Re: pwlib going into testing

against the newer pwlib? Yes, pwlib and openh323 are candidates for testing today and have been hinted together. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: remove mozilla-firefox-locale-gl [jtarrio@trasno.net: Bug#272040: Please update for 0.9 or remove]

, and 0.8 is now trying to enter Testing. Though it's not as urgent because the m68k build is not yet ready. The RC bug in mozilla-thunderbird-locale-gl was closed prematurely. I've reopened it, and am removing this package from testing. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Re: Any chance of getting a more recent thunderbird into Sarge?

-firefox. FWIW, there are now current thunderbird packages on mips, and the package is building on m68k. The best strategy for getting an update into sarge is to avoid gratuitous re-uploads of the package. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: please hint boost, regina-normal and kdeedu

On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 09:56:14AM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: it looks like qt-x11-free is finally going to testing tomorrow. i suspect that boost, regina-normal and kdeedu need a hint to go to testing as well. Hint added for boost and regina-normal. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek

Re: [sarge] Removal of lasso

on 273071. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: remove lirc-svga from !i386 sarge

getting the new package in. The issue with out-of-date binaries needs to be sorted out in unstable before the package is considered for testing. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: please remove sendmail-wide from testing/unstable

no worth to maintain sendmail-wide package in debian. RMs, please remove sendmail-wide from Sarge (RoM). Hint added. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please remove trm from Sarge

On Fri, Sep 24, 2004 at 01:26:59AM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote: clone 266559 -1 reassign -1 trm retitle -1 trm should not be in Sarge, in process of being removed thanks RMs, please hint this package out of sarge (RoM) Hinted for removal. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern

Re: [Oldenburg] topics for today's meeting

know, many users won't test until it's released... -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: RM: ddt -- Dead upstream, dead in Debian

, I'll file a RC bug in a minute. It's not in sarge. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please remove ifrit from testing

it's ready to go into a stable release and would rather give more time for bugs to be worked out. Please keep me CC'd as I'm not subscribed. Tagged for removal. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#273674: ftp.debian.org: please remove libdvbpsi and libdvbpsi2 from testing and unstable

severity -1 serious retitle -1 In process of being removed, should not be released RMs, please remove this package from sarge. See below mail from the maintainer: All three have been hinted for removal. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Security in sarge

of available autobuilder for this arch). gtk+2.0 is waiting on a requeue for m68k, following an interrupted build attempt. Mail sent to the m68k buildd list requesting someone to look at this. The wv bug is tagged as fixed in NMU by version 1.0.2-0.1, which is in testing. -- Steve Langasek postmodern

Re: Security in sarge

if ruby1.7 was/is vulnetable, do you? Ruby1.7 (ie, ruby-beta) is most definitely vulnerable; both 1.6 and 1.8 had the problem. However, ruby-beta should be hinted for removal anyways. Rather, ruby-beta is already removed from testing. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc

Re: Security in sarge

to see it removed. Are you willing to maintain the package yourself? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Security in sarge

you even if he doesn't have time to maintain rlpr himself anymore; and if not, the debian-qa team can help you get the package orphaned so that you can set about finding a sponsor or NMUer the usual way. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#273958: RM: moobot -- RoM; Not in development anymore, supybot will replace it

/forum.php?forum_id=322517 RMs, please remove this package from Sarge. Hint added. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: education-common: con't fulfill the Recommends on !i386

on dependencies. Does it need to have a dependency to grub at all? Quite agreed. If there were a clearer reason for having such a recommends, I'm not sure it would be RC (but I'd have to see such a case to know for sure); here, it seems the relationship should definitely be dropped. -- Steve Langasek

Re: another failed removal hint

On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 01:40:57AM +0200, Adeodato Simó wrote: this hint from vorlon seems to not have worked (Bug#260508): # 20040826; done 20040828 # RoM remove sympa/3.4.4.3-6 Re-queued. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: kernel and upgrades from woody to sarge

-- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: kernel and upgrades from woody to sarge

On Mon, Nov 01, 2004 at 10:00:00PM +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: * Steve Langasek ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [041101 21:45]: On Fri, Oct 29, 2004 at 08:44:33PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote: during my investigation for the next release update, it seems that there are more upgrade issues related

Re: xerces not-for-us problem persists but no longer release issue

platforms have in common that would explain why xerces should not be built there but should be built on all other archs; but to be safe, I hope Graham tested the resulting binaries before uploading them, to check for any overt brokenness? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc

Re: Please remove lingoteach packages from testing

is stable. Please file a serious bug against the package documenting your belief that this package does not currently belong in a stable release, to ensure that the package won't sneak back into testing the next time britney runs. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc

Re: possible update for bsdmainutils

, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please allow gettext 0.14.1-6 to enter testing

The upload was made for unstable because testing and unstable were in sync. This version fixes Bug#278283 aka CAN-2004-0966. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Uploading l10n-changed dictionaries-common_0.22.40sarge7 to sarge

(closes: #277632, #277752) - Added zh_TW Chinese debconf translation, thanks to Tetralet (closes: #279310) - Arabic debconf translation update, thanks to Ossama M. Khayat (closes: #279835) Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description

Re: please approve netbase 4.19 for sarge

ypxfrd (600100069). (Closes: #275244) -- Marco d'Itri [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun, 31 Oct 2004 16:51:02 +0100 Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please hint udftools into sarge

combinations of {new,old}-style packet writing API (roughly, kernel 2.6.8, =2.6.8) and {absence,presence} of udev. This package is not frozen, and does not require hinting; in fact, the new version of udftools appears to have reached sarge today. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Re: openssh 1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.2

it if somebody other than me could review it and push it into testing. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer openssh (1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.2) unstable; urgency=low * Preserve /etc/ssh/sshd_config ownership/permissions (closes: #276754). * Shorten the version string from

Re: Please let zlib into testing

On Sun, Nov 14, 2004 at 01:04:29PM +, Mark Brown wrote: zlib 1:1.2.2-3 contains some non-intrusive and useful fixes in the packaging relative to version 1:1.2.2-1 which is currently in testing. Please consider allowing it into testing. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern

Re: Please push exim4 4.34-7 to sarge.

-8 to simmer a little bit longer in sid and would like the trivial changes only, but many of them-release (-7) to get into sarge quickly. Package approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: KDE 3.3.1 for Sarge

build static libs, and no one complained, it doesn't seem to matter to our users. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: KDE 3.3.1 for Sarge

is called for -- though of course, there may be other reasons I don't know about, as well. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: libtiff 3.7.0 for sarge?

technical merits. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: removing gcj/gij/libgcj from the gcc-3.4 mips{,el} build

removing the stale binaries? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: modutils: fix #159708 in sarge?

issue and modutils is frozen, I'd perfectly understand a no way. If it is possible, I guess the right path is uploading a new version with just this fix to unstable, letting it age there, and finally hinting it through. Correct? That's correct. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Re: Upload of GNOME 2.8 to unstable

enough that you'll need to give the maintainers of those reverse-deps a heads-up, and address their concerns, before uploading. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: KDE 3.3.1 for Sarge

in ways that keep it out). I don't think the community would thank any of us if we had to send out a release update announcing *that* state of affairs. ;) -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please accept nano_1.2.4-3

into testing. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: libpqxx testing migration

days old (needed 10 days) out of date on i386: libpqxx-2.4.0 (from 2.4.0-2) Not considered and, once that's fixed, I don't see anything else here that requires a hint. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#282700: fr locale strill display Waiting for heeaders in apt-get while the string is translated

says is appropriate, though. Cosmetic bugs are also likely to have low-risk fixes; I would leave it entirely to your discretion whether to upload this change to unstable. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: zip sarge's package vulnerable to CAN-2004-1010

On Fri, Nov 26, 2004 at 05:21:03PM -0200, Otavio Salvador wrote: Current CAN-2004-1010 was fixed on zip 2.30-8 but current sarge version still vulnerable. This package need to be included on sarge to solve it. It already has been. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc

Re: Please push exim4 4.34-8 into sarge

On Mon, Nov 22, 2004 at 09:05:42AM +0100, Andreas Metzler wrote: Hello, exim4-4.38 features minimal changes over 4.34-7 and closes a rc bug on alpha: Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please consider reportbug 3.2 for sarge

translation of the man page (#281505) and a report of a problem due to filesystem corruption on the user's system (#281909). Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#282276: bigloo: FTBFS in sarge: skribe is missing.

? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Suggestion: Release sarge without security support

can't remove glibc from the archive when it has unfixed RC bugs. Security support is a core feature of Debian stable releases, and I'm no more willing to release sarge without security support than most woody users would be willing to use it. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Re: report on current state of sarge security

with wrong urgency, should have an urgent hint added. Urgent hint added. Thanks to all who've worked on this massive security review. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#282276: bigloo: FTBFS in sarge: skribe is missing.

to include this information in your bug report on ftp.debian.org. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Bug#283116: Debian Installer Report

status of KDE in testing is wedged tight. It would be helpful if someone who's experienced this problem can provide information about which packages are uninstallable. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Processed: reassign because it can't be fixed in ssed

the t-p-u autobuilders are all in place; otherwise, it's preferable to upload the fix to unstable and the release team can push the update into testing manually. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: smlnj blocked from testing. circular dependency

know if there is anything I am doing wrong or any thing I can do to get my package into testing. New releases keep coming out and the clock keeps getting set to 0 (I have a 110.51 package ready). Er, you don't *have* to always upload the newest upstream version? -- Steve Langasek postmodern

Re: Please push findutils 4.1.20-5 into testing

if the environment is larger than 20KB. (Closes: #176201) -- The bug fixed by this upload is an important one for everybody having to use a large environment - xargs simply would not work at all. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: smlnj blocked from testing. circular dependency

upload; merely pointing out that balancing the freshness of packages in unstable vs. testing is under maintainer control. Of course in this case, the complexity of the source/binary relationships mean it may take some time for an ftp-master to sort out sml-nj's removal. -- Steve Langasek

Re: Problem with kernel on SATA hosts - RC?

On Wed, Dec 01, 2004 at 12:01:29PM +0100, Richard Atterer wrote: Obviously, you cannot load the SATA modules if you need the SATA code to access the hard disc. Of course you can, that's what initial ramdisks are for. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: quik_2.1-1 in sarge-proposed-updates?

an opportunity to review the source (i.e., after the package is in unstable). -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Why is evolution-data-server not in testing yet?

-arch dependencies will simply cause it to fail at a later step. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please approve base-files_3.1.0 for sarge

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 08:00:10PM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: It has been in unstable for 20 days and does not contain any dangerous change. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Accepted newt 0.51.6-19 (i386 source)

, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please hint shadow for entering testing

the package again to enter testing. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

). -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

has changed since that version that would block other packages -- if it's only a shlibs change, this normally does not require a hint, but if it's a package name change, it normally will require a hint. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: scim and associated need a hint

added. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: scim and associated need a hint

On Mon, Dec 06, 2004 at 11:08:39PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 04:15:14PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sun, Dec 05, 2004 at 09:41:12PM +0100, Osamu Aoki wrote: On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 06:28:42PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 04:45:22PM -0800

Re: please allow mutt 1.5.6-20040907+2 into testing

that they don't intend to ask us to hint it to testing... Considering that sarge is taking so long and the hcache patch has not showed any problem, I have no objections to move the current mutt package to sarge. Hinted for the next run (at the 20 day mark as discussed). Thanks, -- Steve

Re: please hint traceroute 1.4a12-18 into testing

Thanks for your help. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

to the recent changes on ia64, which would have required a shlibs bump for libgcc1. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please approve diff 2.8.1-7 for testing

provided by John Hasler. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Processed: reassign because it can't be fixed in ssed

autobuilders are all in place; otherwise, it's preferable to upload the fix to unstable and the release team can push the update into testing manually. The fix is being uploaded as 4.1.2-6. I don't think the fixes are inappropriate for sarge. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern

Re: subversion transition from 1.0.9 to 1.1.1

to be a low-risk transition in terms of its effect on other packages. I hope it's also protocol-compatible with 1.0.9? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: full transition to libcurl3

are still fine for such issues, but they would not be regarded as release-critical for sarge in the absence of other compelling factors. Regards, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: proposal for the KDE 3.3 transition

, and then some RM will have to (or instruct us to) close #266478 (new kdelibs should not enter testing alone). Unless anyone else on the release team objects, I think this plan is sufficient for getting KDE3.3 into testing. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description

Re: status of getting security fixes into sarge

. perl however builds fine with pbuilder on the same machine. This is a failure of gethost('localhost'), which could be caused by a name resolution problem in the build environment. Can you verify that your sbuild environment has a valid /etc/hosts? -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer

Re: file in sarge (was Re: [VAC] ...)

tags 283316 -sarge tags 283316 +woody thanks Hi Michael, On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 12:06:39PM +0200, Michael Piefel wrote: Am Mi, den 25.08.2004 schrieb Steve Langasek um 11:05: It still seems like a rather large diff for such a small number of known bugfixes... Colin? I just had

Re: status of getting security fixes into sarge

IIRC. Hrm, the last status I had on this was that I was *waiting* for maintainer comments... :) Seeing none, I've gone ahead and pushed this in despite 278082. cscope 15.5-1.1 needed, have 15.5-1 for CAN-2004-0996 Should go in RSN. Yep, it's in. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern

Re: Please consider portmap 5.7 for sarge

default functionality is the same as the current version 5.4 in sarge. Please consider portmap 5.7 for sarge. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please approve mailx 1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-3 for sarge

in some cases could lead to a security problem. Although the changes between 1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-1 and 1:8.1.2-0.20040524cvs-3 are not so small, I think, they are well tested. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: status of getting security fixes into sarge

On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 06:59:32PM +0100, Moritz Muehlenhoff wrote: Steve Langasek wrote: prozilla (unfixed; bug #284117) for CAN-2004-1120 Well it's not fixed, and no patch is known. Candidate for removal. Tagged for removal. But as the stable version is already vulnerable

Re: status of getting security fixes into sarge

in diagnosing the test failures that are now happening on various platforms, to pin down if these are buildd bugs or source bugs so that they can be fixed on whichever end they need to be. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: security problem on openwebmail

? As this package is arch: all and is not frozen, it will move into testing in two days on its own unless someone reports another RC bug in the meantime. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Cyclic dependencies in octave2.1 packages?

versions of libunwind and gcc-3.4 will move to testing as soon as certain build issues have been resolved. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: section and priority of dummy packages

On Thu, Dec 16, 2004 at 02:37:26AM +0100, Santiago Vila wrote: [ moving to -release ] On Thu, 16 Dec 2004, Javier Fernández-Sanguino Peña wrote: After reading a point made by Steve Langasek in debian-release [1] I was wondering if it would be appropiate to list of things 'TODO' after

Re: Please allow flex into testing

upload. I've waited for any new bugs to be reported, but so far things seem to be fine. It has successfully built on all architectures. Please allow this to enter sarge, since the version in sarge does have a valid FTBS bug. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern

Re: Please review openssh/1:3.8.1p1-8.sarge.4

introduced any new regressions, and I consider the two information leaks to be security issues. Approved. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: python2.3 and python-defaults for testing

. The pther important fix is the fix for #283108, some data loss when writing on a full file system. Approved. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: uninstallation bugs are RC

. Indeed, being unable to uninstall a package is RC. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Problem with octave-plplot

blocking numerous packages have been sorted out, thanks to Anthony Towns, so the only remaining issue holding plplot and octave2.1 out of testing is that the powerpc binaries for octave2.1 have gone missing. I've cc:ed the powerpc buildd maintainer to apprise him of this issue. -- Steve Langasek

Re: Please review groff 1.18.1.1-5 for sarge

] Sat, 11 Dec 2004 14:39:11 +0100 I've had no regressions reported to me, and the stuff at the top fixes two security bugs. Approved. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Final polishing of the KDE 3.3 transition

, it would be best to investigate them before the affected packages reach testing, of course. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: quik into testing

of individual bootloader packages on the rest of the installer is minimal. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Please prepare for a request to hint shadow (really, now...)

, Christian. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: any objections to uploading tiff 3.7.1 to unstable?

for the same reason, I'm not overly concerned about its impact on the KDE 3.3 transition, which appears to be ready to go without any further rebuilds of the core KDE packages. Regards, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

of libcharva1-jni on i386. In general, I think getting contrib builds of JNI packages for both i386 and powerpc would be a good idea. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: freeswan and opensc migration to testing

Hi Domenico, On Sun, Jan 02, 2005 at 12:18:54AM +0100, Domenico Andreoli wrote: looking at freeswan and opensc i noted they probably need a hint to enter sarge together. Well spotted. Hint added. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: Can we move GDB to testing?

if it affected 6.1). So I would like to move this into sarge. OK? Yes, despite being prio: standard I think the risk of gdb causing a total meltdown is quite low. :) Approved after reviewing the diffs to the debian/ dir. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc

Re: Boosting priority of upload: wmusic

are available. Cheers, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Woody to Sarge upgrade and Debian menu.

On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 07:29:17PM +0100, Bill Allombert wrote: On Tue, Jan 11, 2005 at 09:17:36AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote: Of these packages, one is essential and one is virtually essential. The other two (libgcc1 and libstdc++5) are neither; although in this case they *should* work

Re: Contrib packages that probably should be forced into testing

On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 11:11:40AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 01:20:37 -0800, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, Jan 05, 2005 at 09:48:02AM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: Wed, 5 Jan 2005 02:02:29 +0100, Jeroen van Wolffelaar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: Please consider lzo 1.08-2 for sarge

the changeset from -1.2, which seems reasonable; any future updates you need to make before release that do fix higher-priority bugs can be approved through unstable without problems. Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: Re: Dropping 2.4 hppa kernel-image packages

that the installer works with 2.6, and help get it working if it isn't already? Thanks, -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: gnupg 1.2.5 vs. 1.4

. What you're looking for is an answer to why the gnupg package has not been updated in unstable; for that, you will have to ask the maintainer, not us. -- Steve Langasek postmodern programmer signature.asc Description: Digital signature

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >