Re: Please accept linphone into sarge (was: libosip2 and libosip2-3)

2005-05-12 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 02:14:03PM +0200, Samuel Mimram wrote: > Steve Langasek wrote: > >Nevertheless, since when all is said and done the only thing that kept > >libosip2 2.2.0 out of sarge was a spurious upload to change the maintainer > >field, and siproxd missed the freeze by one day, I'm (pro

Please accept linphone into sarge (was: libosip2 and libosip2-3)

2005-05-12 Thread Samuel Mimram
Hi, Could linphone be accepted into sarge? Steve Langasek wrote: Nevertheless, since when all is said and done the only thing that kept libosip2 2.2.0 out of sarge was a spurious upload to change the maintainer field, and siproxd missed the freeze by one day, I'm (provisionally) approving both to g