Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-10-04 Thread David S. Miller
From: IvanK. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 19:12:10 -0400 I've compiled many times 2.4.19 with 3.1 cross-compiled for sparc64-linux and so far had had no problem (except not being able to compile framebuffer support). Should I continue using it (if it ain't

RE : 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?)

2002-10-03 Thread Olivier Hochreutiner
PROTECTED] Envoyé : jeudi, 3. octobre 2002 03:01 À : Roy Bixler Cc : David S. Miller; debian-sparc@lists.debian.org; sparclinux@vger.kernel.org Objet : Re: 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?) I thought GCC 3.1 and above are OK for compiling kernels on Ultrasparc. I also thought the IDE

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-10-03 Thread IvanK.
Dave, I've compiled many times 2.4.19 with 3.1 cross-compiled for sparc64-linux and so far had had no problem (except not being able to compile framebuffer support). Should I continue using it (if it ain't broke, don't fix it) or should I compile egcs64? Thanks, IvanK. [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-10-02 Thread Roy Bixler
On Mon, Sep 30, 2002 at 03:48:22PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: Hi Roy, ncpfs related sparc fixes are now in Linus kernels (2.5.x), and DaveM also told me that he applied patches to his 2.4.x tree, so they should arrive to Marcelo soon too. If you'll download ncpfs-2.2.0.19.8.tar.gz

RE: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-10-02 Thread Holzrichter, Bruce
In my latest attempt, I changed the 2.5.40 Makefile to use the sparc64-linux-gcc compiler which I used to successfully compile 2.4.19. This time, the boot got past the 'Booting Linux' but perhaps my options are not set right because, after getting the black screen, the characters were

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-10-02 Thread Roy Bixler
On Wed, Oct 02, 2002 at 01:07:25PM -0500, Holzrichter, Bruce wrote: In my latest attempt, I changed the 2.5.40 Makefile to use the sparc64-linux-gcc compiler which I used to successfully compile 2.4.19. This time, the boot got past the 'Booting Linux' but perhaps my options are not set

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-10-02 Thread IvanK.
Yes, it is IDE-based. Last I heard, Marcin Daleki stopped maintaining the 2.5 IDE code and the 2.5 series now uses the IDE logic from the 2.4 series. Accordingly, IDE in 2.5 is reputed to be stable as it is in the 2.4 kernels. Maybe you can turn off framebuffer support, and see how

Re: 2.5.40 on Sunblade 100 (was Re: NCPFS, anyone?)

2002-10-02 Thread Ben Collins
I thought GCC 3.1 and above are OK for compiling kernels on Ultrasparc. I also thought the IDE drivers were from the 2.4 series and should be stable. Will I have to eat my words there too? egcs64 has always been the suggested way to compile kernels from ultrasparc. Nothing else has ever been

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-09-06 Thread Andreas Tille
On Thu, 5 Sep 2002, Roy Bixler wrote: I do have 'ncpfs' compiled into the kernel as a module. The really bizarre thing about this is that the 'mount' version appears to be the same (2.11) on both the old '386 box and the new Sparc. Ideas? I should have also noted that I am using a stock

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-09-06 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 5 Sep 02 at 19:45, Roy Bixler wrote: On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:53:26PM -0500, Roy Bixler wrote: Has anyone gotten NCPFS mounts to work in Woody? Actually, I have but only on my old '386 box. However, on the Sparc, I get this: # ncpmount -S server -U rcb -A server /mnt Logging

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-09-06 Thread Andreas Tille
On Fri, 6 Sep 2002, Petr Vandrovec wrote: It should work, but only if you are using sparc binary on sparc kernel, or sparc64 binary on sparc64 kernel, otherwise sizeof(int), sizeof(long), sizeof(__kernel_uid_t) and other may differ between kernel and user. I have patch to ncpfs kernel

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-09-06 Thread Roy Bixler
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 11:59:55AM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: On 5 Sep 02 at 19:45, Roy Bixler wrote: On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:53:26PM -0500, Roy Bixler wrote: Has anyone gotten NCPFS mounts to work in Woody? Actually, I have but only on my old '386 box. However, on the Sparc, I

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-09-06 Thread Roy Bixler
On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 06:22:48PM +0200, Petr Vandrovec wrote: Patch below is for latest kernel I have unpacked here. I hope that it applies to the released 2.4.19 too... It compiles, but it is everything I can tell about it. It is entirely possible that after you'll get Netware volume

NCPFS, anyone?

2002-09-05 Thread Roy Bixler
Has anyone gotten NCPFS mounts to work in Woody? Actually, I have but only on my old '386 box. However, on the Sparc, I get this: # ncpmount -S server -U rcb -A server /mnt Logging into SERVER as RCB Password: ncpmount: Invalid argument in mount(2) A 'dmesg' command shows the

Re: NCPFS, anyone?

2002-09-05 Thread Roy Bixler
On Thu, Sep 05, 2002 at 05:53:26PM -0500, Roy Bixler wrote: Has anyone gotten NCPFS mounts to work in Woody? Actually, I have but only on my old '386 box. However, on the Sparc, I get this: # ncpmount -S server -U rcb -A server /mnt Logging into SERVER as RCB Password: ncpmount: