Hi Flavien,
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:15:38AM +0100, Flavien Bridault wrote:
> No my GPG key has not been signed by anyone afaik.
I guess somewhere close to you you can find a Debian developer to sign
your key.
> Otherwise Andreas proposed me some weeks to apply as a Debian Developer,
> that m
Hi Flavien,
I have put the porter lists of the affected architectures in CC whether
there is somebody who has a hint for a better solution than removing
these architectures from the supported architectures. This kind of
"random failure"[1] is quite hard to debug for somebody who is not
familiar f
On Sun, 25 Sep 2005, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
What makes you so sure it ever was there? I can't find any prove nor
trace of that.
Well, it was just installed on my Sarge based sparc machine for a long
time (even before Sarge was released) and I had nothing else than the
Debian-Mirror in my sou
On Sat, 24 Sep 2005, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
The newest version build successfully on the non-free sparc buildd:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/fetch.php?&pkg=openmotif&ver=2.2.3-1.1&arch=sparc&stamp=1124715920&file=log&as=raw
So will probably uploaded...
Thanks for the hint.
NB: in its curr
On Fri, 23 Sep 2005, Petr Salinger wrote:
In fact, there is a successful attempt of package build:
http://experimental.ftbfs.de/build.php?arch=&pkg=openmotif
But only alpha, arm, mips and initial i386 version are already
in unstable, sparc and powerpc are now in incoming.
Thanks for the hint
which would be the more appropriate list
for this boring issue would be welcome. Please CC me if you are going to post
to debian-sparc only (which would be fine for me).
Kind regards
Andreas.
For the record I quote my initial mail from three weeks ago to debian-devel:
On Mon, 29 Au
On Mon, 29 Aug 2005, Andreas Metzler wrote:
I know that it was there formerly because I once got it without any extra
lines in my sources.list file. Now the Sparc port can be found at
http://ftp.unixdev.net/pub/debian-udev/pool/non-free/o/openmotif/
This is a version with security issue
Hi,
my E250 server throws the following log messages since about two weeks always
at the same time. So I guess some cron job is triggering a problem and I
called each single cron job in daily but nothing happened. Any hint what
to do now to track down the problem?
I have to add that this machin
BTW, because there was an answer to the previous mail with subject:
"Make tc1 more visible?"
I can ensure you that the bug is *not* fixed in the daily build
from today!
On Thu, 3 Jun 2004, Andreas Tille wrote:
> TCP: Unix domain sockets 1.0/SMP for Linux NET4.0
> cramfs:
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Peter wrote:
> What is this tcl version btw?
The login screen says:
Sun Ultra 5/10 UPA/PCI (UltraSPARC-IIi 333MHz), Keyboard Present
OpenBoot 3.15, 256 MB memory installed, Serial #10648638
After pressing -A I tried:
ok probe-ide
Device 0 ( Primary Mast
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Peter wrote:
> What is this tcl version btw?
I'm not sitting in front of the box until tomorrow morning, but
I have also trouble to handle the boot screen via keyboard.
On my E250 server I was able to send the right codes via serial
line but the SUn keyboard is a real advantage
On Wed, 2 Jun 2004, Christian Perrier wrote:
> Could you try the tc1 version ?
>
> http://cdimage.debian.org/pub/cdimage-testing/sarge_d-i/sparc/tc1/sarge-sparc-netinst.iso
It was absolutely the same behaviour as I described in my posting at
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2004/06/msg00092
On 19 Jun 2003, Steve Pacenka wrote:
> Data density difference on a track? From its name, this test would be
> writing a block much larger than the on-drive buffer and should be
> limited by the rate at which the drive can write to whole tracks on a
> platter, and seek between nearby tracks. Mor
On 18 Jun 2003, Steve Pacenka wrote:
> > 2.4.21:
> >ehec2,496M,3316,98,13866,27,5968,13,2856,92,12546,13,123.9,1,16,261,97,
^
> +,+++,13110,100,270,97,+,+++,1658,96
> Some comparative bonnie++ results ...
>
> 2.4.21 from Debian, Ultra 10 333 CPU
Hello,
after compiling a 2.4.21 without module support and left out any unused stuff
I was able to increase disk performance of my Ultra 10 (256 MB Ram, 333 MHz):
bonnie:
Install-Kernel (woody):
ehec2,496M,2655,82,11695,63,2407,56,1621,91,3374,80,93.2,20,16,300,96,+,+++,14258,100,303,97
On Tue, 17 Jun 2003, Herbert Xu wrote:
> >kernel-image-2.4.19-sun4u(from stable)
^^
>
> Make sure you have modutils >= 2.4.19. Those kernels are
> built with a relatively recent version (not in woody) of
> binutils which "requires" a n
On Mon, 16 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> > I failed compiling a working kernel fpr my UltraSparc 10, running stable and
> > egcs64. Thus I tried this hint, but it also fails with the messages printed
> > in the end of this mail. It is the same as I reported in this list with
> > subject "Some
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> I bet you compiled it with gcc-3.3. Upgraded the gcc and gcc-3.2
> packages, and rebuild, or just install the kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64
> package.
I failed compiling a working kernel fpr my UltraSparc 10, running stable and
egcs64. Thus I tried this hin
On Fri, 13 Jun 2003, Ben Collins wrote:
> suspect you did something wrong though. Try my
> kernel-image-2.4.21-sparc64 package. If that works, use the
> /boot/config-2.4.21 as a starting point for compiling your own.
Any hint what would be the right compiler for a woody machine?
Kind regards
Hi,
I just installed an UltraSparc 10 (256MB mem / 333MHz single processor)
with woody. All went fine so far but I found the following log entries:
Jun 4 17:53:01 ehec2 /USR/SBIN/CRON[10752]: (mail) CMD ( if [ -x
/usr/sbin/exim -a -f /etc/exim/exim.conf ]; then /usr/sbin/exim -q ; fi)
Jun 4
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Petr Vandrovec wrote:
> It should work, but only if you are using sparc binary on sparc kernel,
> or sparc64 binary on sparc64 kernel, otherwise sizeof(int), sizeof(long),
> sizeof(__kernel_uid_t) and other may differ between kernel and user. I have
> patch to ncpfs & kernel (2
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Roy Bixler wrote:
> > I do have 'ncpfs' compiled into the kernel as a module. The really
> > bizarre thing about this is that the 'mount' version appears to be the
> > same (2.11) on both the old '386 box and the new Sparc. Ideas?
>
> I should have also noted that I am using
On Tue, 8 May 2001, Anton Blanchard wrote:
> > data_access_exception: Shit SFSR[00801009] SFAR[fe320048],
> > going.
>
> You need to pass this through ksymoops to be useful. What kernel
> version are you using?
2.2.18pre??
Can't check at this moment because of installing a smal
Hello,
I did further investigation in the E250 server crash problem. I tried
to report here sometimes but got now real help on the topic - so I tried
again.
Short summary:
I observe randomly crashes of the E250 box.
After a crash serial console seems to be dead.
Sun support only tasks with
On Thu, 3 May 2001, Erik Mouw wrote:
> Oh no, it already works this way for years. It is simply not doable for
> a single person to test a kernel release on all platforms. For example:
> the ARM port currently supports 73 different wildly architectures. Do
> you really expect Linus to test them al
On Tue, 1 May 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> It can't find the Solaris dynamic linker, which needs to be in /lib (as
> ld.so or ld.so.1, can't remember).
>
> Also, to find the other libraries, you need to either set
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH, or put them in /usr/lib. You can also copy all the
> Solaris stuff
On Wed, 2 May 2001, Marco Gaiarin wrote:
> Exactly same things (and error) with 2.4.4. ;(
This makes me wonder if a new released kernel isn't tested on all
architectures. May be we should spread our knowledge about autobuild
daemons in Debian to the kernel development team.
Seems to me that Linux
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001, Giovanni dos Reis Nunes wrote:
> First, you must upgrade standard potato instalation with new versions
> of pppd, modutils and another things. I've it in DEB packages if you
> (and another one) have interest I can upload they in a public FTP.
This would be interesting. An arc
On Thu, 19 Apr 2001, Marcus Crafter wrote:
> Is anyone out there using Sparc Debian on a Sun Enterprise 250 ?
Yes.
> I'd be really interested in hearing any information about such a
> machine with Sparc Debian installed on it. ie. success stories,
> problems, performance
Hello,
it's really strange that this problem shouldn't occure before.
apt-get install kernel-source-2.2.19
worked well on my potato 2.2r3 system. I unpacked the sources
in /usr/src and tried to
/usr/src/kernel-source-2.2.19# make menuconfig
mv: cannot create regular file `include/linux/vers
install
kernel-source-2.2.18pre21 install
~# dpkg --status kernel-image-2.2.18pre21-sun4u
Package: kernel-image-2.2.18pre21-sun4u
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: local
Installed-Size: 2232
Maintainer: Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source
Hello,
I'm really clueless about the following problem:
I'm running a Sparc E250 server since december last year under potato.
Two weeks ago the machine canceled network connection (no ping) and
dosn't had any output on ttyS0 console. I switched it off :-( and
on again some times but it doesn't h
On Mon, 12 Mar 2001, Ben Collins wrote:
> Ok, let me rephrase, I doubt it will work on ultrasparc :) Nice to see
> it has made some progress since the last time I checked into it where I
> was told it wasn't going to happen in the forseeable future.
Just for the sake of interest: How far depends
On Fri, 16 Feb 2001, sylvain wrote:
> 1 - using an i386 box as a terminal for the Sparc. I know it's via the
> serial line, but all resarch gave nothing for this. Could anyone know
> how?
Did you tried seyon?
> 2 - For later, be able to boot it, and see what's left on. rarp, tftp
> and bottpar
On Thu, 25 Jan 2001, Steffan Baron wrote on debian-sparc@lists.debian.org:
> >The new modutils works fine. I could install modules to the 2.4.0 kernel.
> >However when I mount a filesystem via nfs there's a complaint about
> >that I have older version of mount than the kernel. Shall I upgrade
> >m
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Joshua Uziel wrote:
> * Andreas Tille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [001215 03:14]:
> > > This is expected and known... your only options are to use only 512MB of
> > > RAM with 2.2.x or to have all 1024MB with 2.4.0-testX kernel.
> > Huh, because we ar
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Karl Hammar wrote:
> 0, write down network configs and such
>rarp support in opal kernel
>tftp installed
>local mirror exported ro via nfs
> 1, on hematit, power on, stop-a, boot net
> 2, on opal, run insmod and make sure hostname is in either dns or /etc/hosts
> 3
On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Andreas Jaehnigen wrote:
> > Hmm, my box seems not to find the tftp image. It just repeats:
> > Timeout waiting for ARP/RARP packet
>
> Is your ARP server up and running? This message is typically generated due
What is an "ARP server".
I followed the instructions in the SPA
On Sun, 17 Dec 2000, Erik Mouw wrote:
> Sun machines are able to boot from network, so instead of fiddling with
> new hardware, it might be easier to do a net boot. See section 5.5 from
> the installation manual:
>
> http://www.debian.org/releases/potato/sparc/install
Hmm, my box seems not to f
Hello,
because I'm not able to burn a Debian sparc boot CD just now I wonder
if I could insert a floppy drive into my brandnew E250 server to
install Debian from floppy.
Any hints if I could use normal PC IDE hardware?
Kind regards
Andreas.
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Joshua Uziel wrote:
> > > This is expected and known... your only options are to use only 512MB of
> > > RAM with 2.2.x or to have all 1024MB with 2.4.0-testX kernel.
> > Huh, because we are at it. I'm going to install an E250 with 2GB memory.
> > Is this also true for this m
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Joshua Uziel wrote:
> This is expected and known... your only options are to use only 512MB of
> RAM with 2.2.x or to have all 1024MB with 2.4.0-testX kernel.
Huh, because we are at it. I'm going to install an E250 with 2GB memory.
Is this also true for this machine???
Kind
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Jean-Paul Blaquiere wrote:
> > There is no graphics card in the machine and I have to connect via
> > serial line. I found a searial cable which I used to connect a laptop
> > with a desktop years ago and adapted it via gender-changer and
> > 25pin to 9 pin adapter to a Linux
Hello,
I've got my fine E250 machine, but run in trouble before thinking about
installing Debian.
There is no graphics card in the machine and I have to connect via
serial line. I found a searial cable which I used to connect a laptop
with a desktop years ago and adapted it via gender-changer an
Hello,
we intent to by a E250 server for production purpose. I wonder what
to do in case I have to compile a new kernel for this hardware. I would
really like to do this on a separate testing machine. But I don't want
to by another E250 ;-).
Would it be possible to use a cheap Ultra for this p
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> if i had the choice, i'd go for the HW RAID. SW RAID is certainly possible,
> and it's cheap. but when you look at the administrative overhead, it's just
> not worth it.
The salesman told us about the advantage of software RAID if (and only if
as he w
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Karl Hammar wrote:
> Yes it is "like" lilo (I have not used grub), and there are no menu.
> How do you select from a menu without any key press, is grub mouse based?
Sorry, the menu comes up without pressing any key. After this I have
to select from a list of systems using th
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Karl Hammar wrote:
> I don't know the german market. But I do know that my distributor
> have a presence in germany. Maybe you can call them and see if they
> have a partner who can solve your need.
Wrote e-mail to a partner of them. Thanks for the hint!
> Boot manager
>
On Tue, 28 Nov 2000, Karl Hammar wrote:
> Buy from someone who supports Linux/Debian on Sun/Sparc.
Does anybody know a salesman who does this in Germany
> The point is: if that salesman don't support linux, you are not helped
> by the sun label on all your stuff, since if it don't work, you h
Hello,
I'm new on Debian Sparc and have a question about hardware we have to
decide for in a limited time frame (sorry for the urgent tag).
We have got a certain promotion offer which includes:
2 x 400MHz UltraSPARC-II CPUs, 2MB E-cache
2048MB memory
4 x 36GB 1RPM UltraSCSI disk drive
50 matches
Mail list logo
