Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-25 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/12/2010 03:15 PM, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: On 12/12/2010 02:24 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Take 2-7 which has no RC-relevant bug or use 2-8 from mentors if you prefer that. At this point, I'm strictly against anything else. There's always a third alternative… FTR, I uploaded an NMU to

Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-12 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/12/2010 03:59 AM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Hi, On 12.12.2010 07:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Any news here? Can't you put the dependency back so that we get this finally properly fixed? Do you prefer an NMU? My package has been up at mentors.debian.net for sponsorship for almost a week now.

Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-12 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Mehdi, thank you for your mail. If you were aware of the mentors.debian.net package and the discussion then why ask the question in the way you asked it? I have received no further replies to my last message and certainly nothing that would made me reconsider my position. If anything I should

Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-12 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/12/2010 02:24 PM, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Mehdi, thank you for your mail. If you were aware of the mentors.debian.net package and the discussion then why ask the question in the way you asked it? I have received no Sometimes, it's good idea to give people time to prepare their

Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-11 Thread Mehdi Dogguy
On 12/05/2010 10:09 AM, Julien Cristau wrote: On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:33:48 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Hello Julien, thank you for taking care of isdnutils. I was travelling and thus unable to respond immediately. On 01.12.2010 22:55, Julien Cristau wrote: * debian/control: -

Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-11 Thread Rolf Leggewie
Hi, On 12.12.2010 07:14, Mehdi Dogguy wrote: Any news here? Can't you put the dependency back so that we get this finally properly fixed? Do you prefer an NMU? My package has been up at mentors.debian.net for sponsorship for almost a week now. I sincerely hope that anybody actually

Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-05 Thread Julien Cristau
On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 10:33:48 +0800, Rolf Leggewie wrote: Hello Julien, thank you for taking care of isdnutils. I was travelling and thus unable to respond immediately. On 01.12.2010 22:55, Julien Cristau wrote: * debian/control: - drop explicit dependency on udev|makedev,

Re: Accepted isdnutils 1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7 (source all amd64)

2010-12-01 Thread Julien Cristau
Hi Rolf, I'm looking at moving isdnutils to testing to fix its RC bugs, but I don't quite understand one of the changes you made. On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:32:38 +, Rolf Leggewie wrote: isdnutils (1:3.9.20060704+dfsg.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium . * debian/*.postinst: hardcode