Re: Lots of postgresql packages FTBFS in trixie (debian/control needs updating from debian/control.in)

2024-09-28 Thread Santiago Vila
Thanks for the hints. It seems postgresql-common will finally propagate to testing this night: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/postgresql-common [ For the curious: I still do archive rebuilds mostly in testing, but I always double-check in unstable before reporting, so these anomalies are some ki

Lots of postgresql packages FTBFS in trixie (debian/control needs updating from debian/control.in)

2024-09-25 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello. As the subject says, many postgresql-related packages FTBFS in this way: (I'm taking postgresql-unit as an example) make[1]: Leaving directory '/<>' dh_clean pg_buildext checkcontrol --- debian/control 2024-09-15 11:58:15.0 + +++ debian/control.VFAeRh 2024-09-

Bug#1079313: bullseye-pu: package mlpost/0.8.2-4+deb11u1

2024-08-22 Thread Santiago Vila
[ I would restore the metadata here, but the commands I issued before didn't work... ] El 22/8/24 a las 20:06, Adam D. Barratt escribió: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 14:28 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: This upload fixes FTBFS bug #991060, which is probably the

Bug#1079313: bullseye-pu: package mlpost/0.8.2-4+deb11u1

2024-08-22 Thread Santiago Vila
tags -1 - confirmed tags -1 + moreinfo thanks El 22/8/24 a las 20:06, Adam D. Barratt escribió: Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Thu, 2024-08-22 at 14:28 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: This upload fixes FTBFS bug #991060, which is probably the last remaining build failure due to a new imagemagick

Bug#1079313: bullseye-pu: package mlpost/0.8.2-4+deb11u1

2024-08-22 Thread Santiago Vila
by Dennis Filder to override ImageMagick policy. +Closes: #991060. + + -- Santiago Vila Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:00:00 +0200 + mlpost (0.8.2-4) unstable; urgency=medium * Add empty dh_dwz override to fix FTBFS diff -Nru mlpost-0.8.2/debian/patches/0009-Override-ImageMagick-policy.patch ml

Bug#1079291: bullseye-pu: package healpix-java/3.60+ds-4+deb11u1

2024-08-22 Thread Santiago Vila
000 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +healpix-java (3.60+ds-4+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Non-maintainer upload. + * Fix FTBFS bug: rm: cannot remove 'images'. Closes: #1022373. + + -- Santiago Vila Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:05:00 +0200 + healpix-java (3.60+ds-4) unstable; urgenc

Bug#1079271: bullseye-pu: package trinity/1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18c7b-2+deb11u1

2024-08-21 Thread Santiago Vila
* Drop decnet support to fix FTBFS bug. Closes: #1028795. + + -- Santiago Vila Thu, 22 Aug 2024 03:32:00 +0200 + trinity (1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18c7b-2) unstable; urgency=medium * [c24aa6] Make the build verbose by default. diff -Nru trinity-1.9+git20200331.4d2343bd18c7b/debi

Bug#1079217: bullseye-pu: package net-tools/1.60+git20181103.0eebece-1+deb11u1

2024-08-21 Thread Santiago Vila
loses: #1024730. +This is required to be able to remove dnprogs from bullseye, +since it's obsolete and it does not build from source. + Thanks to Santiago Vila for preparing this. + + -- Martina Ferrari Mon, 19 Aug 2024 16:30:00 +0200 + net-tools (1.60+git20181103.0eebece-1) unst

Re: [Pkg-openssl-devel] openssl-provider-legacy has become build-essential

2024-08-21 Thread Santiago Vila
El 21/8/24 a las 17:54, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior escribió: Is this some kind of problem or just a check? This is mainly a check. I keep track of the list of packages in the build-essential set (as a side outcome of archive rebuilds), so whenever I find a new package in the set, that's an anoma

Re: openssl-provider-legacy has become build-essential

2024-08-21 Thread Santiago Vila
Sorry, I see there is a discussion here: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=965041 Apparently this is intended to prevent greater problems, I just wanted to be sure. Thanks.

openssl-provider-legacy has become build-essential

2024-08-21 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello. I've just noticed about this new build-essential package. In sid, coreutils depends on libssl3t64 which in turn depends on openssl-provider-legacy. Is this really ok and intended? [ Cc to relevant parties ]. Thanks.

Bug#1079021: RM: dnprogs/2.65

2024-08-19 Thread Santiago Vila
Note: I've unarchived this bug and proposed a trivial patch: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024730 Hopefully there will be another release.debian.org request soon for net-tools to complement this one. Thanks.

Bug#1079021: RM: dnprogs/2.65

2024-08-19 Thread Santiago Vila
Unfortunately it's not that simple: Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Build-Depends: net-tools: libdnet-dev Hi. Additional tests indicate that such build-dependency is not really used to build the package. When I build the package with and without it, the resulting .deb packages are es

Bug#1079021: RM: dnprogs/2.65

2024-08-19 Thread Santiago Vila
El 19/8/24 a las 7:39, Adam D. Barratt escribió: Control: tags -1 +moreinfo On Mon, 2024-08-19 at 02:25 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: I believe this package (dnprogs) should be removed from bullseye in the next (and last) upcoming point release. - Main reason: Packages in bullseye must build in

Bug#1079021: RM: dnprogs/2.65

2024-08-18 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: rm X-Debbugs-Cc: sanv...@debian.org Dear Release Managers: I believe this package (dnprogs) should be removed from bullseye in the next (and last) upcoming point release. - Main reason: Packages

Bug#1077803: transition: recode

2024-08-05 Thread Santiago Vila
El 5/8/24 a las 15:20, Adrian Bunk escribió: ... dh_auto_configure -- \ --libexecdir=\${prefix}/lib \ --with-librecode \ ... checking for recode_new_outer in librecode... no ... Features: ... GNU recode library interface:no ... Looking at config.log, this is one

Bug#1077803: transition: recode

2024-08-05 Thread Santiago Vila
El 2/8/24 a las 17:15, Santiago Vila escribió: enca   -> will need binNMU Note: I've just realized that this one was in the list because I made a list of source packages having a build-depends on librecode-dev. But the binary packages themselves do not have a Depends on librecode.

Bug#1077803: transition: recode

2024-08-02 Thread Santiago Vila
- How are binNMUs handled? Is the maintainer (me in this case) in charge of requesting them (at appropriate times), or maybe there is some automated procedure to trigger them? It's documented on the wiki (linked from the transition page): https://wiki.debian.org/Teams/ReleaseTeam/Transitions (u

Bug#1077803: transition: recode

2024-08-02 Thread Santiago Vila
I'd like to request a transition slot to upload recode for unstable and start this transition. Please go ahead Done. Some minor questions: - How are binNMUs handled? Is the maintainer (me in this case) in charge of requesting them (at appropriate times), or maybe there is some automated proc

Bug#1077803: transition: recode

2024-08-02 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: rec...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org, ui-util...@packages.debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:recode Dear Release Managers: I'd like to request a transition sl

Bug#1074142: bullseye-pu: package indent/2.2.12-1+deb11u1

2024-06-23 Thread Santiago Vila
ch by Petr Písař . +This is CVE-2024-0911. + + -- Santiago Vila Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:25:00 +0200 + indent (2.2.12-1) unstable; urgency=low * New upstream release. Closes: #916199. diff -Nru indent-2.2.12/debian/patches/02-restore-round-up-macro-and-adjust-initial-buffer-size.patch ind

Bug#1074128: bullseye-pu: package python-stdnum/1.16-1+deb11u1

2024-06-23 Thread Santiago Vila
ium + + * Team upload. + [ Arthur de Jong ] + * Update Fødselsnummer test case for date in future. Closes: #1022311. + + -- Santiago Vila Sun, 23 Jun 2024 15:35:00 +0200 + python-stdnum (1.16-1) unstable; urgency=medium * New upstream release: diff -Nru python-stdnum-1.16/debian/patches

Bug#1051237: transition: move files from / to /usr to finalize /usr-merge

2024-06-03 Thread Santiago Vila
El 3/6/24 a las 23:10, Helmut Grohne escribió: On Wed, May 29, 2024 at 03:14:59PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote: Since noble includes these changes and I'd get this done sooner rather than later, how about moving forward with June 5th after 22:30 UTC (such that all buildds have regenerated their

Bug#1070761: bullseye-pu: package bart-cuda/0.6.00-1+deb11u1

2024-05-14 Thread Santiago Vila
Nevermind. I see that the upload was already accepted, and what is missing is a binary-only upload matching the already existing source. Yes, sorry if I wasn't clear enough about that. No problem. I've now done the additional binary-only upload. Thanks a lot.

Bug#1070761: bullseye-pu: package bart-cuda/0.6.00-1+deb11u1

2024-05-14 Thread Santiago Vila
As bart-cuda build-depends on nvidia-cuda-toolkit, which is in non- free, bart-cuda is not buildable on the buildd network, so this will also need a binary upload to be performed. Ok, what's the best way to solve this? Can you reject the upload so that I do it again including .debs? Nevermind.

Bug#1070761: bullseye-pu: package bart-cuda/0.6.00-1+deb11u1

2024-05-14 Thread Santiago Vila
El 14/5/24 a las 20:24, Adam D. Barratt escribió: On Wed, 2024-05-08 at 17:18 +0200, Santiago Vila wrote: This upload fixes Bug #1070757 FTBFS in bullseye. Note: A similar request for a similar bug has been made for package "bart". [ Impact ] Anybody who try to build the package f

Bug#1070761: bullseye-pu: package bart-cuda/0.6.00-1+deb11u1

2024-05-08 Thread Santiago Vila
ling-unit-test.patch from release 0.7.00-1. +Fixes FTBFS bug. Closes: #1070757. + + -- Santiago Vila Wed, 08 May 2024 16:40:00 +0200 + bart-cuda (0.6.00-1) unstable; urgency=medium * Initial upload of this cuda enabled bart version diff -Nru bart-cuda-0.6.00/debian/patches/0005-relax-fail

Bug#1070723: bullseye-pu: package bart/0.6.00-3+deb11u1

2024-05-07 Thread Santiago Vila
+0200 +++ bart-0.6.00/debian/changelog2024-05-07 23:05:00.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +bart (0.6.00-3+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Cherry-pick 0004-relax-failing-unit-test.patch from +release 0.7.00-1. Fixes FTBFS bug. Closes: #1026061. + + -- Santiago

Bug#1069802: bullseye-pu: package galera-4 26.4.18-0+deb11u1

2024-04-25 Thread Santiago Vila
Dear Release Managers: Since I reported bug #1053334, I'd like to emphasize on this item: * New upstream release includes multiple Debian build and post-build test failure fixes: - Generate keys and certificates for SSL tests (Closes: #1053334) This is a FTBFS bug due to expiring

Bug#1068654: bookworm-pu: package bioawk/1.0-4+deb12u1

2024-04-08 Thread Santiago Vila
-4+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * debian/rules: Add --no-parallel to avoid the effects of a Makefile bug which +makes the package to FTBFS randomly. Closes: #1068341. + + -- Santiago Vila Mon, 08 Apr 2024 19:40:00 +0200 + bioawk (1.0-4) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#1054386: bookworm-pu: package fssync/1.6-1.1+deb12u1

2024-02-01 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello. I was going to sponsor this upload and we were waiting for approval before upload, but given that 12.5 is approaching and I believe that rejecting an incorrect upload is relatively easy, I've decided to go ahead and make the upload. Please consider for 12.5. Thanks.

Bug#1062435: bookworm-pu: package indent/2.2.12-4+deb12u3

2024-02-01 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: ind...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:indent [ Reason ] This upload fixes CVE-2024-0911. [ Impact ] We remain vulnerable if the u

Bug#1058623: bullseye-pu: package pyzoltan/1.0.1-2+deb11u1

2023-12-13 Thread Santiago Vila
1.0.1/debian/changelog 2023-12-13 18:40:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +pyzoltan (1.0.1-2+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * debian/rules: Set NPROC to 1 so that the package may be +built on systems with a single core. Closes: #1055625. + + -- Santiago Vila We

Bug#1058586: bullseye-pu: package python-cogent/2020.12.21a+dfsg-4+deb11u1

2023-12-13 Thread Santiago Vila
30885. + + -- Santiago Vila Wed, 13 Dec 2023 12:30:00 +0100 + python-cogent (2020.12.21a+dfsg-4) unstable; urgency=high * Team upload. diff -Nru python-cogent-2020.12.21a+dfsg/debian/patches/series python-cogent-2020.12.21a+dfsg/debian/patches/series --- python-cogent-2020.12.21a+dfsg/debian/pa

Bug#1058562: bullseye-pu: package python-django-imagekit/4.0.2-3+deb11u1

2023-12-12 Thread Santiago Vila
s: #991650. + + -- Santiago Vila Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:00:00 +0100 + python-django-imagekit (4.0.2-3) unstable; urgency=medium [ Ondřej Nový ] diff -Nru python-django-imagekit-4.0.2/debian/gbp.conf python-django-imagekit-4.0.2/debian/gbp.conf --- python-django-imagekit-4.0.2/debian/gbp.conf2020

Bug#1058559: bullseye-pu: package vlfeat/0.9.21+dfsg0-6+deb11u1

2023-12-12 Thread Santiago Vila
2023-12-12 21:30:00.0 +0100 @@ -1,3 +1,10 @@ +vlfeat (0.9.21+dfsg0-6+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Apply patch by Dennis Filder to fix build error. Closes: #991066. + + -- Santiago Vila Tue, 12 Dec 2023 21:30:00 +0100 + vlfeat (0.9.21+dfsg0-6) unstabl

Bug#1056330: bookworm-pu: package toil/5.9.2-2+deb12u1

2023-11-20 Thread Santiago Vila
kworm; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Apply patch by Michael R. Crusoe to request a single core +in the tests. Closes: #1031192. + + -- Santiago Vila Tue, 21 Nov 2023 00:35:00 +0100 + toil (5.9.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Add patch to handle errors when testing on ec2. diff -Nru

Bug#1056194: bookworm-pu: package python3-onelogin-saml2/1.12.0-2+deb12u1

2023-11-18 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: python3-onelogin-sa...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:python3-onelogin-saml2 [ Reason ] This upload fixes Bug #1036255: FTBFS due

Bug#1056123: bullseye-pu: package conda-package-handling/1.7.2-2+deb11u1

2023-11-17 Thread Santiago Vila
edium + + * Team upload. + * Disable flaky test. Closes: #976506. + + -- Santiago Vila Fri, 17 Nov 2023 11:30:00 +0100 + conda-package-handling (1.7.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Team upload. diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series index 3d1dca5..b36fda0 100644 --- a/d

Bug#1019096: bullseye-pu: package cifs-utils/2:6.11-3.1+deb11u2

2023-11-12 Thread Santiago Vila
El 25/7/23 a las 23:32, Jonathan Wiltshire escribió: This request was approved but not uploaded in time for the previous point release (11.7). Should it be included in 11.8 or should this request be abandoned and closed? Hi. Since the debdiff was already approved by you (RMs), I've just uploade

Bug#1055859: bookworm-pu: package pyzoltan/1.0.1-5+deb12u1

2023-11-12 Thread Santiago Vila
to 1 so that the package may be +built on systems with a single core. Closes: #1055625. + + -- Santiago Vila Sun, 12 Nov 2023 23:25:00 +0100 + pyzoltan (1.0.1-5) unstable; urgency=medium * Standards version bumped to 4.6.1 (non changes). diff -Nru pyzoltan-1.0.1/debian/rules pyzoltan

Bug#1055611: bookworm-pu: package oscrypto/1.3.0-1+deb12u1

2023-11-08 Thread Santiago Vila
Note: I should also include some changes in debian/salsa-ci.yml and gbp.conf. The final debdiff may differ slightly in that minor detail only. Thanks.

Bug#1055611: bookworm-pu: package oscrypto/1.3.0-1+deb12u1

2023-11-08 Thread Santiago Vila
utopkgtest by switching to autopkgtest-pkg-pybuild. Closes: #1033822. + [ Bastian Germann ] + * Fix OpenSSL version parsing, take 1. + [ Arnaud Rebillout ] + * Fix OpenSSL version parsing, take 2. Closes: #1055598. + + -- Santiago Vila Wed, 08 Nov 2023 21:38:44 +0100 + oscrypto (1.3.0-1

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

2023-10-29 Thread Santiago Vila
tests are only skipped when the system has a single CPU. +Closes: #1030885. + + -- Santiago Vila Sun, 29 Oct 2023 21:45:00 +0100 + python-cogent (2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Restrict to 64 bit architectures diff -Nru python-cogent-2023.2.12a1+dfsg/debian/patches/fix-bui

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

2023-10-29 Thread Santiago Vila
Dear Release Managers: Please reject the upload I made for bookworm. Following the suggestion from Holger, I've fixed this issue in the optimal way in unstable: https://tracker.debian.org/news/1474401/accepted-python-cogent-2023212a1dfsg-4-source-into-unstable/ and now I'd like to upload the s

Bug#1054470: bookworm-pu: package wormhole-william/1.0.6-2+deb12u1

2023-10-24 Thread Santiago Vila
: #1031063. + + -- Santiago Vila Tue, 24 Oct 2023 09:50:00 +0200 + wormhole-william (1.0.6-2) unstable; urgency=medium * Don't run help2man at build time, instead generate man page diff -Nru wormhole-william-1.0.6/debian/gbp.conf wormhole-william-1.0.6/debian/gbp.conf --- wormhole-willi

Lots of buggy packages propagated to trixie today (?)

2023-10-22 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello. It is just me, or lots of packages that were autoremoved from testing have propagated to testing again this night? Example: "broker" has #1037597, however: $ rmadison broker broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | oldstable | source broker | 1.4.0+ds1-1 | stable | source broker

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

2023-10-21 Thread Santiago Vila
El 21/10/23 a las 12:31, Holger Levsen escribió: Santiago, I don't object to fixing fails to build on a single core bugs, I just object to fixing them by disabling tests *unconditionally*. A fix disabling the tests on single core system *only* I would not object. Ah, ok. Sorry for the misunder

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

2023-10-21 Thread Santiago Vila
El 21/10/23 a las 11:33, Holger Levsen escribió: Am Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 07:40:55PM +0200 schrieb Santiago Vila: + * Update fix-build-on-single-cpu-systems.patch to skip +"test_write_db_parallel" again. Closes: #1030885. fwiw, I find it wrong to disable tests to make sure

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

2023-10-20 Thread Santiago Vila
/changelog 2023-10-20 19:04:00.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +python-cogent (2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium + + * Team upload. + * Update fix-build-on-single-cpu-systems.patch to skip +"test_write_db_parallel" again. Closes: #1030885. + + -- Santiago Vila F

Bug#1054286: bookworm-pu: package python-cogent/2023.2.12a1+dfsg-2+deb12u1

2023-10-20 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: bookworm User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu X-Debbugs-Cc: python-cog...@packages.debian.org, sanv...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:python-cogent [ Reason ] This upload fixes #1030885. FTBFS on single-CPU systems. [

Re: severity of bugs that FTBFS because of missing B-D

2023-10-14 Thread Santiago Vila
Hello Holger et al. I was trying hard not to reply in this thread, but there are some things that I'd like to point out and clarify. El 10/10/23 a las 16:54, Holger Levsen escribió: but why? As Johannes has already replied, and I agree, there will be always somebody annoyed, and we don't have

Bug#1050697: bookworm-pu: package indent/2.2.12-4+deb12u2

2023-08-28 Thread Santiago Vila
Fix a heap buffer overwrite in search_brace(). Closes: #1049366. +This one is CVE-2023-40305. + + -- Santiago Vila Mon, 28 Aug 2023 12:55:00 +0200 + indent (2.2.12-4+deb12u1) bookworm; urgency=medium * Restore the ROUND_UP macro and adjust the initial buffer size. diff -Nru indent-2.2

Bug#1042805: base-files: removal of VERSION_ID from /etc/os-release broke zoom screen sharing, please restore

2023-08-15 Thread Santiago Vila
El 1/8/23 a las 6:14, Kipp Cannon escribió: Package: base-files Version: 13 Severity: normal Dear Maintainer, *** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate *** Version 13 of base-files removed VERSION_ID from /etc/os-release. As reported in https://bugs.debian.org

Re: base-files: removal of VERSION_ID from /etc/os-release broke zoom screen sharing, please restore

2023-08-15 Thread Santiago Vila
reassign 1042805 base-files,release.debian.org thanks Note: I'm going to close this bug with a detailed explanation. I'm doing a reassign first because it's something for which the Release Managers have usually the last word. Thanks.

Bug#1041045: bookworm-pu: package indent/2.2.12-4+deb12u1

2023-07-14 Thread Santiago Vila
h from the author, backported from 2.2.13. +Fix memory handling problem. Closes: #1036851. + + -- Santiago Vila Fri, 14 Jul 2023 13:40:00 +0200 + indent (2.2.12-4) unstable; urgency=medium [ Helge Deller ] diff -Nru indent-2.2.12/debian/patches/02-restore-round-up-macro-and-adjust-init

Bug#1025654: bullseye-pu: package x4d-icons/1.2-2+deb11u1

2023-04-01 Thread Santiago Vila
El 1/4/23 a las 21:58, Adam D. Barratt escribió: Have you confirmed via a binary debdiff that there are no changes to the resulting packages? The package contents is the expected one: $ debdiff x4d-icons_1.2-2_all.deb x4d-icons_1.2-2+deb11u1_all.deb File lists identical (after any substitution

Bug#1025703: bullseye-pu: package libexplain/1.4.D001-11+deb11u1

2023-03-21 Thread Santiago Vila
11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * QA upload. + * Apply two patches from bookworm to build with newer kernels: + - Patch: Linux 5.11 no longer has if_frad.h, from Ubuntu. Closes: #997222 + - Patch: termiox removed since kernel 5.12, from ALT Linux. + + -- Santiago Vila Tue, 21 Mar 2023 1

Bug#1025654: bullseye-pu: package x4d-icons/1.2-2+deb11u1

2023-03-21 Thread Santiago Vila
lem with new imagemagick. The fix is the same which was +already applied in bookworm. Closes: #991067. + * The above patch requires raising debhelper compatibility level to 13. + + -- Santiago Vila Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:50:00 +0100 + x4d-icons (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium * QA uplo

Bug#1033080: unblock: base-files/12.4

2023-03-16 Thread Santiago Vila
Closing as duplicate the one which has a greater bug number. Sorry for the noise.

Bug#1033080: unblock: base-files/12.4

2023-03-16 Thread Santiago Vila
ce at https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/Licenses/ as they have +minor editorial changes like trimming spaces, https, etc. + * Drop debian/current-md5sums-obsolete. Closes: #1009358. + * Ship a real debian/copyright file in source package instead of +generating it at build time. + * Call dh_installch

Bug#1033074: unblock: base-files/12.4

2023-03-16 Thread Santiago Vila
place at https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/Licenses/ as they have +minor editorial changes like trimming spaces, https, etc. + * Drop debian/current-md5sums-obsolete. Closes: #1009358. + * Ship a real debian/copyright file in source package instead of +generating it at build time. + * Call dh_inst

Bug#1031376: tzdata 2022g-3 removed /etc/timezone without a proper transition, breaking multiple packages

2023-02-16 Thread Santiago Vila
El 16/2/23 a las 12:34, Daniel Leidert escribió: Am Donnerstag, dem 16.02.2023 um 08:41 +0100 schrieb Paul Gevers: Control: tags -1 moreinfo Control: severity -1 normal Hi Daniel, On 16-02-2023 01:11, Daniel Leidert wrote: I ask you to find a reasonable approach to deal with this for the Book

Bug#1020413: nmu: bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3

2023-01-06 Thread Santiago Vila
El 21/9/22 a las 13:47, Ondřej Surý escribió: Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3 . ANY . bullseye . -m "rebuild for bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1" Hi, after the bind9_9.16.33-1~deb11u1 is release to b

Bug#1020413: nmu: bind-dyndb-ldap_11.6-3

2023-01-06 Thread Santiago Vila
El 23/9/22 a las 10:21, Timo Aaltonen escribió: Paul Gevers kirjoitti 22.9.2022 klo 22.26: So, Timo, is the package in bullseye broken with the security update and does it need a fix, or is it fine? It needs a rebuild, [...] I think it's really broken: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugre

Bug#1025703: bullseye-pu: package libexplain/1.4.D001-11+deb11u1

2022-12-07 Thread Santiago Vila
r has if_frad.h, from Ubuntu. Closes: #997222 + - Patch: termiox removed since kernel 5.12, from ALT Linux. + + -- Santiago Vila Wed, 07 Dec 2022 19:10:00 +0100 + libexplain (1.4.D001-11) unstable; urgency=medium * QA upload. diff -Nru libexplain-1.4.D001/debian/patches/linux5.11.patch libex

Bug#1025654: bullseye-pu: package x4d-icons/1.2-2+deb11u1

2022-12-06 Thread Santiago Vila
patch requires raising debhelper compatibility level to 13, +which should not be a problem because debhelper 13 is in bullseye. + + -- Santiago Vila Tue, 06 Dec 2022 17:50:00 +0100 + x4d-icons (1.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium * QA upload. diff -Nru x4d-icons-1.2/debian/compat x4d-icons-1.

Bug#1016439: buster-pu: package procmail/3.22-26+deb10u1

2022-07-31 Thread Santiago Vila
d by Jakub Wilk using American Fuzzy Lop. +Patch from Stephen R. van den Berg. + + -- Santiago Vila Sun, 31 Jul 2022 20:10:00 +0200 + procmail (3.22-26) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix buffer overflow in loadbuf(). Closes: #876511. diff -Nru procmail-3.22/debian/patches/31 procmail-3

Bug#1014221: bullseye-pu:package procmail/3.22-26+deb11u1

2022-07-02 Thread Santiago Vila
.22/debian/changelog 2022-07-02 13:20:00.0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ +procmail (3.22-26+deb11u1) bullseye; urgency=medium + + * Fix NULL pointer dereference. Closes: #769938. +Reported by Jakub Wilk using American Fuzzy Lop. +Patch from Stephen R. van den Berg. + + -- Santiago Vila S

Bug#1014221: bullseye-pu:package procmail/3.22-26+deb11u1

2022-07-02 Thread Santiago Vila
pointer dereference. Closes: #769938. +Reported by Jakub Wilk using American Fuzzy Lop. +Patch from Stephen R. van den Berg. + + -- Santiago Vila Sat, 02 Jul 2022 13:20:00 +0200 + procmail (3.22-26) unstable; urgency=medium * Fix buffer overflow in loadbuf(). Closes: #876511. diff -Nru

Bug#988276: unblock: base-files/11.1

2021-05-14 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 10:21:31PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Priority: required > Maintainer: Santiago Vila > Standards-Version: 4.1.3 > -Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 9) > +Build-Depends: debhelper-compat (= 13) > > Please revert that [1] or show with diffoscop

Bug#988276: unblock: base-files/11.1

2021-05-09 Thread Santiago Vila
sion number +and "(bullseye)" as codename. Add also VERSION_ID and VERSION. +(never expected to change) + - Add VERSION_CODENAME to os-release. +(only expected on stable releases) + - Update README (bullseye -> bookworm). + + -- Santiago Vila Sat, 10 Apr 2021 22:15:00

Re: Bug#931003: Bug#931003: Removed package(s) from unstable

2021-05-04 Thread Santiago Vila
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:48:09AM +0100, peter green wrote: > > This was automatically closed by ftpmaster because the package was > > removed from unstable, but this still does not fix the FTBFS problem > > in stable. > > Unfortunately I don't think a proper fix will be forthcoming, upstream > h

Bug#944351: Providing minor version somewhere in /etc/os-release in buster

2019-11-14 Thread Santiago Vila
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 07:10:08PM +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Fri, Nov 08, 2019 at 01:17:20PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > I received this bug from one of the ansible upstream authors: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931197 >

Bug#944351: Providing minor version somewhere in /etc/os-release in buster

2019-11-11 Thread Santiago Vila
ix a not-yet-fixed breakage in lsb-release). On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 01:14:12PM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 10, 2019 at 01:24:42PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > Ok, I have just uploaded base-files as usual, but if possible I'd like > > this to be sorted-out for 1

Bug#944351: Providing minor version somewhere in /etc/os-release in buster

2019-11-10 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 03:33:26PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2019-11-09 at 16:09 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > (If we can't sort this out for 10.2 I'll have to upload base-files > > for 10.2 as usual. What's the real deadline for that? This weeken

Bug#944351: Providing minor version somewhere in /etc/os-release in buster

2019-11-09 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, Nov 09, 2019 at 02:10:45PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > On Fri, 2019-11-08 at 13:17 +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: > > I received this bug from one of the ansible upstream authors: > > > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-b

Bug#944351: Providing minor version somewhere in /etc/os-release in buster

2019-11-08 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: buster User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu Dear Release Managers: I received this bug from one of the ansible upstream authors: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=931197 asking to include information about m

Bug#938997: stretch-pu: package gettext/0.19.8.1-2+deb9u1

2019-08-30 Thread Santiago Vila
from Debian 10, which in turn was extracted from +upstream git. Should help the inkscape project. Closes: #891347. +See https://gitlab.com/inkscape/inkscape/issues/271 for details. + + -- Santiago Vila Sat, 31 Aug 2019 01:30:22 +0200 + gettext (0.19.8.1-2) unstable; urgency=medium

Bug#938926: stretch-pu: package base-files/9.9+deb9u10

2019-08-30 Thread Santiago Vila
to os-release. Closes: #829245. Please note +that this is only for stable releases. + + -- Santiago Vila Fri, 30 Aug 2019 10:45:44 +0200 + base-files (9.9+deb9u9) stretch; urgency=medium * Change /etc/debian_version to 9.9, for Debian 9.9 point release. diff -Nru base-files-9.9+deb9u

Bug#931245: unblock: encoding-rs/0.8.15-2

2019-08-25 Thread Santiago Vila
Hi. I'm still tracking FTBFS bugs in buster. Am I right to think that this upload for stable (when accepted) will fix Bugs #931002 and #931003 in rust-coresimd and rust-simd, making them buildable again? (Those bugs have been closed automatically by FTPmaster, but the automatic script does not kn

Bug#933970: stretch-pu: package unzip/6.0-21+deb9u2

2019-08-05 Thread Santiago Vila
31433. + - Do not raise a zip bomb alert for a misplaced central directory. +Reported by Peter Green. Closes: #932404. + + -- Santiago Vila Mon, 05 Aug 2019 18:10:06 +0200 + unzip (6.0-21+deb9u1) stretch; urgency=medium * Fix buffer overflow in password protected ZIP archives. Closes: #8

Bug#932318: buster-pu: package unzip/6.0-23+deb10u1

2019-08-03 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sat, Jul 27, 2019 at 01:38:46PM -0300, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2019-07-27 13:18, Santiago Vila wrote: > > tags 932318 - moreinfo > > thanks > > > > Hello. > > > > The problem with Firefox should now be fixed, and it was unzip's fault. > >

Bug#932318: buster-pu: package unzip/6.0-23+deb10u1

2019-07-27 Thread Santiago Vila
tags 932318 - moreinfo thanks Hello. The problem with Firefox should now be fixed, and it was unzip's fault. If possible, I'd like this upload I did 6.0-23+deb10u1 to be rejected so that I can reuse the +deb10u1 version with all the fixes included. Thanks.

Bug#932318: buster-pu: package unzip/6.0-23+deb10u1

2019-07-19 Thread Santiago Vila
Dear Release Managers: Please leave this package unapproved for now. It has some side-effects (like firefox FTBFS) which need to be investigated: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=932404 I have the feeling that this will be another case of buggy zipfile, like this one: https://

Bug#932318: buster-pu: package unzip/6.0-23+deb10u1

2019-07-17 Thread Santiago Vila
ug in undefer_input() that misplaced the input state. + - Detect and reject a zip bomb using overlapped entries. Closes: #931433. +Bug discovered by David Fifield. For reference, this is CVE-2019-13232. + + -- Santiago Vila Wed, 17 Jul 2019 16:35:30 +0200 + unzip (6.0-23) unstable; urgency=m

Bug#929082: unblock: razor/1:2.85-4.2

2019-05-19 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 10:00:17PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi, > > On 16-05-2019 22:03, Holger Levsen wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:52:45PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > >> Well, if they are maintained by the QA group, there are at least around > >> 90 people notified of stuff. > > > >

Bug#929082: unblock: razor/1:2.85-4.2

2019-05-16 Thread Santiago Vila
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > The reason why it got removed, is that nobody was looking after razor. > Otherwise, preventing removal would have been easy. Indeed. If I had known that it was going to be removed, I would have downgraded the severity of the bug befor

Bug#929082: unblock: razor/1:2.85-4.2

2019-05-16 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Please allow razor back in testing, as a freeze exception. It was autoremoved because there was a RC bug in the BTS, but the real problem was not in the package itself but in the razor serv

Bug#929012: unblock: base-files/10.3

2019-05-15 Thread Santiago Vila
+ + * Add Breaks: debian-security-support (<< 2019.04.25). Closes: #928172. +This is the first version of debian-security-support which does not break +when /etc/debian_version contains a string in the form "10.x". + + -- Santiago Vila Mon, 13 May 2019 22:25:32 +0200 + +

Bug#928939: unblock: hello/2.10-2

2019-05-13 Thread Santiago Vila
00:00.0 +0100 @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -9 diff -Nru hello-2.10/debian/control hello-2.10/debian/control --- hello-2.10/debian/control 2015-03-22 11:00:00.0 +0100 +++ hello-2.10/debian/control 2019-05-12 22:26:59.0 +0200 @@ -2,9 +2,10 @@ Section: devel Priority: optional Maintainer

Re: Please verify that buster related suites are functional

2019-04-15 Thread Santiago Vila
On Mon, Apr 15, 2019 at 07:57:20AM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > Hi Niels, release team and ftp-masters, > > [dropping backports list for this reply, adding ftp-masters] > > On Sun, Apr 14, 2019 at 09:02:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > Hi Security team and backports team, > > > > Acc

Bug#926645: unblock: diffutils_1:3.7-3

2019-04-08 Thread Santiago Vila
0 +0200 @@ -1,3 +1,9 @@ +diffutils (1:3.7-3) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Disable tests/colors completely for buster. Closes: #922552. + + -- Santiago Vila Mon, 08 Apr 2019 14:04:00 +0200 + diffutils (1:3.7-2) unstable; urgency=low * Increase sleeping time from 1 to 5 seconds in

Bug#921977: stretch-pu: package unzip/6.0-21+deb9u1

2019-02-10 Thread Santiago Vila
1) stretch; urgency=medium + + * Fix buffer overflow in password protected ZIP archives. Closes: #889838. +Patch borrowed from SUSE. For reference, this is CVE-2018-135. + + -- Santiago Vila Sun, 10 Feb 2019 20:53:00 +0100 + unzip (6.0-21) unstable; urgency=medium * Rename all debian/pa

Bug#903211: release.debian.org: How to handle unbuildable packages in buster

2018-08-10 Thread Santiago Vila
> I wish I could say unconditionally yes, but I am not sure we are ready > for it yet. If your testing can trivially say which relation in > Build-Depends/Build-Depends-Arch is broken, you could cross reference it > with the [excuses] and see if they are permanently rejected due (and why). > > I

Bug#903211: release.debian.org: How to handle unbuildable packages in buster

2018-07-07 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: wishlist Dear Release Managers: I'm looking for guidance and advice here. I'm reporting FTBFS bugs in testing, but I'm skipping bugs of type "unmet build-depends" because I've heard somewhere that Britney takes care of that. However, I don't see the procedu

Bug#864506: unblock: ruby-benchmark-suite/1.0.0+git.20130122.5bded6-2

2017-06-09 Thread Santiago Vila
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Dear Release Managers: I wish this package to be unblocked: unblock ruby-benchmark-suite/1.0.0+git.20130122.5bded6-2 It was removed from testing because of a FTBFS bug: https://bugs.debi

Bug#844264: Help requested: Packages which FTBFS randomly

2017-02-19 Thread Santiago Vila
On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:59:00PM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > Santiago Vila: > > On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 06:23:00AM +, Niels Thykier wrote: > > > >> Santiago already brought it up in #844264. I believe my answer in > >> comment 70 is still relevant (oth

Bug#851664: nmu: pcp_3.11.7

2017-01-23 Thread Santiago Vila
On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 04:41:59PM -0500, Nathan Scott wrote: > > This is happening again and again (see bugs 776440 and 847149). The fix > > here is to get rid of the package until the maintainer catches up, not > > to work around him time and time again, IMO. > > I'm planning to start source-o

Bug#850094: Please do not remove packages which FTBFS randomly yet

2017-01-15 Thread Santiago Vila
On Wed, 4 Jan 2017, Santiago Vila wrote: > Please help me to ensure that we are not removing (yet!) any package > from stretch because of any of such bugs (I think this mass-severity-setting > should yield such effect, but I'm not 100% sure). > > In particular, please

  1   2   3   >