Bug#1062063: bookworm-pu: package monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5+deb12u2

Hi Adam, > > Am 31.01.2024 um 18:59 schrieb Adam D. Barratt : > >> On Wed, 2024-01-31 at 09:50 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: >> As reported in #1061956, check_http fails when called with --no-body >> and >> Transfer-Encoding: chunked is used > > Please go ahe

Bug#1062063: bookworm-pu: package monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5+deb12u2

ebian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +monitoring-plugins (2.3.3-5+deb12u2) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * [c45bc15] Adding d/p/23_check_http_fix_unchunking_body from upstream +(Closes: #1061956) + + -- Jan Wagner Wed, 31 Jan 2024 09:40:18 +0100 + monitoring-plugins (2.3.3-5+deb12u1) bookworm; ur

Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1

Hi, Am 05.11.23 um 15:41 schrieb Jan Wagner: Am 23.10.23 um 19:43 schrieb Holger Levsen: On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 01:19:25PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: [ Reason ] As reported in #1033791, check_running_kernel fails to find version on bookworm/(arm64|armhf). [ Impact ] check_running_kernel

Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1

Hi there, Am 23.10.23 um 19:43 schrieb Holger Levsen: On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 01:19:25PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: [ Reason ] As reported in #1033791, check_running_kernel fails to find version on bookworm/(arm64|armhf). [ Impact ] check_running_kernel doesn't work on arm64 and arm

Bug#1054401: bookworm-pu: package nagios-plugins-contrib/42.20230308+deb12u1

sk version detection on Bookworm +(Closes: #1033791) + + -- Jan Wagner Mon, 23 Oct 2023 13:03:28 +0200 + nagios-plugins-contrib (42.20230308) unstable; urgency=high * [4ab7834] Adding d/p/dsa/check_running_kernel_bookworm_fix diff --git a/debian/patches/dsa/check_running_kernel_bookworm_fix

Bug#1052218: bookworm-pu: package monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5+deb12u1

Am 23.09.23 um 21:42 schrieb Adam D. Barratt: Control: tags -1 confirmed On Tue, 2023-09-19 at 08:35 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: As reported in #1051768, check_disk has gotten very slow on a machine with a huge number of mount points (in excess of 16000). [ Impact ] check_disk used to take

Bug#1052218: bookworm-pu: package monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5+deb12u1

ebian/changelog index d938ad6..d0b7b5b 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +monitoring-plugins (2.3.3-5+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * [85eed74] Adding d/p/22_check_disk_avoid_mount from upstream +(Closes: #1051768) + + -- Jan Wagner Tue, 19 Sep 2023

Bug#1033439: pre-unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5

Hi, Am 27.03.23 um 08:28 schrieb Jan Wagner: here are the upstream fixes, related upstream CI pipelines and issues: while we are at fixing bugs. I'd also like to include https://patch-diff.githubusercontent.com/raw/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins/pull/1850.patch, which fixes

Bug#1033439: pre-unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5

Hi Sebastian, Am 26.03.23 um 19:36 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: Hi Jan On 2023-03-25 16:58:12 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: Hi Sebastian, Am 25.03.23 um 10:31 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: What's the rationale to include these patches? Do they fix bugs reported in the BTS or upstream? ups

Bug#1033439: pre-unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5

Hi Sebastian, Am 25.03.23 um 10:31 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: What's the rationale to include these patches? Do they fix bugs reported in the BTS or upstream? upstream With kind regards, Jan

Bug#1033439: pre-unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.3.3-5

] Adding d/p/14_check_curl_fix_SSL_with_multiple_IPs from upstream + * [eab1e1d] Adding d/p/15_check_swap_remove_includes from upstream + + -- Jan Wagner Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:16:16 + + +monitoring-plugins (2.3.3-4) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [953ee52] Adding d/p/13_check_icmp_improvements

bullseye-pu: Bug#994901: postfwd: Systemd .service file missing for postfwd

d0ecd91cc74c6934b53792da0a3bb8a649b6a40d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jan Wagner Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2021 12:12:12 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] d/rules: Calling dh_installsystemd (Closes: #994901) --- debian/rules | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/debian/rules b/debian/rules index 7ad15e3

Bug#988012: Bug#988190: unblock: diaspora-installer/0.7.14.0+debian2

Am 14.05.21 um 12:46 schrieb Pirate Praveen: Tracker says it will be auto removed by May 25 and 15 more days are needed for migration. Does it mean, this missed bullseye? 0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu2 would have been in time. Cheers, Jan.

Bug#988012: unblock: diaspora-installer/0.7.14.0+debian2+nmu2

Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package diaspora-installer I prepared a fix for #986286 and uploaded it to unstable, this fixed the problem that the Gemfile.lock included unavailable software versions. Gu

Bug#987488: unblock: ircci/20210314-1

Hi Daniel, Am 28.04.21 um 18:52 schrieb Daniel Echeverri: I will go to work in this, but I'm not sure how is the best way in the case. Could you give a orientation? I think I can't make a complete debdiff because  in version unstable I bumped debhelper to 13 and this change is not accepted at

Bug#987488: unblock: ircci/20210314-1

Hi there, Am 25.04.21 um 09:35 schrieb Graham Inggs: Control: retitle -1 unblock: ircii/20210314-1 Contro: tags -1 + moreinfo Hi Jan On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 at 16:21, Jan Wagner wrote: [ Risks ] While the diffstat looks huge, a significant part is removed code. This debdiff is unreviewable

Bug#987488: (no subject)

user debian-release@lists.debian.org usertags -1 + bsp-2021-04-AT-Salzburg thank you

Bug#986908: unblock: snort 2.9.15.1-5

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Hi there, Am 22.04.21 um 11:03 schrieb Javier Fernandez-Sanguino: On Mon, 19 Apr 2021 at 23:24, Chris Hofstaedtler > wrote: > $ debdiff snort_2.9.15.1-4_i386.deb snort_2.9.15.1-5_i386.deb [..] The debdiff does not seem to show

Bug#987178: [pre-approval] unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.3.1-1

Control: tags -1 - moreinfo Am 21.04.21 um 23:06 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher: On 2021-04-19 10:03:12 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: Package: release.debian.org User:release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please unblock package monitoring-plugins 2.3.1-1 The new

Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

Dear release team, Am 12.05.19 um 12:41 schrieb Jan Wagner: >>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded > or removed >> (LP: #1821103) (Closes: #924554) > I'm still considering this as a regression and thus RC. DO we need to change sev

Bug#928108: unblock: unattended-upgrades/1.12 ?

Dear Release Team, Am 28.04.19 um 12:57 schrieb Bálint Réczey: > Unattended-upgrades 1.12 contains almost only fixes for bugs holding > back security updates or for regressions. > I'm wondering if you would let it in Buster in full or just with > omitting parts of the fixes. If omitting some of th

Re: Bug#924554: SUCCESS messages: significant behaviour change

Hi Bálint, Am 28.04.19 um 13:08 schrieb Bálint Réczey: > I asked Release Team in #928108. thanks and much appreciated. Cheers, Jan. -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version: 3.12 GIT d-- s+: a C+++ UL P+ L+++ E--- W+++ N+++ o++ K++ w--- O M+ V-

Re: Bug#924554: SUCCESS messages: significant behaviour change

Hi there, Am 25.04.19 um 21:53 schrieb Sébastien Villemot: > On Thu, 18 Apr 2019 17:18:45 + Balint Reczey wrote: > >>* Skip sending email when no package had to be installed, upgraded or >> removed >> (LP: #1821103) (Closes: #924554) > > Any chance to have this issue fixed in bust

Bug#927272: unblock: monitoring-plugins 2.2-6

11228 100644 --- a/debian/changelog +++ b/debian/changelog @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +monitoring-plugins (2.2-6) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [697d611] travis-ci: Remove trusty from definition + * [7b5d419] d/rules: Explicitly call ping with -4 and -6 on linux arch +(Closes: #863981) + + -- Jan Wagner

Re: Freeze exception enquiry (Xen 4.12)

Hi there, Am 05.02.19 um 17:08 schrieb Ian Jackson: > tl;dr: should we update buster to Xen 4.12 (currently, 4.12-RC2) ? is there any update of this? thanks, Jan. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Bug#773063: pre-approval unblock: quotatool/1.4.12-1.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: > Normally this wouldn't even be up for discussion for a package that > was removed in July and only fixed in November. But I think people > might be surprised that we shipped without a working quota

Bug#773063: pre-approval unblock: quotatool/1.4.12-1.1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Bas, Am 14.12.2014 um 00:24 schrieb Jonathan Wiltshire: > On Sat, Dec 13, 2014 at 10:26:59PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: >> Could you please state if you would approve to update the >> quotatool package via testing-proposed-updates

Bug#773063: pre-approval unblock: quotatool/1.4.12-1.1

@@ +quotatool (1.4.12-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Adding debian/patches/ignore_initramfs.diff takes from upstream +(Closes: #711502) + + -- Jan Wagner Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:27:17 +0100 + quotatool (1.4.12-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release diff -Nru quotatool-1.4.12/debian

Re: Bug in quotatool, need to update package

014-12-12 15:44:26.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +quotatool (1.4.12-1.1) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Adding debian/patches/ignore_initramfs.diff takes from upstream +(Closes: #711502) + + -- Jan Wagner Fri, 12 Dec 2014 14:27:17 +0100 + quotatool (1.4.12-1) unstable; urgency=low * New u

Bug#771715: pre-approval unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.1-3 (or 2.1.1-1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, Am 02.12.14 14:13, schrieb Jan Wagner: > We got a 2.1.1 upstream release tarball. > > I've included you a complete diff from the last code base (with my > applied patches)[2.1-3] I've proposed and new upstream [2.1.

Bug#771715: pre-approval unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.1-3 (or 2.1.1-1)

dpatch - 11_check_ntp_revert_n-p_coverty_fix.dpatch - 12_check_ntp_null_termination_jitter.dpatch -- Jan Wagner Tue, 02 Dec 2014 05:42:05 +0100 diffstats: monitoring-plugins-2.1.1/ChangeLog | 55 monitoring-plugins-2.1.1/NEWS |8 + monitoring-plugins-2.1.1/NP-VERSION-GEN |2 monitoring

Bug#771715: pre-approval unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.1-3 (or 2.1.1-1)

dpatch * [92d5f60] Fixing dpatch macro - 10_check_ntp_null_termination.dpatch - 10_check_real_null_termination.dpatch -- Jan Wagner Mon, 01 Dec 2014 21:29:16 +0100 The source debdiff is attached. Many thanks, Jan. [1] https://github.com/monitoring-plugins/monitoring-plugins/commits/maint -- Ne

Bug#771412: unblock: monitoring-plugins/2.1-2

k_real_null_termination.dpatch + + -- Jan Wagner Sat, 29 Nov 2014 11:12:58 +0100 + monitoring-plugins (2.1-1) unstable; urgency=medium * [060ec72] Imported Upstream version 2.1 (Closes: #758662) diff -u monitoring-plugins-2.1/debian/patches/00list monitoring-plugins-2.1/debian/patches/00list ---

Bug#767824: unblock: nagios-snmp-plugins/1.1.1-11

-1.1.1/debian/changelog 2014-10-13 12:50:51.0 +0200 +++ nagios-snmp-plugins-1.1.1/debian/changelog 2014-11-02 20:45:34.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +nagios-snmp-plugins (1.1.1-11) unstable; urgency=medium + + * [dd7632d] Create /etc/nagios-plugins/config/ (Closes: #767681) + + -- Jan

Re: Re: Uploading linux (3.2.60-1)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, Am 09.07.14 20:29, schrieb Ben Hutchings: > On Wed, 2014-07-09 at 18:59 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >> The upload has since had some wider exposure as a result of being >> used as the basis for a security release. In the process, a few >>

Bug#711178: pu: package php5/5.4.4-14+deb7u2

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 05.06.2013 21:06, schrieb Adam D. Barratt: > On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 10:40 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote: >> since the next point release is not out, I am asking for another >> pu for php5. This update bring one bugfix and one small >> improvement: >> >>

Bug#699415: pre-approval for unblock: nagios-snmp-plugins/1.1.1-8

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi there, Am 01.02.2013 22:56, schrieb Russ Allbery: > Julien Cristau writes: >> On Thu, Jan 31, 2013 at 10:18:41 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > >>> nagios-snmp-plugins (1.1.1-8) unstable; urgency=low > >>> * A

Re: Bug#592539: (isc-dhcp-server: supply additional initscript for IPv6 daemon): Yet another idea how to solve this issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, Am 12.11.2012 15:34, schrieb Andrew Pollock: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 11:46:53AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: On > 10/30/2012 05:23 PM, Andrew Pollock wrote: >>>> I shall endeavour to work on this next Tuesday with a view &

Bug#699415: pre-approval for unblock: nagios-snmp-plugins/1.1.1-8

version (Closes: #699413) + + -- Jan Wagner Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:56:00 +0100 + nagios-snmp-plugins (1.1.1-7) unstable; urgency=low * Add "Copyright" to all copyrights in debian/copyright diff -u nagios-snmp-plugins-1.1.1/debian/patches/00list nagios-snmp-plugins-1.1.1/debian/patc

Re: Bug#592539: (isc-dhcp-server: supply additional initscript for IPv6 daemon): Yet another idea how to solve this issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, On 10/30/2012 05:23 PM, Andrew Pollock wrote: > I shall endeavour to work on this next Tuesday with a view to > producing a debdiff then. > > I feel there's slightly more to it than just shipping an init > script, the package should also a

Re: Bug#668776: [lshell] log directory permissions insecure/wrong

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Ignace, thanks for your fast reply. Am 06.11.2012 09:11, schrieb Ignace Mouzannar: > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 9:05 AM, Jan Wagner > wrote: >> is there a chance to get that fixed in wheezy? > > I will fix this ASAP. > &g

[lshell] log directory permissions insecure/wrong

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi there, Am 14.04.2012 12:36, schrieb Raf Czlonka: > When logrotate runs it generates an error message: > > error: skipping "/var/log/lshell/*.log" because parent directory > has insecure permissions (It's world writable or writable by group > which

Re: Bug#592539: (isc-dhcp-server: supply additional initscript for IPv6 daemon): Yet another idea how to solve this issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Andrew, On 10/28/2012 07:54 AM, Philipp Kern wrote: > On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 01:11:41PM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: >> Could you please state, if you would accept such fix via t-p-u, >> if this was also fixed in unstable. > > i

Re: Bug#592539: (isc-dhcp-server: supply additional initscript for IPv6 daemon): Yet another idea how to solve this issue

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear release team, I stumbled over this problem when we tried to setup a dualstacked isc-dhcp-server in wheezy. On 10/25/2012 06:03 PM, Andrew Pollock wrote: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:13:14AM +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: >> On 08/15/2011

Re: Outstanding release of nagios-plugins 1.4.16

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi KiBi, thanks for the quick answer. On 06/13/2012 11:52 AM, Cyril Brulebois wrote: >>> When the release of 1.4.16 is ready, we could update to it with >>> a small diff against upstream. > If the diff meets the freeze criteria. are these already de

Outstanding release of nagios-plugins 1.4.16

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear release team, the Debian Nagios Maintainers Group is waiting for the release of nagios-plugins 1.4.16, which has several enhances and fixes[1], for example a updated Gnulib, Nagios::Plugin and a couple of IPv6 related fixes. We thought the releas

Re: Bug#649923: [xen-hypervisor-4.0-amd64] Kernel panic - not syncing: VFS: Unable to mount root fs on unknown-block(0, 0)

Hi there, On Thursday 22 December 2011 12:26:57 Jan Wagner wrote: > On Monday, 28. November 2011, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Fri, 2011-11-25 at 18:27 +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > > I did prepare a source package at > > > http://ftp.cyconet.org/debian/archive/unoff

Bug#627221: pu: package nagios-plugins/1.4.15-3squeeze1

Hi Adam, On Saturday, 21. May 2011, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Thanks for working on fixing this in stable; please go ahead with the > upload. I uploaded the fixed package last night. Thanks and with kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-

Bug#627221: pu: package nagios-plugins/1.4.15-3squeeze1

and line, each of its IPs is added + to the host table (and each one is pinged). So, the buffer has to be large + enough to hold all of the respective host objects. (argc - 1) only fits + hosts with a single IP. + + -- Jan Wagner Wed, 18 May 2011 21:21:05 +0200 + nagios-plugins (1.4.1

Bug#607915: unblock: nagios-plugins/1.4.15-3

), thanks to Adam Buchbinder * Fix broken symlink of README.Debian.plugins (Closes: #603414), thanks Bernd Zeimetz * Add patche provided by upstream to fix regressions with check_snmp introduced in 1.4.15 (Closes: #607736) - 12_check_snmp_1.4.15_regression.dpatch -- Jan Wagner Wed, 22

Re: Bug#603427: probable fix for rc bug #603427

ax.dpatch to fix broken default config * Only call postinst and config if we install the package or on dpkg-reconfigure * Copy template of local_conf.php to /etc/ipplan/ via postinst if there isn't one yet * Remove /etc/ipplan/local_conf.php on purge -- Jan Wagner Thu, 09 Dec 20

Bug#605910: Please ack (or not) probable fix for rc bug #603427 in ipplan

one yet * Remove /etc/ipplan/local_conf.php on purge -- Jan Wagner Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:00:25 +0100 diffstat: README.Debian | 15 ++--- changelog | 22 +++ config | 18 +++--

Re: probable fix for rc bug #603427

Dear Release Team, On Sunday, 21. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Saturday, 20. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > > i did work on a fix for rc bug #603427[1], but before uploading i would > > like to get some feedback from you, if that would be sufficient, as it > &

Re: probable fix for rc bug #603427

hi again, On Saturday, 20. November 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > i did work on a fix for rc bug #603427[1], but before uploading i would > like to get some feedback from you, if that would be sufficient, as it > isn't a small fix. i was going through your hints and did modify the

probable fix for rc bug #603427

nfig_syntax.dpatch to fix broken default config * Only call postinst and config if we install the package or on dpkg-reconfigure -- Jan Wagner Tue, 16 Nov 2010 21:00:25 +0100 diffstat: README.Debian | 15 +++--- changelog | 2

Re: NDOutils in squeeze

On Thursday, 14. October 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 10/14/2010 10:14 PM, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Friday, 1. October 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >> On 30/09/2010 14:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >>> Removing them from kfreebsd-* seems the right thing to do, IMO > &

Re: NDOutils in squeeze

Hi Mehdi, On Friday, 1. October 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 30/09/2010 14:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > Removing them from kfreebsd-* seems the right thing to do, IMO (for > > this specific case). Once they have been removed, let me know so that I > > can unblock it. > > A prerequisite to re-int

Re: NDOutils in squeeze

Dear Mehdi, On Wednesday 29 September 2010 22:30:04 Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > On 09/29/2010 08:40 PM, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Wednesday, 29. September 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > >>> * ndoutils is in lenny but dropped with squeeze (maybe without > >>> any strong re

Re: NDOutils in squeeze

On Wednesday, 29. September 2010, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: > > * ndoutils is in lenny but dropped with squeeze (maybe without any > > strong reason) > > Never assume that! It was rc-buggy (#560681, causing some data-loss) and > that's why it was removed. Its maintainer didn't try to get it back in > te

NDOutils in squeeze

Dear release team, having a look into the status of the nagios packages in squeeze, we discovered, that ndoutils is not in squeeze (yet). Not having ndoutils in squeeze means: * nagvis is broken (missing recommand) * ndoutils is in lenny but dropped with squeeze (maybe without any strong reaso

Bug#597813: unblock: nagios-plugins/1.4.15-2

[ Alexander Wirt ] * Call ps with two "w" to ensure unlimited width of ps output (Closes: #596372) [ Jan Wagner ] * Add 05_check_linux_raid_fix_striped.dpatch to fix bad output from check_linux_raid with RAID0 and linear volumes, thanks to Thomas Guyot-Sionnest (Closes: #57

Freeze exception: php-suhosin 0.9.32.1-1

Hi Adam, On Wednesday, 18. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Wed, 2010-08-18 at 20:48 +0000, Jan Wagner wrote: > > On Friday, 13. August 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > > > On Thursday, 12. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at

Re: approval request for php-suhosin 0.9.32.1-1

Hi Adam, On Friday, 13. August 2010, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Thursday, 12. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:12 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: > > > php-suhosin (0.9.32.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > > > > > * N

Re: approval request for php-suhosin 0.9.32.1-1

Hi Adam, On Thursday, 12. August 2010, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2010-08-12 at 10:12 +0200, Jan Wagner wrote: > > php-suhosin (0.9.32.1-1) UNRELEASED; urgency=low > > > > * New upstream version (Closes: #584509) > > > >- Improved random number se

approval request for php-suhosin 0.9.32.1-1

ile resulting in compile errors * Drop 10_fix_function_prototype, integrated upstream * Update watch file -- Jan Wagner Tue, 13 Apr 2010 13:51:22 +0200 packaging changes: changelog| 13 + patches/00list |1 - patc

Re: webapps in stable release cyles Was: flashplugin-nonfree in Debian

Hi Romain, On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Romain Beauxis wrote: > However, I wonder if this would need yet another archive, or just an update > of a policy, either in backports.org or volatile.. DUNNO for volatile, but the ftp-master of bpo, which is actually doing the main work clarified, that don

webapps in stable release cyles Was: flashplugin-nonfree in Debian

Hi Luk, On Wednesday 22 April 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > Bart Martens wrote: > > I have updated bug report 457291 "flashplugin-nonfree: decision > > 2007-12-21: keep this package out of stable starting with lenny". > > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=457291 > > > > I hereby invite y

please allow transition of nagios-snmp-plugins 1.1.1-6 to lenny

/nagios-plugins/config and registered via ucf, since /usr/share/nagios-plugins/dpkg/functions is used in postinst (Closes: #513872) -- Jan Wagner Sun, 01 Feb 2009 23:49:10 +0100 Many thanks, Jan. -- Never write mail to , you have been warned! -BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK- Version

Re: approval for nagios-plugins 1.4.12-5?

Hi Luk, On Saturday 31 January 2009, Luk Claes wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > I would like to upload a new package for nagios-plugins, which hopefully > > can be accepted for lenny. I know it's a bit late, but fixes for #505610 > > and #387001 should go to lenny, I thin

approval for nagios-plugins 1.4.12-5?

7;\'' -c '\''$ARG2$'\'' -e -p '\''$ARG3$'\' -4 } Index: debian/changelog =========== --- debian/changelog (revision 1588) +++ debian/changelog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +

Re: approval for planned upload of ipplan 4.86a-7

Hi Adeodato, On Monday 19 January 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Jan Wagner [Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:20:38 +0100]: > > is there anything I can do to make ipplan 4.86a-7 happen for lenny? > > Thanks for the prod. Please upload the latest diff you sent. thanks for your help, I uploa

Re: approval for planned upload of ipplan 4.86a-7

Hi Adeodato, On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > > On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jan Wagner wrote: > > > + if [ -f /usr/lib/$webserver/modules/mod_actions ]; then > > > > Here a ".so

Re: approval for planned upload of ipplan 4.86a-7

Hi, On Wednesday 14 January 2009, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Jan Wagner wrote: > > + if [ -f /usr/lib/$webserver/modules/mod_actions ]; then > > Here a ".so" is missing. But you can just drop that test. > When /usr/sbin/apache2 i

Re: approval for planned upload of ipplan 4.86a-7

Hi, On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Stefan Fritsch wrote: > BTW, apache 1.3 is not in lenny. Maybe the 1.3 specific parts can be > removed? this is a step, I scheduled for post lenny. The actual package allows also to be installed on etch. > On Tuesday 13 January 2009, Adeodato Simó wrote: > > (Apac

approval for planned upload of ippan 4.86a-7

iases in apache.conf (Closes: #511327) + + -- Jan Wagner Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:10:28 +0100 + ipplan (4.86a-6) unstable; urgency=low signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: approval for planned upload of policyd-weight 0.1.14.17-5

Hi Neil, On Tuesday 11 November 2008 18:59, Neil McGovern wrote: > All ok, please upload and ping when it's approaching time for an > unblock. the package was uploaded 3 days ago. Thanks and with kind regards, Jan. -- Never write mail to <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, you have been warned! -BEGIN GEE

Re: approval for planned upload of policyd-weight 0.1.14.17-5

Hi Neil, On Tuesday 11 November 2008, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 01:53:50PM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > * Remove multi.surbl.org from default DNSBL list, since they changed > > their policy and restricted the use of it, see > > http://www.surbl.

approval for planned upload of policyd-weight 0.1.14.17-5

, since they changed their +policy and restricted the use of it, see +http://www.surbl.org/usage-policy.html + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Tue, 11 Nov 2008 13:21:18 +0100 + policyd-weight (0.1.14.17-4) unstable; urgency=low Index: debian/policyd-weight/tags/0.1.14.17-5/

Re: approval for planned upload of postfwd 1.10pre7c-3

Hi Neil, On Friday 31 October 2008, Neil McGovern wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:13:37AM +0100, Jan Wagner wrote: > > Dear release team, > > > > could you please review the changes for postfwd 1.10pre7c-3, which I plan > > to upload to unstable and state if it coul

approval for planned upload of postfwd 1.10pre7c-3

le; urgency=low + + * implement machine-interpretable copyright file + * fix init script (Closes: #503597). +- let daemon write pid file for his own +- point start-stop daemon to pidfile when stoping +- fix reload by fixing the way how to get the pid + * fix example-cfg2.txt to w

Re: Bug#497871: php-suhosin: please package suhosin 0.9.27 and try to get it in lenny

Hi Luk, On Wednesday 01 October 2008 12:34, Jan Wagner wrote: > On Friday 05 September 2008, Luk Claes wrote: > > 0.9.24 is in unstable and testing and below diffstat doesn't look > > promissing. Though please point me to an actual diff to have a look if > > it'

Re: approval for planned upload of ps-watcher 1.06-11

On Sunday 05 October 2008 12:51, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Jan Wagner [Thu, 02 Oct 2008 20:40:08 +0200]: > > This is the case for the version in etch, pidfile support was added with > > 1.06-9, just the restart target of the init-script did overwrite the > > pidfile, which is

Re: approval for planned upload of nagios-plugins 1.4.12-4

On Thursday 02 October 2008 20:54, Luk Claes wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > I uploaded the package last night. > > I unblocked the package last night :-) Wow .. next time I should check the PTS before bothering around. :) Thanks again, Jan. -- Never write mail to <[EMAIL PRO

Re: approval for planned upload of nagios-plugins 1.4.12-4

Hi Luk, On Wednesday 01 October 2008 23:45, Luk Claes wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > could you please review the changes for nagios-plugins 1.4.12-4, which I > > plan to upload to unstable and state if it could be considered for > > unblock it for lenny? > > Please uplo

Re: approval for planned upload of ps-watcher 1.06-11

Hi Adeodato On Thursday 02 October 2008 16:51, Adeodato Simó wrote: > * Jan Wagner [Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:19:06 +0200]: > > ps-watcher (1.06-11) unstable; urgency=low > > > > * removed use of pidof from restart|force-reload init-script target, > > since daemon

approval for planned upload of nagios-plugins 1.4.12-4

, server_url, user_agent); Index: debian/changelog === --- debian/changelog (revision 1558) +++ debian/changelog (working copy) @@ -1,3 +1,15 @@ +nagios-plugins (1.4.12-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * add server_port back to 41_c

Re: Bug#497871: php-suhosin: please package suhosin 0.9.27 and try to get it in lenny

+++ php-suhosin-0.9.27/debian/changelog 2008-10-01 11:54:42.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +php-suhosin (0.9.27-1) unstable; urgency=low + + * new upstream release (closes: #497871) + * declare license situation of execute.c in copyright file + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 18 Ju

approval for planned upload of ps-watcher 1.06-11

; urgency=low + + * removed use of pidof from restart|force-reload init-script target, +since daemon has pidfile support and it never worked anyways +(Closes: #500741) + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 01 Oct 2008 11:05:25 +0200 + ps-watcher (1.06-10) unstable; urgency=lo

Re: approval for policyd-weight 0.1.14.17-4 Was: Bug#498037: policyd-weight: dsbl.org is gone

Hi Marc, On Tuesday 09 September 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > On Saturday 06 September 2008 16:08, Mika Tiainen wrote: > >> http://dsbl.org/node/3 > >> > >> lists.dsbl.org needs to be removed f

Re: approval for planned upload of ipplan 4.86a-6

Hi, On Monday 08 September 2008, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote: > Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > could you please review the changes for ipplan 4.86a-6, which I plan to > > upload to unstable and state if it could be considered for unblock it for >

approval for planned upload of ipplan 4.86a-6

+ * Updating standards version to 3.8.0, no changes needed + * update sv.po (Closes: #492886), thanks Martin + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 07 Sep 2008 22:29:35 +0200 + ipplan (4.86a-5) unstable; urgency=low * build depend on po-debconf @@ -6,7 +14,7 @@ * just reload web

approval for policyd-weight 0.1.14.17-4 Was: Bug#498037: policyd-weight: dsbl.org is gone

log 2008-09-07 14:03:08.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +policyd-weight (0.1.14.17-4) unstable; urgency=low + + * Remove list.dsbl.org from default DNSBL list (Closes: #498037). + * Leave hint about blocking lists in README.Debian + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:4

Re: Bug#497871: php-suhosin: please package suhosin 0.9.27 and try to get it in lenny

Hi Raphael, On Friday 05 September 2008 23:52, Luk Claes wrote: > Jan Wagner wrote: > > Dear Release Team, > > > > as Raphael already asked, is there a chance for such an update? > > 0.9.24 is in unstable and testing and below diffstat doesn't look > promi

Re: Bug#497871: php-suhosin: please package suhosin 0.9.27 and try to get it in lenny

Dear Release Team, as Raphael already asked, is there a chance for such an update? On Friday 05 September 2008, Raphael Geissert wrote: > Since version 0.9.26 there are several enhancements that would help avoid > some attacks on poorly written applications. > > Relevant changelog since current v

Re: approval for nagios-plugins 1.4.12-3?

Hi release team, On Saturday 23 August 2008 20:06, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 03:31:31PM +0000, Jan Wagner wrote: > > Hi release team, > > looks fine to me, please ping us when it's uploaded. thanks for approval, the package is in incoming. :)

approval for nagios-plugins 1.4.12-3?

(Closes: #494835) + + -- Jan Wagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sat, 23 Aug 2008 17:20:34 +0200 + nagios-plugins (1.4.12-2) unstable; urgency=low * add 40_check_http_status_line.dpatch to add content of the status_line diff -u nagios-plugins-1.4.12/debian/patches/00list nagios-plugins-1.4.12

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

On Tuesday 20 May 2008 14:14, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > On Tuesday 20 May 2008 14:11, Jan Wagner wrote: > > malice or not, if the old L would have answered with false (in which way > > ever) answers, there would be a significant part of users affected. Users > > (of users) o

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

Hi Thijs, On Tuesday 20 May 2008 13:40, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > I think your blog post with title "stolen" suggests malice and is not > representative of the real severity of the issue. I suggest that you add a malice or not, if the old L would have answered with false (in which way ever) answe

Re: updates bind9 package for etch?

Hi Thijs, On Tuesday 20 May 2008 11:58, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Reading that blog post, it becomes clear to me that there's no immediate > problem with this address, only that it ideally "shouldn't have been done > this way". I don't see a ground for doing this "asap". with "asap" wasn't meant D

updates bind9 package for etch?

Package: bind9 Version: 1:9.3.4-2etch1 Severity: important While reading about the issues of renumbering L.ROOT-SERVERS.NET on http://blog.icann.org/?p=309, we should provide asap an up to date db.root file. The actual file can be obtained from: http://www.internic.net/zones/named.root Thanks

  1   2   >