Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

2010-12-28 Thread Julien Cristau
user release.debian@packages.debian.org usertag 603710 squeeze-can-defer tag 603710 squeeze-ignore kthxbye On Fri, Dec 24, 2010 at 00:57:21 +0100, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Dec 24, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you

Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

2010-12-23 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 24, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: I don't know. You say there's a RC bug in our lvm package, so you could provide a patch or NMU, or at least give some details about this since you seem to know what this is about and there's no details in the bug log... This is what the

Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

2010-12-16 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 01:03:08 +0100, Michael Biebl wrote: CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see in squeeze? Cheers, Julien

Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

2010-12-16 Thread Marco d'Itri
On Dec 16, Julien Cristau jcris...@debian.org wrote: CCing the release team to raise awareness for this issue. I have no idea what this is about, but it seems you guys need to fight LVM is unreliable in squeeze. it out and then come back to us when you have packages you want to see in

Re: Bug#603710: root and swap devices on lvm do not correctly show up in udev (missing symlinks)

2010-11-16 Thread Michael Biebl
On 16.11.2010 18:44, Marco d'Itri wrote: On Nov 16, Michael Biebl bi...@debian.org wrote: As you can see from the attached log, while the symlinks in /dev are created, they do not show up correctly in the udev database (not the missing S: entries for dm-0 and dm-1), so the information is out