On Wed, 2006-11-29 at 19:14 +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote:
> Afair the outcome was that it was ok to rename to libsasl2-2 and
> libsasl2-2-dev so I guess ther has been a small misunderstanding.
This was my understanding also.
> On 2006-11-29 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Anyway, th
On 2006-11-29 Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:50:53PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
>> We ask you to take a look at the cyrus-sasl2 package in unstable and
>> decide if it's fit for etch. If not, we'd appreciate a list of the
>> blocking issues. If it is fit
Hi Fabian,
On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 04:50:53PM +0200, Fabian Fagerholm wrote:
> We ask you to take a look at the cyrus-sasl2 package in unstable and
> decide if it's fit for etch. If not, we'd appreciate a list of the
> blocking issues. If it is fit for inclusion, please advise on what we
> need t
* Roberto C. Sanchez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [061125 18:07]:
> We ask you to take a look at the cyrus-sasl2 package in unstable and
> decide if it's fit for etch. If not, we'd appreciate a list of the
> blocking issues. If it is fit for inclusion, please advise on what we
> need to do, if anything.
We
[ Fabian sent this message to vorlon and to pkg-cyrus-sasl2-debian-devel
early yesterday. I've not seen a response, so I am resending and adding
debian-release. ]
- Forwarded message from Fabian Fagerholm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -
Hi!
The cyrus-sasl2 team has now reached a point where we wo
5 matches
Mail list logo
