Hi Graham,
On 12/2/21 2:48 AM, Graham Inggs wrote:
I've already added hints marking r-bioc-biocparallel/1.28.2-2 urgent
and gffread/0.12.1-4 as a bad test, so please do let us know if there
are others.
Yes, I could spot some more.
Please set these to ignore, or Let me know if I should rather
Am Thu, Dec 02, 2021 at 02:30:21AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> Actually, it started issuing a warning with regards to some white space/tab
> problem. Something else changed and it is already failing in testing.
The warning string comes from libgclib - so the change comes from there.
> But y
Hi Nliesh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 23:00, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> But we should make a list of all such packages and ping for Graham/Sebastian
> to propagate the hints accordingly. Probably that's what Graham wanted to say
> in the first place.
I've already added hints marking r-bioc-biocparallel/1
On 1 December 2021 11:01:12 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>But this is set[3]. If not Salsa-CI should fail.
You are testing it on a different version than in testing that's why it passes.
If you want to validate, trigger CI on the upload commit for 0.12.1-4
>Moreover, the issue
>is not connecte
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 06:28:06PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2021-12-01 22:46:45 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > Because the version from testing 0.12.1-4 is failing which does not have
> > allow-stderr restriction.
> >
> > The new version 0.12.7 you uploaded has it. The new version i
Hi Sebastian,
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 05:13:24PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> On 2021-12-01 17:06:00 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > >
> > > There's at least one more regression; in gffread, caused by
> > > r-bioc-gviz [1]. Please check that each r-bioc* package is ready to
> > > migrate.
On 2021-12-01 22:46:45 +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> On 1 December 2021 9:36:00 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
> >Hi Graham,
> >
> >Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> >> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> >> > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-bioc
On 1 December 2021 9:36:00 pm IST, Andreas Tille wrote:
>Hi Graham,
>
>Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
>> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the
>> > entire migration. Rest stuff lo
On 2021-12-01 17:06:00 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi Graham,
>
> Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> > On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the
> > > entire migration. Rest stuff lo
Hi Graham,
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 01:33:15PM +0200 schrieb Graham Inggs:
> On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> > One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire
> > migration. Rest stuff looks okay.
>
> There's at least one more regression; in gffread
Hi,
Am Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:29:45PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
>
> One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire
> migration.
Its not "only" on i386 if I'm correctly but it randomly happens on different
architectures. I've now deactivated the according test so
Hi Nilesh
On Wed, 1 Dec 2021 at 13:03, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> One i386 autopkgtest failure for r-bioc-biocparallel is stalling the entire
> migration. Rest stuff looks okay.
There's at least one more regression; in gffread, caused by
r-bioc-gviz [1]. Please check that each r-bioc* package is re
On 24 November 2021 12:37:49 am IST, Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
>Control: tags -1 = confirmed
>
>On 2021-11-23 23:32:46, Nilesh Patra wrote:
>> Hi Sebastian,
>>
>> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:46:56 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
>> wrote:
>> > > Hi,
>> > > Bioconductor 3.14 was released [1].
>> > >
>> > >
On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 08:07:49PM +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Please go ahead.
Thanks a lot.
@All,
me and Andreas have kick started the transition. Right now, we are at dependency
level 2.
Should you have free cycles, do not hesitate to chime in.
Here is the tracker for $more info[1]
[1
Processing control commands:
> tags -1 = confirmed
Bug #998057 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-bioc-3.14
Added tag(s) confirmed.
--
998057: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998057
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
Control: tags -1 = confirmed
On 2021-11-23 23:32:46, Nilesh Patra wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:46:56 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > > Bioconductor 3.14 was released [1].
> > >
> > > [1] https://bioconductor.org/news/bioc_3_14_release/
> > >
> > > Like for
Hi Sebastian,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2021 17:46:56 +0100 Sebastian Ramacher
wrote:
> > Hi,
> > Bioconductor 3.14 was released [1].
> >
> > [1] https://bioconductor.org/news/bioc_3_14_release/
> >
> > Like for previous r-api-bioc transitions, all reverse dependencies
> > need a manual upgrade to the new
Processing control commands:
> block -1 by 998192
Bug #998057 [release.debian.org] transition: r-api-bioc-3.14
998057 was not blocked by any bugs.
998057 was not blocking any bugs.
Added blocking bug(s) of 998057: 998192
> forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-api-bioc-3.14.ht
Control: block -1 by 998192
Control: forwarded -1
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/r-api-bioc-3.14.html
On 2021-10-29 10:32:25 +0200, Dylan Aïssi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-CC
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-CC: debia...@lists.debian.org
Hi,
Bioconductor 3.14 was released [1].
[1] https://bioconductor.org/news/bioc_3_14_release/
Like for previous r-api-bioc transitions, all rever
20 matches
Mail list logo
