On Wed, Jan 06, 2010 at 07:54:31AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
geda-gaf is not available on all arches yet or do you want me to remove
the whole lot of geda packages?
Ah I see. We'll fix that and then wait 10 days..
Hamish
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with
On Sun, Jan 03, 2010 at 11:57:05PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Hi Debian-release,
Source package libgeda has been removed from unstable but is still in
testing. According to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=geda-gaf,
that is blocking geda
Hi Debian-release,
Source package libgeda has been removed from unstable but is still in
testing. According to
http://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=geda-gaf,
that is blocking geda-gaf's transition.
Could you please remove libgeda from testing.
Thanks
Hamish
On Sun, Jan 03,
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 07:40:17AM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:39:20PM +, Debian testing watch wrote:
FYI: The status of the geda-examples source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.4.3-1
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 04:39:20PM +, Debian testing watch wrote:
FYI: The status of the geda-examples source package
in Debian's testing distribution has changed.
Previous version: 1:1.4.3-1
Current version: (not in testing)
Hint: Package not in unstable
I can't work out why
Could you please schedule a rebuild of gwave on amd64. It is
uninstallable due to dep on old libltdl3.
thanks,
Hamish
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
?
Thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB ham...@debian.org ham...@cloud.net.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:14:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:01:35AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
on hppa several days ago but haven't been accepted into unstable yet?
Is this something you
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 07:04:37PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 12:14:40AM +0100, Philipp Kern wrote:
On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:01:35AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
buildd.debian.org shows geda-gnetlist and geda-gsymcheck were last built
on hppa
to
unstable so perhaps I just need to be patient?
Thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB ham...@debian.org ham...@cloud.net.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Fri, Feb 06, 2009 at 02:28:51PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Could the RMs please comment on this proposed change? I realise we are
in deep freeze now but this discussion started well before that. Some of
the bugs fixed are serious (though logged upstream rather than
On Tue, Feb 03, 2009 at 12:00:03AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:36:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hamish Moffatt ham...@debian.org (02/02/2009):
RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If
you can't do it, I will look at it tonight
On Mon, Feb 02, 2009 at 04:36:59AM +0100, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Hamish Moffatt ham...@debian.org (02/02/2009):
RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3 to be attached. If
you can't do it, I will look at it tonight.
I've posted the diffs twice now, and the list is eating
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 03:11:27PM +0100, Richard Hartmann wrote:
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 00:19, Hamish Moffatt ham...@debian.org wrote:
Ping? I'd like to get geda* 1.4.3 into lenny. Could you please consider
allowing this in?
RM asked for a full diff between 1.4.0 and 1.4.3
On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 10:30:04AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
Upstream for geda* has released a new version with bug fixes only. This
release has been specifically aimed at us, and contains bug fixes only.
Some of the bugs are serious, some are minor, most aren't logged in our
BTS.
What
with nine packages).
Could you please allow these into lenny?
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB ham...@debian.org ham...@cloud.net.au
diff -Nru geda-1.4.0.1/debian/changelog geda-1.4.0.2/debian/changelog
--- geda-1.4.0.1/debian/changelog 2008-03-30 22:55:10.0 +1100
+++ geda-1.4.0.2/debian
On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 08:16:07PM +0100, Luk Claes wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I've uploaded new versions of the libgeda and geda-* packages to
unstable which fix RC bugs with the copyright files and a couple of
other things, like a tempfile vulnerability in an example script
(geda
|4
src/s_textbuffer.c| 17
69 files changed, 36871 insertions(+), 38565 deletions(-)
Thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB ham...@debian.org ham...@cloud.net.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact
to #511509? It's just been fixed (6 days since reported).
Could tqsllib and trustedqsl please be re-admitted to lenny?
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB ham...@debian.org ham...@cloud.net.au
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-release-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of unsubscribe
this issue, so it seems not that uncommon.
The problem: Machines upgraded from Sarge to Etch won't get mktemp
pulled in, because nothing depends on essential packages. They won't
FWIW, etch's debianutils depends on mktemp, and debianutils was
essential in sarge too.
Hamish
--
Hamish
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 09:46:10AM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I uploaded www-sql 0.5.7-21 just about the time I received the final
freeze announcement, so I'm not sure if it missed out or not. It fixes
#438897 (incorrect dependencies).
Would you consider letting
not too concerned if you don't want to. Given that it hasn't had an
upstream release in years and I suspect nobody uses it, we could
probably remove it altogether.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
the orphaned file is a conffile now owned by
another package that geda-symbols users will have installed.
Thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, Platform-independent software solutions
- End forwarded message -
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:40:26AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
Hm, nice. xpdf is arch:all but depends on xpdf-reader strictly. Thus
it is not binNMU-safe.
That's already fixed in lenny.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
prepare an upload. See the attached debdiff for details.
Why are you hacking xpdf to fix a relationship problem between
pdftohtml and poppler-utils? Neither of them are xpdf-utils.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 11:39:20AM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:19 AM, Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, May 31, 2008 at 04:39:43PM -0600, Debian testing watch wrote:
FYI: The status of the verilog source package
in Debian's testing distribution has
, according to packages.qa.d.o).
Pierre,
Why was verilog removed from testing?
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Recent builds of geda-gschem and geda-gattrib failed because
libxml-parser-perl wasn't installable. I expect this is fixed due to the
recent binNMU, so could you please reschedule these geda packages?
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
cleared? I emailed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] but no reply or action has occurred.
thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Apr 19, 2008 at 07:19:22PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
geda-gschem: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc
geda-gattrib: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc
geda-gnetlist: alpha, mips, mipsel, powerpc, i386, ia64
geda-gsymcheck: alpha, mips, mipsel
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Are 'important' bugs NMU targets? My reading of release.debian.org would
suggest not.
geda-* 1:1.4.0-* has just been set back from entering testing due to an
NMU to fix an important (but not serious) bug. I'm a tad annoyed.
Thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 07:58:05PM -0600, Raphael Geissert wrote:
Hamish Moffatt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ax25-tools (U)
hf (U)
Thanks, fixed these two.
libguilegtk-1.2-dev
False alarm: the /usr/bin/build-gtk-guile script is actually in guile,
but has a quick shell wrapper at the top
to wxwidgets 2.4. trustedqsl 1.11-5 was uploaded a
day or two back to fix that.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
. This was the reason why I stopped updating
the library name a while back.
What do you suggest?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and GNOME installed.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
geda-{gschem,gnetlist,gattrib,gsymcheck,utils} all depend on libgeda,
all of which were uploaded in new versions 11 days ago. They are
candidates for testing based on the time delay and I don't understand why
they haven't gone in?
Thanks
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED
, thanks.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
library do exist.
[..]
My package tqsllib is only used by my other package trustedqsl.
Can I cheat and skip the library rename by simply setting better
dependencies on the rebuilds? (Library conflicts app, library shlibs
updated, app build-depends new library.)
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB
needed?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Sep 27, 2005 at 09:35:07AM +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Le mardi 27 septembre 2005 à 16:54 +1000, Hamish Moffatt a écrit :
What about the 134 packages that depend on gdk-imlib1? Some of them are
libraries but there are certainly real applications in there too, like
gpredict
that Takuo told would have to migrate
from libgal-dev (which is, of course, impossible, if you are
maintaining a Gnome 1 package).
OK. This shouldn't affect users of the binary packages then.
Thanks for sorting this out.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi RMs,
What is the appropriate severity currently for FTBFS on amd64 bugs?
What is the NMU policy for such bugs?
For an initial list of such bugs, just check the list of bugs submitted
by [EMAIL PROTECTED] Many of these are gcc-4.0 bugs too.
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL
to file important bugs and then upgrade them to
something RC after a few weeks. Is that OK?
Couldn't you keep the old library in the archive for a while?
Is a mass forced upgrade necessary? Beneficial?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
).
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 01:57:13AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, May 02, 2005 at 06:46:10PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
I uploaded with severity=medium so they're due to go in in 1-2 days'
time unless frozen. (Although trustedqsl is missing 1-2 builds still.)
Please ask [EMAIL
in in 1-2 days'
time unless frozen. (Although trustedqsl is missing 1-2 builds still.)
Will they go in automatically, or will you allow them manually?
trustedqsl is the only user of the tqsllib package.
thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
Hi,
According to http://bjorn.haxx.se/debian/testing.pl?package=geda
package geda was removed from testing as requested by vorlon (Steve).
Same for geda-gnetlist, geda-gsymcheck and geda-utils.
Why is that? I can't see any RC bugs in any of them.
Thanks,
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL
On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 07:00:56PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2005 at 11:51:42AM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
If you are indeed relaxing the arm requirement temporarily, could you
push the current geda packages into testing?
As these are new upstream versions that may
.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of unsubscribe. Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Goswin wrote:
Need-build is a good sign. http://buildd.net/ shows you are on place
37 out of 120. I suggest just waiting unless the buildd has stoped
altogether.
What is the ordering criteria on the buildds?
I notice that speex (for example) was uploaded on Feb 26 with priority
low and it's
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 01:55:51PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:52:41PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
What is the ordering criteria on the buildds?
According to the documentation:
The packages are ordered by the following criteria (in
this order):
- out-of-date
On Sun, Mar 06, 2005 at 10:50:54PM +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2005 at 08:27:53AM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
That's useful to know, but doesn't seem to be correct in the arm case at
least.
1. geda-gschem, speex and wipl are all out-of-date.
2. geda-gschem, speex
would help. Could someone
trigger that please?
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
look
less minimal. Now you're asking that we change again?
Do you advertise your CD set as 2.2r2, or just 2.2? I think
the latter would be accurate enough, and should help to avoid
complaints from your customers that your CDs are too old.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 11:45:33PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote:
On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 01:45:50PM +0100, lance wrote:
All I am asking for is enough time to make a reasonable effort at making
and shipping the version before the next version is released. If you want
to have interim releases
don't remember whether we
actually updated the main distribution directory as well.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
version.
So I suppose it should really be 2.2.3r1 then ;)
Not at all. This IS a minor revision to 2.2. Hence it is 2.2r3.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
work under X11).
I'm not sure why though.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, May 04, 2000 at 08:40:26AM +0200, J.A. Bezemer wrote:
considered RC. (i.e. we're not going to delay a release because of problems in
a package that isn't even going to be officially released.)
No, we should just pull them. They can't be critical.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB [EMAIL
I received a Y2K bug report and patch for cnews this morning. I
have uploaded version cr.g7-12.1 (slink version -12 plus the Y2K patch)
for 2.1r5.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB. CCs of replies on mailing lists are welcome.
64 matches
Mail list logo
