Hi!
Please unblock libapache-mod-log-sql 1.100-14. It has very few changes:
updated dependency to apache2-mpm-prefork (= 2.0.53) | apache2-mpm-itk
instead of just apache2-mpm-prefork (= 2.0.53), plus added a bit of doc
on how to create the tables. This closes 2 bugs in the BTS.
Interdiff between
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Hi!
Please unblock libapache-mod-log-sql 1.100-14. It has very few changes:
updated dependency to apache2-mpm-prefork (= 2.0.53) | apache2-mpm-itk
instead of just apache2-mpm-prefork (= 2.0.53), plus added a bit of doc
on how to create the tables. This closes 2 bugs
* Thomas Goirand ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [070330 17:46]:
I think these 2 packages are ok to be uploaded to Etch before its out as
the new stable. They are currently only in SID. These 2 have been in
production in many servers without issues so far.
Then you should've requested that far earlier. We
::CBC module
libapache-mod-log-sql - Use SQL to store/write your apache queries logs
Thomas Goirand
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGDSxTl4M9yZjvmkkRAvZEAKCPgLBCtn2KXzyZ4sagmMoUnJYKWgCcC/73
to emulate Perl's Crypt::CBC module
libapache-mod-log-sql - Use SQL to store/write your apache queries logs
New packages aren't added to testing during the freeze, let alone a week
before release.
Cheers,
Julien
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
Just sending a quick mail to ask if it was possible to upload this
package (libapache-mod-log-sql) from Unstable to Testing. I've been
using it in production since quite a long time now, and it seems to work
rather well. I'd be very happy
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Just sending a quick mail to ask if it was possible to upload this
package (libapache-mod-log-sql) from Unstable to Testing. I've been
using it in production since quite a long time now, and it seems to work
rather well. I'd be very happy if it could be included
Thomas Goirand wrote:
Maybe libapache-mod-log-sql only then (which was my first idea). That
one is ok, right?
Yes, this package is fine, but it was not part of any stable release
yet, and it's imho too new in Debian to be considered.
I think, release-team will not grant an exception here
8 matches
Mail list logo