Processed: Re: Bug#707880: pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-21 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Processing control commands: > tags -1 + pending Bug #707880 [release.debian.org] pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1 Added tag(s) pending. -- 707880: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707880 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- To UNSUBSCR

Bug#707880: pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
Control: tags -1 + pending [recipients fixed: +bug, -list] On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 17:58 +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2013-05-21 16:57, Laszlo Kajan wrote: > > Well - so - I do not want to be a trouble maker: is it all right to > > upload, like I did, or should I have waited? In the latter ca

Re: Bug#707880: pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-21 Thread Laszlo Kajan
On 21/05/13 18:58, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2013-05-21 16:57, Laszlo Kajan wrote: >> Well - so - I do not want to be a trouble maker: is it all right to >> upload, like I did, or should I have waited? In the latter case, >> perhaps you could make that explicit on [1]. It says 'you should >> disc

Re: Bug#707880: pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2013-05-21 16:57, Laszlo Kajan wrote: Well - so - I do not want to be a trouble maker: is it all right to upload, like I did, or should I have waited? In the latter case, perhaps you could make that explicit on [1]. It says 'you should discuss'... it could be 'do not upload unless you have dis

Re: Bug#707880: pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-21 Thread Laszlo Kajan
Hello Adam! On 21/05/13 14:42, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > On 2013-05-11 23:13, Laszlo Kajan wrote: >> As we installed Wheezy on our cluster, I found that profisis is >> broken because of a bug in profnet-isis (#707874). The bug was fixed >> in later versions, but in Wheezy it is broken. I prepared a

Bug#707880: pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-21 Thread Adam D. Barratt
On 2013-05-11 23:13, Laszlo Kajan wrote: As we installed Wheezy on our cluster, I found that profisis is broken because of a bug in profnet-isis (#707874). The bug was fixed in later versions, but in Wheezy it is broken. I prepared a patch that addresses only this issue, for Wheezy (attached).

pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-12 Thread Laszlo Kajan
Dear Release Team! As we installed Wheezy on our cluster, I found that profisis is broken because of a bug in profnet-isis (#707874 [1]). The bug was fixed in later versions, but in Wheezy it is broken. I apologize for that. [1] http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=707874 I prepared

Bug#707880: pu: package profnet/1.0.21-1

2013-05-11 Thread Laszlo Kajan
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: pu -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dear release team! As we installed Wheezy on our cluster, I found that profisis is broken because of a bug in profnet-isis (#707874).