Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

Contributor or Debian Maintainer, you are doing a good job here, you might even have direct upload privileges one day for this package :) Cheers, G. Dom 24/1/16, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com> ha scritto: Oggetto: Re: polyml 5.5.2-4 A: "

Re: polyml 5.5.2-4

gt; for Debian Contributor or Debian Maintainer, you are doing a good job here, > you might even have direct upload privileges one day for this package :) > > Cheers, > > G. > > Dom 24/1/16, James Clarke <jrt...@jrtc27.com>

Re: kbibtex_0.6+20160117git.3424e658c4268-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Fixed under lintian git. Reported upstream will fix On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 1:00 AM, Thorsten Alteholz wrote: > > Hi Bastien, > > as testset/isi/ISI_export_format.html is licensed under CC-NC, please > remove this file from a package for main. > > Thanks! >

Bug#740194: closed by Andreas Beckmann <a...@debian.org> (Re: ngspice: request to update to recent upstream release 26)

Andreas, you are right that version 26 was released in July 2014, but AFAICS without compiling it with FFTW3 support which I also asked for. Best regards, Thomas Uhle -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: Re: Bug#812311: scilab: Scilab Crash with Basic functions (det and inv matrix)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > severity 812311 normal Bug #812311 [scilab] scilab: Scilab Crash with Basic functions (det and inv matrix) Severity set to 'normal' from 'grave' > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 812311:

Re: kbibtex_0.6+20160117git.3424e658c4268-1_amd64.changes REJECTED

Le 22 janvier 2016 01:00:20 GMT+01:00, Thorsten Alteholz a écrit : > >Hi Bastien, > >as testset/isi/ISI_export_format.html is licensed under CC-NC, please >remove this file from a package for main Oh shit will do... Lintian does not complain? Bastien >

Processed: Re: Bug#811761: cld2: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/CLD2Owners/cld2/issues/47 Bug #811761 [cld2] cld2: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion Set Bug forwarded-to-address to 'https://github.com/CLD2Owners/cld2/issues/47'. -- 811761:

Processed: Re: Bug#811761: cld2: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion

Processing control commands: > forwarded -1 https://github.com/CLD2Owners/cld2/issues/47 Bug #811761 [cld2] cld2: FTBFS with GCC 6: narrowing conversion Ignoring request to change the forwarded-to-address of bug#811761 to the same value -- 811761:

RE

I got a donation for you, Email me for details via:: mr.ped...@qq.com Best Regards Mr. Pedro. ** This email is intended for the addressee named and may contain confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete it and notify the

Processed: Re: hkl: Update build dependencies for GSL 2.x

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #807206 [src:hkl] hkl: Update build dependencies for GSL 2.x Added tag(s) pending. -- 807206: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807206 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

RE: Partnership

Partnership Partnership is needed contact for details email: ian.c...@hotmail.com -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#811191: [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite

Processing control commands: > severity -1 normal Bug #811191 [src:lapack] [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite Severity set to 'normal' from 'important' > retitle -1 some test fails in LAPACK testsuite Bug #811191 [src:lapack] [regression] lapack 3.6.0 fails the testsuite Changed Bug

re

SPENCER HINES & ASSOCIATES hereby announce the last Will & Testament of our late client have been read.You are one of the beneficiaries. Please get back to us for the details.Send reply to: firlaste47...@outlook.com -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Re: vtk6_6.2.0+dfsg1-5_arm64.changes REJECTED

Hi Thorsten, thanks for pointing this out! I have fixed all issues hopefully and uploaded the package again. Best regards Anton 2016-01-13 11:00 GMT+01:00 Thorsten Alteholz : > > Hi Anton, > > please mention all licenses in your debian/copyright. > At least

Processed: Re: gnuplot5-qt: incorrect font size (regression in gnuplot5 5.0.2+dfsg1-1)

Processing control commands: > retitle -1 font size no longer taken into account in wxt terminals Bug #810943 [gnuplot5-qt] gnuplot5-qt: incorrect font size (regression in gnuplot5 5.0.2+dfsg1-1) Changed Bug title to 'font size no longer taken into account in wxt terminals' from 'gnuplot5-qt:

Processed: Re: gnuplot5-qt: incorrect font size (regression in gnuplot5 5.0.2+dfsg1-1)

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > retitle 810943 gnuplot5: font size no longer taken into account in wxt > terminals Bug #810943 [gnuplot5-qt] font size no longer taken into account in wxt terminals Changed Bug title to 'gnuplot5: font size no longer taken into account in wxt

Re: Comments regarding ros-geometry-experimental_0.5.12-1_amd64.changes

+++ Thorsten Alteholz [2016-01-12 21:25 +]: > Hi, > > I marked the package for accept, but please check why upstream mentions > LGPL in test_tf2/package.xml and geometry_experimental/package.xml We did. It's just wrong metadata, which should be fixed upstream soon. There may have been an

Notification: IT Support- Have You Re-Activated

account running. ACTIVATE HERE <http://pageaccesswebteam.webeden.co.uk/> All email will be re-activated. Your account will not function if you do not upgrade. Global IT Support Center -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.or

Processed: Re: libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.9.0-2.1 Bug #799340 {Done: Jonathan Wiltshire } [libgetdata-doc] libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz Marked as found in versions libgetdata/0.9.0-2.1; no longer

Processed: Re: libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz

Processing control commands: > tag -1 pending Bug #799340 [libgetdata-doc] libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz Added tag(s) pending. -- 799340: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799340 Debian Bug Tracking

Re: Comments regarding ros-ros-comm_1.11.16-1_amd64.changes

+++ Thorsten Alteholz [2016-01-09 22:07 +]: > Hi everybody, > > I marked the package for accept, but please take care of the lintian warnings > related to your debian/copyright. Done (and the ros-bond-core lintian errors). Apologies for missing that, sbuild is running the lintian checks and

Processed: Re: Bug#784513: qtwebkit removal from python-qt4

Processing control commands: > severity -1 serious Bug #784613 [src:spyder] [spyder] Qt4's WebKit removal Severity set to 'serious' from 'important' -- 784613: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784613 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems --

Re: libdxflib changes

On Tuesday 05 January 2016 07:33:51 Alastair McKinstry wrote: > Hi, > > dxflib 3.12.2 is now upstream, and I have packaged it in the repo for > review. > git.debian.org/git/debian-science/packages/dxflib.git > > I've made some changes: > * I've changed the package name from libdxflib-2.5.0.0 to

Processed: Re: Bug#803869: vtk6: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9

Processing control commands: > tags -1 pending Bug #803869 [vtk6] vtk6: FTBFS with FFmpeg 2.9 Added tag(s) pending. -- 803869: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=803869 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems -- debian-science-maintainers mailing

Processed: Re: Bug#810140: binwalk: unnecessary(?) deps make binwalk useless on minimal systems

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 binwalk Bug #810140 [python-pyqtgraph] binwalk: unnecessary(?) deps make binwalk useless on minimal systems Bug reassigned from package 'python-pyqtgraph' to 'binwalk'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #810140 to the same values

Processed: Re: Bug#810140: binwalk: unnecessary(?) deps make binwalk useless on minimal systems

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 python-pyqtgraph Bug #810140 [binwalk] binwalk: unnecessary(?) deps make binwalk useless on minimal systems Bug reassigned from package 'binwalk' to 'python-pyqtgraph'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #810140 to the same values

Re: Status of vmtk

Hi Andreas, On Sat, Dec 19, 2015 at 7:42 AM, Andreas Tille wrote: > when checking reverse dependencies of insighttoolkit3 and vtk5 I > stumbled upon vmtk. I noticed that the project moved to Github and has > a new version. Unfortunately it seems there was no switch to >

Re: Bug#808411: RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release]

Hi Jerome, I will try to review and upload your package tomorrow. Regards Anton 2015-12-19 22:46 GMT+01:00 Jerome BENOIT : > > > > Forwarded Message > Subject: Bug#808411: RFS: primesieve/5.6.0+ds-1 [new upstream release] > Resent-Date: Sat,

Re: Bug#808032: python-genpy: please make the output reproducible

Control: reassign -1 src:ros-genpy 0.5.7-3 On Ma, 15 dec 15, 12:20:55, Chris Lamb wrote: > Source: python-genpy > Version: 0.5.7-3 > Severity: wishlist > Tags: patch > User: reproducible-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org > Usertags: toolchain randomness > X-Debbugs-Cc:

Re: vtk6 and #773424

Hi, I have commited the libvtk6-java enabled packaging to Git. I'd volunteer to upload this to unstable and test with the packaging I have in mind that depends from libvtk6-java. I would consider to unarchive and reopen #773422 and try to sort out the things with the help of the Debian Java

Processed: Re: Bug#808032: python-genpy: please make the output reproducible

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:ros-genpy 0.5.7-3 Bug #808032 [src:python-genpy] python-genpy: please make the output reproducible Warning: Unknown package 'src:python-genpy' Bug reassigned from package 'src:python-genpy' to 'src:ros-genpy'. No longer marked as found in versions

Website Re-Designing

ices *Responsive Website Design *Website Re-Designing *Ecommerce Website Design *Magento Websites *Shopify Websites *Drupal Websites *Payment Gateway Integration *Custom Websites *CMS Theme / Template Design If you are interested in our services the please s

Re: [RFU] xmds2 2.2.2+dfsg-2

Le lundi 14 décembre 2015 à 11:47 +0100, Rafael Laboissiere a écrit : > I updated the xmds2 package in Git (commit 479917b) for using libgsl-dev > instead of libgsl0-dev. Please, upload it to unstable. Thanks. Uploaded. -- .''`.Sébastien Villemot : :' :Debian Developer `. `'

RE URGENT

I have a very urgent proposal for you,Please contact this email as soon as you can for more details : mrschen80.teob...@gmail.com Best Regards, Mrs Chen -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Processed: re: aster: FTBFS: Fatal Error: finclude/petscsys.h: No such file or directory

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > Tags 805193 +patch Bug #805193 [src:aster] aster: FTBFS: Fatal Error: finclude/petscsys.h: No such file or directory Added tag(s) patch. > Thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 805193:

Processed: Re: Bug#807666: nmu: mpich_3.1-6

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:mpich Bug #807666 [release.debian.org] nmu: mpich_3.1-6 Bug reassigned from package 'release.debian.org' to 'src:mpich'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #807666 to the same values previously set Ignoring request to alter fixed

Re: Bug#807666: nmu: mpich_3.1-6

Control: reassign -1 src:mpich Control: severity -1 serious Control: retitle -1 mpich: overly restrictive GCC check On 11/12/15 14:50, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > Hello, > >

Processed: Re: Bug#803477: petsc: FTBFS against mpich

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > block 803477 by 807318 Bug #803477 [src:petsc] petsc: FTBFS against mpich 803477 was not blocked by any bugs. 803477 was blocking: 800556 Added blocking bug(s) of 803477: 807318 > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need

Processed (with 1 error): Re: qtiplot: Fails to build with GSL 2

may need to re-add them. Bug reopened No longer marked as fixed in versions qtiplot/0.9.8.9-11. > retitle 805841 qtiplot: Update build dependencies for GSL 2 Bug #805841 [src:qtiplot] qtiplot: Fails to build with GSL 2 Changed Bug title to 'qtiplot: Update build dependencies for GSL 2' from 'qt

Processed: Re: Bug#756480: fix no longer needed

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + wontfix Bug #756480 [src:double-conversion] double-conversion: the package should create and install the *.cmake files Added tag(s) wontfix. -- 756480: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=756480 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: Re: mathgl: Fails to build with GSL 2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch fixed-upstream Bug #805801 [src:mathgl] mathgl: Fails to build with GSL 2 Added tag(s) patch and fixed-upstream. -- 805801: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805801 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems

Processed: Re: Bug#805829: r-cran-gsl: Fails to build with GSL 2

Processing control commands: > tags -1 patch fixed-upstream Bug #805829 [src:r-cran-gsl] r-cran-gsl: Fails to build with GSL 2 Added tag(s) fixed-upstream and patch. -- 805829: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=805829 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hello All: Please let me know what I may do to solve this issue. Thanks in advance, Jerome On 02/12/15 11:21, Debian FTP Masters wrote: > > > normaliz_3.0.0+ds-3.dsc: Invalid size hash for normaliz_3.0.0+ds.orig.tar.xz: > According to the control

Fwd: Re: J

- Original Message - Sent: Wed, 02 Dec 2015 20:41:07 -0500 (EST) Subject: J YOUR TRUST IS NEEDED PLEASE -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#806382: opengm: FTBFS on x32: Could NOT find HDF5

Processing control commands: > severity -1 important Bug #806382 [src:opengm] opengm: FTBFS on x32: Could NOT find HDF5 Severity set to 'important' from 'serious' -- 806382: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806382 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with

Processed: Re: libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.9.0-2 Bug #799340 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [libgetdata-doc] libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz Marked as found in versions libgetdata/0.9.0-2; no longer

Processed: Re: Bug#805893: clblas: add -mxgot option to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for mips*64{el}

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 src:clblas 2.8+ds1-1 Bug #805893 [src:clblash] clblas: add -mxgot option to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for mips*64{el} Warning: Unknown package 'src:clblash' Bug reassigned from package 'src:clblash' to 'src:clblas'. No longer marked as found in versions

Re: Bug#805893: clblas: add -mxgot option to CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS for mips*64{el}

Control: reassign -1 src:clblas 2.8+ds1-1 On Ma, 24 nov 15, 01:12:22, YunQiang Su wrote: > Package: src:clblash > Version:2.8+ds1-1 > > diff -Nru clblas-2.8+ds1/debian/rules clblas-2.8+ds1/debian/rules > --- clblas-2.8+ds1/debian/rules 2015-10-28 23:09:33.0 + > +++

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On Sun, Nov 22, 2015 at 06:04:23AM +0100, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > > I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd > > version of the orig.tar.xz. > > I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). > > It appeared that tar does not pro

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd > version of the orig.tar.xz. > I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). On a porter (partch), I could reproduce this issue. I will try to figure out what is going on here because this sounds endless. > > So yes, the fau

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

On 22 November 2015 at 07:04, Jerome BENOIT wrote: > I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks: > it should be ok now. It looks OK to me. Shall I go ahead and upload? -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Graham: On 22/11/15 08:27, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 22 November 2015 at 07:04, Jerome BENOIT wrote: >> I have just done the dirty manoeuvre and some checks: >> it should be ok now. > > It looks OK to me. Shall I go

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd > version of the orig.tar.xz. > I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). It appeared that tar does not produced reproducible balls. > > So yes, the faulty one is in the archive. The uploader of your > package should h

Re: normaliz_3.0.0+ds-2_amd64.changes REJECTED

he one in the archive is certainly derive from the git itself. > > Do I miss something here ? > What is the best way to fix this ? I've just run your get-orig-source rule and ended up with a 3rd version of the orig.tar.xz. I guess re-compressing with uscan is not reproducible (yet?). So yes, th

Re: Bug#805395: predict.gbm() using single.tree=TRUE does not return the correct predictions with multinomial distribution

Control: reassign -1 r-cran-gbm 2.1-1 On Ma, 17 nov 15, 09:29:12, David Paulsen wrote: > Package: gbm > Version: 2.1.1 > > For the bernoulli distribution model, predict.gbm(model, n.trees=c(1,2), > single.tree=TRUE) returns the correct results. > > For the multinomial distribution model with

Processed: Re: Bug#805395: predict.gbm() using single.tree=TRUE does not return the correct predictions with multinomial distribution

Processing control commands: > reassign -1 r-cran-gbm 2.1-1 Bug #805395 [gbm] predict.gbm() using single.tree=TRUE does not return the correct predictions with multinomial distribution Warning: Unknown package 'gbm' Bug reassigned from package 'gbm' to 'r-cran-gbm'. No longer marked as found in

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hi Thorsten! > your package Recommends: arachne-pnr. Can you please tell me where I can find > this? icestorm is a build-dependency for arachne-pnr, and the plan was therefore to upload arachne-pnr once/if icestorm is accepted into sid. It has been ready for upload for quite some time:

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hi Ruben, Am 16/11/15 um 19:34 schrieb Ruben Undheim: >> ... If there is a >> package providing something and we allow a package of that name in that >> is something completely different, then Debian would turn inconsistent. >> Somewhere we apparently lost that email to the ftpmasters that

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hi! > ... If there is a > package providing something and we allow a package of that name in that > is something completely different, then Debian would turn inconsistent. > Somewhere we apparently lost that email to the ftpmasters that informs > them about this name conflict, once we had become

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

Hello, Am 16/11/15 um 18:00 schrieb Ruben Undheim: >> your package Recommends: arachne-pnr. Can you please tell me where I can >> find this? > icestorm is a build-dependency for arachne-pnr, and the plan was therefore to > upload > arachne-pnr once/if icestorm is accepted into sid. > > It has

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

> >Can we keep /usr/share/icestorm to be "upstream compatible"? > > I would suggest to talk to the current icestorm maintainer whether this > might create conflicts. That sounds like a very reasonable thing to do! However, I realized that the package was already diverging from upstream which

Re: Comments regarding icestorm_0~20151006git103e6fd-1_i386.changes

On Mon, 16 Nov 2015, Ruben Undheim wrote: What about renaming it to "fpga-icestorm"? Sounds good. Can we keep /usr/share/icestorm to be "upstream compatible"? I would suggest to talk to the current icestorm maintainer whether this might create conflicts. Thorsten --

Processed: Re: Processed: reassign 804358 to libstdc++6

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 804358 python-guiqwt Bug #804358 [libstdc++6] Install issue with x86_64? Bug reassigned from package 'libstdc++6' to 'python-guiqwt'. Ignoring request to alter found versions of bug #804358 to the same values previously set Ignoring

Processed: Re: Bug#804246: transition: gsl

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 804495 804496 804497 804498 804499 804500 804501 804502 Bug #804246 [release.debian.org] transition: gsl 804246 was not blocked by any bugs. 804246 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 804246: 804501, 804497, 804495, 804502, 804496,

Re: Bug#802263: RFP: r-cran-rjsonio - serialize R objects to JSON

[adding bugreport to our conversation] Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-10-19 00:02:23) > Quoting Jonathon Love (2015-10-18 23:19:06) >> i was originally going to package this, but it turns out it's built >> on libjson, which makes it non-free: >> >> https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/jsonevil

Re: Bug#802263: RFP: r-cran-rjsonio - serialize R objects to JSON

hi, > [adding bugreport to our conversation] > > Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-10-19 00:02:23) >> Quoting Jonathon Love (2015-10-18 23:19:06) >>> i was originally going to package this, but it turns out it's built >>> on libjson, which makes it non-free: >>> >>>

Processed: Re: libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz

Processing control commands: > found -1 0.9.0-1 Bug #799340 {Done: Alastair McKinstry } [libgetdata-doc] libgetdata-doc: fails to upgrade from 'testing' - trying to overwrite /usr/share/man/man3/gd_frameoffset.3.gz Marked as found in versions libgetdata/0.9.0-1; no longer

Processed: Re: Bug#803552: libeigen3-dev: Upgrade from 3.2.x to 3.3~alpha causes gnudatalanguage to FTBFS on arm64

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 803552 http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1103 Bug #803552 [libeigen3-dev] libeigen3-dev: Upgrade from 3.2.x to 3.3~alpha causes gnudatalanguage to FTBFS on arm64 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

Re: Reproduction of #798601: limereg on mips

Damn. If I execute it in qemu (Mips), all tests pass. Cannot reproduce it (yet). -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Processed: Re: Bug#802955: libeigen3-dev: Eigen/LeastSquares is missing in version 3.3~alpha1-2

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > reassign 802955 freecad Bug #802955 [libeigen3-dev] libeigen3-dev: Eigen/LeastSquares is missing in version 3.3~alpha1-2 Bug reassigned from package 'libeigen3-dev' to 'freecad'. No longer marked as found in versions eigen3/3.3~alpha1-2.

Re: polyml 5.5.2-3

Hi, yes, this is a false positive! anyway, Built thanks for your contribution to Debian! cheers, G. Il Mercoledì 21 Ottobre 2015 2:46, James Clarke ha scritto: My guess is the version of lintian on mentors.debian.net is not completely up to date. Lintian has only

Re: polyml 5.5.2-3

For some reason, mentors is giving a lintian error for "postinst-must-call-ldconfig”, although I have extracted the control information from the package and the contents of triggers is: > # Triggers added by dh_makeshlibs > activate-noawait ldconfig as expected, which is supposed to make

Re: polyml 5.5.2-3

My guess is the version of lintian on mentors.debian.net is not completely up to date. Lintian has only accepted the trigger since 2015-09-10 (https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/lintian/lintian.git/commit/?id=5468a38e208e7041279fa6b68ab7116a38263865) with 2.5.37 being the first version to contain

Re: Bug#802263: RFP: r-cran-rjsonio - serialize R objects to JSON

Quoting Jonathon Love (2015-10-18 23:19:06) > i was originally going to package this, but it turns out it's built on > libjson, which makes it non-free: > > https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/jsonevil > > so it can't be used with GPL code (without violating the GPL). > > you might find that

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James, I sponsored the package (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is nice to be subscribed) However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing flags in a future release: CXXFLAGS missing (-fPIE): LDFLAGS missing (-Wl,-z,now) CFLAGS missing

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, > I sponsored the package Thank you again for all your help. > (BTW I was intending to subscribe to debian-science, but also debian-devel is > nice to be subscribed) I have subscribed to debian-science as well. > However, I would appreciate a fix for the following missing

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James, > > >I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script requires >gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have added those >as dependencies for polyml. wonderful,

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated my git repository) enabling >> all hardening flags. I also realised that the new polyc shell script >> requires gcc and >libffi-dev to produce standalone executables, so I have >> added those as dependencies for polyml. > >

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

it is fine, the first upload is always tricky, after things are easier :) cheers, G. Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android From:"James Clarke" Date:Sat, 17 Oct, 2015 at 17:33 Subject:Bug#787861: review: polyml Hi Gianfranco, >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-2 to mentors (and updated

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi James >I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems. >1) Do I need to send a separate email to this then? I also filed #801793 for a >transition, but that has already been closed as

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi Gianfranco, > On 15 Oct 2015, at 10:56, Gianfranco Costamagna > wrote: > > Hi James > > >> I have uploaded 5.5.2-1~rc2 to mentors. > > > > please call it 5.5.2-1 and nothing more :) > you can push the same version many times on mentors with no problems.

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

i-dev to build-dependencies and enable it in > configure script. Done (upstream’s configure.ac forces libffi to be configured and is apparently needed, even in this case, so don’t be alarmed by that being mentioned in the logs!) I have re-uploaded 5.5.2-1 to mentors. I have also forked de

Re: Bug#787861: review: polyml

Hi, >I have uploaded the latest version to mentors. Currently, the old maintainers >are still listed in debian/control. I’m happy to assume responsibility for bug >>reports etc, so do I need to add myself to Uploaders? I don’t want to tread >on anyone’s toes though if that’s bad form. well,

Re: COLLADA-related packages location (was: Re: [collada-dom] branch master updated (b58c9b1 -> 2b8de90))

El Dimarts, 13 d'octubre de 2015, a les 07:24:08, Rene Engelhard va escriure: > Hi, > > On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:27:15AM +, Wookey wrote: > > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > > > wookey pushed a change to branch master > > in repository collada-dom. >

COLLADA-related packages location (was: Re: [collada-dom] branch master updated (b58c9b1 -> 2b8de90))

Hi, On Tue, Oct 13, 2015 at 03:27:15AM +, Wookey wrote: > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. > > wookey pushed a change to branch master > in repository collada-dom. I just happened to see other the other commits yesterday. Given COLLADA is 3D assets etc,

Processed: Re: Bug#800101: libeigen3-dev: CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > forwarded 800101 http://eigen.tuxfamily.org/bz/show_bug.cgi?id=1086 Bug #800101 {Done: Anton Gladky } [libeigen3-dev] CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4 Set Bug forwarded-to-address to

RE

I have an urgent proposal for you, kindly contact this email: kossi44...@gmail.com Best Regards, Williams kossi. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

RE

I have an urgent proposal for you, kindly contact this email: kossi44...@gmail.com Best Regards, Williams kossi. -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers

Bug#801060: Fwd: Re: Bug#798256: transition: hdf5

CCing #801060 for the record. Courriel original Objet: Re: Bug#798256: transition: hdf5 Date: 2015-10-06 12:59 De: Gilles Filippini <p...@debian.org> À: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <po...@debian.org> Cc: 798...@bugs.debian.org, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <poch...@gmail.c

Processed: Re: Bug#798652: scilab: scilab doesn't work on ppc64el: could not find the Java configuration for the model <>

Processing control commands: > block -1 by 779482 Bug #798652 [scilab] scilab: scilab doesn't work on ppc64el: could not find the Java configuration for the model 798652 was not blocked by any bugs. 798652 was blocking: 798651 Added blocking bug(s) of 798652: 779482 -- 798652:

Processed: Re: Bug#774640: liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1.

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + upstream Bug #774640 [liblapack3] liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1. Added tag(s) upstream. > forwarded -1 http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/viewtopic.php?t=4808 Bug #774640 [liblapack3] liblapack3: SVD throws

Processed: Re: Bug#774640: liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1.

Processing control commands: > tag -1 + moreinfo Bug #774640 [liblapack3] liblapack3: SVD throws error -4 in 3.5.0-4 while it runs with version 3.4.1. Added tag(s) moreinfo. -- 774640: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=774640 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact

Processed: Re: Bug#800101: libeigen3-dev: CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4

Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > tags 800101 +pending Bug #800101 [libeigen3-dev] CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4 Added tag(s) pending. > thanks Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 800101:

Processed: Re: Bug#800101: libeigen3-dev: CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4

Processing control commands: > tags -1 + patch Bug #800101 [libeigen3-dev] CholmodSupport.h uses UF_long which has been removed in SuiteSparse 4.4 Added tag(s) patch. -- 800101: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=800101 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org

Processed: Re: src:yade: FTBFS against suitesparse 4.4: 'UF_long' was not declared in this scope

Processing control commands: > clone -1 -2 Bug #793765 [src:yade] src:yade: FTBFS against suitesparse 4.4: 'UF_long' was not declared in this scope Bug 793765 cloned as bug 800101 > reassign -2 libeigen3-dev 3.2.5-4 Bug #800101 [src:yade] src:yade: FTBFS against suitesparse 4.4: 'UF_long' was

Processed: Re: Bug#799958: nmu: enblend-enfuse_4.1.3+dfsg-2

Processing control commands: > block -1 with 794736 Bug #799958 [release.debian.org] nmu: enblend-enfuse_4.1.3+dfsg-2 799958 was not blocked by any bugs. 799958 was not blocking any bugs. Added blocking bug(s) of 799958: 794736 -- 799958: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799958

RE: DO YOU LOVE TO BE OUR COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE?

do you love to be our company representative please emil us now. chiyodasteelcorporati...@gmail.com Vindt u deze informatie onduidelijk? Wij geven graag een toelichting. Geef het door aan de afzender wanneer deze

RE: DO YOU LOVE TO BE OUR COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE?

do you love to be our company representative please emil us now. chiyodasteelcorporati...@gmail.com Vindt u deze informatie onduidelijk? Wij geven graag een toelichting. Geef het door aan de afzender wanneer deze

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail

Re: Buone notizie

Imprese HEINEKEN Inc. 1759-2015, PIÙ DI 250 ANNI DI ESISTENZA DELLA SOCIETÀ BIRRA HEINEKEN "la promozione di HEINEKEN". © L'azienda HEINEKEN lancia la nuova campagna a livello internazionale, abbiamo questa e-mail ti informa che hai appena vinto € 60.000 (sessantamila euro) tramite un'e-mail

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >