Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-07-02 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 01:43 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 06/30/2013 01:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Yes, but please either adjust the version to be -9+deb7u1 or include the > > -9.1 changelog and make the stable stanza a "rebuild for wheezy" or > > something similar. > > Done and uploade

Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Adam, Thanks for your explanations about numbering, it makes sense indeed. On 06/30/2013 01:11 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > For one thing, the package isn't targetted at squeeze. ;-) Wooops! :) It's going to take me a year or 2 until I get used to it. Oh wait, that's when Jessie will be out.

Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Sun, 2013-06-30 at 00:59 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > On 06/29/2013 06:43 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Please add an appropriate Closes: to the changelog and use 1.4.2 > > +git20120612-9.1~deb7u1 as the version for an upload targetted at > > "wheezy". [...] > The "Closes:" is obvious and I w

Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-29 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/29/2013 06:43 PM, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 22:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as >> a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch applied cleanly, and we have >> tested it, it really fixes the bug as we

Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-29 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Tue, 2013-06-25 at 22:19 +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as > a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch applied cleanly, and we have > tested it, it really fixes the bug as we expected. We now use the > attached patch in product

Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
On 06/26/2013 12:27 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > I am currently working on a 1.9.x upload for sid. It's not ready > (some lintian complaints that I agree with and want to fix). Would > you prefer to get this fix through the above process before I upload, > then? Hi Ben, Thanks a lot for the quick rep

Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-25 Thread Jesse Gross
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:27 AM, Ben Pfaff wrote: > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:19:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: >> Hi Ben Pfaff, Jesse Gross, the release team, and others, >> >> Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as >> a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch

Re: Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-25 Thread Ben Pfaff
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 10:19:13PM +0800, Thomas Goirand wrote: > Hi Ben Pfaff, Jesse Gross, the release team, and others, > > Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as > a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch applied cleanly, and we have > tested it, it really fix

Bug fix for "openvswitch-datapath-dkms: packet don't pass in postrouting iptables table"

2013-06-25 Thread Thomas Goirand
Hi Ben Pfaff, Jesse Gross, the release team, and others, Mehdi found out the upstream bug fix for this, and I incorporated it as a patch for the Wheezy version. The patch applied cleanly, and we have tested it, it really fixes the bug as we expected. We now use the attached patch in production. I