Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-19 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 01:28:57 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > It is no big deal if Scilab is not available under mips. If it is ok > with you, we could go in this direction. In that case please file a bug against ftp.debian.org. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le vendredi 19 novembre 2010 à 01:24 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 00:55:55 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, N

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 00:55:55 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > > > > Does asking

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > > Does asking for a rebuild/reupload of libjogl-jni under mips would be > > > enough ? or

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-18 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le jeudi 18 novembre 2010 à 23:32 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > > > Does asking for a rebuild/reupload of libjogl-jni under mips would be > > > enough ? or

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-18 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 12:02:58 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > > > Does asking for a rebuild/reupload of libjogl-jni under mips would be > > enough ? or do I need to upload a new version of jogl ? > > > I've scheduled a binNMU, le

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:36:51 +0100, Sylvestre Ledru wrote: > Does asking for a rebuild/reupload of libjogl-jni under mips would be > enough ? or do I need to upload a new version of jogl ? > I've scheduled a binNMU, let's see if that works. Cheers, Julien signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-17 Thread Sylvestre Ledru
Le mercredi 17 novembre 2010 à 11:30 +0100, Julien Cristau a écrit : > Helps if I actually add the cc... > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:27:28 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 23:15:33 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > > > On 2010-11-15, Julien Cristau wrote: > > >

Re: scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-17 Thread Julien Cristau
Helps if I actually add the cc... On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:27:28 +0100, Julien Cristau wrote: > On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 23:15:33 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > > > On 2010-11-15, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > > > >> scilab: CVE-2010-3378, fixed in 5.2.2-8 > > > > > > out of date on mips

scilab migration to testing (was: Unblocks for security fixes)

2010-11-17 Thread Julien Cristau
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 23:15:33 +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: > On 2010-11-15, Julien Cristau wrote: > > > >> scilab: CVE-2010-3378, fixed in 5.2.2-8 > > > > out of date on mips: libscilab-java, scilab, scilab-cli, scilab-data, s= > > cilab-doc, scilab-doc-fr, scilab-doc-pt-br, scilab-ful

Re: Unblocks for security fixes

2010-11-16 Thread Moritz Muehlenhoff
On 2010-11-15, Julien Cristau wrote: > > --K90HjsLT/gE7/naG > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > Content-Disposition: inline > Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable > > On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:05:21 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > >> Hi, >>=20 >> When looking at the security-tracker p

Re: Unblocks for security fixes

2010-11-15 Thread Julien Cristau
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 21:05:21 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > Hi, > > When looking at the security-tracker page for testing, I noticed some of the > security bugs are fixed in unstable. > > aircrack-ng: CVE-2010-1159, fixed in 1:1.1-1 Looks unmaintained. > bind9: CVE-2010-3762, fixed in 1:9.7.2.d

Re: Unblocks for security fixes

2010-11-15 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On Mon, 2010-11-15 at 21:05 +0100, Rik Theys wrote: > When looking at the security-tracker page for testing, I noticed some > of the security bugs are fixed in unstable. Thanks for this. > aircrack-ng: CVE-2010-1159, fixed in 1:1.1-1 The changes relative to testing date back to August 2009; this

Unblocks for security fixes

2010-11-15 Thread Rik Theys
Hi, When looking at the security-tracker page for testing, I noticed some of the security bugs are fixed in unstable. aircrack-ng: CVE-2010-1159, fixed in 1:1.1-1 bind9: CVE-2010-3762, fixed in 1:9.7.2.dfsg.P2-1 cups: CVE-2010-2941, fixed in 1.4.4-7 freeradius: CVE-2010-3696 and CVE-2010-3697, fi