Hi Paul and Ivo,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:23 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 17-06-2019 22:05, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> >> Do I understand correctly that what we are now getting with this version
> >> is:
> >>
> >> - Reiwa support
>
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
Hi Paul,
On Tue, Jun 18, 2019 at 7:23 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> There are quite a lot of changes in the diff, and only at the end we get
> to the Reiwa support (if I understand the code and comments at all). You
> haven't explained these other changes. If all we are now
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #928111 [release.debian.org] unblock: icu/63.2-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
928111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928111
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #928111 [release.debian.org] unblock: icu/63.2-2
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
--
928111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928111
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi László,
On 17-06-2019 22:05, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
>> Do I understand correctly that what we are now getting with this version is:
>>
>> - Reiwa support
>> - fix for the speed regression?
>>
>> Can you c
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo
On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 9:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 16-06-2019 11:20, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
[The ICU 63.2 upstream release]
> > Last but not least fixed the startup slowness issue, changing a
> > function signature as well. While this is a public function,
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #928111 [release.debian.org] unblock: icu/63.2-2
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
928111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928111
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 moreinfo
Bug #928111 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1
Added tag(s) moreinfo.
> retitle -1 unblock: icu/63.2-2
Bug #928111 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1
Changed Bug title to 'unblock: icu/63.2-2' from '[pre-appr
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: retitle -1 unblock: icu/63.2-2
Hi László,
On 16-06-2019 11:20, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
>> Unfortunately, the state of chromium at this moment doesn't allow us to
>> rebuild and have the package migrate to buster as chromium FTBFS on
>> arm64 and the pack
Hi Paul,
On Sun, Jun 16, 2019 at 9:50 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> On 16-06-2019 11:20, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> > The debdiff is larger for the following changes. The backported
> > security fixes are no longer under debian/patches but inline. The ABI
> > break, called the 'ICU-20250' issue
Hi László,
On 16-06-2019 11:20, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> The debdiff is larger for the following changes. The backported
> security fixes are no longer under debian/patches but inline. The ABI
> break, called the 'ICU-20250' issue upstream is reversed with a patch.
> Then the s/63.1/63.2/
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 -moreinfo
Bug #928111 [release.debian.org] [pre-approval] unblock: icu/63.2-1
Removed tag(s) moreinfo.
--
928111: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=928111
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Hi Lázló,
On 08-06-2019 22:17, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> While I think binNMU can be done for testing as well, I know that
> would make things more complicated.
We don't know why, but that currently doesn't work. We tried that for
bug 928227.
Paul
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP d
Hi Paul,
On Sat, Jun 8, 2019 at 9:57 PM Paul Gevers wrote:
> On Sun, 5 May 2019 18:40:51 +0200
> =?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote:
> > Chromium is a bit bigger than me, but as I've experienced it's one of
> > its pre-checks with an assert. As the size of the Unicode se
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: block -1 by 928097
Hi László,
On Sun, 5 May 2019 18:40:51 +0200
=?UTF-8?B?TMOhc3psw7MgQsO2c3rDtnJtw6lueWkgKEdDUyk=?= wrote:
> Chromium is a bit bigger than me, but as I've experienced it's one of
> its pre-checks with an assert. As the size of the Unicode set
On Sun, May 05, 2019 at 02:25:01PM +0200, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Secondly, the fact that chromium needs a rebuild suggest there is a change
> that breaks something.
>
> I suggest you upload the new version to experimental. That way we can look at
> the differences and people can test the new packa
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi,
On Sun, Apr 28, 2019 at 01:57:15PM +0200, László Böszörményi (GCS) wrote:
> Hi Release Team,
>
> As Hideki Yamane noted on debian-release [1] Japanese new era is in
> effect. ICU upstream released the 63.2 version to address this. The
> packaging is ready to be uplo
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Hi Release Team,
As Hideki Yamane noted on debian-release [1] Japanese new era is in
effect. ICU upstream released the 63.2 version to address this. The
packaging is ready to be uploaded. T
18 matches
Mail list logo
