On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 11:23:30PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> Am 29.03.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> > On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> >> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
> >> we only ship the servlet API a
Am 29.03.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
>> we only ship the servlet API and documentation in this release which
>> can't be affected by security v
Am 29.03.2016 um 23:01 schrieb Moritz Mühlenhoff:
> On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
>> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
>> we only ship the servlet API and documentation in this release which
>> can't be affected by security v
On Tue, Mar 29, 2016 at 10:03:56PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote:
> The Security Team decided to mark the issues in Jessie as no-dsa because
> we only ship the servlet API and documentation in this release which
> can't be affected by security vulnerabilities at all. I wouldn't mind
> uploading the
Am 29.03.2016 um 21:47 schrieb Adam D. Barratt:
> On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 18:39 +, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
>> Version in base suite: 6.0.35-6+deb7u1
>>
>> Base version: tomcat6_6.0.35-6+deb7u1
>> Target version: tomcat6_6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u1
>
> That leaves us in a slightly awkward position, a
On Fri, 2016-03-25 at 18:39 +, Debian Queue Viewer wrote:
> Version in base suite: 6.0.35-6+deb7u1
>
> Base version: tomcat6_6.0.35-6+deb7u1
> Target version: tomcat6_6.0.45+dfsg-1~deb7u1
That leaves us in a slightly awkward position, as stable only has
6.0.41. Is there any plan to update the
6 matches
Mail list logo