak). :-(
>
> Would it be possible to have a cleaned up version of the diff that skips
> the translation changes and the nois
On 10/10/12 05:12 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 08:17 -0300, Ben Armstrong wrote:
>> Please unblock package live-tools
>>
>> Primarily to fix diversion conflicts. Also includes doc updates and
>> other fixes needed for the release.
>
> In th
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
> doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
> archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
The biggest barrier to this is that Matt sa
On 06/03/11 12:08 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> Well, having it fixed in unstable would be a good start. The problem
> doesn't just affect stable so having the first time the patch is in the
> archive be a stable point release isn't generally appropriate.
>
> Where would one find the patch for #614
On 06/03/11 11:20 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> - anything I missed?
netcfg. #614884 blocks #606268 against network-manager. We have a
working solution with the two fixes I mentioned in 614884 and my
supplied patch for NM's ifblacklist_migrate.sh filed against 606268.
The NM bug is RC but had no i
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 18:06:40 +0100
Luk Claes wrote:
> > eeepc-acpi-scripts 1.1.4, just released by the debian-eeepc team,
> > closes RC bug #559578 which inadvertently already migrated to testing
> > (I still don't know how that happened). However, we neglected to set
> > urgency=high. Would you
Hi,
eeepc-acpi-scripts 1.1.4, just released by the debian-eeepc team,
closes RC bug #559578 which inadvertently already migrated to testing
(I still don't know how that happened). However, we neglected to set
urgency=high. Would you please fix that?
Thanks,
Ben
--
,-. nSLUGhttp://www.nslu
On Sat, 9 Aug 2008 14:55:23 +0100
Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unblocked.
Thanks!
Ben
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The 2.0.3-3 release of atl2 currently in Lenny is essentially
2.0.4 (same fix with inconsequential difference in implementation).
2.0.5 adds another one-line fix from Atheros to prevent spurious device
resets under heavy load. It "just fixes a comparison to check the
right thing, rather than a thi
On Sun, 4 Feb 2007 16:37:08 -0400
Ben Armstrong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is fixed in junior-internet 1.8 which I have just uploaded to unstable.
> I believe it should go into etch as well, since it contains no substantial
> changes other than the fix itself.
Only pl
This is fixed in junior-games-net 1.3 which I have just uploaded to
unstable. I believe it should go into etch as well, since it contains
no substantial changes other than the fix itself.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 05:06:12 -0500
From: Ariel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bu
This is fixed in junior-internet 1.8 which I have just uploaded to unstable. I
believe it should go into etch as well, since it contains no substantial
changes other than the fix itself.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Sat, 09 Dec 2006 09:12:39 +0100
From: Laurent Bonnaud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 05:24:14PM -0400, Joey Hess wrote:
> I've only been slowly becoming familiar with debian-edu over the past
> two or three weeks and only noticed it was subject to this set of
> problems last Tuesday, so I don't have a full proposal for how to
> restructure the debian-edu tas
28 matches
Mail list logo
