Re: Using videos in presentations

2023-09-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Bonjour Pierre, El 18/9/23 a les 21:28, Pierre Gruet ha escrit: [...] Putting \usepackage{movie15} in the preamble (movie15.sty being provided by texlive-latex-extra), one can later include a movie with, for instance, \begin{frame} \begin{figure}     \includemovie[poster, cont

Re: Using videos in presentations

2023-09-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Dima!! El 18/9/23 a les 20:10, Dima Kogan ha escrit: Hi Leopold. I use beamer regularly, but have never wanted to put videos into the slides. I would like to know more about the tools, though. Is the issue that existing pdf viewers can't play embedded video (i.e. do other people's video pre

Re: Using videos in presentations

2023-09-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Filippo!!! El 18/9/23 a les 13:08, Filippo Rusconi ha escrit: [...] Not actually helping you with your precise issue, but I discovered years ago this software to make presentations, dynamic or not, and that may include video files: https://sozi.baierouge.fr/pages/10-about.html Basical

Using videos in presentations

2023-09-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I like to use LaTeX and if I need to make a presentation I use Beamer. In the past, if I had to insert a video, I could do it with the necessary packages and any Acroread could played it. It seems that from 2021 it is not possible, although that Okular can show it and I'm quite sure th

Re: Multiple versions of Ignition libraries for different simulators

2021-08-15 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi all, first of all sorry for the late reply. El 14/8/21 a les 22:17, Jochen Sprickerhof ha escrit: > Hi Jose, > > sorry for the late reply. I had a longer discussion with Timo about this > today. > > * Jose Luis Rivero [2021-08-11 18:10]: >> Development upstream (Open Robotics) is now focu

Performance in scientific applications

2021-05-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, probably it's an off-topic email, but I would like to ask here because maybe some of you could guide me. I'm working with some scientists to evaluate some programs that calculate a solution for a problem. They basically run an instance of CPLEX ILOG and obtain the time used to calculate the s

Re: Multi-Body Dynamics Simulation in Debian

2021-03-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 27/3/21 a les 0:45, Drew Parsons ha escrit: > On 2021-03-26 17:52, Rock Storm wrote: > ... >>> Does siconos do what you need? > ... >> Thanks for your suggestion! It does seem to do what I'm after, though it >> seems to lack the integration with FreeCAD. But again, thanks, I'll look >> into it a

Re: Multi-Body Dynamics Simulation in Debian

2021-03-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Rock, El 26/3/21 a les 17:52, Rock Storm ha escrit: [...] > > Yeah, sorry, I probably should have included a use case to show what my > needs were. The project I'm working on is an electro-mechanical actuator > and the simulation software would be used to predict the performance of > the unit

Status of Coin3, SoQt, Pivy and Freecad

2018-12-12 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Anton Gladky, Kurt Kremitzki and I have been working in these packages. We have an ugly bug #874727 in Coin3 that affect all the packages that use them. Also, SoQt was affected by the Qt4 drop in Buster. Also, upstream began to move their build system from autotools to CMake. So, finally,

Re: [ROS] Bringing ros-visualization to Debian

2018-09-06 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Dino, On 06/09/18 11:36, H. wrote: > Attachment was missing... > > Am Donnerstag, den 06.09.2018, 11:14 +0200 schrieb H.: >> Hi, >> >> First of all I have to say that it's great to work with ROS under >> Debian because it just works out-of-the-box without any additional >> package sources. >>

Re: ROS: catkin and ROS_PACKAGE_PATH

2018-07-13 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Jörg, On 13/07/18 00:30, Jörg wrote: [...] > > I've also tried the catkin-tools package (installed via pip, because not in > debian) they should bring their own devel/setup.bash scripts but they don't > work > either. I created a simple prototype of catkin-tools package. I have pushed to sa

ros-urdf repository in salsa

2018-07-13 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Andreas and Anton, please could you help us in one stupid thing in salsa? Some of you, or me, or I don't know who, created a ros-urdf project. The debian science VIP people ;-) are the owners and we would like to change the visibility from private to public. Please could you change it? Anot

Re: ROS: catkin and ROS_PACKAGE_PATH

2018-07-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Jörg!! On 09/07/18 13:39, Jörg wrote: > Hi, > > since a few days my ROS-Workspace do not work anymore. I am on Debian sid > (unstable). the sid expert is Jochen. I just work with backported packages. > I've tried to compile as much as possible of the missing ros-desktop-full > packages and

Re: Some scientific packages are looking for new maintainers

2018-06-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Dear Anton, On 16/06/18 21:00, Anton Gladky wrote: > soqt - Qt4 GUI component toolkit for Inventor I think that I'm one of the few people in Debian that knows this package so it's fair that I take it. Best regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A7A949A2D9AA Catalonia ---

Re: Freecad is looking for new maintainers

2018-05-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi all!!! El 25/05/18 a les 22:11, Kurt Kremitzki ha escrit: > > > On 05/24/2018 03:07 PM, Anton Gladky wrote: >> Great to hear it! Feel free to ping me if you need a review/sponsorship. >> AFAIK Leopold has also some interest in this package (in CC), so please >> coordinate the efforts with him

Re: Coin3d and SoQt

2018-03-06 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
ilt against both of these libs. yes, but I need first soqt done to test it. Probably a lot of things will fail. Regards, Leo > Regards > > Anton > > > 2018-02-20 17:53 GMT+01:00 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : >> Hi Anton and Debian-science list, >> >> >

Coin3d and SoQt

2018-02-20 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Anton and Debian-science list, I have been working with Coin3 and SoQt. In Coin3 I have made small modifications to include cmake files. Pushed in experimental branch, not in the archive. Don't you think that maybe we should drop the v5 part? In SoQt, I have been able to create in the Qt5 b

Re: Coin3d and SoQt with Qt5 and CMake

2018-01-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Anton, you are right. I was confused with the original sources. It seems that the package in experimental fix the bug.At least use the system expat library. I'm so sorry for the noise. El 11/01/18 a les 19:37, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda ha escrit: > The bug really exists in unst

Re: Coin3d and SoQt with Qt5 and CMake

2018-01-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Anton. Are you sure is fixed? I have looked the coin sources Cmake version and it uses the internal expat version always. I.ll check it . Leopold On 11 gener de 2018 18:40:57 CET, Anton Gladky wrote: >Hi Leo, > >2018-01-11 9:30 GMT+01:00 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : >>> I bui

Re: Coin3d and SoQt with Qt5 and CMake

2018-01-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
this packages. I use coin3+soqt so no problem here. Regards, Leo > Regards > > Anton > > > 2018-01-10 15:47 GMT+01:00 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : >> Hi, >> >> >> Coin3d is moving to CMake as build system ans SoQt is moving to Qt5 >> (finally).

Coin3d and SoQt with Qt5 and CMake

2018-01-10 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, Coin3d is moving to CMake as build system ans SoQt is moving to Qt5 (finally). Anton, I have seen that you have pushed to experimental coin3 with CMake. It would be possible to have a version in Debian (at least in experimental) os SoQt build with Qt5 and begin a transition of all the packag

Re: Debian science robotics subgroup

2018-01-10 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 10:08:47AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: >> I have been thinking and looking on salsa and I would like to ask you if you >> think that it could be interesting to have a subgroup about robotics. >> >> With the migration to salsa, we have l

Re: Question about packaging projectchrono and duplicated source code

2017-05-02 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 02/05/17 22:39, dada wrote: [] > > Hello, I push a first version of the projectchrono package. > See ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/projectchrono.git please, push pristine-tar branch. > > Some observations : > > - The embedded bullet source files are located at > '

Re: Question about packaging projectchrono and duplicated source code

2017-05-01 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
On 02/05/17 08:21, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 01, 2017 at 08:10:29PM +0200, Anton Gladky wrote: >> if it is really so, that the code forked, removed, edited, feel free >> to let this embedded code be in the source of chronoengine. Please >> do not forget to make a note in d/copyrig

Re: Help for openmeca copyright

2017-04-25 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I have seen this mail just now and I see that it's a bit old. On 05/04/17 21:59, dada wrote: > Hello all, > With the help of Andreas Tille (thanks to him), I packaged a first version of > openmeca software. > Unfortunately the package was rejected by the ftp team because the copyright > file

About openmeca package

2017-04-25 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I have read a bit about the openmeca package. I'm sorry, but IMHO the package is not well done from the beginning. Let me explain my opinion because I would not be destructive. openmeca source has three folders: * ChronoEngine * OpenMeca * Serialization Your package should be just OpenMeca.

Re: Please add ros packages to robotics tasks

2016-12-30 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El 30/12/16 a les 23:32, Jochen Sprickerhof ha escrit: > Hi Andreas, > > thanks for asking how to integrate ROS into the science meta package. > As ROS is so big, we already created a special ros-metapackages package, > resembling to what upstream has as well. The top meta package, currently > pac

Re: debdiff addressed to strecth-staging

2016-09-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 9 de setembre de 2016, a les 03:38:36, Jose Luis Rivero va escriure: > Hi all: > > I've received the bug below that attaches a debdiff that includes a > modification in the changelog with the header: > > +gazebo (7.3.0+dfsg-3+rpi1) stretch-staging; urgency=medium > > Two quick que

Re: BinNMUs of header only libraries (eigen3, flann, pcl)

2016-08-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Jochen, El Dijous, 18 d'agost de 2016, a les 21:34:51, Jochen Sprickerhof va escriure: > Hi Anton, Leo, > > I just stumbled over the problem that we have no transition tracking for > header only libraries. If you grep for reverse build depends [1], you > get quite a number of packages with out

Re: flann package

2016-08-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 15 de juliol de 2016, a les 12:27:22, Anton Gladky va escriure: > Hi Leo, > > 2016-07-15 8:55 GMT+02:00 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : > > PS I would need some sponsor too ... > Anton, please could you upload flann 1.9.1 to experimental?. The pac

Re: flann package

2016-07-18 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 15 de juliol de 2016, a les 15:54:39, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda va escriure: [...] > > The package is imported and updated to a new version of flann. Just need to > check ABI compatibility. [...] from my point of view it seems that the ABI is broken. But, I would

Re: flann package

2016-07-15 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 15 de juliol de 2016, a les 09:19:02, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 08:55:33AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > flann has some serious bug (#822717) that affects several packages that I > >

flann package

2016-07-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, flann has some serious bug (#822717) that affects several packages that I co- maintain or are under debian-science team: fcl ompl pcl ros-metapackages ros- pcl-conversions I have seen that the package is *maintained* under svn. Also, there's a new version of that package that seems that com

Reflexxes library

2015-10-29 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I have "almost" packaged the library Reflexxes [1] for internal use. However I don't know if some of you can think that it could be an interested package. In any case, the package is located here: https://github.com/iocroblab/reflexxes If some of you are interested feel free I can provide

Re: openmpi + c++11

2015-10-29 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 28 d'octubre de 2015, a les 16:42:06, Nico Schlömer va escriure: > Hi everyone, > > the OpenMPI in Debian is somewhat outdated; the current stable version is > 1.10.1 [1], Debian ships 1.6.5 [2]. A bug has been filed for this a while > ago [3]. > > When compiling a C++11-enabled sour

Re: Looking for sponsor for ROS packages (robotic framework)

2015-10-09 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Divendres, 9 d'octubre de 2015, a les 15:59:48, Wookey va escriure: > > we (me and Leopold Palomo) have done a lot of work to bring ROS (Robot > > Operating System; free robot middleware used in many universities and > > companies world wide, see [1]) to Debian. ROS contains a ton of software >

Re: Packaging ASL (2)

2015-08-04 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 3 d'agost de 2015, a les 17:22:31, Anton Gladky va escriure: > Hi Leopold, > > 2015-08-02 18:47 GMT+02:00 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : > > I have been working a bit in ASL. The changes are pushed in Alioth. > > However I have not been able to build it

Re: Packaging ASL (2)

2015-08-04 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 3 d'agost de 2015, a les 09:35:44, Ghislain Vaillant va escriure: > On 02/08/15 20:12, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > I was not working on the packaging, but I followed the thread and as I > > have > > some experience and it's very sim

Re: Packaging ASL (2)

2015-08-02 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Diumenge, 2 d'agost de 2015, a les 20:00:07, Ghislain Vaillant va escriure: > On 2 Aug 2015 17:47, "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda" wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I have been working a bit in ASL. The changes are pushed in Alioth. > > However I > > > ha

Packaging ASL (2)

2015-08-02 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I have been working a bit in ASL. The changes are pushed in Alioth. However I have not been able to build it because libvtk6-dev is not installable. I have not time by now but it doesn't built in an old chroot sid that I had with libvtk6-dev installed. I got this error: In file included fr

Re: Gazebo is not installable

2015-05-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
rol file, just simbody 3.X series) , that is totally > > fine for me. Please go ahead. If you need me to modify anything, please > > point me to it. > > > > Thanks Leo, Jochen for reporting. > > > > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda &g

Re: Gazebo is not installable

2015-05-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dimecres, 27 de maig de 2015, a les 11:35:33, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda va escriure: > Hi, > > I don't know what is wrong with gazebo but now the situation is that this > package is not installable in a sid environment. > > The situation was that the package uploaded b

Gazebo is not installable

2015-05-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I don't know what is wrong with gazebo but now the situation is that this package is not installable in a sid environment. The situation was that the package uploaded by Anton was built using libsimbody3.4. However, this package have been upgraded to simbody3.5, deleting the old one. I ha

Bug#783109: ITP: orocos-kdl -- Orocos Kinematics and Dynamics Library

2015-04-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda" * Package name: orocos-kdl Version : 1.3.0 Upstream Author : Orocos Developers * URL : http://www.orocos.org/kdl * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++ Description : Orocos

Bug#783016: ITP: orocos-typelib -- C/C++ type introspection library

2015-04-20 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda" * Package name: orocos-typelib Version : 2.8.0 Upstream Author : Orocos Developers * URL : https://github.com/orocos-toolchain/typelib * License : CeCILL-B (BSD-like) Programmi

Bug#783008: ITP: orocos-utilrb -- Ruby toolkit: collection of useful Ruby classes

2015-04-20 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda" * Package name: orocos-utilrb Version : 2.8.0 Upstream Author : Orocos Developers * URL : https://github.com/orocos-toolchain/utilrb * License : CeCILL-B (BSD-like) Programming

Bug#782745: ITP: orocos-log4cpp -- C++ library for flexible logging

2015-04-17 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: wnpp Severity: wishlist Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda" * Package name: orocos-log4cpp Version : 2.8.0 Upstream Author : Orocos Developers * URL : https://github.com/orocos-toolchain/log4cpp * License : LGPL Programming Lang: C++ D

Re: Bug#782623: ITP: orocos-ocl -- Orocos Component Library

2015-04-15 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
ackage it requires a lot of work. I was concentrate on it and I forget this step. Also, I forget orocos- rtt #782210. Best regards, Leopold > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 08:11:16AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Package: wnpp &

Re: Something is wrong in alioth

2015-03-23 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 23 de març de 2015, a les 08:14:51, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda va escriure: > Hi, > > the web interface to the debian-science repos is broken: > > http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/ > > doesn't show any repos. However, the repos are in

Something is wrong in alioth

2015-03-23 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, the web interface to the debian-science repos is broken: http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/ doesn't show any repos. However, the repos are in alioth (moszumanska) so I understand that only cgit is broken. Best regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 GPG: 05F4A

Bug#779884: unblock: pcl/1.7.2-7

2015-03-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
+1,10 @@ +pcl (1.7.2-7) unstable; urgency=medium + + * Added patch to solve sometimes FTBFS. Patch proposed by +James Cowgill (thanks!!!). Closes: #779183 + + -- Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda Wed, 25 Feb 2015 23:12:50 +0100 + pcl (1.7.2-6) unstable; urgency=medium [ Jochen Sprickerhof ]

Re: Packages in Jessie

2014-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dilluns, 27 d'octubre de 2014, Aaron M. Ucko va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda writes: > > > So, one thing it that the package has important bugs and we are not able to > > solve it in time, so this package will not be in Jessie. But, are you telling > >

Bug#767085: unblock: pcl/1.7.2-2

2014-10-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please reduce the 10-day age period to 9 (or less) of this package. Let me explain the situation: We have worked hard with a big package: pcl. The package goes to new queue on June (2014-06

Re: Packages in Jessie

2014-10-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 27 d'octubre de 2014, a les 10:57:31, Aaron M. Ucko va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda writes: > > So, one thing it that the package has important bugs and we are not able > > to > > solve it in time, so this package will not be in Jessie. But, are y

Re: Packages in Jessie

2014-10-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dilluns, 27 d'octubre de 2014, Andreas Tille va escriure: > On Sun, Oct 26, 2014 at 11:57:49PM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > there's one thing that I don't have understood clearly about the dates to > > freeze and the proced

Packages in Jessie

2014-10-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, there's one thing that I don't have understood clearly about the dates to freeze and the procedure. On November 5th at 23:59 UTC begin the freeze period. The page [1] mention that: "So ensure your package is in testing before that last run." So, may I understand that, if a package needs 10

pcl_1.7.2-1 needs to be uploaded

2014-10-14 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Dears, after a lot of hours of compilation, efforts and readings finally pcl is ready to be uploaded (again) to the ftp-masters queue. The package is here: https://mentors.debian.net/package/pcl Nobuhiro Iwamatsu was the first sponsor and I hope we continue sponsoring but if someone is interes

Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-31 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, A Dijous, 31 de juliol de 2014, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 12:07:54PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > > > > > > I have worked in the octomap package following the ftp-master > > >

Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-31 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous, 31 de juliol de 2014, Jose Luis Rivero va escriure: > Hey Leo: > > On 07/31/2014 12:43 AM, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > > > El Dimarts, 29 de juliol de 2014, a les 16:40:21, Andreas Tille va > > escriure: [...] > > > &g

Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-30 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Andreas, El Dimarts, 29 de juliol de 2014, a les 16:40:21, Andreas Tille va escriure: [...] > Once you consider your work finished, you could simply ping me that you > are ready. Just make sure you keep the changelog entry targeting at > UNRELEASED and everybody knows that it is work in progr

Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-29 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dimarts, 29 de juliol de 2014, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi Leopold, > > On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 04:08:02PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > > > You can approach this easily by adding > > > > > > > > > > Files-Excluded

Re: octomap_1.6.6-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

2014-07-29 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Andreas, I solved it. A Dimarts, 29 de juliol de 2014, Andreas Tille va escriure: > HI Leopold, > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 05:52:24PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > > > > If everything is DFSG free usually repackaging is not considered best

RFS ompl

2014-05-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Dear people, I am looking for a sponsor for the package ompl. The package is hosted in our git: ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/ompl.git and it's in the debian archive [1]. It's a part of the robotics blend and the SoB page is filled. [2] The package seem lintian clean in my

RFS octomap

2014-05-27 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Dear people, I am looking for a sponsor for my package octomap [1] . The package is hosted in our git: ssh://git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/octomap.git it's a part of the robotics blend and the SoB page is filled. [2] The package seem lintian clean in my pbuilder environment. Than

Re: Question about sponsoring a package

2014-05-23 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 23 de maig de 2014, Felix Salfelder va escriure: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 12:20:16AM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Testing the generated package it has easy warnings to fix, but more than one > > hundred: > > > > libpcl-tools: binary-wi

Re: Question about sponsoring a package

2014-05-23 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Divendres, 23 de maig de 2014, Оlе Ѕtrеісhеr va escriure: > Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda writes: > > Testing the generated package it has easy warnings to fix, but more than one > > hundred: > > > > libpcl-tools: binary-without-manpage > > > > I have tr

Question about sponsoring a package

2014-05-22 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm working in the pcl library (following Jochen Sprickerhof and Thomas Moulard work) and I have a doubt about lintian. Testing the generated package it has easy warnings to fix, but more than one hundred: libpcl-tools: binary-without-manpage I have tried to generate with help2man man pa

Re: OpenCascade

2014-05-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dilluns, 19 de maig de 2014, Julien Cristau va escriure: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 14:59:54 +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > we had in Squeeze OpenCascade. Now, there's no package, although we have the > > git with the

OpenCascade

2014-05-19 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, we had in Squeeze OpenCascade. Now, there's no package, although we have the git with the debian part. Someone knows what happened? Regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: Alioth /git/debian-science/packages directory

2014-03-28 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous, 27 de març de 2014, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi, > > On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 08:17:59PM +0100, Anton Gladky wrote: > > 2014-03-26 16:41 GMT+01:00 Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda : > > > > > > I thought that the packages from robotics blend could go

Alioth /git/debian-science/packages directory

2014-03-26 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I'm thinking to package another piece of software under about robotics. When I have login to alioth and chdir to /git/debian-science/packages I have realised that: $ ls -1 | grep .git | wc -l 425 so, we have 425 folders containing 425 git repos. I thought that the packages from robotics

Re: Problems generating latest debian-science packages using new blends-dev

2014-01-16 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, A Dijous, 16 de gener de 2014, Andreas Tille va escriure: > > * Removed metapackages: [...] >-science-robotics-dev [...] why did you remove science-robotics-dev? I don't understand what happened? Regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User 152692 Catalonia signature.asc Description: Thi

Alioth is down?

2013-11-11 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, I cannot make a git pull from the git repositories of alioth. Also, I cannot browse by: http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=debian-science/packages/ompl.git or make a ssh to git.debian.org Do you have experimented this? do you know what's happening? Regards, Leopold -- -- Linux User

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-11-05 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Hi Andreas, El Dimarts, 5 de novembre de 2013, a les 16:04:06, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi Leopold, > > On Tue, Nov 05, 2013 at 12:00:51PM +0100, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > ... > > Deleted the tag, and push all. > > Great. Uploaded, tagged and pushe

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-11-05 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Hi Andreas, El Dimarts, 5 de novembre de 2013, a les 11:00:51, Andreas Tille va escriure: $ lintian ompl_0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4-1_amd64.changes clean. > > > Some of the 'I' severity issues are easy to fix. Since I'm a bit > nitpicking I would really like you to fix the > debian-watch-con

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-11-05 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Hi Andreas, El Dimarts, 5 de novembre de 2013, a les 08:03:47, Andreas Tille va escriure: [...] > No, not readme. It seems the `DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS += nocheck` method does > not work correctly. Either this need to be used with "export " in front > or you really should use override_dh_auto_test whi

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-11-04 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Hi Andreas, El Dilluns, 4 de novembre de 2013, a les 23:46:07, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi Leopold, > > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 11:19:51PM +0100, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > > The following tests FAILED: > > > 13 - test_2denvs_geometric

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-11-04 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
El Dilluns, 4 de novembre de 2013, a les 14:19:07, Andreas Tille va escriure: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 10:19:29AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > /tmp/buildd/ompl-0.13.0+git20130920.01d0ca4/build/CMakeFiles 0 > > > > > make[2]: Leaving directory > >

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-11-04 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dilluns, 4 de novembre de 2013, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi Leopold, > > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 10:04:51AM +0100, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > > If it is helpful for you there is no rule that would forbid to keep the > > > entries. I just heard fro

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-10-31 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Andreas, A Dimecres, 30 d'octubre de 2013, Andreas Tille va escriure: [...] > > Ok, but from the packager point of view, it helps you to see how many packages > > you have worked before. I can delete whatever you think convenient, but I > > began to package it with one version of the library

Re: Packaging and sponsoring of ompl (Was: r3898 - in /projects/science/trunk/debian-science/tasks: robotics robotics-dev)

2013-10-30 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
e examples who to do this > properly and efficiently. So let me comment your changes first: Ok, [...] > > > > +Package: ompl > > +Homepage: http://ompl.kavrakilab.org > > +License: BSD-3-clause > > +Responsible: Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda > > +WNPP: 706

Re: RFS: nfft -- Library for computing Non-uniform Fast Fourier Transforms

2013-10-08 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi Ghislain, A Dimarts, 8 d'octubre de 2013, Ghislain Vaillant va escriure: > Hello everyone, > > Following the ITP filed here: > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=725705 > > I have uploaded a first package for the NFFT library. It is an extension > of the FFTW library for non-eq

Re: libompl

2013-10-05 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
El Dissabte, 5 d'octubre de 2013, a les 19:59:14, Bill Allombert va escriure: > On Wed, Oct 02, 2013 at 02:41:41PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Hi, > > > > after some work I have finished (in some state usable) the package ompl. > > You could see

libompl

2013-10-02 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, after some work I have finished (in some state usable) the package ompl. You could see here the work done: ssh://alioth-git/git/debian-science/packages/ompl.git please, some of you could look on it and blame me about my work? Thanks in advance, Leopold PS please be patient it's one of my

Re: Bug#722266: ITP: libccd -- libccd is library for collision detection between two convex shapes

2013-09-10 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
> Andreas. > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:02:30PM +0200, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Package: wnpp > > Severity: wishlist > > Owner: "Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda" > > > > * Package name: libccd > > Version : 1

Re: Please check Debian Science robotics tasks (Was: [SCM] choreonoid branch, master, updated. ...)

2013-06-18 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
Hi, A Dilluns, 17 de juny de 2013, Andreas Tille va escriure: > Hi Thomas, > > On Fri, Jun 14, 2013 at 04:08:45PM +0900, Thomas Moulard wrote: > > Hi Andreas, > > I checked out the repository to make some modifications and I have a > > > couple of questions: > Thanks for checking! Those sanity

Re: OpenCASCADE re-licensing: a (desperate) call for help

2012-06-28 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dijous, 28 de juny de 2012, Francesco Poli va escriure: > Hello members of debian-science and of debian-legal, > I am writing a (desperate) call for help. > > As some of you already know, oce [1] is the Debian package of OCE [2], > a fork of OpenCASCADE Technology [3]. > > [1] http://packages.q

Re: OpenCV 2.4

2012-05-23 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
I have seen the answer of Nobuhiro Iwamatsu wrote some hours ago ... Leo A Dimecres 23 Maig 2012, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda va escriure: > Hi, > > there's a new version of OpenCV [1], and although there's a bug report to > package it [2] no ones has said any about it. &

OpenCV 2.4

2012-05-23 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, there's a new version of OpenCV [1], and although there's a bug report to package it [2] no ones has said any about it. As this package is maintained in a group and uses this list (I think ...) I would like to ask here is someone are working on it. Wheeze is near to freeze (June, the end?

Re: Giving lesstif2 some attention

2009-05-05 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Diumenge 03 Maig 2009, Paul Gevers va escriure: > Hi, > > [I was suggested to ask on this list after mails to debian-ment...@l.d.o] > > Recently I have invested quite some time to prepare a NMU package for > lesstif2 [0]. Lesstif did not have a regular update in 1.5 years and > definitely could u

Re: Full paper-to-bibliography toolchain

2009-03-17 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dilluns 16 Març 2009, Ross Boylan va escriure: > On Mon, 2009-03-16 at 12:53 -0500, Bryan Bishop wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Ross Boylan wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-03-14 at 21:41 -0500, Bryan Bishop wrote: > > . > > > > tellico (packaged for Debian) might be useful here. Al

Re: Creating a debian robotics group inside debian science

2008-10-05 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Diumenge 05 Octubre 2008, Andreas Tille va escriure: > On Sun, 5 Oct 2008, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > >> http://wiki.debian.org/DebianScience/Robotics - which doesn't > >> exist. Is there somewhere more appropriate for it to point? > > > > I think t

Re: Creating a debian robotics group inside debian science

2008-10-04 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Dissabte 04 Octubre 2008, Chris Walker va escriure: > Leopold Palomo Avellaneda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > A Dimarts 30 Setembre 2008, Jose Luis Blanco va escriure: > > > Hi everyone! > > > > > > As researcher in robotics, I really like the idea

Re: Creating a debian robotics group inside debian science

2008-09-30 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
ors ;-) > Another good library (I think still not debianized) which would fit is > VXL (algebra, computer vision,...). Ok, I prepare the template to add. Think that I fill a text file and after is created the the web page. So, the changes, if there's no erros need some time. >

Creating a debian robotics group inside debian science

2008-09-30 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
[Please follow up to debian-science] Dear people, first of all I would like to apologise because I have "BCC" this mail to people that I think that use debian (or ubuntu) and has relation with the robotics area and they are not subscribe to this list. If I'm wrong, sorry for the noise and move

Creating a debian robotics group inside debian science

2008-09-30 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
[Please follow up to debian-science] Dear people, first of all I would like to apologise because I have "BCC" this mail to people that I think that use debian (or ubuntu) and has relation with the robotics area and they are not subscribe to this list. If I'm wrong, sorry for the noise and move

Relicencing requests for collision detection software

2008-06-17 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
Hi, the Charles Plessy mail about the re-licencing request have make me think about one great hole that we have in the free software world: the absence of collision detection packages. There's a big group that have developed some important libraries [1] for collision detection and others field

Re: debian and robotics

2008-05-12 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 09 Maig 2008, vàreu escriure: > On Thu, 8 May 2008, Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda wrote: > > Well, I'm working in an specific field of the robotics. But for example > > the list could have: > > > > - rtai > > - xenomai > > RTOS, both in debian

Re: OpenCASCADE copyright/license audit

2008-05-12 Thread Leopold Palomo Avellaneda
A Divendres 09 Maig 2008, Sylvestre Ledru va escriure: > Hello Adam, > > Le vendredi 09 mai 2008 à 09:33 -0400, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : > > By the way, speaking of size, would anyone mind if I drop the static > > libs from the -dev package? They are enormous, they double the build > > time and

Re: debian and robotics

2008-05-08 Thread Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda
A Dijous 08 Maig 2008, Andreas Tille va escriure: > On Wed, 7 May 2008, Leopold Palomo Avellaneda wrote: > > The robotics area is very wide. To many kind of packages could go there, > > You should probably come up with a list of these many packages to gain the > interest of peopl

  1   2   >