Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On December 11, 2006 at 6:40PM +0100, he (at ftwca.de) wrote:
Could you please allow wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 with the 2 line
patch to fix an IMAP connection bug for testing-proposed-updates
to replace wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-1?
Could you
On December 12, 2006 at 5:15PM +0100,
he (at ftwca.de) wrote:
Could you please allow wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 with the 2 line
patch to fix an IMAP connection bug for testing-proposed-updates
to replace wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-1?
Could you describe the bug and show the diff (for
Please allow wl-beta_2.15.5+0.20061203-1 into etch. It is 7 days
old, and no RC bugs.
It is a new upstream version and the diff is not small, but the
changes are mostly bug fixes, and no new/significant features.
Most important bug fixed in this version is that IMAP connection
fails on some
Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please allow wl-beta_2.15.5+0.20061203-1 into etch. It is 7 days
old, and no RC bugs.
It is a new upstream version and the diff is not small, but the
changes are mostly bug fixes, and no new/significant features.
Sorry, I will not add a unblock
On December 11, 2006 at 6:06PM +0100,
he (at ftwca.de) wrote:
Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please allow wl-beta_2.15.5+0.20061203-1 into etch. It is 7 days
old, and no RC bugs.
It is a new upstream version and the diff is not small, but the
changes are mostly bug fixes,
Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
he (at ftwca.de) wrote:
Tatsuya Kinoshita [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please allow wl-beta_2.15.5+0.20061203-1 into etch. It is 7 days
old, and no RC bugs.
It is a new upstream version and the diff is not small, but the
changes are mostly bug fixes,
On December 11, 2006 at 6:40PM +0100,
he (at ftwca.de) wrote:
Could you please allow wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-2 with the 2 line
patch to fix an IMAP connection bug for testing-proposed-updates
to replace wl-beta_2.15.4+0.20061015-1?
Could you describe the bug and show the diff (for
7 matches
Mail list logo
