is not a joke).
If you wish to receive any of these, email me back and we'll sort
something out. They are currently residing in Liverpool unless
otherwise stated; if you want them and live further afield, let me know
and we may be able to arrange something. First come, first served.
Happy hacking,
Bob
On 21/12/15 11:57, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
We just reached the milestone of 10,000 up-to-date packages in the
sparc64 archive. There are only around 1,500 to go which are needed
to catch up with the releases architectures.
Mazel tov! :)
--
Best wishes,
Bob
debian-sparc/2015/08/msg00018.html
--
Best wishes,
Bob
On 09/08/15 08:55, Christian PERRIER wrote:
Quoting Bob Bib (bob...@ukr.net):
What do you mean by "attic"? (Probably a newbie question, sorry).
...
That's a special directory named "attic" in the Debian Installer git
repository, where we store old stuff, just like
On 08/08/15 20:01, Christian PERRIER wrote:
...
I just moved silo-installer out to the attic this morning.
What do you mean by "attic"? (Probably a newbie question, sorry).
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of &q
any other specific solution to keep
the important ports-only-architecture packages in the Debian archive.
[1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/07/msg00023.html
[2] http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/07/msg00037.html
[3] http://www.ports.debian.org/
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSC
On 28/07/15 12:11, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
Bob Bib wrote:
Hmm, could it affect some sparc[64]-only packages in a bad way (e. g.,
source package getting removed and no more available for debian-ports)?
[...]
E. g., silo is "Architecture: sparc sparc64".
Source packages which no lo
or me to get access to that machine again ;-)
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/55b80fbf.8050...@ukr.net
kages in a bad way (e. g.,
source package getting removed and no more available for debian-ports)?
E. g., silo is "Architecture: sparc sparc64".
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Conta
quot;sparc64" from debian-ports.
* The current situation is quite sad:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-sparc/2015/07/msg00012.html
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=745938
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-announce/2014/04/msg00012.html
--
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
d though) if the GNU assembler
can readily support the Sun syntax as good as the Intel foreign one ;)
---
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: https://lists.debian.org/1421116927.791508026.aci5z...@frv40.fwdcdn.com
Linux distributions, I only tried Debian some time ago.
It seems that Gentoo supports SPARC too.
As for Fedora, they likely no longer build SPARC packages.
---
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble?
rent syntax than GNU asm. So to preserve compatibility with GNU or
> not to preserve that is the question. :-)
Are the differences so hard?
Maybe the GNU assembler already has the support for Sun syntax?
Then it looks more like a GNU Binutils issue:
http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
---
Bes
. 1 GiB of RAM
(usually come with 128, 256 or 512 MiB, but fortunately upgradeable).
BTW, 64-bit CPU with max. 440 MHz clock is great too :)
---
Best wishes,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? C
On Sun, Sep 29, 2013 at 04:32:05AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-09-28 at 10:16 -0500, Bob Tracy wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 02:29:05PM +0100, Jurij Smakov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 10:26 PM, Julien Cristau
> > > wrote:
> > > &g
driver, mention is
made of the fact XAA support went bye-bye, and the attempted use of EXA
causes looping segfaults on X server startup. Only current workaround
is to disable acceleration. Truly a case of "bad breath is better than
no breath".
--Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-
up to
$5000.00 dollars when someone you recommend is hired.
Exceptional compensation package / We need a current resume from you.--
--
Bob Kaufman
Main Office: 516-554-8843
inncare...@gmail.com
www.inncareers.com
We find special situations and special people.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema
wap partition and mount previous linux partition.
4. Execute a shell.
5. cp /target/boot/silo.conf /target/etc/silo.conf
6. type "silo --help"
7. Then "silo -r /target -f" # note from memory - caveat user!
8. reboot
> Best regards.
> --
> Jurij Smakov
later problems with software if the hardware is
faulty.
> Regards
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-sparc-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
nsatisfied dependancies for the
> kernel.
>
> Does anyone have an idea for this?
Hi
Maybe if you give us a clue as to what the unsatisfied
dependencies are?
I do have debian running on an Ultra Sparc 10.
> Thank you
>
> Regards
Bob
--
Writing is easy; all you do is sit
On Mon, May 04, 2009 at 12:27:42PM +0200, Martin Lemmen wrote:
> you inserted the line BusID "SBUS:/SUNW,f...@1e,o" into your xorg.conf -
> where did you get that, exactly?
> I want to try the same (and see if it does me any good), but I'm not sure my
> card has the s
7;t edit
# Linux kernel version: 2.6.29
# Fri Apr 17 14:27:44 2009
#
# CONFIG_64BIT is not set
CONFIG_SPARC=y
CONFIG_SPARC32=y
# CONFIG_SPARC64 is not set
CONFIG_ARCH_DEFCONFIG="arch/sparc/configs/sparc32_defconfig"
b...@spain:~$
I really did expect to see CONFIG_SPARC64 and not CONF
t;
> Any suggestions?
>
> Regards,
> Donatas
Hi Donatas
If you use UUIDs inside /etc/fstab instead of the raw
device names you may have joy?
e.g. ls -l /dev/disks/by-uuid and find the UUID of /dev/sda1
Then replace /dev/sda1 in /etc/fstab with UUID=
Bob
--
To UNSUBS
on my Ultra 1, I don't know about Sparcstation 10's, but its a possible
alternative.
Bob Schaefer
Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Karl Goetz wrote:
Thats interesting - so the chip contains a battery itself?
My understanding is that it's an ablutions-standard chip with a no
OTECTED],80
> ok
>
> Any ideas on how I should proceed would be greatly appreciated. Thanks
> in advance,
I suspect your /etc/X11/XF86Config file. Check it, or google for a
working one?
> --
> Dario Alcocer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bob
--
Where you stand depends on where you sit.
-- Rufus Miles, HEW
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
To customer service:
I would like to order books online or via telephone, but I
discarded the card which holds my account number. How can I contact you
without this number?
Rosemary Pericic
5072 New England
Ct.
San Jose, CA 95136 – This is a new email account as
well.
drivers for disk access compiled-in and does not use an initial
> ramdisk).
>
> THNX, Roger
Hi
I think this may well be due to udev managing /dev.
Bob
--
BOFH excuse #135:
You put the disk in upside down.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Sebastian Niehaus wrote:
> Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> What other info should I add to this post to be more informative?
>
> The kind of hardware you use.
# prtconf -v
System Configuration: Sun Microsystems sun4m
Memory size: 128 Megabytes
System Per
stem call 188
mount[15]: Unimplemented SPARC system call 188
Adding Swap: 523192k swap-space (priority -1)
eth0: Carrier Lost, trying TPE
The dmesg output for 2.4 is match to what is in the system.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.real-time.com,
e9ee8]: start_kernel+0x218/0x22c
Caller[f01e9790]: sun4c_continue_boot+0x314/0x324
Caller[]: 0x0
Instruction DUMP: 85310001 8088a001 832b4001 <83d02005> 82290001 8e01e001
8
Kernel panic - not syncing: Aiee, killing interrupt handler!
<0>Press L1-A to return to the boot prom
I have an odd xserver crash problem on a E250 with
Raptor/GFX display. If Xwindows runs under control
with xdm,gdm or kdm the xserver will crash hard
after running an application. The KDE session
does completely startup so have "start" panel.
I will lockup after variety of mouse/keyboard events.
I am attempting to run a simple solaris binary on
sparc debian on Ultra 5.
lsmod displays:
Module Size Used byTainted: P
solaris45480 0
ip_tables 14784 0
vfat 11424 0 (unused)
msdos 5896 0 (unused)
fat
CLEAN_HOOK
I searched for sparc-linux-strip at packages.debian.org, but it does not find
anything.
What am I doing wrong?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.mn-linux.org, Minnesota, Linux | Fax : (952)943-8500
Key fingerprint = AB15 0BDF BCDE 4369 5B42 1973 7CF1 A709 2CC1 B288
arget 0
Unit 0 Disk IBM DNES-318350 SA30AK0LX442
(C) Copyright IBM Corp.
1998. All rights reserved.
Is there a way I can force this to boot the old kernel?
Is there away to make silo come up so I can choose which kernel gets booted?
Thanks.
On Sunday 25 April 2004 07:23 pm, Eric Nichols wrote:
> I didn't see this in apt... Is there a 2.6.x kernel image available for
> Sparc (I have a Sparc 5).
> Thanks
> Eric
http://osinvestor.com/sparc/debs
?
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952
What should the boot-file be set to in the prom to get silo to work?
I had to force it to 1/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda3 to work around some kernel
issues, but I'd like to have silo installed if possible.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.m
tate.
Since the pre-install of libc6 checks what kernel you are running and it looks
like it only will install if your running kernel is 2.4.21 (or higher?) I had
to do all of this to make it work.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.mn-linux.org, M
On Thursday 22 January 2004 4:49 pm, Bob Tanner wrote:
> Quoting Ben Collins ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > > # apt-get install kernel-image-2.4.21
> > > Sorry, but the following packages have unmet dependencies:
> > > libc6-dev: Depends: libc6 (= 2.3.2.ds1-11) but 2.2.5
.
dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_sparc.deb
(--unpack):
subprocess pre-installation script returned error exit status 1
Errors were encountered while processing:
/var/cache/apt/archives/libc6_2.3.2.ds1-11_sparc.deb
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code
VersionDescription
+++-==-==-
un kernel-image(no description available)
Any help would be appreciated. Thanks.
--
Bob Tanner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Phone : (952)943-8700
http://www.mn-l
because
the *client* isn't running portmap or statd. *Both* the client, and the
server need to run them for locking to work apparently, and the
boot-floppies image in woody doesn't have them. More details here:
http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2002/debian-boot-200208/msg00278.h
gentoo
workstation) and see if it works but I think I remember it erroring out
in the same place when I tried it from the server before.
Cheers anyway,
Bob
--
Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
he/apt/archives/base-passwd_3.4.1_sparc.deb x
And then:
x debootstrap exited with an error (return value 1) x
/target/tmp/debootstrap.log contains a single line:
dpkg: unable to lock dpkg status database: No locks available
Can anyone provide any help
ell it what kernel to boot, b) what kernel
I should be trying to boot, c) how to tell the kernel to use nfs root
and serial console. If anyone can shed some light on this I'd be
grateful.
Cheers,
Bob
--
Bob Ham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi,
I just tried your advices how to solve my problem with the odd libc6
installation. I did not succeed in deinstalling the libc6-sparc64. I tried the
hint
from BenC with apt-get remove but it did not work. I also tried to deinstall
gcc-3.0 and stuff but there was always the failure with "unmet
Hi there,
I got a problem during the woody install on a SS20. It did not want to
download and install a kernel. It just tried to download the image from the CD
and
there was no chance to do that from a special source. Which flags have to be
set or how can I remove the CD-Rom as a source so that h
I would just like to second that sentiment.
Apt-get and the other package management tools for
Debian are far more capable and easier to use, IMHO.
Bob
Original Message
Subject:
Re: How does Debian Linux compare to the "others" on Sparc
From: James Fowl
FYI
Although I could not succesfully boot the debian-sparc kernel with the Sun
PCI HME ethernet card installed as a second ethernet interface in my
Blade-100 box, the new Aurora-SPARC kernel worked, straight off the CD's.
http://www.auroralinux.org/
the full distribution CDs when they arrive but I'm stumped for
now.
Thanks,
Bob
don't have this command on my system and can't seem to find a source for
it. The man page for dpkg wasn't enlightening.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Bob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, the most advanced Linux user environment, will become the
preferred desktop for Solaris OE when GNOME 2.0 begins shipping later this
year.
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
th
Solaris We have both flavors, and Solaris is only run on the systems
that require it. Linux is our OS of choice. (Except from some SunOS
4.1.4 systems that refuse to retire. )
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> >
the normal 9600.
http://www.pogolinux.com/
So, apparently, the x86 motherboard vendors are hearing us...
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Bo
role of linux on entry level servers" sounds promising
in relation to my Blade-100 problems.
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Bob Van Cle
ls with a bus error under both OS.
nmap V. 2.53 runs as root on the debian system without any problems.
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Bob V
On Sat, 26 Jan 2002, Erik Rossen wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:13:26PM -0800, Bob Van Cleef wrote:
> > On a Blade 100 and a Sparc 10 running debian - bus errors.
>
> Works fine for me on my SunBlade 100 - but only when I am not trying to
> run it as *root*. No, I don&
On Fri, 25 Jan 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 03:13:26PM -0800, Bob Van Cleef wrote:
> >
> > On a Blade 100 and a Sparc 10 running debian - bus errors.
> > nmap 2.53 from a RedHat rpm works fine on a RedHat 6.2 sparc system...
>
> Does 2.
robes,
try -P0
Nmap run completed -- 1 IP address (0 hosts up) scanned in 30 seconds
tethys:~# nmap -sS -O 192.86.7.81/32
Starting nmap V. 2.54BETA30 ( www.insecure.org/nmap/ )
Bus error
tethys:~#
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
/hda4 on / type ext2 (rw,errors=remount-ro,errors=remount-ro)
proc on /proc type proc (rw)
devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620)
/dev/hda1 on /boot type ext2 (rw)
/dev/hda5 on /altroot type ext2 (rw)
/dev/hda6 on /s1 type ext2 (rw)
tethys:~#
Bob
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Alvaro F. Figuero
On Tue, 22 Jan 2002, Ben Collins wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2002 at 05:16:14PM -0800, Bob Van Cleef wrote:
> >
> > Since this card does not seem to be supported under the current kernels
> > and no one has even been able to identify it, could any of you tell me
> > wh
gt; I really do need to get a second ethernet port working on this box.
>
> I have tried with eepro100 network cards on Ultra 5's. They sould work on
> blades too.
>
> > Otherwise it will be relegated to a back room role. :(
>
>
.
Otherwise it will be relegated to a back room role. :(
Bob
On Fri, 28 Dec 2001, Bob Van Cleef wrote:
>
> A little more information on this problem. I am not familier with Sun's
> numbering schemes, but here is what I found on the board.
>
> The main chip is a Sun one, with
Being as they are "subsciption only" lists, why do I see SPAM on them?
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Bob Van Cleef, Systems
a Sparc I thought I would start here. /grin
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Bob Van Cleef, Systems Administrator (408) 734-8100
MicroUnity, Inc. FAX (408) 734-8136
376 Martin Ave., Santa Clara, CA 95050 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I installed Solaris 8 on one of the systems. It reported two
ethernet interfaces, hme0 and eri0.
On Mon, 24 Dec 2001, Bob Van Cleef wrote:
>
> Anyone have any clues on this one? My project is dead in the water
> unless I can activate the second ethernet card.
>
> On Wed, 1
KOREA
The board part number appears to be:
5015019216349
01REV52
With a bar coded lable stating:
EAE283
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><>
Anyone have any clues on this one? My project is dead in the water
unless I can activate the second ethernet card.
On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Bob Van Cleef wrote:
>
> I have a Sun Blade 100 running debiab linux 2.4.10. If I install a second
> 10/100 ethernet card it fails to boot. It ge
2.4
Based upon Swansea University Computer Society NET3.039
Starting kswapd
Bob
--
><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> ><> >
underneath the keyboard with a row of dip
switches, would this be a likely culprit for my lack of mouse? The
following is a part of dmesg:
Sun TYPE 5 keyboard detected without keyclick
Sun Mouse-Systems mouse driver version 1.00
Thanks for your time and help.
--
Bob 'where the hell did the last 864
underneath the keyboard with a row of dip
switches, would this be a likely culprit for my lack of mouse? The
following is a part of dmesg:
Sun TYPE 5 keyboard detected without keyclick
Sun Mouse-Systems mouse driver version 1.00
Thanks for your time and help.
--
Bob 'where the hell did the last 864
architecture, and thinks it should be included on that CD, please let
me.
Bob
--
_
|_) _ |_ Robert D. Hilliard<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
|_) (_) |_) Palm City, FL USAPGP Key ID: A8E40EB9
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscrib
71 matches
Mail list logo
