Re: two removal suggestions awl and gem

2008-09-02 Thread Andreas Henriksson
On mån, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: - gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more than two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the non-RC bugs: a segfault unsanswered by the maintainer for 8 months, a new

Re: Bug#421560: two removal suggestions awl and gem

2008-09-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
Andreas Henriksson wrote: On mån, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: - gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more than two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the non-RC bugs: a segfault unsanswered by the maintainer for

Re: Bug#421560: two removal suggestions awl and gem

2008-09-02 Thread IOhannes m zmoelnig
IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: Andreas Henriksson wrote: On mån, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: - gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more than two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the non-RC bugs: a segfault unsanswered

two removal suggestions awl and gem

2008-09-01 Thread Thomas Viehmann
Hi, two removal suggestions for lenny: - awl: initial upload in mid-July, does not properly build from source, is RC-buggy (#493687). - gem: multiple RC bugs with NMU proposal without comment for more than two months, but also seems in bad shape from looking at the non-RC

Re: Bug#493687: two removal suggestions awl and gem

2008-09-01 Thread Andrew McMillan
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Hi, two removal suggestions for lenny: - awl: initial upload in mid-July, does not properly build from source, is RC-buggy (#493687). Hi, I'll fix the bugs in AWL this week but I'm happy for this, since the point of having

Re: Bug#493687: two removal suggestions awl and gem

2008-09-01 Thread Luk Claes
Andrew McMillan wrote: On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 21:06 +0200, Thomas Viehmann wrote: Hi, two removal suggestions for lenny: - awl: initial upload in mid-July, does not properly build from source, is RC-buggy (#493687). Hi, I'll fix the bugs in AWL this week but I'm happy

Re: removal suggestions

2004-10-15 Thread Steve Langasek
On Thu, Oct 14, 2004 at 08:00:49PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: two suggestions of me. # ROM, outdated, #274992 remove python-xml-0.6/0.6.6-3 # RC since long time, #188448 remove abuse-sdl/1:0.7.0-1 Hints added. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: removal suggestions

2004-10-15 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
Steve Langasek wrote: # RC since long time, #188448 remove abuse-sdl/1:0.7.0-1 Hints added. Another removal suggestion: With the removal of doomlegacy, doomlegacy-data become superfluous for sarge. Probably for sid well as well, if no one wants to reupload a fixed doomlegacy package without

removal suggestions

2004-10-14 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, two suggestions of me. # ROM, outdated, #274992 remove python-xml-0.6/0.6.6-3 # RC since long time, #188448 remove abuse-sdl/1:0.7.0-1 Cheers, Andi -- http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/ PGP 1024/89FB5CE5 DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F 3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-10-11 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
# 20041011 # changes to 20041010: # + add dhcping # + remove mico (conflict bugs have been fixed in other packages) # + add amavis-stats # + add bbdate # + add ccrypt # changes to 20041009: # + don't comment thrust out, only rdepends is a meta-package # which can easily be fixed # + don't

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-10-10 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
Updated my virtual hint file On Sat, Oct 09, 2004 at 02:58:06PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I've gathered some removal suggestions (where I was unsure if we should break the depending packages I left the remove hint commented out, so that one can dump the following list directly

Removal suggestions

2004-10-09 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
I've gathered some removal suggestions (where I was unsure if we should break the depending packages I left the remove hint commented out, so that one can dump the following list directly into a hint file) # 20041009 # #274950, unclear license situation # much rdepends: linda, irssi-scripts, tpp

Re: removal suggestions

2004-09-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Sep 14, 2004 at 02:23:03AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: # RoM: 271051 remove xen/1.2-4.1 # RoM (me): 270461 # (current discussions with the maintainers indicate that the BR is # valid) remove lincvs/1.3.2-3 # unusable in its current state: 218497 remove lids-2.4/1.1.1r2-5

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-09-10 Thread Turbo Fredriksson
Quoting Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: remove ccs/0.cvs20040703-2 # see 262925 remove libroxen-gdbmuserauth/1.0-7 remove libroxen-kiwilogger/1.3-4 remove libroxen-roxpoll-doc/1.3-5 remove

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-09-09 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Sep 08, 2004 at 12:52:55PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: remove ccs/0.cvs20040703-2 # see 262925 remove libroxen-gdbmuserauth/1.0-7 remove libroxen-kiwilogger/1.3-4 remove libroxen-roxpoll-doc/1.3-5 remove libroxen-templatecreator/0.4-5 remove roxen-fonts-iso8859-1/0-6 remove

Removal suggestions

2004-09-08 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
remove ccs/0.cvs20040703-2 # see 262925 remove libroxen-gdbmuserauth/1.0-7 remove libroxen-kiwilogger/1.3-4 remove libroxen-roxpoll-doc/1.3-5 remove libroxen-templatecreator/0.4-5 remove roxen-fonts-iso8859-1/0-6 remove roxen-fonts-iso8859-2/0-6 # depend all on removed roxen, should be removed or

Removal suggestions (ROM)

2004-08-31 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
The following packages should be removed from testing on RoM: rrdcollect (see #267585) omlcs (see #269192) xsim (see #267291) removal requests filed for unstable (but perhaps we want to remove them from testing faster) vis5d talksoup Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www:

Re: Removal suggestions (ROM)

2004-08-31 Thread Steve Langasek
On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 01:58:36PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: The following packages should be removed from testing on RoM: rrdcollect (see #267585) omlcs (see #269192) xsim (see #267291) removal requests filed for unstable (but perhaps we want to remove them from testing faster)

Removal suggestions

2004-08-21 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
remove doomlegacy/1.41release-1 doomlegacy-data/1.41release-1 # RC bugs, licensing issues remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2 # RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing # we can't provide atm remove mindterm/1.2.1-10 # See #263362 Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-08-21 Thread Andreas Barth
* Frank Lichtenheld ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040822 00:55]: remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2 # RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing # we can't provide atm Needs also to remove jsboard-theme-diary-ko/0.5-1 jsboard-theme-trash-ko/0.5-1 jsboard-theme-aicom-ko/0.5-1

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-08-21 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Aug 22, 2004 at 12:36:16AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: remove doomlegacy/1.41release-1 doomlegacy-data/1.41release-1 # RC bugs, licensing issues remove jsboard/2.0.4-1.2 # RC bug, the patch seems somewhat dubios to me and requires testing # we can't provide atm remove

Re: Removal suggestions

2004-07-17 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sat, Jul 17, 2004 at 03:54:52AM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: remove roleplaying/2.0-10 RC bug, ITA, but adopter is slow... remove lush/1.0+cvs.2003.07.15 RC bug, orphaned, upstream issue, long standing. Both hinted. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc

Removal suggestions

2004-07-16 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
remove roleplaying/2.0-10 RC bug, ITA, but adopter is slow... remove lush/1.0+cvs.2003.07.15 RC bug, orphaned, upstream issue, long standing. Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

further removal suggestions

2004-06-18 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, a next round of removal suggestions. I'm fairly certain that the removal suggestion on kdebase will not be taken (and I wouldn't put it in a file if I could directly enter hints), and also the hint on libdvdnav is doubtable. Also, please note, that, as always, my removal suggestions

Re: further removal suggestions

2004-06-18 Thread Russ Allbery
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # Package: gaim (optional; Robert McQueen)remove gaim/1:0.77-1 # 248867 [ ] gaim: Gaim 0.77 crashes with SIGSEGV when entering text when using MSN over HTTP method # no maintainer reaction; no dependencies remove gaim/1:0.77-1 This bug

Re: further removal suggestions

2004-06-18 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 12:31:00PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote: Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: # Package: gaim (optional; Robert McQueen)remove gaim/1:0.77-1 # 248867 [ ] gaim: Gaim 0.77 crashes with SIGSEGV when entering text when using MSN over HTTP method # no

Re: further removal suggestions

2004-06-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
On Fri, Jun 18, 2004 at 06:51:27PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: # Package: pbbuttonsd (optional; Jan-Hendrik Palic)remove pbbuttonsd/0.5.3a-2 # 244361 [ + ] pbbuttonsd: FTBFS: Cannot find depcomp # no maintainer reaction remove pbbuttonsd/0.5.3a-2 # kdeutils has an unsatisfied

Re: more removal suggestions

2004-06-16 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, thanks for adding the hints. I have however one question: * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040614 12:25]: On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: # segfaults; report from 2004-03-30 # no maintainer reaction # depends: axkit-language-htmldoc #

Re: more removal suggestions

2004-06-14 Thread Steve Langasek
On Wed, Jun 09, 2004 at 12:09:41AM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: # suggestions from 2004-06-09 # build-dependency disappeared; report from 2004-05-02; no maintainer reaction # no dependencies # 246963 remove dchub/0.4.5-2 Hinted. # security issue; report from 2004-04-27; no maintainer

more removal suggestions

2004-06-08 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, some more removal suggestions. I now put my minimum time frame to 21 days. As usual, I consider my suggestions to be a bit agressive. # suggestions from 2004-06-09 # build-dependency disappeared; report from 2004-05-02; no maintainer reaction # no dependencies # 246963 remove dchub/0.4.5-2

aggressive removal suggestions

2004-05-23 Thread Andreas Barth
Hi, as just promised on IRC, here are some aggressive removal suggestions. They probably need some re-viewing. # kernels that have already a newer version in testing: # ignore d-i kernel-image-2.4.25-s390/2.4.25-2 remove kernel-image-2.4.21-s390/2.4.21-2 # ignore version kernel-patch-2.4.25

Re: removal suggestions

2004-04-26 Thread Andreas Barth
* Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [040426 04:40]: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 03:41:22PM +0200, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: I was going through the RC bug list while preparing the BSP. The following packages are IMHO candidates for removal from testing. kernel-headers-2.2.20-sparc

Re: removal suggestions

2004-04-25 Thread Steve Langasek
). Four weeks. Hinted. And there are many kernel removal suggestions (as RC bugs) for kernel-headers-2.2.20-sparc kernel-image-2.2.20-sun4dm-smp kernel-image-2.4.17-s390 kernel-patch-2.2-lids kernel-patch-2.2.17-vm-global kernel-patch-2.2.18-vm-global kernel-patch-2.2.20-arm kernel-patch

removal suggestions

2004-04-15 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
-release/2004/debian-release-200403/msg00121.html for a reasoning. And there are many kernel removal suggestions (as RC bugs) for kernel-headers-2.2.20-sparc kernel-image-2.2.20-sun4dm-smp kernel-image-2.4.17-s390 kernel-patch-2.2-lids kernel-patch-2.2.17-vm-global kernel-patch-2.2.18-vm-global kernel

Re: Removal suggestions due to uninstallability

2004-03-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 09:44:35PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: ... | All I can see is that they will become installable in testing ass soon | as netsaint-plugins enters testing, and netsaint-plugins is waiting for | PostgreSQL. You mean nagios-plugins, right? Yes, my fault. | What

Re: More removal suggestions

2004-03-21 Thread Riku Voipio
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Igor Genibel wrote: Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ? The upstream seems to be active and aware ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225048 ) and the maintainer too ... The package is up to

Re: More removal suggestions

2004-03-21 Thread Nathanael Nerode
Riku Voipio wrote: On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 09:37:15PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: Igor Genibel wrote: Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ? The upstream seems to be active and aware ( http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=225048 ) and the maintainer too ...

Re: removal suggestions

2004-03-20 Thread Colin Watson
On Fri, Mar 19, 2004 at 01:15:55AM +0100, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: remove pointless/0.4-3 latex2html transition required, no reaction from maintainer (#221342) remove sear-media/0.4.6-1 RoM (#238492) remove sear/0.4.6-3 RoM (#238493) All done, thanks. -- Colin Watson

Removal suggestions due to uninstallability

2004-03-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
So, the nagios mess does not look close to being fixed. The following packages have no installable binaries in 'testing' (except nagios-nrpe-doc, which seems kind of silly when none of the other packages are installable.) remove nagios-nrpe/2.0-2 remove nagios-statd/3.09-3 remove nagios/2:1.1-11

Re: Removal suggestions due to uninstallability

2004-03-20 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:46:28PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: So, the nagios mess does not look close to being fixed. The following packages have no installable binaries in 'testing' (except nagios-nrpe-doc, which seems kind of silly when none of the other packages are installable.) Why

Re: Removal suggestions due to uninstallability

2004-03-20 Thread Nathanael Nerode
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Adrian Bunk wrote: | On Sat, Mar 20, 2004 at 06:46:28PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: | |So, the nagios mess does not look close to being fixed. |The following packages have no installable binaries in 'testing' (except |nagios-nrpe-doc, which seems

removal suggestions

2004-03-18 Thread Frank Lichtenheld
remove pointless/0.4-3 latex2html transition required, no reaction from maintainer (#221342) remove sear-media/0.4.6-1 RoM (#238492) remove sear/0.4.6-3 RoM (#238493) Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld [EMAIL PROTECTED] www: http://www.djpig.de/

Re: More removal suggestions

2004-03-16 Thread Steve Langasek
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 06:22:40PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: I see that all my earlier suggestions have been dealt with. Cool! == remove kmusicdb/0.8.2-4 KDE2 dependency, uninstallable. == remove ksensors/0.7-6 KDE2 dependency, uninstallable. Hints added for both of the above.

Re: More removal suggestions

2004-03-13 Thread Igor Genibel
Le Saturday 13 March 2004 03:37, Nathanael Nerode a écrit : I don't think it's reasonable to release the current version, and the bug has sat at 'grave' since February 11 (a full month) with no visible progress. Yes, I agree. I have seen that no cvs commit was done by the upstream since

Re: More removal suggestions

2004-03-12 Thread Igor Genibel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Le Friday 12 March 2004 02:27, Nathanael Nerode a écrit : remove dovecot/0.99.10.4-2 #225048 (data loss) and #232832 Could you explain your motivation about dovecot ? The upstream seems to be active and aware (

Re: More removal suggestions

2004-03-12 Thread Colin Watson
On Thu, Mar 11, 2004 at 08:27:48PM -0500, Nathanael Nerode wrote: remove boot-icons/0.2 Request of the maintainer, a.k.a. bug 235862 Done. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]

More hinting (simple removal) suggestions.

2003-12-31 Thread Nathanael Nerode
== remove rocks-n-diamonds/2.0.0-0.2 May not be distributable; see bug #210233 == remove mindi-kernel/1.0-1 No source; see bug #217160 == remove kernel-image-3.4.18-i386bf Boot-floppies image, useless in sarge == remove iraf/2.11.3-2 FTBFS, major FHS violation, binary with same name as one in

Re: More hinting (simple removal) suggestions.

2003-12-31 Thread Joerg Jaspert
Nathanael Nerode [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: == remove kernel-image-3.4.18-i386bf Boot-floppies image, useless in sarge 3.4-2.4? :) -- bye Joerg elmo [..] trying to avoid extra dependencies on gnumeric is like trying to plug one hole in the titantic with a bit of tissue paper