Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-05 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Nov 05, 2011 at 02:06:42PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 08:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > [...] > > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > [...] > > > > > Please see attached debdiffs. > [...] > > Okay. In that case, pleas

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-05 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 08:35 +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: [...] > > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > [...] > > > > Please see attached debdiffs. [...] > Okay. In that case, please go ahead; thanks. For the record, these were uploaded and accepted. Regards

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-03 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 22:07 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:35:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:48 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: [...] > > > Please see attached

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-02 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 09:35:36PM +, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:48 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say > > > > ye

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-11-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-29 at 20:48 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > > > I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say > > > yes based on the information provided so far. > > > > > OK. I will prepare

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 12:16:00PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > > > I'd like to see debdiffs before a final ACK, but I'd be inclined to say > > yes based on the information provided so far. > > > OK. I will prepare the uploads and send the debdiffs for final approval > prior to uploading

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 03:12:06PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a > > packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released > > with Squeeze. Incid

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sat, 2011-10-22 at 16:35 -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a > packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released > with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and > shorewall6-lite in

Re: [SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-22 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
On Sat, Oct 22, 2011 at 04:35:49PM -0400, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote: > > I have > attached the two helpers files that would need to be included in the > update. The first file would be included in shorewall and > shorewall-lite and the second file in shorewall6 and shorewall6-lite. > I cleverly f

[SRM] shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} update for stable?

2011-10-22 Thread Roberto C . Sánchez
As a result of #646112, it has come to my attention that I made a packaging error in the shorewall{,6,-lite,6-lite} packages that released with Squeeze. Incidentally, the problem also affects shorewall-lite and shorewall6-lite in Sid. I have already fixed the latest version in the git repository