Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 08:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: [...] Please see attached debdiffs. [...] Okay. In that case, please go ahead; thanks. For the record, these were uploaded and accepted. Regards, Adam

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-05 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 02:06:42PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 08:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: [...] Please see attached debdiffs. [...] Okay. In that case, please go ahead;

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 22:07 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:35:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:48 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: [...] Please see attached

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:48 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say yes based on the information provided so far. OK. I will prepare the uploads

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-02 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:35:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:48 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say yes based on the

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite in

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:12:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released with Squeeze.

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say yes based on the information provided so far. OK. I will prepare the uploads and send the debdiffs for final approval prior to uploading.

[SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-22 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite in Sid. I have already fixed the latest version in the git repository

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-22 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 04:35:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: I have attached the two helpers files that would need to be included in the update. The first file would be included in shorewall and shorewall-lite and the second file in shorewall6 and shorewall6-lite. I cleverly forgot