On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:07:01PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
SAFT is a nifty little protocol that lets you send a file to some other
user on the internet without them having to explicitly accept it. Instead,
the SAFT server will receive the file and place it in a queue for access
later
HEllo,
is debian protected beforeconnecting from remote hosts to address
127.0.0.0/8 ?
how?
--
Matus "fantomas" Uhlar, sysadmin at NEXTRA, Slovakia; IRCNET admin of *.sk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ ; http://www.nextra.sk/
If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her
Am Samstag, 10. Mrz 2001 00:05 schrieb Kevin:
Then they only have to compile their own version. Openwall shows only
you when you run 'w' but shows everyone if you 'who'. Anyone know
why?
No experience with tools like this (LIDS/Openwall etc.)
w and who are different binaries on my system, so
I don't know if this could be exploited is any way, but here's something
that I've seen. This is on x86 on two machines and a ppc g3.
#su
#login
login:
^D
Segmentation fault
Maybe you guys can check this more.
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:49:54PM +, Jim Breton wrote:
# deny and log all packets trying to come in from a 127.0.0.0/8 address
# over a non-'lo' interface
Oops. Just occurred to me that this is not what you were asking about.
Why do I do such things?
Anyway.
On Thu, Mar 08, 2001 at 09:07:01PM -0800, Alexander Hvostov wrote:
SAFT is a nifty little protocol that lets you send a file to some other
user on the internet without them having to explicitly accept it. Instead,
the SAFT server will receive the file and place it in a queue for access
later
HEllo,
is debian protected beforeconnecting from remote hosts to address
127.0.0.0/8 ?
how?
--
Matus fantomas Uhlar, sysadmin at NEXTRA, Slovakia; IRCNET admin of *.sk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ; http://www.fantomas.sk/ ; http://www.nextra.sk/
If Barbie is so popular, why do you have to buy her
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 11:30:23AM +0100, Matus fantomas Uhlar wrote:
HEllo,
is debian protected beforeconnecting from remote hosts to address
127.0.0.0/8 ?
how?
Yes. It uses rp_filter (this is controlled in /proc/sys/... Read
linux/Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt, in the kernel
- is debian protected beforeconnecting from remote hosts to address
- 127.0.0.0/8 ?
-
- how?
-
-
- [amos]:~/# grep spoof-protect /etc/init.d/networking
- if [ -e /etc/network/spoof-protect ]; then
- . /etc/network/spoof-protect
-
- [amos]:~/# grep 127.0.0.1 /etc/network/spoof-protect
-
On Wed, 7 Mar 2001, [iso-8859-1] Niklas H?glund wrote:
Hi!
Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so..
'who' shows only the user himself
'netstat -a' only ports that root/the user owns
'ls' only files that are owned by root/the user
??
//Niklas
Take a look at
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:47:41AM -0400, Peter Cordes wrote:
Yes. It uses rp_filter (this is controlled in /proc/sys/... Read
Also by:
/etc/ipmasq/rules/I15lospoof.def
if you have the ipmasq package installed:
# deny and log all packets trying to come in from a 127.0.0.0/8 address
# over
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Niklas H?glund wrote:
Hi!
Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so..
'who' shows only the user himself
who is not a kernel function, it's a system utility.
Something like this will work:
alias who=me=`whoami`; who
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 05:40:03PM -0500, Robert Mognet wrote:
Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so..
'who' shows only the user himself
who is not a kernel function, it's a system utility.
That doesn't mean a kernel patch can't modify its behavior. Have you
Am Freitag, 9. März 2001 23:40 schrieb Robert Mognet:
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at 05:03:55PM +0100, Niklas H?glund wrote:
Hi!
Anyone know where I can find a kernel patch that restricts users so..
'who' shows only the user himself
who is not a kernel function, it's a system utility.
Then they only have to compile their own version. Openwall shows only
you when you run 'w' but shows everyone if you 'who'. Anyone know
why?
--
Kevin - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Original message --
Am Freitag, 9. März 2001 23:40 schrieb Robert Mognet:
Hello,
On Wed, Mar 07, 2001 at
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 04:05:17PM -0700, Kevin wrote:
Then they only have to compile their own version. Openwall shows only
you when you run 'w' but shows everyone if you 'who'. Anyone know
why?
Because 'who' just read /var/log/wtmp, where as 'w' looks at the process that
currently
also sprach Kevin (on Fri, 09 Mar 2001 04:05:17PM -0700):
Then they only have to compile their own version. Openwall shows only
you when you run 'w' but shows everyone if you 'who'. Anyone know
why?
well, afaik w and who are two separate programs.
it appears that who uses utmp information
Am Samstag, 10. März 2001 00:05 schrieb Kevin:
Then they only have to compile their own version. Openwall shows only
you when you run 'w' but shows everyone if you 'who'. Anyone know
why?
No experience with tools like this (LIDS/Openwall etc.)
w and who are different binaries on my system, so
I don't know if this could be exploited is any way, but here's something
that I've seen. This is on x86 on two machines and a ppc g3.
#su
#login
login:
^D
Segmentation fault
Maybe you guys can check this more.
Mike
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:49:54PM +, Jim Breton wrote:
# deny and log all packets trying to come in from a 127.0.0.0/8 address
# over a non-'lo' interface
Oops. Just occurred to me that this is not what you were asking about.
Why do I do such things?
Anyway.
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jim Breton writes:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2001 at 08:49:54PM +, Jim Breton wrote:
# deny and log all packets trying to come in from a 127.0.0.0/8 address
# over a non-'lo' interface
Oops. Just occurred to me that this is not what you were asking about.
Why do I do
21 matches
Mail list logo
