* Otavio Salvador ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060614 19:11]:
Manoj Srivastava [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One way to mitigate the problem is to propagate a fixed
update-grub script into a Sarge point release; here is a minimal
patch that should make a sarge update-grub script be STDOUT
Hi Bill,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:00:17PM +0200, Bill Allombert wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:19:27PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
work list.
Hello Andi,
there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
bugs that have version tracking used in a close message.
Good, thanks for the effort. I have just two queries here: first, since
Debian seems to
* Andreas Barth [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:50:12 +0200]:
there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
bugs that have version tracking used in a close message.
Cool, thanks.
For this reason, if you do bug
* Thijs Kinkhorst ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060615 12:33]:
Good, thanks for the effort. I have just two queries here: first, since
Debian seems to rely on this tool for the release process, wouldn't it
make sense to move it to a debian.org host (release.debian.org comes to
mind)?
Might be a good
* Adeodato Simó ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [060615 14:01]:
- make the default dist be both instead of any, so that what
people get by default is the list of bugs that must be dealt with
before we can release.
hm, IIRC we had that case before we entered sarge's base-freeze. I
personally
Aargh forgot to send this yesterday. Please cc me on any replies, I'm not
subscribed to the list.
-- Forwarded message --
A question for the stable release managers.
In bug #369359, Martin Pitt also sent a patch to fix this problem for the
sarge version of Dovecot. When I
I tend to agree with Joey on the issue, though I do think it's not
very nice that the postgresql security upgrade breaks other
packages. But going via stable-proposed-updates seems like the right
path.
Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be willing
to let it into the next
On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 05:09:24PM -0400, Jay Berkenbilt wrote:
One of my packages (libxml-xerces-perl) has failed on m68k and arm,
In this case I'd say mailing the buildd maintainers would be the way to
go. In any case, I'm requeueing for m68k since it was a buildd timeout
and nothing wrong
Andreas Barth wrote:
Hi,
...
So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
work list.
Only #311188 (debian-edu-config) remained. After some discussion with
the Debian Edu Team I started filing
Hi,
This bug is open for almost two months. As Mozilla version 1.7.13 fixes
several security bugs, please package it. If you don't have time, can I
NMU it?
Thanks,
Laszlo/GCS
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
* Andreas Barth [Tue, 30 May 2006 12:19:27 +0200]:
Adeodato Simó
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.php?pkg=tagcollarch=hppaver=1.6.2-2stamp=1148891155file=log
I reproduced this on paer, started to look at it, and since it was
messy, I put it on hold and went to do some other stuff. A week later
I
martin f krafft wrote:
I tend to agree with Joey on the issue, though I do think it's not
very nice that the postgresql security upgrade breaks other
packages. But going via stable-proposed-updates seems like the right
path.
Have you talked to the stable release team? Maybe they'd be
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 02:02:10PM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote:
* Andreas Barth [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:50:12 +0200]:
there has been a change that affects the number of visible bugs:
We treat version tracking correctly now, and ignore the done-status on
bugs that have version tracking used in
* Steve Langasek [Thu, 15 Jun 2006 15:04:56 -0700]:
Hey,
- make etch and sid exclusive, as in, list bugs present _only_ in
that distribution.
I disagree with this. I use the etch view as the (more or less, bugs not
withstanding) authoritative view of bugs that are blockers for the
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jun 14, 2006 at 05:54:43PM +0200, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
Andreas Barth [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So first, please continue to work on the RC bugs you already have, and
select at least two RC bugs from our RC bug list and add them to your
work list.
The
On Thu, Jun 15, 2006 at 08:20:34PM +0200, Luk Claes wrote:
Only #311188 (debian-edu-config) remained. After some discussion with
the Debian Edu Team I started filing wishlist bugs to the packages where
debian-edu-config would gain by having a way to change the conffiles of
these package
17 matches
Mail list logo
