Bug#1020799: Transition: pkg-config to pkgconf: next steps

2022-10-20 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 20/10/22 a les 12:56, Johannes Schauer Marin Rodrigues ha escrit: Quoting Andrej Shadura (2022-10-20 12:25:13) I’ve been rebuilding packages with pkgconf for the past couple of weeks, and it looks very good so far: http://pkgconf-migration.debian.net/ Thank you! Attached is a dd-list of th

Bug#978730: transition: fcl

2020-12-30 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Subject: transition: fcl Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Dear release team, I would like to ask a transition slot for the fcl library. Upstream published a new version with a soname bump. We have had a lot of problems

Bug#951499: transition: collada-dom

2020-03-13 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Alberto (openscenegraph maintainer), if nothing strange happens this weekend we will push collada-dom to unstable. I don't think that openscenegraph will FTBFS because we have added a transitional package, but if not as we have commented privately, with the change of libcollada-dom2.4-dp-dev

Bug#951499: transition: collada-dom

2020-02-17 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Subject: transition: collada-dom Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Dear release team, I would like to ask a transition slot for the collada-dom library. Upstream published a new version with a soname bump and we have d

Bug#930998: RM: ompl/1.4.2+ds1-3

2019-06-25 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Just some clarifications: As Jochen said: > Reason: The package in testing is RC buggy with #930507. Leo pushed a > new -3 revision over a week ago to unstable but expressed in > https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2019/06/msg00526.html > > that he is not 'very happy with the patches'. h

ompl package in unstable

2019-06-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, one of the package that I take care under the Debian Science Team, ompl, received a bug #930507 with Severity serious on Jun 14th. Jochen Sprickerhof solved partially on Jun 16th pushing a new version 1.4.2+ds1-2. And on Jun 17th I pushed another version 1.4.2+ds1-3 solving it completely (or

Bug#925205: nmu: ros-rosconsole_1.13.9-1

2019-03-21 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu ros-rosconsole_1.13.9-1 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild because of #924395 bug in ros-catkin" tags 924399 - moreinfo -- System Information: Debian Release: 9.8 APT prefers stable-up

Bug#924399: release.debian.org: ros-catkin has a bug and needs to rebuild one package

2019-03-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 17/3/19 a les 9:26, Niels Thykier ha escrit: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda: >> Package: release.debian.org >> Severity: normal >> >> I have detected an ugly bug in ros-catkin (#924395). It _only_ affects to >> software that us

Bug#924399: release.debian.org: ros-catkin has a bug and needs to rebuild one package

2019-03-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal I have detected an ugly bug in ros-catkin (#924395). It _only_ affects to software that uses catkin and generates pkgconfig files (.pc) that uses Boost. In our case we have ros-rosconsole. The pkgconfig file is wrong. So, I would like to push a new ver

Bug#918987: transition: ode

2019-01-13 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 13/1/19 a les 15:52, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit: > On 11/01/2019 18:09, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: >> Control: tags -1 confirmed >> >> On 11/01/2019 15:17, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>> Subject: transition: ode >>> Package: rele

Bug#918987: transition: ode

2019-01-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Subject: transition: ode Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Dear release team, I would like to ask a transition slot for the ode library. Upstream published a new version with a soname bump. The affected packages can be b

Bug#914392: transition: coin3

2018-12-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 19/12/18 a les 11:41, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 16/12/2018 23:08, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >> El 28/11/18 a les 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit: >>> On 22/11/2018 23:33, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >>

Bug#914392: transition: coin3

2018-12-16 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 28/11/18 a les 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit: > On 22/11/2018 23:33, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >> Subject: transition: coin3 >> Package: release.debian.org >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> Severit

Bug#914392: transition: coin3

2018-11-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 28/11/18 a les 19:12, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort ha escrit: > On 22/11/2018 23:33, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >> Subject: transition: coin3 >> Package: release.debian.org >> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org >> Usertags: transition >> Severit

Bug#914392: transition: coin3

2018-11-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Subject: transition: coin3 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Dear release team, I would like to ask a transition slot for the coin3 library. The package has been reworked and a new version of the upstream has been packag

transition: coin3

2018-11-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Subject: transition: coin3 Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal Dear release team, I would like to ask a transition slot for the coin3 library. The package has been reworked and a new version of the upstream has been packag

Bug#842846: New ros-vision-opencv transition

2016-11-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El dimarts, 1 de novembre de 2016, a les 19:49:35 CET, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort va escriure: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 01/11/16 19:13, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packa

Bug#842846: New ros-vision-opencv transition

2016-11-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of ros-vision-opencv. It is in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built previously. Ben fi

Bug#828966: transition: ros-ros-comm

2016-06-29 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a transition of ros-ros-comm . It is in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built previously. Ben file: titl

Bug#827341: transition: octomap

2016-06-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a transition of octomap. It is in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built previously. Ben file: title = "

Bug#824526: New libode version: transition

2016-05-16 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of ode (Open Dynamics Engine). It is in experimental. It builds on all architectures in testing, where it built previously.

Bug#804285: transition: ode

2015-11-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 9 de novembre de 2015, a les 19:11:05, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort va escriure: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > > On 06/11/15 23:53, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packa

Bug#804285: transition: ode

2015-11-06 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I'm filing this bug for a new transition of ode (Open Dynamics Engine). In Debian we have a version too old (0.11.1-4.1, 2009-05-25). The package has been rewritte

Bug#779884: unblock: pcl/1.7.2-7

2015-03-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
+1,10 @@ +pcl (1.7.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Added patch to solve sometimes FTBFS. Patch proposed by +James Cowgill (thanks!!!). Closes: #779183 + + -- Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:12:50 +0100 + pcl (1.7.2-6) unstable; urgency=medium [ Jochen Sprickerhof ]

Bug#771084: Unblock: pcl/1.7.2-4/1.7.2-5/1.7.2-6

2014-12-02 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dilluns, 1 de desembre de 2014, Niels Thykier va escriure: > > Can you have it done by the end of the week? Nobuhiro, please, new version without the --parallel Could you make a new upload? http://mentors.debian.net/package/pcl Leo -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalon

Bug#771084: Unblock: pcl/1.7.2-4/1.7.2-5/1.7.2-6

2014-12-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 1 de desembre de 2014, a les 21:45:28, Niels Thykier va escriure: > On 2014-12-01 15:19, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > pcl 1.7.2-5 is in unstable. The change proposed by release team is made. > > However, we have another issue [1]. In

Bug#771084: Unblock: pcl/1.7.2-4/1.7.2-5

2014-12-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi all, pcl 1.7.2-5 is in unstable. The change proposed by release team is made. However, we have another issue [1]. In the #debian-buildd channel, suggested removing the --parallel dh flag. Basically the buildd ran out of memory. It's something aleatory. Niels, we don't know what to do. Can w

Bug#771084: Unblock: pcl/1.7.2-4

2014-11-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous, 27 de novembre de 2014, Niels Thykier va escriure: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2014-11-26 17:27, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > > Us

Bug#771084: Unblock: pcl/1.7.2-4

2014-11-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
? - ChangeLog [Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda] * Added missing Multi-arch field for libpcl-apps1.7. * Removing Multi-Arch of libpcl-dev. Closes: #770503 Best regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia

Bug#770462: Unblock: pcl/1.7.2-3

2014-11-21 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock We have had to make some changes in the package pcl. We know we have done "bad" things, but we have needed because some bugs: * Change openni-dev to libopenni, Closes: #768953 we got an i

Bug#767085: unblock: pcl/1.7.2-2

2014-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please reduce the 10-day age period to 9 (or less) of this package. Let me explain the situation: We have worked hard with a big package: pcl. The package goes to new queue on June (2014-06

Re: soqt: Please upgrade it to Lenny. Bug #498364

2008-10-24 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 24 Octubre 2008, Neil McGovern va escriure: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 10:26:40AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Package: soqt > > Followup-For: Bug #498364 > > Assuming you mean 1.4.1-1 (you don't mention this anywhere), it's been > done

soqt: Please upgrade it to Lenny. Bug #498364

2008-10-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Assumpte: soqt: Please upgrade it to Lenny Data: Dimecres 22 Octubre 2008 De: Leopold Palomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> A: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Package: soqt Followup-For: Bug #498364 Please, the bug is closed, upgrade the need version to Lenny. The package more or less is work