On Wed, Jun 16, 2004 at 10:54:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> thanks for adding the hints. I have however one question:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 12:25]:
> > On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > > # segfaults; report from 2004-03-30
> > > # no
Hi,
thanks for adding the hints. I have however one question:
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 12:25]:
> On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> > # segfaults; report from 2004-03-30
> > # no maintainer reaction
> > # depends: axkit-language-htmldoc
> > # bui
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> # suggestions from 2004-06-09
> # build-dependency disappeared; report from 2004-05-02; no maintainer reaction
> # no dependencies
> # 246963
> remove dchub/0.4.5-2
Hinted.
> # security issue; report from 2004-04-27; no maintainer
Hi,
some more removal suggestions. I now put my minimum time frame to 21
days. As usual, I consider my suggestions to be a bit agressive.
# suggestions from 2004-06-09
# build-dependency disappeared; report from 2004-05-02; no maintainer reaction
# no dependencies
# 246963
remove dchub/0.4.5-2
On Sun, Mar 21, 2004 at 08:20:55PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Riku Voipio wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> >> Igor Genibel wrote:
> >> > Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
> >> > The upstream seems to be active and aware
> >> > ( h
Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
>> Igor Genibel wrote:
>> > Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
>> > The upstream seems to be active and aware
>> > ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225048 )
>> > and the maintain
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> Igor Genibel wrote:
> > Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
> > The upstream seems to be active and aware
> > ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225048 )
> > and the maintainer too ...
> > The package
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:22:40PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> I see that all my earlier suggestions have been dealt with. Cool!
> ==> remove kmusicdb/0.8.2-4
> KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
> ==> remove ksensors/0.7-6
> KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
Hints added for both of the above.
Le Saturday 13 March 2004 03:37, Nathanael Nerode a écrit :
> I don't think it's reasonable to release the current version, and the bug
> has sat at 'grave' since February 11 (a full month) with no visible
> progress.
Yes, I agree. I have seen that no cvs commit was done by the upstream since
ja
Igor Genibel wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Le Friday 12 March 2004 02:27, Nathanael Nerode a écrit :
>
>> remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-2
>> #225048 (data loss) and #232832
>
> Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
> The upstream seems to be active and awar
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:27:48PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote:
> remove boot-icons/0.2
> Request of the maintainer, a.k.a. bug 235862
Done.
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Le Friday 12 March 2004 02:27, Nathanael Nerode a écrit :
> remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-2
> #225048 (data loss) and #232832
Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ?
The upstream seems to be active and aware
( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bu
remove boot-icons/0.2
Request of the maintainer, a.k.a. bug 235862
remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-2
#225048 (data loss) and #232832
--
Make sure your vote will count.
http://www.verifiedvoting.org/
I see that all my earlier suggestions have been dealt with. Cool!
==> remove kmusicdb/0.8.2-4
KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
==> remove ksensors/0.7-6
KDE2 dependency, uninstallable.
A new version can eventually go in when the lm-sensors mess is
sorted out (which see below), but it's not clear
14 matches
Mail list logo
