Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #972393 [release.debian.org] transition: armadillo
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
972393: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=972393
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2020-10-19 08:37:30 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Dear Sebastian,
>
> On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:10:18AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > > I wish to update armadillo in unstable. A binNMU should suffice for
> > > all reverse dependencies. Please let me know
Dear Sebastian,
On Sun, Oct 18, 2020 at 12:10:18AM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > I wish to update armadillo in unstable. A binNMU should suffice for
> > all reverse dependencies. Please let me know your opinion.
>
> Did you check if the reverse dependencies build against the new versuin
>
Processing control commands:
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-armadillo.html
Bug #972393 [release.debian.org] transition: armadillo
Set Bug forwarded-to-address to
'https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-armadillo.html'.
--
972393:
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-armadillo.html
Hi Kumar
On 2020-10-17 22:15:24 +0530, Kumar Appaiah wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
>
> Dear Release Team,
>
> I
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear Release Team,
I wish to update armadillo in unstable. A binNMU should suffice for
all reverse dependencies. Please let me know your opinion.
Thanks.
Kumar
Ben file:
title =
6 matches
Mail list logo
