Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On 2016-07-28 14:36, Peter Green wrote: > > Fixed package is in sid (5.0-3) since Fri, 15 Jul > > I have installed this on the main raspbian server and I can confirm it works > for us with wanna-build. > > Note1: I had to update wanna-build, the version of wanna-build I had (which > was not bang

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

> Fixed package is in sid (5.0-3) since Fri, 15 Jul I have installed this on the main raspbian server and I can confirm it works for us with wanna-build. Note1: I had to update wanna-build, the version of wanna-build I had (which was not bang up to date but not all that old either) wouldn't

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 08:17:22PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > well, the source-only upload to jessie-backports was rejected, claiming > that architecture-independent packages have to be included. Great surprise, > that wasn't the case before. source only uploads (without arch:all binaries) to

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 05:18:43PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > Fixed package is in sid (5.0-3) since Fri, 15 Jul, should migrate to > > testing soon. I just uploaded to jessie-backports. > > It migrated to testing this morning.

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:17:03PM +0200, Ralf Treinen wrote: > Fixed package is in sid (5.0-3) since Fri, 15 Jul, should migrate to > testing soon. I just uploaded to jessie-backports. It migrated to testing this morning. -- regards, Mattia Rizzolo GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 07:04:47PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote: > Hi, > > On 13/07/16 19:19, Ralf Treinen wrote: > > I think I have found the bug, for the moment I am waiting for confirmation > > by someone more knowledgable than me about this part of the code. > > Any progress on this?

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi, On 13/07/16 19:19, Ralf Treinen wrote: > I think I have found the bug, for the moment I am waiting for confirmation > by someone more knowledgable than me about this part of the code. Any progress on this? Do you have a patch? It'd be good to fix this, as at the moment there are many

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi, On Sat, Jul 09, 2016 at 05:19:12PM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi, > > Quoting Anton Gladky (2016-07-09 16:01:21) > > is there any progress on this issue? How can we help with it? I have 3 > > pending packages, waiting to be built. > > I created a minimum test case from the data that

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi, Quoting Anton Gladky (2016-07-09 16:01:21) > is there any progress on this issue? How can we help with it? I have 3 > pending packages, waiting to be built. I created a minimum test case from the data that Aurélien provided and reported it in the upstream bug tracker:

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Dear all, is there any progress on this issue? How can we help with it? I have 3 pending packages, waiting to be built. Thanks Anton

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi all, Quoting Ralf Treinen (2016-07-05 15:51:58) > One change I also spotted only very recently is that the --latest option now > takes an integer argument. If you used -latest before you should replace it > by "--latest 1" now. from IRC, the error supposedly was: STDERR: Fatal error in

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi Aurelien, On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 03:12:06PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > Thanks a lot, I have installed it on wuiet. It seems to work fine at a > > first glance. > > Unfortunately I had to revert it to the jessie version has it doesn't > correctly compute the dependencies. It looks like

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On 2016-07-05 14:36, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On 2016-07-02 22:03, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > I have just uploaded dose3_5.0-1~bpo8+1 into jessie-backports. > > > > Thanks a lot, I have installed it on wuiet. It seems to work fine at a > first glance. Unfortunately I had to

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On 2016-07-02 22:03, Anton Gladky wrote: > Dear all, > > I have just uploaded dose3_5.0-1~bpo8+1 into jessie-backports. > Thanks a lot, I have installed it on wuiet. It seems to work fine at a first glance. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On Sat, Jul 02, 2016 at 10:03:00PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: > I have just uploaded dose3_5.0-1~bpo8+1 into jessie-backports. I was waiting for 5.0-1 to enter testing, apperently that was happening while I was on the plane for debconf. So, thanks for having done the upload! Cheers -Ralf.

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Dear all, I have just uploaded dose3_5.0-1~bpo8+1 into jessie-backports. Thanks Anton 2016-06-29 11:37 GMT+02:00 Ralf Treinen : > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 07:34:03AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: >> Hi Anton, >> >> Quoting Anton Gladky (2016-06-29

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi, On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 07:34:03AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote: > Hi Anton, > > Quoting Anton Gladky (2016-06-29 07:30:36) > > are you planning to upload dose3 to jessie-backports? > > I would like to ask Ralf to do that because I never did a backport upload and > would first have to

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi Johannes, are you planning to upload dose3 to jessie-backports? Thanks Anton 2016-06-22 13:32 GMT+02:00 Johannes Schauer : > Hi all, > > Quoting Pietro Abate (2016-06-22 11:44:59) > > Hei josh, can you check this branch ? > > > > dose3.5.0-debian-jessie > > > > I don't

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi Anton, Quoting Anton Gladky (2016-06-29 07:30:36) > are you planning to upload dose3 to jessie-backports? I would like to ask Ralf to do that because I never did a backport upload and would first have to familiarize myself with all the policies and technicalities for which I currently do not

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi all, Quoting Pietro Abate (2016-06-22 11:44:59) > Hei josh, can you check this branch ? > > dose3.5.0-debian-jessie > > I don't have a vm with debian jessie ready, but I've used an opam > switch that should be close enough to what we ave in jessie. thanks to Pietro we now have a patch that

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Hi all, Quoting Emilio Pozuelo Monfort (2016-06-20 20:52:32) > On 20/06/16 20:17, Anton Gladky wrote: > > Dear release team, > > > > I am not sure, whether I ask the question, using > > the correct address. If I am not right, please redirect > > me. > > > > Two of my packages (liggghts and

Re: Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

On 20/06/16 20:17, Anton Gladky wrote: > Dear release team, > > I am not sure, whether I ask the question, using > the correct address. If I am not right, please redirect > me. > > Two of my packages (liggghts and yade) are waiting to > be build on build servers due to unsatisfied dependency >

Unsattisfied dependency python-cffi-backend-api-min (<= 9729)

Dear release team, I am not sure, whether I ask the question, using the correct address. If I am not right, please redirect me. Two of my packages (liggghts and yade) are waiting to be build on build servers due to unsatisfied dependency with the following note: = liggghts build-depends