Re: GNUstep Software for Sarge

2004-08-16 Thread Wouter Verhelst
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:06:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote: It's not realistic to expect the ftpmasters to prioritize package name changes above other tasks that are critical for the release. Except that the GNUstep packages have been critized over and over again for polluting the package

GNUstep Software for Sarge

2004-08-15 Thread Gürkan Sengün
Hello Steve Langasek suggested me I re-upload my gnustep packages without the binary package rename. I know they happened late, but I think it's good they happened now. The latest GNUstep tarball release got an update that is binary incompatible to the old ones. So all needed a rebuild, great

Re: GNUstep Software for Sarge

2004-08-15 Thread Matthias Klose
Please can you identify the packages in the new queue, which are currently in testing, and which are new (not in testing)? Thanks; Matthias Gürkan Sengün writes: Hello Steve Langasek suggested me I re-upload my gnustep packages without the binary package rename. I know they happened late,

Re: GNUstep Software for Sarge

2004-08-15 Thread Gürkan Sengün
Please can you identify the packages in the new queue, which are currently in testing, and which are new (not in testing)? Yes of course, New: gnuwash mpdcon plopfolio agenda displaycalibrator volumecontrol helpviewer preview connect Already in sid/testing: camera mknfonts textedit viewpdf

Re: GNUstep Software for Sarge

2004-08-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:34:26AM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote: Steve Langasek suggested me I re-upload my gnustep packages without the binary package rename. I know they happened late, but I think it's good they happened now. The latest GNUstep tarball release got an update that is binary