On Wed, 09 Jan 2019 07:24:00 +0200,
Jeremy Bicha wrote:
> We'd like to remove those libraries soon, but I am willing to wait a
> bit longer for someone to port linsmith to gtk3.
JFTR, I don't intend to work on this package. I don't have time at
the moment, but more importantly I don't have the mo
linsmith is now the last package keeping several libgnome libraries in
Debian Unstable. [1]
We'd like to remove those libraries soon, but I am willing to wait a
bit longer for someone to port linsmith to gtk3.
Note that the Debian Release Team requires your package to reach
Testing by February 12
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 9:23 AM Graham Inggs wrote:
> Is there a RFA bug for libgnome? Perhaps someone would like to adopt it
> in order to prevent the removal of working software from Debian.
I am sorry for the inconvenience.
The list of packages using libgnome is so small now (basically it's
Hi Jeremy
On 2018/11/19 14:13, Jeremy Bicha wrote:
I don't know if you saw this bug and Yavor's response at
https://bugs.debian.org/885742
Yes, I forwarded this bug to John (upstream) by email on January 4.
I didn't get a reply, but as per the discussion on sourceforge, which
Yavor linked, Jo
Graham,
I don't know if you saw this bug and Yavor's response at
https://bugs.debian.org/885742
Are you interested in talking to upstream about getting access to the
gtk3 port of linsmith?
linsmith is one of the last packages using libgnome in Debian and the
Debian GNOME would really like to get
I started working on this bug but fortunately discovered fairly
quickly that upstream is on the way of moving to GTK+ 3:
https://sourceforge.net/p/linsmith/discussion/389360/thread/90b515fb/#01e5/f302
You might want to check the status, it would be a pity if this package
has to be removed for bus
