Hi Julien,
On Tue, Sep 03, 2013 at 11:45:19AM +0200, Julien Cristau wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 21:28:42 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I admit this does not clarify the situation for me. Even if the problem
> > is at upstream side - if upstream does not care for the problem
On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 21:28:42 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I admit this does not clarify the situation for me. Even if the problem
> is at upstream side - if upstream does not care for the problem the
> maintainer is in charge to invent a patch. I was just wondering if a
> binNMU wo
Hi,
I admit this does not clarify the situation for me. Even if the problem
is at upstream side - if upstream does not care for the problem the
maintainer is in charge to invent a patch. I was just wondering if a
binNMU would do the trick or not. If not I have no idea what to do
because I do no
Sorry, just a guess of mine, not something to packagers deal with. It is
maybe something on the source code. See the info about libtool, versioning
system.
2013/9/2 Andreas Tille
> Hi,
>
> I admit I have no idea what you expect me (main Uploader) to do. Please
> explain and I'll try to be as q
Hi,
I admit I have no idea what you expect me (main Uploader) to do. Please
explain and I'll try to be as quick as possible to do so.
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Sun, Sep 01, 2013 at 05:50:12PM -0300, Felipe Castro wrote:
> Maybe a problem with the libtool versioning, I had warned the upst
Maybe a problem with the libtool versioning, I had warned the upstream
about something similar to it a long time ago...
2013/9/1 Michael Biebl
> Am 01.09.2013 19:03, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> > On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> >
> >> Package: release.debian.org
> >
Am 01.09.2013 19:03, schrieb Julien Cristau:
> On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
>
>> Package: release.debian.org
>> Severity: normal
>> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
>> Usertags: binnmu
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently bloc
On Sun, Sep 1, 2013 at 15:05:22 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi,
>
> afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of
> libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] a
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hi,
afaics, the rdeps of libgtkdatabox are currently blocking the cruft removal of
libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-1 [1] and in turn glade-3
Both libgtkdatabox-0.9.1-dev and libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-dev pro
9 matches
Mail list logo
