Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Sandro, On 21.12.2016 16:43, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: >> Sure; what I also don't understand is why numpy pushes its RC and betas >> into unstable instead of experimental (and then maybe check or asks for >> checking for

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:27 AM, Ole Streicher wrote: > Sure; what I also don't understand is why numpy pushes its RC and betas > into unstable instead of experimental (and then maybe check or asks for > checking for the reverse deps). This makes it harder to revert if there

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On 21.12.2016 16:17, Adrian Bunk wrote: > I can clearly understand why Andreas is unhappy to see when such a > change is uploaded without prior warning 1.5 months after the start > of the freeze, and 1 week before an important deadline for his package. Sure; what I also don't understand is why

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 03:38:36PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On 21.12.2016 15:29, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > >> ... > >> The according functions are since then marked as "deprecated" and issue > >> a warning. Numpy

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Adrian, On 21.12.2016 15:29, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >> ... >> The according functions are since then marked as "deprecated" and issue >> a warning. Numpy introduced this change with 1.11rc already, which was >> uploaded to Debian

Re: Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: >... > The according functions are since then marked as "deprecated" and issue > a warning. Numpy introduced this change with 1.11rc already, which was > uploaded to Debian about 6 months ago. After it appears that many > packages (als

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:54:35AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: >... > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >... > >> For python-skbio to have any chance of being part of stretch, the > >> latest possible date for an upload of a package without any RC bugs > >> is Christmas

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 8:35 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > In my initial response I mentioned skiping the test. However, I > intended to discuss this first since simply hiding the eyes from an > upgrading problem is not the prefered way to go. youre not closing your eyes to a

Re: Bug#848758: Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Ole, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 02:05:57PM +0100, Ole Streicher wrote: > On 21.12.2016 11:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > >> For python-skbio it is *really* time to panic *right now*. > > Thanks for confirming that I was not actually

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Sandro, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 07:54:35AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > >> For python-skbio it is *really* time to panic *right now*. > >> > >> python-skbio is currently not in testing. > > the last upload (0.5.1-1) was

Re: Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi all, On 21.12.2016 11:59, Andreas Tille wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> For python-skbio it is *really* time to panic *right now*. > Thanks for confirming that I was not actually panicing. ;-) While I agree in principle, I would like to remind the

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Adrian and Anton, > > On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:01:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: >> > > it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

Hi Adrian and Anton, On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 11:40:16AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:01:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > > it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in other > > > packages like for instance this one in python-skbio. I wonder whether >

Re: Bug#848758: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

On Tue, Dec 20, 2016 at 09:01:31AM -0500, Sandro Tosi wrote: > > it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in other > > packages like for instance this one in python-skbio. I wonder whether > > you are either able to suggest patches to get the tests working with the > > new

Processed: Re: [src:dx] FTBFS dx

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #848894 [src:dx] [src:dx] FTBFS dx Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 848894: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=848894 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

2016-12-20 15:01 GMT+01:00 Sandro Tosi : >> it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in other >> packages like for instance this one in python-skbio. I wonder whether >> you are either able to suggest patches to get the tests working with the >> new interface

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#848799: pcl: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/usr/lib/libmpi.so', needed by 'lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcl_io.so.1.8.0'. Stop.

Processing control commands: > affects -1 src:gdcm Bug #848799 [src:vtk6] pcl: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/usr/lib/libmpi.so', needed by 'lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcl_io.so.1.8.0'. Stop. Added indication that 848799 affects src:gdcm > affects 848793 src:pcl Bug #848793 [src:vtk6]

Re: Latest upgrade of Numpy breaks tests of other packages (Was: Bug#848758: python-skbio: FTBFS: Test failures)

> it seems the recent upgrade of numpy has broken some tests in other > packages like for instance this one in python-skbio. I wonder whether > you are either able to suggest patches to get the tests working with the > new interface of numpy again or whether it might be sensible to revert > the

Processed (with 1 error): Re: Bug#848799: pcl: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/usr/lib/libmpi.so', needed by 'lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcl_io.so.1.8.0'. Stop.

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:vtk6 Bug #848799 [src:pcl] pcl: FTBFS: make[3]: *** No rule to make target '/usr/lib/libmpi.so', needed by 'lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libpcl_io.so.1.8.0'. Stop. Bug reassigned from package 'src:pcl' to 'src:vtk6'. No longer marked as found in versions

Processed: Re: Bug#848793: gdcm: FTBFS: CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1625: recipe for target 'Utilities/VTK/Applications/CMakeFiles/gdcm2pnm.dir/all' failed

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:vtk6 Bug #848793 [src:gdcm] gdcm: FTBFS: CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1625: recipe for target 'Utilities/VTK/Applications/CMakeFiles/gdcm2pnm.dir/all' failed Bug reassigned from package 'src:gdcm' to 'src:vtk6'. No longer marked as found in versions

Re: r-cran-mcmcpack_1.3-8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

an-progress (helps upgrading r-cran-rncl) >4. camp (helps re-introducing fw4spl and rewards work of newcomer) Processed. :) Regards, -- ,''`. : :' : Chris Lamb `. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk `- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debia

Re: r-cran-mcmcpack_1.3-8-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

upgrading r-cran-rncl) 4. camp (helps re-introducing fw4spl and rewards work of newcomer) -- http://fam-tille.de -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Re: python-cartopy: FTBFS on *i386: test_lambert_azimuthal_equal_area fails

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/SciTools/cartopy/issues/799 Bug #848634 [src:python-cartopy] python-cartopy: FTBFS on *i386: test_lambert_azimuthal_equal_area fails Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/SciTools/cartopy/issues/799'. -- 848634:

Processed: Re: [Debian-science-sagemath] Fwd: sagemath_7.4-1_amd64.changes is NEW

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 Document SYMPOW_CACHEDIR better and automatically try to create it Bug #848246 {Done: Jerome BENOIT } [sympow] sympow does not works properly when HOME is non-writable Changed Bug title to 'Document SYMPOW_CACHEDIR better and

Re: gtkdataboxmm_0.9.4-4_amd64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 07:00:09PM +, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > according to COPYING and the file headers, the license seems to be LGPL-2.1+ > now. Thanks for checking. The issue is fixed in the latest upload. Comment: I have experienced from other ftpmasters to simply

Re: Bug#848131: Acknowledgement (libmpich.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Ximin, thanks for your report. On 14/12/16 14:55, Ximin Luo wrote: > Control: reassign -1 libtachyon-mpich-0 Control: affects -1 > tachyon-bin-nox Control: affects -1 tachyon-bin-ogl > > Note that the problem occurs only when you install >

Processed: Re: Bug#848131: Acknowledgement (libmpich.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory)

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 libtachyon-mpich-0 Bug #848131 [tachyon-bin-nox] libmpich.so.12: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory Bug reassigned from package 'tachyon-bin-nox' to 'libtachyon-mpich-0'. No longer marked as found in versions

Re: Bug#847699: apophenia FTBFS on several architectures: distances: The error is 0.0220695, which is too big (> 0.02).

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello Adrian, thanks for your hint. On 10/12/16 18:05, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Source: apophenia > Version: 1.0+ds-4 > Severity: serious > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=apophenia=sid > > ... > PASS: lognormal_test > FAIL:

RE

to transfer your bank account immediately.-Your complete name:-Your Contact Address:-Your Direct Mobile Phone Number:-Your date of birth:-Your job: I expect your rapid response and re-entry so we can start this transaction immediately.Best regards,Dr. Weber HeinzOffice: 44 03-333-8804Fax: 44 03-333

Re: Bug#846512: ITP: dijitso -- distributed just-in-time building of shared libraries

On Thu, 2016-12-08 at 14:43 +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:20:53AM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > > > > looks like group members are locked out of the fenics subdir: > > > > Can you provide group write access, chmod g+w /git/debian- > > science/packages/fenics ? > > > >

Re: Bug#846512: ITP: dijitso -- distributed just-in-time building of shared libraries

On Thu, Dec 08, 2016 at 01:20:53AM +0800, Drew Parsons wrote: > Hi Mattias, > > looks like group members are locked out of the fenics subdir: > > $ ls -ld /git/debian-science/packages/fenics > drwxr-sr-x+ 14 mattia debian-science 4096 Apr 23  2016 > /git/debian-science/packages/fenics > > Can

Processed: Re: Bug#847172: sagenb-export: FTBFS: UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 41-42: ordinal not in range(128)

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 -3 Bug #847172 [src:sagenb-export] sagenb-export: FTBFS: UnicodeEncodeError: 'ascii' codec can't encode characters in position 41-42: ordinal not in range(128) Bug 847172 cloned as bugs 847393-847394 > reassign -2 src:nbformat Bug #847393

Processed: Re:

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 845972 important Bug #845972 [libvtk6-dev] Version number in library names Severity set to 'important' from 'normal' > thank you Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 845972:

Re: conflicts between VTK/XDMF and libloki

Hello Alastair,  Am Montag, den 05.12.2016, 13:56 + schrieb Alastair McKinstry: > I'm the maintainer of xdmf, which I packaged to work with VisIT and > related code (in particular CDAT, which  uses VISIT). > > I originally packaged xdmf, recently moving up to xdmf3 as required > by VTK 7+.

Re: maxima-sage_5.35.1-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Wow, now it's going super fast with the sage dependencies! :D Many thanks for that! I just uploaded a new maxima-sage package. Best, Tobias On 12/05/2016 07:00 PM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi, > > please mention > maxima-5.35.1/interfaces/emacs/imaxima/breqn097a/* > in your

Re: geant321 is marked for autoremoval from testing

Hi, On Fri, Dec 02, 2016 at 04:39:08AM +, Debian testing autoremoval watch wrote: > geant321 1:3.21.14.dfsg-11 is marked for autoremoval from testing on > 2016-12-20 > > It (build-)depends on packages with these RC bugs: > 837657: cernlib: FTBFS with bindnow and PIE enabled > 837711:

Processed: Re: Bug#846984: Acknowledgement (Please migrate to emacs25)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > clone 846984 -1 -2 -3 -4 -5 -6 -7 -8 Bug #846984 [egg] Please migrate to emacs25 Bug 846984 cloned as bugs 846985-846992 > reassign -1 asciijump Bug #846985 [egg] Please migrate to emacs25 Bug reassigned from package 'egg' to 'asciijump'. No

Processed: Re: libgtkdatabox-0.9.3-0-{, lib}glade: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/lib/glade/modules/libgladedatabox.a, ...

Processing control commands: > found -1 1:0.9.3.0+dfsg-2 Bug #843931 {Done: Andreas Tille } [libgtkdatabox-0.9.3-0-glade,libgtkdatabox-0.9.3-0-libglade] libgtkdatabox-0.9.3-0-{, lib}glade: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite

Re: Bug#846512: ITP: dijitso -- distributed just-in-time building of shared libraries

On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 7:51 PM, Johannes Ring wrote: > The package will be maintained in Debian Science Team's Git > repository. I have packaged dijitso locally but when I try to create a repository at https://anonscm.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/fenics/dijitso.git I

Re: Overhaul of r-cran-yaml package

Hi Andreas, Thanks for your work; sure; go ahead and push and upload your changes. Bye, Joost On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 05:02:17PM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Joost, > > as announced[1] I'm trying to update Debian Science R packages to have a > set of up to date R packages at freeze time.

Processed: Re: linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly}

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:givaro Bug #840458 [src:linbox] linbox: FTBFS on i386: illegal instruction in test-{cra,charpoly} Bug reassigned from package 'src:linbox' to 'src:givaro'. No longer marked as found in versions linbox/1.4.2-1. Ignoring request to alter fixed

Re

Greetings, I am Mrs. Selina Aurel, and I have a confidential Project to discuss with you. Kindly get in touch with me immediately to give you the details. Mrs. Selina Aurel.

Re: Paymnet made

The payment is made. Please confirm your receipt of the payment. attached is the payment confirmation copy Jeannie Helmke H.S. Para CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this message (including attachments) is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C.

Re: sagenb-export_2.0-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Thorsten Alteholz: > > Hi, > > in case the license is GPL-3, your License block should not contain > "or (at your option) any later version.". This doesn't seem to match. > > Thorsten > Whoops, my bad. I've fixed this and uploaded again. X -- GPG: ed25519/56034877E1F87C35 GPG:

Processed: Re: numexpr FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 845082 + pending Bug #845082 [src:numexpr] numexpr FTBFS on ppc64el: test failures Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 845082:

Bug#836599: RE: Bug#836599: shark: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: test errors

On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:36:52 + Dejan Latinovic wrote: Control: tags -1 + patch Control: user -1 debian-m...@lists.debian.org Control: usertags -1 mips-patch Hi Ghislain, I have updated the patch that reduces optimization level with requested information,

Re: Bug#845348: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

Hi Daniele, thanks for the quick response. On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 04:34:26PM +0100, Daniele E. Domenichelli wrote: > On 2016-11-24 08:24, Andreas Tille wrote: > >I'll checkout gtkdataboxmm myself since I was once sponsering this - no > >idea whether Daniele remains active on this package. > >

Re: Bug#845348: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

On 2016-11-24 08:24, Andreas Tille wrote: I'll checkout gtkdataboxmm myself since I was once sponsering this - no idea whether Daniele remains active on this package. I haven't used gtkdataboxmm for a long time now, and I'm no longer developing it upstream. I think that, unless someone wants

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

On 24/11/16 09:04, Andreas Tille wrote: The other problem is that libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev should not be any more in the pool at all and I have no idea why this is the case. Binary packages that are no longer built by a source package are not removed instantly, they will be cleaned up by

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

On 2016-11-24 9:04, Andreas Tille wrote: The other problem is that libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev should not be any more in the pool at all and I have no idea why this is the case. As with almost every other transition, it's still in the archive because other packages in the archive still

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

Hi Adrian, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 10:27:18AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > I'm now realising that the first option has installable candidates which > > is astonishing since I assumed that with a new source package upload the > > binaries created by the previous version would vanish from the

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 08:40:43AM +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi again, > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote: > > > > brp-pacu: has a build-dependency on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev | > > libgtkdatabox-dev . Unfortunately buildds only look at the first option > > I'm

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

[Andreas Tille] >> xoscope: build-depends on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev explicitly I'll take care of this one, if the maintainer do not fix it quickly. I just submitted a patch to BTS solving the build problem by changing libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev go libgtkdatabox-dev. Thank you for the warning.

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

Hi again, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote: > > brp-pacu: has a build-dependency on libgtkdatabox-0.9.2-0-dev | > libgtkdatabox-dev . Unfortunately buildds only look at the first option I'm now realising that the first option has installable candidates which is

Re: What is going on with gtkdatabox?

Hi Peter, On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 02:49:56AM +, peter green wrote: > As a derivative maintainer I noticed that there appears to be a gtkdatabox > transition going on. Looking at the list archives for debian-release I see > no mention of it on there. That might have been a race condition

Processed: Re: Bug#741112 closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> (Bug#845053: Removed package(s) from unstable)

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 libopenfoam: libscotchDecomp.so.0.1.0 is GPL-licensed but links > with GPL-incompatible library Bug #845267 [libopenfoam] libfreefoam1: libscotchDecomp.so.0.1.0 is GPL-licensed but links with GPL-incompatible library Changed Bug title to 'libopenfoam:

Processed: Re: Bug#741112 closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> (Bug#845053: Removed package(s) from unstable)

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #741112 {Done: Debian FTP Masters } [libfreefoam1] libfreefoam1: libscotchDecomp.so.0.1.0 is GPL-licensed but links with GPL-incompatible library Bug 741112 cloned as bug 845267 > reassign -2 libopenfoam 4.0+dfsg1-5

Re: Bug#741112 closed by Debian FTP Masters <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org> (Bug#845053: Removed package(s) from unstable)

Control: clone -1 -2 Control: reassign -2 libopenfoam 4.0+dfsg1-5 Control: reopen -2 On Mon, 21 Nov 2016 06:18:09 + Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Dear submitter, > > as the package freefoam has just been removed from the Debian archive > unstable we hereby close the associated bug

Re: python-spyder: "from spyder.plugins.editor import Editor" hangs the machine

On sábado, 19 de noviembre de 2016 14:02:27 ART PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > From the original bug report (the only thing I had up to know): > I attached my backtrace in the bug report. this is why we are speaking about > different things;) And you seem to be solving another bug and not

Re: python-spyder: "from spyder.plugins.editor import Editor" hangs the machine

On sábado, 19 de noviembre de 2016 13:40:56 ART PICCA Frederic-Emmanuel wrote: > > Hi Picca! Please next time you reassign a bug also CC the maintainer/team > > that receives the bug, else we don't get this very text you wrote above > > :-) > sorry about that. No problems, I've made the same

Processed: Re: python-spyder: "from spyder.plugins.editor import Editor" hangs the machine

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 844601 python-spyder 3.0.1+dfsg1-1 Bug #844601 [libqt5gui5] python-spyder: "from spyder.plugins.editor import Editor" hangs the machine Bug reassigned from package 'libqt5gui5' to 'python-spyder'. No longer marked as found in versions

Re: python-spyder: "from spyder.plugins.editor import Editor" hangs the machine

reassign 844601 python-spyder 3.0.1+dfsg1-1 thanks Hi Picca! Please next time you reassign a bug also CC the maintainer/team that receives the bug, else we don't get this very text you wrote above :-) On sábado, 19 de noviembre de 2016 12:40:25 ART picca wrote: > Hello libqt5gui5 maintainer, I

Processed: Re: Bug#844526: Bug#844486: gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:wxwidgets3.0 Bug #844486 [gnuplot-qt] gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt Bug reassigned from package 'gnuplot-qt' to 'src:wxwidgets3.0'. No longer marked as found in versions gnuplot/5.0.5+dfsg1-4.

re

I have a proposal for you email me at mrsyua7...@gmail.com Yours Faithfully Mrs Yuan

Processed: Re: Bug#844486: gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 844486 by 844526 Bug #844486 [gnuplot-qt] gnuplot-qt: Mismatch between the program and library build versions with GNUTERM=wxt 844486 was not blocked by any bugs. 844486 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 844486: 844526 >

Processed: Re-add the fixed that was lost when reopening

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > fixed 698527 6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-2 Bug #698527 [elmer] elmer: executable ElmerGUI.real links with both GPL-licensed and GPL-incompatible libraries Marked as fixed in versions elmerfem/6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-2. > thanks Stopping processing here.

Processed: Re: Already fixed in oldstable

versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed in versions elmerfem/6.1.0.svn.5396.dfsg2-2. -- 698527: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=698527 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainer

Processed: Re: closing 844373

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 844373 ros-catkin Bug #844373 {Done: Jochen Sprickerhof } [librospack-dev] ros-image-common: FTBFS (incompatible build-dependencies) Bug reassigned from package 'librospack-dev' to 'ros-catkin'. Ignoring request to

Processed: Re: Bug#844199: ros-message-generation: FTBFS: INSTALL cannot find "/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20161113092941.NnUukgDcPF.db.ros-message-generation/ros-message-generation-0.4.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gn

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 844199 catkin Bug #844199 [src:ros-message-generation] ros-message-generation: FTBFS: INSTALL cannot find "ros-message-generation-0.4.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/gtest/libgtest.so Bug reassigned from package 'src:ros-message-generation' to

Processed: Re: Bug#836844: eigen3: autopkgtests fail on ppc64el

Processing control commands: > reopen -1 Bug #836844 {Done: Anton Gladky <gl...@debian.org>} [src:eigen3] eigen3: autopkgtests fail on ppc64el 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add

Processed: Re: ros-message-generation: FTBFS: INSTALL cannot find "/home/lamby/temp/cdt.20161113092941.NnUukgDcPF.db.ros-message-generation/ros-message-generation-0.4.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/gtest/libg

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 844199 ros-message-generation: FTBFS: INSTALL cannot find > "ros-message-generation-0.4.0/obj-x86_64-linux-gnu/gtest/libgtest.so Bug #844199 [src:ros-message-generation] ros-message-generation: FTBFS: INSTALL cannot find

Processed: Re: Bug#843897: Should allow pyqt5

Processing control commands: > tags -1 moreinfo Bug #843897 [python-pyqtgraph] Should allow pyqt5 Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 843897: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843897 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers

Re

I, Alice Louise Walton avtentikacijo tega sporočila, si lahko preberete več o meniPišem vam, ker nameravam darovati, da vam del mojega Net-vrednosti, ki sem bil banking.you so bile izbrane po veliko molitve in posvetovanju z najboljšimi strokovnjaki interneta. Želim odstopiti izkazale kot

Processed: Re: gazebo: diff for NMU version 7.3.1+dfsg-1.1

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #843243 [gazebo] gazebo: diff for NMU version 7.3.1+dfsg-1.1 Bug #843249 [gazebo] gazebo: diff for NMU version 7.3.1+dfsg-1.1 Added tag(s) pending. Added tag(s) pending. -- 843243: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=843243 843249:

Re

I, Alice Louise Walton avtentikacijo tega sporočila, si lahko preberete več o meniPišem vam, ker nameravam darovati, da vam del mojega Net-vrednosti, ki sem bil banking.you so bile izbrane po veliko molitve in posvetovanju z najboljšimi strokovnjaki interneta. Želim odstopiti izkazale kot

Re

Hoya Corporation needs an Account Receivable agent, If interested kindly contact Augustine Yee via augustine_...@hoyacorps.com for more information Enock, Banda (ICRISAT-Malawi) -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re:

Hello I am Mrs Andrea Lawson, secretary to Mr. Andrew Bailey. We have an inheritance of a deceased client with your surname. Kindly contact Andrew Bailey via email: ( a.b20...@yandex.com ) with your full names for info. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

Re: Bug#828252: qtcreator is marked for autoremoval from testing

Ondřej, * Ondřej Surý [161106 21:12]: > In the end it was very easy (hopefully) - the OpenSSL module is optional > and hopefully this won't break anything :). Ccing other botan1.10 users. > > Please test with botan1.10 - 1.10.13-1 that just got uploaded to > unstable. Tested

Re: Bug#828252: qtcreator is marked for autoremoval from testing

On domingo, 6 de noviembre de 2016 21:12:14 ART Ondřej Surý wrote: > In the end it was very easy (hopefully) - the OpenSSL module is optional > and hopefully this won't break anything :). Ccing other botan1.10 users. > > Please test with botan1.10 - 1.10.13-1 that just got uploaded to > unstable.

Bug#833905: dimbl will get removed from Debian (was: Re: Bug#833905: dimbl: FTBFS: include/dimbl/DimProcs.h:37:29: error: expected ')' before '&' token)

See also Bug#843328: O: dimbl . Chris and Adrian: thanks a lot for your investigations! Bye, Joost signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#842677: libosmocore: FTBFS randomly (failing tests)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 842677 + patch Bug #842677 [src:libosmocore] libosmocore: FTBFS randomly (failing tests) Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 842677:

Processed: Re: Bug#841733: Transition Opencv 3.1

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 841733 with 841245 841245 841412 841407 841246 841413 841406 812032 > 841370 841246 841408 841246 841409 841405 841416 841410 841287 841411 Bug #841733 [release.debian.org] Transition Opencv 3.1 841733 was not blocked by any bugs. 841733

Re

I,AliceLouiseWaltonavtentikacijotega sporočila, silahko preberete več omenina: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alice_Walton Pišem vam, kernameravamdamdelmojegaNet-vrednosti, kisem jihbilbančništvo.Želimodstopitiizkazale kotdarilo v upanju,da bi bilov pomočvam indrugimpreveč.Odzoveza potrditev. Z

Processed: Re: Fwd: Re: yade and ipython5

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + patch Bug #840527 [src:yade] yade: ipython transition: FTBFS with ipython 5 Added tag(s) patch. -- 840527: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=840527 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Bug#840527: Fwd: Re: yade and ipython5

;"" ++Sphinx directive to support embedded IPython code. ++ ++This directive allows pasting of entire interactive IPython sessions, prompts ++and all, and their code will actually get re-executed at doc build time, with ++all prompts renumbered sequentially. It also allows you to input code

Bug#840527: Fwd: Re: yade and ipython5

Hi Tobias, feel free to push to git (please create a new branch). I will try to test it on Saturday. Thanks! Anton 2016-10-26 21:11 GMT+02:00 Tobias Hansen : > Hi, > > the problem occurred in the file doc/sphinx/ipython_directive200.py. It > seems this is an old version of

Bug#840527: Fwd: Re: yade and ipython5

Hi, the problem occurred in the file doc/sphinx/ipython_directive200.py. It seems this is an old version of the file [1], so the first thing to try would be to include the new version with a new name and edit doc/sphinx/conf.py so that it is used. Anton, do you mind if I push a patch to the

Processed: Re: Bug#841885: gerris: autopkgtests fail with openmpi2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 841885 +pending +patch Bug #841885 [src:gerris] gerris: autopkgtests fail with openmpi2 Added tag(s) pending. Bug #841885 [src:gerris] gerris: autopkgtests fail with openmpi2 Added tag(s) patch. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please

Processed: Re: roboptim-core: FTBFS: dh_install: libroboptim-core2-plugin-base missing files (usr/lib/*/roboptim-core/*.so.2*), aborting

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #808455 [src:roboptim-core] roboptim-core: FTBFS: dh_install: libroboptim-core2-plugin-base missing files (usr/lib/*/roboptim-core/*.so.2*), aborting Added tag(s) patch. -- 808455: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=808455

Processed: Re: v-sim: (Future) FTBFS due to undeclared build dependencies

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #837865 [src:v-sim] v-sim: (Future) FTBFS due to undeclared build dependencies Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' > retitle -1 v-sim: FTBFS due to undeclared build dependencies Bug #837865 [src:v-sim] v-sim: (Future) FTBFS due to

Re: packaging ROS bfl

* Johannes Schauer [2016-10-19 10:40]: > I see. This is the upstream packaging with only very minor modifications by > Jochen (liblti-dev is not packaged yet either, so it got removed from B-D). Yeah, that was only a quick shot to try some stuff. Feel free to rework it. > The

RE: Did you see my other email??

Good day, please can you confirm if my first mail was received. >??? I have waited for your answer, but none came, or did you not receive it, I can resend it now if the first mail was not received.. I am sorry if that is the case, but let me know... -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list

re

i have a proposal for you email me at mshengj7...@gmail.com your faithful Mrs Heng -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: packaging ROS bfl

Hi, Quoting Leopold Palomo-Avellaneda (2016-10-19 09:52:32) > orocos-bfl is packaged (not perfect), but not officially. See: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/orocos/bfl.git/ > > The project is not dead, but AFAIK upstream is the orocos team, specially > Klaas

Re: packaging ROS bfl

El Dimecres, 19 d'octubre de 2016, a les 09:31:40, Johannes Schauer va escriure: > Hi, > > I intend to package ROS bfl but have several questions for the ROS people > among you. > > ROS bfl (http://wiki.ros.org/bfl) seems to be a copy of orocos bfl > (http://www.orocos.org/bfl). Not only does

re

I have a proposal for you email me at mshengj7...@gmail.com Yours Faithfully, Mrs Heng -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed (with 2 errors): RE: Bug#836599: shark: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: test errors

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #836599 [src:shark] shark: FTBFS on mips/mipsel: test errors Added tag(s) patch. > user -1 debian-m...@lists.debian.org Unknown command or malformed arguments to command. > usertags -1 mips-patch Unknown command or malformed arguments to

re

I have a proposal for you email me at mshenng7...@gmail.com Yours Faithfully Mrs Heng -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re

Please Can We Talk ..?-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Re: robot_state_publisher in package ros-robot

Hi Josch, * Johannes Schauer [2016-10-14 18:22]: > My question: why is robot_state_publisher not provided by the package? Is > there > a reason not to? It is not explained in README.Debian. Or is this just > something that is simply "not-done-yet". I need the

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >