Cyril Brulebois <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/11/2008):
>> I'm curious why e2fpsrogs 1.41.3-1 was allowed to migrate to testing?
>
> Otavio said it was DI-okayish and could be hinted in
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The ch
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (17/11/2008):
> I'm curious why e2fpsrogs 1.41.3-1 was allowed to migrate to testing?
Otavio said it was DI-okayish and could be hinted in
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mraw,
KiBi.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
I'm curious way e2fpsrogs 1.41.3-1 was allowed to migrat to testing?
I don't mind, so this isn't a complaint, but if it was to fix Debian
Bug #503057, note that I haven't uploaded a package including that
fixes that yet. And there are a number of fixes in the maint branch
of e2fsprogs that, if we
* Martin-Éric Racine [Mon, 13 Oct 2008 16:21:19 +0300]:
> On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > * Martin-Éric Racine [Sat, 04 Oct 2008 07:50:20 +0300]:
> >> RM: this means that the package may now safely be unblocked. I'll
&
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:02 PM, Adeodato Simó <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Martin-Éric Racine [Sat, 04 Oct 2008 07:50:20 +0300]:
>> RM: this means that the package may now safely be unblocked. I'll
>> produce similar no-change uploads for my other ispell-generated
to at net.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
Listening to: Rosa León - La reina Berenguela
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
et.com.org.es
Debian Developer adeodato at debian.org
A hacker does for love what other would not do for money.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello again.
Host liszt.debian.org seems to have been broken for the past day or two.
Now that it's up I instead got a permanent error.
Lets try without the debdiff and see if we can get through
- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Su
to 5.
Sorry for the noise then and thanks for the bump despite it being not
strictly needed. *blushes*
--
damJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
bug is not present in testing, though age-days set to 5.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
That bug causes FTBFS in (at least) libclass-dbi-sweet-perl (#490336),
libdbix-class-perl (#490330) and libdbix-class-schema-loader-perl
(#490318) so I think a bit higher urgency is warranted.
TIA
[Please Cc me on replies, thanks]
--
damJabberID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
De
is not far behind
that, so please upload soon :-)
Cheers
Luk
>
>
> Subject:
> e2fsprogs 1.40.11-1 MIGRATED to testing
> From:
> Debian testing watch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date:
> Wed, 09 J
Hi, can someone tell me when the udebs have been grabbed for e2fsprogs
1.40.11-1? The release of e2fsprogs 1.41 is *imminent* (with two
previous release candidates having been pushed out to experimental),
so I'd like to know when it might be safe to push this out.
Also, where are we in the Lenny
nks, they might become available again, but
> probably won't. qa.debian.org/debcheck.php should have comparable data
> btw...
>
> Closing this bug.
>
> Cheers
>
> Luk
Ok, done.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:40:26AM +0200, Philipp Kern wrote:
> Hm, nice. xpdf is arch:all but depends on xpdf-reader strictly. Thus
> it is not binNMU-safe.
That's already fixed in lenny.
Hamish
--
Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
T
U-safe. But that's not the issue: the i386 build is not
available yet (the only one missing apart of alpha), it's just `built'
since 3d.
So this will fix itself within the next few days.
Kind regards,
Philipp Kern
--
.''`. Philipp Kern Deb
Philipp,
Is this fixed by your latest xpdf upload for etch?
Thanks,
Hamish
- Forwarded message from Marc Mutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
autolearn=ham version=3.2.4
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
S
Le May 13, 2008 11:38:57 am Joey Schulze, vous avez écrit :
> Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Le May 13, 2008 04:56:06 am Philipp Kern, vous avez écrit :
> > > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't
Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> Le May 13, 2008 04:56:06 am Philipp Kern, vous avez écrit :
> > On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't a discussion list but the role account of
> > > > the release team.
Le May 13, 2008 04:56:06 am Philipp Kern, vous avez écrit :
> On Mon, May 12, 2008 at 09:19:17PM -0400, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] isn't a discussion list but the role account of
> > > the release team. It might be time to enforce that a bit more.
&
Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Security team suggest to redirect this question here.
>
> Thanks.
>
> - Forwarded message from Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
> From: Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:05:33 +0100
> To: [EM
Security team suggest to redirect this question here.
Thanks.
- Forwarded message from Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Marco Gaiarin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 12:05:33 +0100
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug 408440
Organization: La Nostra Famigli
th the current title you request removal from unstable, please fix.
Fixed, though luckily that was harmless as the unstable binaries were
already gone anyway...
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>On 11255 March 1977, Pierre Habouzit wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:30:41AM +, Luk Claes wrote:
>> Please open bugs against ftp.debian.org requesting its removal from
>> stable and oldstable, TIA.
> #459296
With the current title you request removal from unstable, please fix.
--
bye
On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 11:30:41AM +, Luk Claes wrote:
> Pierre Habouzit wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 05, 2008 at 12:45:17AM +, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> >> Hi Pierre,
> >> when investigating some newer flyspray issue I got the following
> >> reply. I suggest removing it from stable in the next
ve flyspray should be removed from the next
> stable release too.
Please open bugs against ftp.debian.org requesting its removal from
stable and oldstable, TIA.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> - Forwarded message from Cristian Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2007 17:08:02 -0300
> From: Cristian Rodriguez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: flyspray FSA:2
>
> On 12/27/07, Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you. You are now approved to send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tired of
spam invading your inbox? ChoiceMail eliminates 100% of spam and puts you in
control. It is available in versions for single users and for enterprise
environments of any size. To find out what ChoiceMail can do for you
Your request to communicate with the recipient has been rejected. : [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
Reason:
You are rejected
Future emails to this recipient will be automatically deleted.
If you wish to contact this person, please contact him/her by other means.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
o it can be dealt with at that point.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
f you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ave 1.1.dfsg-1 or similar for
stable.
Cheers
Luk
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ebian part of -0.1.
I think 1.1.dfsg-3.1 in unstable would have been better; that would allow
use of 1.1-3+etch1 in stable.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTE
is a phone call, if you are unable to speak?
(as seen on /.)
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
what's wrong with the usual
appending of "etch1" to the existing version number, i.e. 1.1-3etch1?
Thijs
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ion regarding your Bug report
> which was filed against the bos package:
>
> #440638: copyright infringement in bos
>
> It has been closed by Robert Millan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>.
>
> Their explanation is attached below. If this explanation is
> unsatisfactory and you ha
Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Debian-Release team,
> retitle 439117 libcommoncpp2-dev: needs binary-only upload
> It seems that simply rebuilding libcommoncpp2 package helps.
> I think we should request binary-only upload to solve this.
> This problem makes clamfs (and probably other packages that depends on
> libcommoncp
* Ola Lundqvist ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070401 20:40]:
> I just got this bugreport and I agree that it is a problem.
>
> Package: ntop
> Severity: serious
> Tags: etch-ignore
Obviously not.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
>
> - Forwarded message from Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
>
> Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Delivery-date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:34:18 +0200
> Subject: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
> Reply-To: Michael Ablassmeier
from Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Sun, 01 Apr 2007 10:34:18 +0200
Subject: Bug#417013: depends on non-essential package debconf in postrm
Reply-To: Michael Ablassmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-F
to include a changelog.
>
> I also think that I just missed the freeze for r-omeghat-ggobi by a few days.
>
> Lastly, feel free to ping upstream -- Hadley and esp. Michael typically reply
> within a few hours.
Ben.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 08, 2007 at 10:02:48PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/w/wordpress.html
>
Right, as I mentioned on IRC, but you may have missed it:
This needs an update through t-p-u, and as it's a security issue, I'll
send a DTSA for it. So, can you produce patches which fi
Oops, original sent to wrong address.
- Forwarded message from Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Kai Hendry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Moritz Muehlenhoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Unblock request for Wordpress
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2007 10:26:19 +
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Not if they can't be reproduced reliably on the autobuilders; that points to
> a sourceful bug in the package that needs to be addressed.
That's what I suspected, but it's a moot point anyway given Paul's
analysis, w
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 07:29:09PM -0500, Aaron M. Ucko wrote:
> reopen 395034
> thanks
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> > From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> [...]
> > Scheduled on the autobuilder. No further action should be requi
reopen 395034
thanks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Debian Bug Tracking System) writes:
> From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
[...]
> Scheduled on the autobuilder. No further action should be required for
> resolving this bug, closing accordingly.
Thanks, but the rebuilt package
On Wed, Jan 03, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> This apparently didn't get attached.
(For the record, the message was repeatedly eaten by lists.debian.org,
but I can provide it to anyone interested.)
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
e upstream tarballs as well as the diffstat
for you to review.
(I'm the last NMUer of nss-mdns and propose myself to prepare a NMU for
this upstream release as well; Cc:ing the maintainer.)
Bye,
--
Loïc Minier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--- Begin Message ---
Hi!
Just a quick update
who discovered a loss of data in OpenBSD. Although it's hard to
get in linux it can be happen.
http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kde-imaging/2006-October/003746.html
I can not determine how that problem impacts Debian. I leave the final
discision to you.
Tom Albers
--
—Carlos.
dn't it?
It could, except that it would prevent 3dfx owners to use the version
of the lib currently shipped in libgl1-mesa-glide3. And it would
defeat the purpose of the current libosmesa6 package, which does not
depend on anything beyond libc6.
--
Yann
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I would appreciate any comments from the Debian Release Managers and
> Debian Masters about whether or not it is required to remove any files
> which are legal for us to redistribute (such as RFC's and I-D's), but
> which
* Theodore Tso ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061003 21:19]:
> I would appreciate any comments from the Debian Release Managers and
> Debian Masters about whether or not it is required to remove any files
> which are legal for us to redistribute (such as RFC's and I-D's), but
> which
According to the file, the authors are Paul J. Leach
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> and Rich Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, but the
> document suggests others may own the document too:
It is legal to distribute the source file, so leaving the I-D in the
source should not be an issue. Debian Polic
ds,
// Ola
> --
> Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
> Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
>
--
--- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult -
is handled entirely by the ftp team, with no manual
intervention from the release team.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
intervention to remove them?
In any case vzctl should never have been built for some architectures
as there is no kernel syscal for those.
Regards,
// Ola
- Forwarded message from Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
From: Ola Lundqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
at it
kind of makes for a public blame.
Friendly,
Sven Luther
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060817 00:00]:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Dear listmasters,
> >
> > Please block [EMAIL PROTECTED] from posting to the debian-release
> > mailing list. He appears to be incapable of exercising self-re
all parties can calm down a bit and think about why
they annoy the other side and find a way back to a more constructive
way to deal with each other.
Yours,
Cord, Debian Listmaster of the day
--
http://lists.debian.org
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of &q
Hi,
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear listmasters,
>
> Please block [EMAIL PROTECTED] from posting to the debian-release
> mailing list. He appears to be incapable of exercising self-restraint in
> using the list for its intended purpose.
This hasn'
[ Note: Reply-To set ]
On Wed, Aug 16, 2006 at 06:59:57PM -0300, Otavio Salvador wrote:
>
>Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Dear listmasters,
>>
>> Please block [EMAIL PROTECTED] from posting to the debian-release
>> mailing list. He app
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Dear listmasters,
>
> Please block [EMAIL PROTECTED] from posting to the debian-release
> mailing list. He appears to be incapable of exercising self-restraint in
> using the list for
Dear listmasters,
Please block [EMAIL PROTECTED] from posting to the debian-release
mailing list. He appears to be incapable of exercising self-restraint in
using the list for its intended purpose.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
Hello Andi,
On Tue, 18.07.2006 at 22:22:19 +0200, Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060717 00:26]:
> > would this qualify for inclusion in a point release (ref.
> > http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en
* Toni Mueller ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060717 00:26]:
> would this qualify for inclusion in a point release (ref.
> http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-upload-stable)?
>
> If yes, I'd try to create such a fixed package.
I would say yes.
Cheers
Hello,
would this qualify for inclusion in a point release (ref.
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-pkgs.en.html#s-upload-stable)?
If yes, I'd try to create such a fixed package.
Best,
--Toni++
- Forwarded message from Frank Hempel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Da
ll, getting the ftp team to remove them from
unstable means fewer people have to be involved.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
t; release team, please consider removing saoimage from testing:
1 RC bug;
unresponsive maintainer;
obsoleted (by my own package saods9);
unmaintained upstream; last release Dec 2003;
I'd like to wait before removing it from unstable, to see if anyone
will adopt it, if we hear back from
camera
I was promised for signing up for the two premium offers.
My e-mail is [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My phone # is 321-725-1217
Thank you
Carla Clawson
his thread shows that your expectation is wrong.
>
... well, of course after pointing the issue for them :-)
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that your expectation is wrong.
> Francesco P. Lovergine
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please remove lw-pro-installer & cl-reversi-clim.
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 29 May 2005 13:03:03 -0600
From: Kevin Rosenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-qa@li
* Philipp Frauenfelder ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050529 21:28]:
> I have already asked to let calamaris 2.59-5 into testing and
> got an approval (see below). However, according to
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/calamaris.html , this did not
> happen.
>
> Could you please c
Philipp
- Forwarded message from Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Envelope-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 May 2005 13:03:04 +0200
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 10:08:40 +0200
From: Andreas Barth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Philipp Frauenfelder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
#x27;m indifferent about sarge, and it
should definitely go from sid.
| Especially as the replacement 'ggobi' is in sarge, I'd suggest to drop
| xgobi{,-doc} from sarge. Agreed?
Sure.
Thanks, Dirk
|
| --Jeroen
|
| - Forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x27;s some legal
reason not to.
Especially as the replacement 'ggobi' is in sarge, I'd suggest to drop
xgobi{,-doc} from sarge. Agreed?
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Dirk Eddelbuettel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#311108: ftp.debian.org: Please remove xgobi a
On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 02:11:12PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> Please approve for sarge. Note that kdelibs has an unversioned
> dependency on libmad0 now because of the broken shlibs of the newest
> version of that package. I don't know how serious we want to take
> that issue.
Approved.
T
Please approve for sarge. Note that kdelibs has an unversioned
dependency on libmad0 now because of the broken shlibs of the newest
version of that package. I don't know how serious we want to take
that issue.
- Forwarded message from Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
On Sun, May 22, 2005 at 09:51:47AM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Release team,
>
> Please review zaptel 1:1.0.7-4.1 for sarge.
Approved
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
nce would be a problem...
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
se
> patches whose maintainers don't speak up for them can then be pulled before
> we release.
>
Yes, this appears reasonable to me.
--
Francesco P. Lovergine
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Release team,
Please review zaptel 1:1.0.7-4.1 for sarge.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer
- Forwarded message from Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Date: Sun, 22 May 2005 04:19:03 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
odern programmer
> - Forwarded message from Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> -
>
> Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
> Subject: Status of
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, May 21, 2005 at 10:13:51PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> Please remove cantus3, RoM
hinted
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
Please remove cantus3, RoM
--Jeroen
- Forwarded message from Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Subject: Bug#309854: RM: cantus3 -- RoM; no longer maintained upstream
Reply-To: Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-From: Igor Stroh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
problem).
I should really have NMUed this package months ago...
Cheers,
--
Bill. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Imagine a large red swirl here.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
arded message from Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: Francesco Paolo Lovergine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
Subject: Status of kernel-patches in sarge
Mail-Followup-To: debian-kernel@lists.debian
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [050518 08:50]:
> Please approve openldap2 2.1.30-8 for sarge. I previously approved
> 2.1.30-7, but then I went and did the -8 upload myself, so it's probably
> better if someone else reviews that diff :)
approved.
Cheers,
Andi
--
http:/
gasek
postmodern programmer
- Forwarded message from Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
X-Original-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Debian Installer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Kat
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 10:22:07PM -0500, Laurence J. Lane wrote:
> There are a couple of iptables bugs that missed the standard
> freeze. #283822 in particular is scripting error that causes
> a FTBFS when using a dash (and probably other shells) instead
> of bash.
> iptables (1.2.11-10) unsta
/prep.sh: patching and patch ordering
* fixed a bashism reported by Geller Sandor in Bug#283822. Thanks.
-- Laurence J. Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Wed, 1 Dec 2004 19:11:34 -0500
iptables (1.2.11-9) unstable; urgency=medium
* another prep.sh tweak for patch ordering
* Bug#
Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> as the maintainer of the polyxmass-doc package, I would like to ask if
> it were possible to make it into Sarge.
Approved.
--
see shy jo
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
to sid, which contains a backport which
should fix #297359 (at least it fixes the problem for the bug submitter).
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wed, May 11, 2005 at 02:54:21PM +0200, Steinar H. Gunderson wrote:
> This is perhaps relevant for the 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-8 upload. Looks like we
> have three options:
> 1) Let 4.1.4beta2-8 go into sarge, fixing one important bug (#304245) but
>letting others (#297359) pass. (Looks like my Clo
This is perhaps relevant for the 4.1.3+4.1.4beta2-8 upload. Looks like we
have three options:
1) Let 4.1.4beta2-8 go into sarge, fixing one important bug (#304245) but
letting others (#297359) pass. (Looks like my Closes: line in 4.1.4beta2-8
was too broad; I'll reopen #297359 later today.)
I'm getting a half-dozen or so of these messages every 24 hours. It
sounds like something is continuously trying to resubmit the
1.35-8sarge1 versions of e2fsprogs into sarge. Could you either
remove them, or tell me who I need to talk to in order to get these
erroneously NMU'ed binary packages f
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
