> It is now out of NEW - kudos to the ftpmaster who fast-tracked it - and
> built on all architectures.
> Could you please schedule binNMUs of nautilus-cd-burner, nautilus,
> music-applet, mail-notification, link-monitor-applet and gnome-mount?
Scheduled, along with binNMUs for nau
e is very small if you except the two file that have been
> mistakenly added in 2.3.6.ds1-12 (see below).
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
fixes uploaded via testing-proposed-updates.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIB
> tor 0.1.2.8-beta-1
> ntop 3:3.2-9
> postfix 2.3.7-4
> Can those pacakges be binNMUd so they use the defines instead?
These have been scheduled for the 6 affected architectures, with the
exception of tor which is only affected in experimental.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek G
e request of the security team. Thanks to Moritz
> for the kick who upgraded #409703 to serious.
> So please unblock sql-ledger/2.6.22-2
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I
ause it hasn't
been tested yet with the official linux-2.6 package. The patches all seem
reasonable, but I wouldn't want to accidentally cause any regressions here.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it
fter the Etch freeze. Could 'rivet
> 0.5.0-3.1' also be migrated to testing?
This package is not in testing. Oddly, I also don't have any record of why
and when it was removed from testing?
Anyway, unblocked as well. FWIW, this package's upstream clean target isn't
very g
is corrected but I would like to
> know whether maintainer or non-maintainer uploads of such packages in
> t-p-u with only changes to debian/po/*po would be OK for you.
That would need to be considered on a case-by-case basis.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long en
gt; ANSI fix.
> But this is not really a strong request, the package is already in good
> shape in Etch and I would understand that you prefer not to unblock it
> only for small things.
Looks small to me (ANSI type changes are easy to review). Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
e for any
random other package that might happen to be built against a previous
version of libblkid1, no?)
Anyway, cc:ed to Frans to get input from the d-i side.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
d you please unblock it?
Yes, unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
ncludes a regression in the translation support for Czech, Swedish,
Danish, Italian, and Bokmal due to new, untranslated strings. Have you
requested updates from these translation teams?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to
D_REENTRANT -fPIC $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g
%.o: %.c
- gcc $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g
+ gcc $< -o $@ -c -Wall -O2 -g -fno-strict-aliasing
clean:
-rm -f *~ *.o *.lo $(BINARY)
What is the reason for this change, not documented in the Debian changelog?
(Why does a native packa
lusion of the
> Japanese translation of the debconf templates (closes: #413222, diffs
> attached below).
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[
t; +++ crossvc-1.5.0/debian/compat
> @@ -1 +1 @@
> -4
> +5
Please don't change debhelper levels during a freeze.
Otherwise, yes, this looks like an important change to have for the package
in etch.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
D
ve the maintainer, Pierre
> Chifflier, do it)?
Yes, this would be ok. (Hmm, only 3 translations? :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
++
debian/po/pt.po | 76 +
udev-0.105/debian/changelog |7 +++
udev-0.105/rules/persistent.rules | 16 +--
4 files changed, 172 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
nl, you say? :)
Unblocked, anyway.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langas
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 03:36:31PM -0800, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Could you unblock the following translation-only updates? Changelogs are
> below. Thanks!
> kerberos-configs 1.15 (just uploaded)
> krb5 1.4.4-7
> openafs 1.4.2-5
> rssh 2.3.2-2
Yep, all unblocked.
Thanks,
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:52:54AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> I made an upload of mol which fixes pending debconf translations
> and the clean rule in debian/rules. Please consider it for
> unblocking. Thanks.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a l
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:58:06AM +0100, Aurélien GÉRÔME wrote:
> I made an upload of ircd-hybrid which fixes pending debconf
> translations, an etch-ignore RC bug, and some minor bits. Please
> consider it for unblocking. Thanks.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
.php example file (Closes: #412655).
>* Add XS-Vcs-* fields to debian/control.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[
y do whatever possible to move
things forward ahead of schedule, even if it's just to give you more slack
elsewhere in the schedule.
> If someone feels this is a bad idea, please speak up :-)
Sounds good to me. It's nice to see we're getting close!
--
Steve Langasek
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 02:24:20PM +1100, Drew Parsons wrote:
> Dear Release Masters,
> could you kindly allow xprint 1.1.99.3+git20060910-9 into etch?
> It contains a Galician debconf translation and fixes some incorrect
> symlinks.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek
ble) before today dinstall run, when it'll get overwriten by
> the newer version. The 7.0.0-4 has been in unstable for 5 days.
Unblocked and bumped the urgency, but getting this in depends on someone
being available to trigger a britney rerun before the next dinstall.
--
Steve Langasek
oad?
If you have the permission of the maintainer for this, it's ok with me.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
behavior change that, correct
or not, may cause regressions in other packages that depend on the *current*
behavior, I don't think this should be unblocked at this late stage.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
the previous version is not currently in etch afaik.
Yes, and I'm afraid the code changes in 1.8.30 aren't something I'm willing
to let through; the shell code is subtle enough that my eyes are likely to
start bleeding before I'm able to give it a thorough review.
Sorry,
--
Steve
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:18:50AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Quoting Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 09:39:52AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> > > The nufw package currently has a 1.0.23-1.1 version in unstable. The
> > > vers
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 01:31:25PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> pth 2.0.7-5 removes libpthread and pth 2.0.7-6 re-adds the sarge
> conflicts. Please unblock it for etch migration, debdiff is attached.
Unblocked. Thanks for fixing the conflicts.
--
Steve Langasek Giv
RY)
> >
> > What is the reason for this change, not documented in the Debian changelog?
> This is to shut up a compiler warning on x86_64. Non-user visible
> changes are not documented in debian changelog.
Well, I'm not certain myself that this is completely user-invisible,
gt; IMO that would be violation of the source requirements, even if the change
> does not affect the udeb.
I don't see any reason to think that's a violation of the source
requirements. What is the basis for this assertion?
Version skew in compilers and gcc has a much greater effe
On Sun, Mar 04, 2007 at 08:19:44AM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 09:06:23PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > It's acceptable to me; the final d-i images haven't been spun yet for etch,
> > and anyway a one-line change for a shlibs fix isn't exac
e :/
> Could I have the permission to upload directly to testing? package
> version is 1.7.9-1etch1, same changes than 1.7.9-2.
This is an (undeclared!) RC bug, so yes, please do.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
ixed patch.
Also, urgency further bumped so we get it into testing ASAP to avoid
delaying d-i rc2.
BTW, why .gtkrc-2.0.32 and .gtkrc-2.0.64, instead of e.g., .gtkrc-2.0-32?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to s
this is somewhat at the limits of what t-p-u can reasonably
handle.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
ing from etch?
Yes, unless you're saying we should ship gnomemeeting *instead* of the
RC-buggy ekiga we now have.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
s does not impact the debian installer.
The only change I find in the uploaded package, aside from the pruning of
the arch metadata (which is welcome, though it makes reviewing this
particular interdiff painful), is to the changelog. Am I overlooking
something?
--
Steve Langasek
ar from being an important bugfix), but under the
circumstances I'll allow it and hope I don't regret it later.
Unblocked.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECT
ucts to work.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO
UND)
> +- { Verbose("Root sector search at -150 successful\n");
> +- return eh;
> ++ if(try_sector(dh, iso_size-150, &eh) == HEADER_FOUND)
> ++ { Verbose("Root sector search at -150 successful\n");
> ++ return eh;
> ++
reby request for the permission to upload a fixed 2.37.3 version
> in t-p-u with translations grabbed from unstable.
Ok.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the
x altivec detection.
Have you not closed these bugs in the changelog of your NMU?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ww
curity and Release team still preferring the removal of
> > > gnomemeeting from etch?
> > Yes, unless you're saying we should ship gnomemeeting *instead* of the
> > RC-buggy ekiga we now have.
> I don't think this is reasonable either.
I'm gl
. Could you please correct this
and reupload?
ALso, the templates seem to have inconsistent capitalization -- SQLite and
MySQL, but postgreSQL with no capital letter?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it o
t been tested in etch before now.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EM
e.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTEC
I can in a chroot, both
> by upgrading from sarge's ssh-krb5 and with a fresh install of ssh-krb5.
> The source affecting the udebs is identical to that in 1:4.3p2-8, but
> you may want to wait for it anyway ...
Unblocked, and urgency bumped to minimize the impact on the d-i schedule.
T
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 06:20:25PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 01:35 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Yes, and I'm afraid the code changes in 1.8.30 aren't something I'm willing
> > to let through; the shell code is subtle enough that my eyes ar
r platter) and
> if it becomes untenable I will support the removal"
> Below is the last email from upstream confirming support.
Is this satisfactory? Should this bug be closed?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
ng an
unblock on this package.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
in the changelog.
-7etch1 approved, in any case; if further l10n updates are needed, there's
still room for them.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ed into Etch. The changelog entry is as follows:
> apache (1.3.34-4.1) unstable; urgency=low
> .
>* Non-Mainainer Upload.
>* Revert 033_-F_NO_SETSID patch and re-fix #244857 in such a way that a
> local root hole is not created (Closes: #357561)
Unblocked.
erned that the e2fsprogs upload
happens sooner rather than later, so that d-i RC2 doesn't get held up
waiting for it.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PRO
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 08:36:19AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > > With this workaround #404876 and #407153 can either be closed or
> > > downgraded &&
> > > retitled to please enable/fix altivec detection.
>
bending the freeze guidelines is somewhat unavoidable due
to Mozilla upstream's practice of delivering security fixes in a lump sum,
but that doesn't mean I'm content to bend those guidelines for other bugs
that aren't RC at all.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a le
ansition for Etch.
All unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E
ew/ wallpaper is ugly, and request another
update for etch...
Anyway, please explain the reason for the undocumented changes above, and
I'll take a look at unblocking it.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 06:26:17PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 22:07 -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > An upload to t-p-u for the l10n updates would be ok. Fixing the dpkg
> > order-of-operations corner case also seems like it would be ok, but I
> >
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 07:51:31PM +0100, sean finney wrote:
> just going through my packages and i found an uncommitted german debconf
> translation for cacti-cactid. no other changes in this upload.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 10:35:51PM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I have just re-uploaded a NMU of mnogosearch, to fix a mistake I
> introduced in the former NMU and a spelling inconsistency in
> templates.
> Could you consider hinting it to enter testing?
Unblocked.
Thank
upload it to testing-proposed-updates?
Yes.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
's a real argument that this is contrary to the interests of our
users. Thus the question: is this your request as a maintainer, or as an
ex-maintainer?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, a
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:46:29PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Security Team,
> > On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 10:27:00PM +, Kai Hendry wrote:
> > > As micah suggests I will offer a "firm commitment to actually making
> > >
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 09:36:00PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 02:05:38PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > No strong opinion either way; I'm more concerned that the e2fsprogs upload
> > happens sooner rather than later, so that d-i RC2 doesn't ge
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 08:37:31AM +0100, Loïc Minier wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Package: desktop-base
> > Architecture: all
> > -Recommends: epiphany-browser | konqueror | www-browser
> > +Depends: librsvg2-common
> That was me in r7
v/sda, and it's not in line with the quality of experience
that our users have come to expect when installing Debian >:), but I don't
think that makes anything unreleasable. Changing the fstab handling at this
point could break many other scenarios that we haven't thought of and test
you?
Please upload.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTE
ch only lists one file in /etc
> - add crude LSB headers to the init script for sendpage-server
> I wonder if that doesn't deserve to be unblocked.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to
ked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with
sputable bugs -- and the DevRef makes *style* recommendations about
debconf templates that certainly can be disputed.
So no, I will not accept a t-p-u upload in this case.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
egarding ucf and config file creation. Besides
> that mostly Translation updates.
6kloc upstream diff; there's no way this is appropriate for a freeze
exception.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:48:08AM +0100, Christian Perrier wrote:
> I have just uploaded a NMU of ssmtp, to fix its pending l10n
> issues (and, if needed, very minor QA issues).
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Dev
s shouldn't be unblocked, but if the maintainer/uploader
hasn't requested the update, I'm not going to risk breaking something that I
haven't thought of.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to s
meantime. 2.9.9d+e-pre2-7etch2 was uploaded to t-p-u with those
> languages added.
> Release masters, please approve!
Already done.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the
lfairy 0.07-4 -> 0.07-5
> Small fix for some broken argument variables. Very low risk.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
testing, so that the modules are actually
> build out of the matching ipw* packages.
Doesn't this package use the same debian/control logic as linux-2.6 and
linux-modules-extra-2.6? If so, it's not binNMU-safe.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a
# Temporary hacks for broken packages
> - Hack_xorg
> -
> # Add filesystem.manifest
> Chroot_exec "dpkg-query -W \*" | awk '$2 ~ /./ {print $1 " " $2
> }' > "${LIVE_ROOT}"/filesystem.manifest
>
Doesn't tell us
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:45:30AM +, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 02:13:10AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 10:19:41AM +0100, Nicolas François wrote:
> > > Please unblock man-db 2.4.3-6.
> > > It only adds French man page
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:27:28PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> >> + * 02defaults.sh: Updated kernel flavours to match etch.
> somewhere last year, the flavour for amd64 was renamed from
> '-amd64-generic' to '-amd64'. before t
advise not allowing nano into Etch any more.
Agreed.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSU
y the new xulrunner,
AFAICS. Even if the "bug" belongs to gcj-4.1, this change in xulrunner's
behavior is grounds for not letting the new xulrunner into etch. Security
updates need to not break related packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:32:14PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > Doesn't this package use the same debian/control logic as linux-2.6 and
> > linux-modules-extra-2.6? If so, it's not binNMU-safe.
> ah right, i should have remembered fr
a very good
> idea to me.
Well, waiting for confirmation from the maintainer that this should go to
etch.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
testing. 1.7.9-1etch2
> should be the good one.
That should be fixable with a binNMU on amd64, without requiring a sourceful
upload that triggers rebuilds on the other architectures.
I don't see 1.7.9-1etch2 yet -- so please refrain from uploading it, a
binNMU will be quick
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 12:14:04AM +0100, Marc 'HE' Brockschmidt wrote:
> Steve Langasek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > On Fri, Mar 02, 2007 at 08:39:47AM +0100, Josselin Mouette wrote:
> >> Le mercredi 28 février 2007 à 19:21 +0100, Josselin Mouette a écrit :
&
to get uploads to both unstable and testing-proposed-updates
fixing the ${Source-Version} dependency. Integration into etch will still
be subject to Frans's approval.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and
.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a s
portable security-wise over the
course of the release cycle, that would certainly be a good reason to drop
it from the release, no question.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move th
issue here, and how severe is the
bug resulting from it?
We're looking at about a 6kloc upstream diff against testing, which is quite
a bit more than I'm comfortable making an exception for.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
-3.1.1-3
> ---
> This is also part of the fix for #405749. This part of the debdiff is
> the same as for lsb-pkgchk3-3.1.1-2. In addition, it contains the fix
> for RC bug #395895 (rpmchk.h) which was in the -2 package that through
> some oversight, never got uploa
ckages which could have significant negative
impact on the user's browser if bugs are hiding.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
her gcj-4.1 and
classpath need to be fixed to work with the new xulrunner, or xulrunner's
bugs need to be fixed without coupling them to a behavior change that breaks
the other packages.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
tched
> 3.1-16 (i.e. after running `debian/rules patch') with changes to
> README.mirror.txt and debian/patches/* removed.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it o
is necessary because fuse in sid has a new upstream
> version, and a package compiled against this version cannot propagate to
> etch. vorlon suggested version numbers 1.13.1-7 for unstable and
> 1.13.1-6+etch1 for testing-proposed-updates. I think -7 must be
> uploaded first.
Yes
and myself). All policy modules compile, and they load.
Unblocked. Note that -4 still hadn't gotten in, on account of not having
aged long enough; the testing waiting period still applies by default even
when freeze exceptions are made.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a le
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:24:22AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 11:29:57AM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
> > >> 2. linux-ntfs
> > >>builds lots of binary packages, but there is only one with
> > >>interdependencies:
> &
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:37:14AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 04:28:30AM -0500, Eric Dorland wrote:
> > > I have a few minor fixes in packages that are in unstable right now
> > > that while no
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 04:04:38PM +0900, Fumitoshi UKAI wrote:
> At Thu, 8 Mar 2007 14:24:55 -0800,
> Steve Langasek wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 12:52:49PM +0100, Reinhard Tartler wrote:
> > > I have no idea why Ukai didn't request this upload to be hint
. It also
> includes updated and fixed debconf translation. Please unblock it and
> let it go into testing.
Just to confirm, the old version of clamav DTRT when invoked /without/ the
--mbox option?
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
D
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Sam Hocevar wrote:
>This version fixes two bugs: "clmake" was unusable (#412772) and
> quotes were interpreted twice.
Unblocked.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
101 - 200 of 3385 matches
Mail list logo
