Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One reason why I did not install any security-updates to SSH1.1 is that on
> > the web page of www.debian.org they say that there is a remote exploit in
> > OpenSSH (DSA-027) but it is fixed in Debian 2.2 (potato) and that is the
> > one I installed. I d
Hi Jeff.
My pcmcia netcard also don't work when i switch on my laptop.
When i type ifconfig it prints:
UP BROADCAST RUNNING
then I enable multicast (ifconfig eth0 multicast)
It works and ifconfig prints
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
Kristian F. Høgh.
Jeff Coppock wrote:
> I recently install s
Jeff,
It can potentially slow your machine down somewhat, as now the kernel has
to handle each and every frame transmitted on the network eth0 is attached
to, rather than only the ones addressed to your machine and
broadcasts. Quite a lot of load if your system isn't addressed much on a
high-traff
I recently install snort on my laptop to check it out and now my pcmcia network
card will pass IP only when snort is running (daemon mode or not), or I have to
put my network card in promiscuous mode [#ifconfig eth0 -promisc].
I can't find any configuration that is obvious to me that would cause
Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > One reason why I did not install any security-updates to SSH1.1 is that on
> > the web page of www.debian.org they say that there is a remote exploit in
> > OpenSSH (DSA-027) but it is fixed in Debian 2.2 (potato) and that is the
> > one I installed. I
Hi Jeff.
My pcmcia netcard also don't work when i switch on my laptop.
When i type ifconfig it prints:
UP BROADCAST RUNNING
then I enable multicast (ifconfig eth0 multicast)
It works and ifconfig prints
UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST
Kristian F. Høgh.
Jeff Coppock wrote:
> I recently install
Jeff,
It can potentially slow your machine down somewhat, as now the kernel has
to handle each and every frame transmitted on the network eth0 is attached
to, rather than only the ones addressed to your machine and
broadcasts. Quite a lot of load if your system isn't addressed much on a
high-traf
I recently install snort on my laptop to check it out and now my pcmcia network card
will pass IP only when snort is running (daemon mode or not), or I have to put my
network card in promiscuous mode [#ifconfig eth0 -promisc].
I can't find any configuration that is obvious to me that would caus
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Runar Bell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and thanks to everybody for all the useful information I have received. :)
> One good thing about using SSH2.4 in stead of OpenSSH is that if someone
> installed an RSA key in my .ssh/authorized_keys file, it would be of no
> us
At 06:08 + 3/2/2001, Jacob Meuser wrote:
I believe it becomes uncommented if one installs over the network? (That
would make sense to ME anyway.)
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It didn't on my network install. I did an FTP install of PowerPC
Debian (Potato). I had to uncomment the security line a
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Ethan Benson
> >
> > | On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > | >
> > | > My potatos have
> > | > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib n
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:30:35AM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
>
> On the other hand, OpenSSH was created by the OpenBSD people, who are
> famous for secure programming.
>
And also for quick security fixes. They had a patch for sudo about 5 hours
after the recent bug was discovered. It took a few
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Ethan Benson
>
> | On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> | >
> | > My potatos have
> | > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
> | > in /etc/apt/sources.list
> | > That
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 07:13:22PM +1100, Steve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible for the latest version of OpenSSH (2.5.1 in
> unstable) to be back-ported to potato and added to proposed updates
> once it enters testing.
>
I second that.
>
> Disclaimer: I am not a developer. However, I am
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 08:39:09AM +0100, Runar Bell wrote:
> Hi,
>
> and thanks to everybody for all the useful information I have received. :)
> One good thing about using SSH2.4 in stead of OpenSSH is that if someone
> installed an RSA key in my .ssh/authorized_keys file, it would be of no
> u
At 06:08 + 3/2/2001, Jacob Meuser wrote:
>I believe it becomes uncommented if one installs over the network? (That
>would make sense to ME anyway.)
>
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
It didn't on my network install. I did an FTP install of PowerPC
Debian (Potato). I had to uncomment the security line
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> > * Ethan Benson
> >
> > | On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> > | >
> > | > My potatos have
> > | > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib
On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 10:30:35AM -0700, Hubert Chan wrote:
>
> On the other hand, OpenSSH was created by the OpenBSD people, who are
> famous for secure programming.
>
And also for quick security fixes. They had a patch for sudo about 5 hours
after the recent bug was discovered. It took a fe
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 11:39:15AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
> * Ethan Benson
>
> | On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
> | >
> | > My potatos have
> | > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
> | > in /etc/apt/sources.list
> | > Tha
On Fri, Mar 02, 2001 at 07:13:22PM +1100, Steve wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Would it be possible for the latest version of OpenSSH (2.5.1 in
> unstable) to be back-ported to potato and added to proposed updates
> once it enters testing.
>
I second that.
>
> Disclaimer: I am not a developer. However, I a
* Ethan Benson
| On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
| >
| > My potatos have
| > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
| > in /etc/apt/sources.list
| > That was in there by default, I just uncommented it. (it was there in r0
too,
|
| i
I need to protect exchange server on NT with firewall. What ports should
I leave open? SMTP, POP3, IMAP, dns? Does it spawn something on high
ports?
JA
* Ethan Benson
| On Thu, Mar 01, 2001 at 05:07:43AM +, Jacob Meuser wrote:
| >
| > My potatos have
| > deb http://security.debian.org stable/updates main contrib non-free
| > in /etc/apt/sources.list
| > That was in there by default, I just uncommented it. (it was there in r0 too,
|
| i
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Of course, all of this is meaningless, since with PAM, `su' _can_
> understand and honor the `wheel' group. Also, if RMS is so against
> authority and power, why is there a GNU `su' at all?
>
> In addition, where the rulers' (ie, sysadmins') power is
I need to protect exchange server on NT with firewall. What ports should
I leave open? SMTP, POP3, IMAP, dns? Does it spawn something on high
ports?
JA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Would it be possible for the latest version of OpenSSH (2.5.1 in
unstable) to be back-ported to potato and added to proposed updates
once it enters testing.
I propose this due to the recent set of ssh vulnerabilities most (all?)
of which didn't apply to 2.3.0, and the concerns over the fundam
Hi,
and thanks to everybody for all the useful information I have received. :)
One good thing about using SSH2.4 in stead of OpenSSH is that if someone
installed an RSA key in my .ssh/authorized_keys file, it would be of no
use :) Besides, I have heard that the SSH1.1 protocol is unsecure, and
tha
[Note: This is Cc'd to debian-devel and debian-security because of the
discussion regarding RMS' su diatribe; subscribers to these lists
might find it interesting, scroll down past the Java stuff if you are,
and feel free to ignore this message if you're not. Please don't flame
me. I'm thin-skinned
On Fri, 2 Mar 2001, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
> Of course, all of this is meaningless, since with PAM, `su' _can_
> understand and honor the `wheel' group. Also, if RMS is so against
> authority and power, why is there a GNU `su' at all?
>
> In addition, where the rulers' (ie, sysadmins') power is
29 matches
Mail list logo
