> Hi Frederic,
> Please provide a filtered (source) debdiff of the changes, so we can
> review them.
No problem here the full debdiff.
debdiff taurus_3.3.0+dfsg-2.dsc taurus_3.3.1+dfsg-1.dsc > debdiff
Cheers
Fred
debdiff
Description: debdiff
On 2014-11-15 13:58, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> so here the question
>
>> That's where you come in. You're the maintainer and the expert in this
>> package. Are 251 and 221 that common and important that the other
>> changes are worth less testing than usual?
>
> [...]
>
> - so my advice a
so here the question
> That's where you come in. You're the maintainer and the expert in this
> package. Are 251 and 221 that common and important that the other
> changes are worth less testing than usual?
Yes I know about the package, I trust also the upstream when they did that they
did all t
Hi,
PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote (15 Nov 2014 12:08:49 GMT) :
> Here the answer of the taurus upstream (he forgot to CC the the bts)
[... snipping general explanation of the upstream dev process ...]
> Do you need more informations ?
It's good to know that upstream seems very confident that th
Hello,
Here the answer of the taurus upstream (he forgot to CC the the bts)
Carlos Pascual [cpasc...@cells.es]
Hi Fred and Jonathan,
First of all, sorry for the late reply (I hope it is still relevant). I am
currently out of office and with limited email access. If you require
further info, plea
Hi Frederic-Emmanuel,
Jonathan Wiltshire wrote (30 Oct 2014 18:28:58 GMT) :
> On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:19:36PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
>> I would say that 251 and 221 deserve an upgrade of both package.
>>
>> Do you need more informations ?
> I think what Adam meant was that with
On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 08:19:36PM +, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
> * taurus
>
> * features
> + http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/234/
> + http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/135/
> + http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/208/ (#208 TaurusValueEdit:
> exception when ed
ok, so here all the link
* sardana
** features
+ http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/231/
+ http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/250/
** bugs
+http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/tickets/251/ (fix a crash)
the dscan things has no bug report but is something important for the final
user
On 2014-10-28 12:37, PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote:
So, please point to the relevant bug reports closed by 3.3.1, that
might help convincing the release team that accepting this last-minute
upstream release is worth it. Thanks!
here the information from the mailing list
http://sourceforge.net/
thanks for the review
> So, please point to the relevant bug reports closed by 3.3.1, that
> might help convincing the release team that accepting this last-minute
> upstream release is worth it. Thanks!
here the information from the mailing list
http://sourceforge.net/p/sardana/mailman/message/
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #767074 [release.debian.org] unblock: taurus/3.3.1+dfsg-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
767074: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767074
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, em
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
Hi,
Picca Frédéric-Emmanuel wrote (28 Oct 2014 09:36:55 GMT) :
> Hello, me and the upstream of taurus worked last week to prepare
> a release of taurus specifically for debian8.
> this is mostly a bug fix.
My understanding is that you would like the release team to un
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package taurus
Hello, me and the upstream of taurus worked last week to prepare
a release of taurus specifically for debian8.
this is mostly a bug fix. (the usual relase cycl
13 matches
Mail list logo
