proposed text for the freeze policy can be found in
> the following merge request on salsa:
>
> https://salsa.debian.org/release-team/release.debian.org/-/merge_requests/27
My favorite course of action is *not* changing anything regarding d-i
(except the fingerpointing I received afterwards,
Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-10-29):
> d-i ack required for the udeb; I'm happy otherwise, so if there are no
> objections please go ahead.
No objections, thanks.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team me
gt; > environment without further source changes by using the nogir build-profile,
> > and it pulls in libglib2.0-dev{,-bin} instead, as desired.
> >
> > An upgraded bookworm GNOME desktop system runs successfully.
>
> d-i ack required for the udeb; in CC.
No objection
Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-10-19):
> Thanks. d-i ack is required for the udeb, CC'd.
No objections, thanks.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
De
I don't think I've ever seen its udeb use{d,ful} in a d-i context (but I
haven't looked extensively), and it's not installable anyway, so not a
factor:
- Before = Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.36), libxenmisc4.17
- After = Depends: libc6-udeb (>= 2.36), libxenmisc4.17 (>
Graham Inggs (2024-09-24):
> Thanks for the ping. These have both been scheduled now.
Thanks, things are looking good now.
For debian-boot@, d-i daily builds should be back (confirmed with a
manual amd64 build on barriere and another arm64 one on amdahl).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (2024-09-20):
> Scott Talbert (2024-09-16):
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > X-Debbugs-Cc: libalien-wxwidgets-p...@packages.debian.org
> > Control: affects -1 + src:libalien-wxwidgets-perl
> > User: release.debian
(that cannot be
built/published as a result).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Steve McIntyre (2024-09-15):
> Kibi: just checking, are you happy for me to call this trixie d-i
> alpha 1?
As communicated a few times in previous mails already: not at all.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager --
Hi,
Steve McIntyre (2024-09-14):
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2024 at 01:49:46AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I'm trying to see if I can get everything lined up for an upload
> > that would have a chance to migrate, which I think would be enough
> > to unblock Steve on
Cc += debian-boot@, quoting in full accordingly.
Hi Salvatore,
Salvatore Bonaccorso (2024-09-13):
> On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 08:27:44AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
> > Hi Cyril, Steve,
> >
> > On Wed, Sep 04, 2024 at 07:51:40AM +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>
, that probably can be cleaned up as
well at some point?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
e, so including explicitly
> both as recipients for their ack/nack on the timing, cf.
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/09/msg00037.html
>
> Ideally we have with the fixes for the FTBFS no new RC level issues,
> so that this transition of linux to testing can happe
eek before, and
can require a little more than the usual couple of hours, as we've just
been reminded…
> 11 January
That should work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n't have any preferences regarding a future wholesale 6.10.y or just
a new revision of the current upstream release. It'd probably just make
sense to avoid upgrading to 6.11.y since I'd guess we would get more
things to look at.
I'll let Steve comment on the preferred timings.
o like to co-ordinate 12.8 if at all possible, since cadence is
> the 30th December. That's unlikely to be convenient so please also indicate
> your availability for:
>
> 7th January (too soon after festivities?)
> 14th January
Ditto, even if both are Tuesdays.
Che
found. It is not a severe one, so
> > > no DSA will be released. But it would be good to have it fixed.
> >
> > Please add a "closes: #1073248" to the changelog and go ahead.
>
> I missed the udeb, sorry. Are there any objections from the d-i side?
o
testing, to clear the path for SB-related things (as requested by
Steve).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
RetentionSec=0
That's not really something I'd expect from a point release…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ease team so who
knows…
> Opinions / objections / octopuses welcome.
I'd like an octopus too, please.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
n some
way?
Beware of libfuse2-udeb though, which is listed by grub-mount-udeb in
its Depends.
Lastly, you mentioned debian-edu but didn't seem to have cc'ed them.
Tschüs,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team memb
retty sure d-i moved to pcre2 a while back now.
I'm not seeing any reverse dependencies for the libpcre3-udeb package,
so we should be good.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
d dodge at the very last moment while building d-i
(picking the version in stable instead).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
or the d-i team's approval.
Absolutely, and no need to ask in the future.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
d-i ack.
Please go ahead, I'll double check once it lands in opu. In the very
worst case, we could dodge at the very last moment while building d-i
(picking the version in oldstable instead).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release mana
or the d-i team's approval.
Absolutely, and no need to ask in the future.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
y for these dates as soon as
> possible.
Both should work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt (2024-06-15):
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi Adam,
Adam D. Barratt (2024-06-15):
> Please go ahead.
Thanks, uploaded.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
golang-github-google-nftables part.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
diff -Nru crowdsec-firewall-bouncer-0.0.25/debian/changelog
crowdsec-firewall-bouncer-0.0.25/debian/changelog
--- crowdsec-firewall-bouncer-0.0.25/debian/changelog 2023-05-31
1
function used by crowdsec-firewall-bouncer
(AddSet).
[ Other info ]
Next bug report is the crowdsec-firewall-bouncer part.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
diff -Nru golang-github-google-nftables-0.1.0/debian/changelog
golang-github-google-nftable
Steve McIntyre (2024-05-27):
> On Mon, May 27, 2024 at 01:07:17PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> > Please indicate availability for:
> >
> > Saturday 15th June
> > Saturday 22nd June
> > Saturday 29th June
>
> Any of those are feasible for me.
Hi,
Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-04-21):
> Too late now in any case. SRMs will regroup and decide whether we push
> for one in May or just wait for June anyway.
June is 10 days away. Do we have any kind of tentative schedule?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)
Hi Colin,
Colin Watson (2024-05-21):
> I've just fixed this in unstable, but it would be helpful to have it
> in place for installs of bookworm too.
ACK on principle; you'll want a dch -r though.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debama
filing bug reports).
See: https://d-i.debian.org/dose/
Some backstory: https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2024/03/msg00102.html
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-26):
> I'm not sure how we reached this situation but there are a bunch of
> packages in trixie that are not in a suitable state. To reproduce, a
> simple `debootstrap trixie /tmp/trixie` on amd64 is sufficient.
That works again, presumably
Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-26):
> Anyway, I wanted to see if suggesting (I wouldn't go as far as requesting
> because I'm really not sure this would be the right course of action, more
> details below) a new binNMU of coreutils within testing would be
> sufficient to make t
.
I'm not sure whether you're keeping track of things that break when
force-hinting but if you were aware of the resulting breakages already,
some kind of heads-up would have been nice…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I r
Cyril Brulebois (2024-04-16):
> Please consider binNMU-ing both packages against libmtdev-dev (>= 1.1.6-1.2)
> on all archs, provided that doesn't interfere with the whole 64-bit time_t
> transition:
> - libinput10
That ought to read:
- libinput
Sorry about that.
>
s.
Please consider binNMU-ing both packages against libmtdev-dev (>= 1.1.6-1.2)
on all archs, provided that doesn't interfere with the whole 64-bit time_t
transition:
- libinput10
- xserver-xorg-input-evdev
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/
hen rebuilt.
3. https://d-i.debian.org/dose/
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
Hi,
Adam D. Barratt (2024-04-01):
> As we had to postpone 12.6, let's look at alternative dates.
I should be able to make anything work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freela
Hi,
Aurelien Jarno (2024-03-13):
> The date of the next point release is slowly approaching, could you
> please have a look at this?
Sorry, lost track of that one. Feel free to upload.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I rel
n't seem particularly fitting to try and get a d-i release out any
day soon.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Jonathan Wiltshire (2024-02-12):
> 12.6 should be around 10th April, so please indicate availability for:
>
> 6 April
> 13 April
> 20 April
Any of those should work.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -
in
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2024/01/msg00089.html ?
> My gut feeling from what was discussed is that nobody will ever use
> the d-i on armel.
I'm not sure how much time armel will stick around (for existing
systems), but it looks to me that d-i/armel is no longer relevant.
C
Steve McIntyre (2023-12-26):
> Any of those *should* be OK for me.
Ditto.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
em
scheduled in one go.
In any case, actually binNMUing both packages would be nice, as we've
been lacking d-i daily builds for some days already.
(I could probably try and do that myself but “above all, do no harm”.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
x27;ll let
others comment as to whether that's some nitpicking that should be
ignored, or something they'd like to see adjusted.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
lien-wxwidgets-perl_0.69+dfsg-6+b3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for
> wxwidgets3.2 (3.2.4+dfsg-1)"
This looks like a redux of #1054146, with libwx-perl also needing a
binNMU (after the libalien-wxwidgets-perl one)?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<h
255-rc1, which I will upload to unstable to get more coverage before
> the release - and it will no longer support legacy paths/layouts, which
> I think will affect the daily d-i builds.
Yes, that's the next topic on my list, as shared with Helmut a couple
weeks ago and confirmed ea
po
as usual instead of thinking about downloading your source packages from
the get-go.)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Cyril Brulebois (2023-10-15):
> Simon McVittie (2023-10-15):
> > I have attempted to test the proposed version in d-i. I am not an
> > expert on d-i, but I hope what I have done here is approximately
> > correct:
> […]
> > I hope this is helpful information.
&
lock processing this upload,
possibly linked to dgit's having been used at some point?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Jonathan Wiltshire (2023-10-07):
> How about:
> 4th December (better for cadence)
> 11th December (more likely suitable in practice)
The later the better.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team memb
kages from the get-go, we have
dep-waits to ensure one finishes before the other one starts?
> PS, what on the d-i uses libwx-perl?
The unifont-bin build-dep pulls it.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release t
i builds.
Package: libalien-wxwidgets-perl
Provides: wxperl-gtk-3-2-3-uni-gcc-3-4
Package: libwx-perl
Depends: […], wxperl-gtk-3-2-2-uni-gcc-3-4, […]
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team membe
on my side should be happening in a couple of days
anyway.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ng anything,
> could we have an upload that uses the -0+ style of versioning ASAP,
> please?
Trying to understand the reasons behind the versioning scheme switch, it
seems the debian/bullseye branch is still at 1.1.1v-0~deb11u1 (without a
tag).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debia
lowing packages have unmet dependencies:
libssl1.1-udeb : Depends: libcrypto1.1-udeb (>= 1.1.1w) but
1.1.1w-0~deb11u1 is to be installed
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_requests/105#note_429838
Even without Philip's clarification regarding what has been tested and
what hasn't, that machinery clearly doesn't test what happens with a
release d-i build.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release ma
ble to upgrade a kernel (which has been
the major pain point up to now) and also to… remove raspi-firmware.
As far as I can remember from user horror stories, they couldn't even
remove the package, and had to manually remove hooks under /etc before
being able to finally remove the package
Adam D. Barratt (2023-07-15):
> Please go ahead.
Uploaded; and thanks for the quick approval to a very late request…
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
──┬──┬┬──╮
│ Parsers │ Hits │ Parsed │ Unparsed │
├─┼──┼┼──┤
│ crowdsecurity/sshd-logs │ 14 │ 5 │ 9│
╰─────┴──┴┴─
or the images team.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ve more time for 12.1 to mature.
I can push the d-i buttons for any dates; I think I'd rather avoid
having to do debian-cd bits if others are available (it'd be a chance
to finalize my streamlining work, but the past few months have been
absolutely exhausting; I'd like to take a
few months have been
absolutely exhausting; I'd like to take a breather, or ten).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ste, as
long as there's a reference to the actual commits in the wiki page… ;)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
he d-i side.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Simon McVittie (2023-06-07):
> Technically dbus has udebs, although as noted above they are not
> directly useful for anything.
I only glanced at the discussion that happened a few hours/days ago on
IRC, but that seemed compelling. No objections from the d-i side.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Bru
0, i.e. the initial Bookworm release.)
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-24):
> I might pick a last minute tasksel change as well (for lxqt); I think
> it would help, could break, but that would be trivially revertable
> (and there would be room to do so, see below).
I did that, didn't hear bad
g up to you.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
picking developers in order.
Source debdiff attached.
By the way, the declared VCS isn't up-to-date, and lacks tags for recent
uploads (last tag is debian/0.6.6-2, testing and unstable have 0.6.8-1
instead).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com
viewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
unblock crowdsec/1.4.6-4
unblock crowdsec-custom-bouncer/0.0.15-3
unblock crowdsec-firewall-bouncer/0.0.25-3
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois -- Debian Consultant @ DEBAMAX -- https://debamax.com/
diff -Nru cro
Hi all,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-21):
> Dates that have been announced[1] so far:
> - 2023-05-24: full freeze
[x] ← You are here!
> - 2023-05-28: last moment to file unblock requests
> - 2023-06-03: bookworm totally frozen
>(per “last week prior to the release”)
ore packages that B-D: nvidia-cuda-toolkit but have
> no library dependencies)
Just for the avoidance of doubt since this topic came up during our
meeting: this is definitely post-bookworm, right?
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release
o the proposed change from a d-i perspective.
But I'm very much worried about possible side effects at this critical
stage of the freeze.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
ia32-signed/1+2.06+13
Yes please!
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
p2. Can you ACK (or udeb-unblock)?
Apologies for losing track of this request. No objections.
FTR reverse dependencies are just brltty-udeb and udev-udeb. Hopefully
neither of those depend on *not* applying those two CVE fixes.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https:
Hi all,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-06):
> I think it'd make sense to have at least 2 releases:
> - 1 around mid-May;
> - 1 around end of May.
>
> The first one would bundle a bunch of the fixes or improvements being
> worked on these days, making sure everything works
that.
I'm happy with an unblock from a d-i perspective.
> Not attaching the debdiff.
:D
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
me 6.1.27-2 follow-up upload.
In any case, it's fine to delay RC 3 by a few days if we need some time
to think, before coming up with an updated plan.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
Thanks for your time!
unblock xorg-server/2:21.1.7-3
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
diff -u
n testing, I'll apply the rolled-back changes again:
Sure, debdiff focuses on differences in the list of files/symlinks getting
shipped, and metadata differences (possibly maintainer scripts too, if given
--controlfiles=ALL); it doesn't actually diff files shipped in binary
p
, that's quite a long mail… With the release approaching,
I thought it'd make sense to be as explicit as possible to make sure
everyone is on the same page.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> Of course, please go ahead.
The proposed, targeted fix seems very much appropriate; please let us
know once it's in the archive. I don't anticipate the maintainer upload
to be less suitable. :)
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D
Hi,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-05-05):
> Gunnar Wolf (2023-04-14):
> > vmdb2 is a leaf package. The code changes are quite minor. While there
> > are several alternatives to vmdb2 in Debian, switching from one image
> > generating system to another might be quite heavy for the u
rue (in either stable or unstable),
since autopkgtest depends on it… and it seems that update would break it.
I'll let Helmut expand, and possibly formulate a plan.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team membe
: this issue worried me earlier
but didn't reach my list of topics to keep an eye on for Bookworm
(https://salsa.debian.org/installer-team/debian-installer/-/issues/1),
I'm glad you kept track!
I'll let someone else from the release team comment on the actual
unblock request though.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
, that assessment seems very plausible
to me; based on this, no objections on the d-i side.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hich will be switched for the upload.
ACK.
With both my d-i and release hats: looks good to me, please go ahead.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
hanges and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
[ Other info ]
Thanks for all your hard work.
unblock debian-cd/3.2.1
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Cons
Hi again,
Cyril Brulebois (2023-04-27):
> FTP team, please sync the installer from sid to testing, as it seems to
> be Installed for all release architectures (9 total):
>
> dak copy-installer 20230427
>
> (It seems the SSH trigger thing wasn't finished, as it's
's being in unstable).
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
fine to me, it can get into testing once the udeb block is
lifted.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
yet to be adjusted?
https://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2023/04/msg00090.html)
Release team: FYI, I've unblocked and urgented it.
Thanks for your time.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member --
| testing| source
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
es without swap area. That includes low-memory rescue systems and
> d-i, but not “normal systems”.
The backporting from unstable looks sane to me, please go ahead.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
${misc:Pre-Depends}
> Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}
> +Breaks: cryptsetup-initramfs (<<2:2.6.1-2)
FWIW: A space is customary after '<<' but it appears in the end (via
dh_gencontrol I suppose but I didn't check the exact inner workings).
With o
27;ll probably take responsibility for the review
and the possible unblock. I have a few more things to prepare anyway,
and I'm on no fixed schedule yet.
Cheers,
--
Cyril Brulebois (k...@debian.org)<https://debamax.com/>
D-I release manager -- Release team member -- Freelance Consultant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
1 - 100 of 1125 matches
Mail list logo
