On 2016-11-24 08:24, Andreas Tille wrote:
I'll checkout gtkdataboxmm myself since I was once sponsering this - no
idea whether Daniele remains active on this package.
I haven't used gtkdataboxmm for a long time now, and I'm no longer
developing it upstream.
I think that, unless someone wants t
On 24/11/16 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
The other problem is that libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev should not be any
more in the pool at all and I have no idea why this is the case.
Binary packages that are no longer built by a source package are not removed
instantly, they will be cleaned up by t
On 2016-11-24 9:04, Andreas Tille wrote:
The other problem is that libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev should not be any
more in the pool at all and I have no idea why this is the case.
As with almost every other transition, it's still in the archive because
other packages in the archive still {,build-}
Hi Adrian,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:27:18AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> >
> > I'm now realising that the first option has installable candidates which
> > is astonishing since I assumed that with a new source package upload the
> > binaries created by the previous version would vanish from the
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:40:43AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote:
> >
> > brp-pacu: has a build-dependency on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev |
> > libgtkdatabox-dev . Unfortunately buildds only look at the first option
>
> I'm
[Andreas Tille]
>> xoscope: build-depends on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev explicitly
I'll take care of this one, if the maintainer do not fix it quickly. I
just submitted a patch to BTS solving the build problem by changing
libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev go libgtkdatabox-dev.
Thank you for the warning.
Hi again,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote:
>
> brp-pacu: has a build-dependency on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev |
> libgtkdatabox-dev . Unfortunately buildds only look at the first option
I'm now realising that the first option has installable candidates which
is astonis
Hi Peter,
On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote:
> As a derivative maintainer I noticed that there appears to be a gtkdatabox
> transition going on. Looking at the list archives for debian-release I see
> no mention of it on there.
That might have been a race condition since
As a derivative maintainer I noticed that there appears to be a
gtkdatabox transition going on. Looking at the list archives for
debian-release I see no mention of it on there.
Specifically it seems that the libgtkdatabox source package has renamed
every binary package it generates.
libgtkda
9 matches
Mail list logo
