Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + pending
Bug #862891 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2
Added tag(s) pending.
--
862891: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 + pending
On Mon, 2017-07-03 at 07:31 +0200, Markus Wanner wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
>
> On 07/02/2017 11:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> >>> What's up with the security upload?
>
> sorry, I misunderstood this as you asking for an upload of deb8u2.
>
> >>> (Also, you should be targett
On 2017-07-03 7:32, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
Adam D. Barratt (2017-07-03):
It was released in DSA 3742-1 at the end of last year, but never made
it
to p-u - from memory due to a key issue with the source upload.
OK, thanks. Does that generate any troubles wrt. accepting +deb8u2 into
p-u? I wou
Hi Markus,
Markus Wanner (2017-07-03):
> On 07/02/2017 11:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> sorry, I misunderstood this as you asking for an upload of deb8u2.
No worries, we'll see what to do.
> >>> (Also, you should be targetting “jessie” directly instead of
> >>> “stable”.)
>
> (Just out of cu
Adam D. Barratt (2017-07-03):
> It was released in DSA 3742-1 at the end of last year, but never made it
> to p-u - from memory due to a key issue with the source upload.
OK, thanks. Does that generate any troubles wrt. accepting +deb8u2 into
p-u? I would assume not but I might be lacking imagina
On Sun, 2017-07-02 at 23:14 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Hi Markus,
>
> Markus Wanner (2017-07-02):
> > On 28.06.2017 00:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > > I don't see 3.0.0-5+deb8u1 anywhere?
[...]
> I did request the target change, but not really the upload; I still
> don't get why your change
Hi Cyril,
On 07/02/2017 11:14 PM, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> Markus Wanner (2017-07-02):
>> On 28.06.2017 00:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
>>> I don't see 3.0.0-5+deb8u1 anywhere?
>>>
>>> flightgear | 3.0.0-5 | oldstable | source
>>> flightgear | 3.0.0-5 | oldstabl
Hi Markus,
Markus Wanner (2017-07-02):
> On 28.06.2017 00:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> > I don't see 3.0.0-5+deb8u1 anywhere?
> >
> > flightgear | 3.0.0-5 | oldstable | source
> > flightgear | 3.0.0-5 | oldstable-kfreebsd | source
> > flightgear | 1:2016.
Hello Cyril,
On 28.06.2017 00:43, Cyril Brulebois wrote:
> I don't see 3.0.0-5+deb8u1 anywhere?
>
> flightgear | 3.0.0-5 | oldstable | source
> flightgear | 3.0.0-5 | oldstable-kfreebsd | source
> flightgear | 1:2016.4.4+dfsg-3 | stable | sourc
Processing control commands:
> tag -1 moreinfo
Bug #862891 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
862891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tag -1 moreinfo
Markus Wanner (2017-05-18):
> as per Salvatore Bonaccorso, the current security fix for flightgear
> doesn't warrant a DSA on its own (see below). Is it okay to upload to
> 'stable'?
>
> A debdiff against the current version in stable-sec (3.0.0-5+deb8u1) is
> attached.
Control: -1 tags -moreinfo
Hi,
Tobias uploaded flightgear-1:2016.4.4+dfsg-3 last Friday (thanks,
Tobias), including the security fix. It already migrated to testing as
well a couple hours ago.
Please proceed with this jessie-pu bug.
Kind Regards
Markus
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
On 2017-05-18 14:25, Markus Wanner wrote:
[...]
On 05/18/2017 03:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
So far as I can tell, having looked at the BTS and Security Tracker,
and
the description of the CVE, this issue also affects the flightgear
package in unstable and is not yet fixed there.
[...]
I fo
Adam,
thank you for your feedback.
On 05/18/2017 03:07 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> So far as I can tell, having looked at the BTS and Security Tracker, and
> the description of the CVE, this issue also affects the flightgear
> package in unstable and is not yet fixed there.
That's correct, yes
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On 2017-05-18 8:38, Markus Wanner wrote:
as per Salvatore Bonaccorso, the current security fix for flightgear
doesn't warrant a DSA on its own (see below). Is it okay to upload to
'stable'?
So far as I can tell, having looked at the BTS and Security Tracker, and
th
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 + moreinfo
Bug #862891 [release.debian.org] jessie-pu: package flightgear/3.0.0-5+deb8u2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
862891: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=862891
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
Tags: jessie
Severity: normal
Dear Release Team,
as per Salvatore Bonaccorso, the current security fix for flightgear
doesn't warrant a DSA on its own (see below). Is it okay to upload to
'stable'?
A debdiff ag
17 matches
Mail list logo
