On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 02:06:23PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
It's not realistic to expect the ftpmasters to prioritize package name
changes above other tasks that are critical for the release.
Except that the GNUstep packages have been critized over and over again
for polluting the package
Hello
Steve Langasek suggested me I re-upload my gnustep packages without the binary
package rename. I know they happened late, but I think it's good they happened
now. The latest GNUstep tarball release got an update that is binary
incompatible to
the old ones. So all needed a rebuild, great
Please can you identify the packages in the new queue, which are
currently in testing, and which are new (not in testing)?
Thanks; Matthias
Gürkan Sengün writes:
Hello
Steve Langasek suggested me I re-upload my gnustep packages without the binary
package rename. I know they happened late,
Please can you identify the packages in the new queue, which are
currently in testing, and which are new (not in testing)?
Yes of course,
New:
gnuwash
mpdcon
plopfolio
agenda
displaycalibrator
volumecontrol
helpviewer
preview
connect
Already in sid/testing:
camera
mknfonts
textedit
viewpdf
On Sun, Aug 15, 2004 at 11:34:26AM +0100, Gürkan Sengün wrote:
Steve Langasek suggested me I re-upload my gnustep packages without the binary
package rename. I know they happened late, but I think it's good they happened
now. The latest GNUstep tarball release got an update that is binary
5 matches
Mail list logo