On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 03:10:40AM +0100, Johannes Holzer wrote:
> It's much simpler by doing it the Debian way:
> make menuconfig / xconfig, whatever
> make-kpkg kernel_image --revision yourkernel
> Creates a nice little .deb with all the things you need, you just have
> to dpkg -i it to get your
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 03:05:13AM +0200, Filippo Carone wrote:
> What you say here may lead to confusion. A monolithic kernel doesn't
> give you added security toward a modular kernel. To make the kernel a
> little bit more secure I'd use grsecurity (ie to prevent code injection,
> syscall hijack
On Thu, Apr 17, 2003 at 11:09:33AM +0200, Gergely Trifonov wrote:
> the linux kernel IS monolithic no matter if you enable loadable modules or
> not. if you
> use modules, it doesn't change the basic structure of the kernel (it is
> monolithic by design). i think disabling modules on a secure ma
9 114
!Please install IND CA Certificate as TRUSTED CA!
https://www.indweb.hu/IND.crt
-Original Message-
From: Filippo Carone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 3:05 AM
To: debian-security@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: own kernel vs debian kernel
* Dale Amon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ha scritto:
> I roll my own; nomodules for servers or secure machines, modules for
> non-secure workstations. Configure them to the specific minimum requirements
> of the particular use and not one option more.
What you say here may lead to confusion. A monolithic
On Domingo, 13 de Abril de 2003 04:10, Johannes Holzer wrote:
> It's much simpler by doing it the Debian way:
> make menuconfig / xconfig, whatever
> make-kpkg kernel_image --revision yourkernel
> Creates a nice little .deb with all the things you need, you just have
> to dpkg -i it to get your bzI
- Original Message -
From: Johannes Holzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Luis Gomez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Dale Amon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 8:10 AM
Subject: Re: own kernel vs debian kernel
>
> It's much simpler by doing it the Debian wa
Luis Gomez wrote:
On Sábado, 12 de Abril de 2003 14:35, Dale Amon wrote:
I usually build on a different machine than the target one as servers
or firewalls usually don't need gcc and such, which I remove from them
where possible.
In machines where you don't need modules, I guess you
Luis Gomez wrote:
On Sábado, 12 de Abril de 2003 14:35, Dale Amon wrote:
I usually build on a different machine than the target one as servers
or firewalls usually don't need gcc and such, which I remove from them
where possible.
In machines where you don't need modules, I guess you just
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 06:13:51PM +0200, Luis Gomez wrote:
> On S?bado, 12 de Abril de 2003 14:35, Dale Amon wrote:
> > I usually build on a different machine than the target one as servers
> > or firewalls usually don't need gcc and such, which I remove from them
> > where possible.
>
> In machi
On Sábado, 12 de Abril de 2003 14:35, Dale Amon wrote:
> I usually build on a different machine than the target one as servers
> or firewalls usually don't need gcc and such, which I remove from them
> where possible.
In machines where you don't need modules, I guess you just compile and then
cop
On Sat, Apr 12, 2003 at 10:55:29AM +0200, Luis Gomez wrote:
> So my question is: what is the approach people take for this point? Do you,
> sysadmins with lots of machines, apt-get install kernel-source, or do you
> rather get an official kernel? What pros and cons has each of these points?
> Am
The only problem I run into is my machines with more then a gig of ram... The
apt-get kernel works on pretty much everything, but that ram thing always gets
me ;)
On Sat, 12 Apr 2003, Luis Gomez wrote:
> On S?bado, 12 de Abril de 2003 05:45, Birzan George Cristian wrote:
> > This might be a
]>;
Sent: Saturday, April 12, 2003 11:55 AM
Subject: own kernel vs debian kernel (was: ptrace exploit)
On Sábado, 12 de Abril de 2003 05:45, Birzan George Cristian wrote:
> This might be a stupid question
Hi all... let me ask another (probably) stupid question I've thought abo
On Sábado, 12 de Abril de 2003 05:45, Birzan George Cristian wrote:
> This might be a stupid question
Hi all... let me ask another (probably) stupid question I've thought about for
a long time.
I always try to use precompiled software as much as possible, software coming
from the official debia
15 matches
Mail list logo
