Kent West wrote:
> I have a Dell Latitude E7250 laptop. I'm trying to install Debian to it using
> a USB stick.
[...]
> The real problem is that after going through the first three or four
> screens, the install halts, complaining about not being able to read
> the CD-ROM.
Yes, I ran into the
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 02:54:53 PM Richard Owlett wrote:
> But you started me thinking about how my use case differs from any
> normal user.
Yup, it appears so. ;-)
Dan Norton composed on 2018-05-12 17:47 (UTC-0400):
> Now, I want to update and upgrade and start to slowly add packages, but
> my network ignorance is getting in the way.
> Tried to run "/sbin/ifconfig -a" but ifconfig is not found.
Deprecated over a decade ago, and finally dropped from basic
On Tue, 8 May 2018 00:10:50 +0100
Brian wrote:
> On Mon 07 May 2018 at 18:37:16 -0400, Dan Norton wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 7 May 2018 23:22:46 +0100
> > Brian wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon 07 May 2018 at 18:04:47 -0400, Dan Norton wrote:
> > >
> > > > On
Yes, rsync has a “-x" option, which does the same thing as for cp: it keeps it
from crossing filesystem boundaries. If you are using rsync to back up whole
filesystems, it’s indispensable.
Rick
On May 12, 2018, at 10:50 AM, Tixy wrote:
> Some commands have options to stop
On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 13:58 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> On 05/12/2018 12:50 PM, Tixy wrote:
> > On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 13:28 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> >> Another hierarchy in Linux not to sync is /system for the same reason
> >> you don't sync /proc.
> >
> > Presumably you meant /sys ?
> >
Hi,
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
> Why then does parted complain about a block size discrepancy ?
Because the Apple Partition Map announces to count blocks with size 2048
whereas the Linux device file announces 512 (via ioctl(BLKSSZGET) ?)).
It is quite a poor choice of parted to hop on the Apple
On Sat 12 May 2018 at 13:54:53 -0500, Richard Owlett wrote:
> I'll keep that in mind.
> But you started me thinking about how my use case differs from any normal
> user.
You would have to put yourself in the thought mode of a normal user
(whatever he is) instead of seeing youself as having
On 05/12/2018 12:50 PM, Tixy wrote:
On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 13:28 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Another hierarchy in Linux not to sync is /system for the same reason
you don't sync /proc.
Presumably you meant /sys ?
Basically, the OP probably don't want to try and sync mount points for
things
On 05/12/2018 12:48 PM, Hans wrote:
Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018, 19:37:40 CEST schrieb Richard Owlett:
Please note, the directory is NOT /system, it is /sys.
Juda got a little typo. :)
I won't complain too much. Otherwise peuple will start talking about mine ;/
However, I would avoid /proc,
On 2018-05-12 09:18 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
On Fri, 11 May 2018, Gary Dale wrote:
Date: Fri, 11 May 2018 17:30:26
From: Gary Dale
Reply-To: g...@extremeground.com
To: debian users
Subject: e-mail addresses not being redone
Resent-Date: Fri,
Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018, 19:37:40 CEST schrieb Richard Owlett:
Please note, the directory is NOT /system, it is /sys.
Juda got a little typo. :)
However, I would avoid /proc, /sys, /tmp and /lost+found
Hint: If you might put /home on another partition, you can easily install or
sync a new
On Sat, 2018-05-12 at 13:28 -0400, Jude DaShiell wrote:
> Another hierarchy in Linux not to sync is /system for the same reason
> you don't sync /proc.
Presumably you meant /sys ?
Basically, the OP probably don't want to try and sync mount points for
things that aren't ordinary filesystems and
Le 11/05/2018 à 22:38, Thomas Schmitt a écrit :
Pascal Hambourg wrote:
It also has Apple and GPT partition tables, but they are bogus
The GPT is not valid because there is a non-"protective" MBR partition
table. The APM is valid, but should be of no interest for any firmware
that does not
On 05/12/2018 12:28 PM, Jude DaShiell wrote:
Another hierarchy in Linux not to sync is /system for the same reason
you don't sync /proc.
thank you.
On Sat, 12 May 2018, Richard Owlett wrote:
Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 11:54:13
From: Richard Owlett
To: debian-user
Subject: Re: rsync - newbie question
Resent-Date: Sat, 12 May 2018 15:54:40 + (UTC)
Resent-From: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Le 12/05/2018 à 01:04, Rick Thomas a écrit :
After doing the cp or dd to write the .iso to the USB, do you do a “sync”
before you eject it?
I don't, because I don't feel the need to.
According to its man page description, sync "flush file system buffers",
but the destination is a raw
Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018, 17:54:13 CEST schrieb Richard Owlett:
As Eero said, do not sync /proc, you can use the --exclude option.
There is a good description here, how to exclude things:
https://www.thegeekstuff.com/2011/01/rsync-exclude-files-and-folders/?
utm_source=feedburner
Have fun!
Hans
You should not sync /proc. it's not normal directory
Eero
la 12. toukok. 2018 klo 18.37 Richard Owlett
kirjoitti:
> In another thread it was suggested that I use:> rsync -avzh --delete
> -n
>
> I tried it and got ~200 error messages of form:
>
> > file has vanished:
On 05/12/2018 10:47 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
You should not sync /proc. it's not normal directory
Eero
Thank you.
In another thread it was suggested that I use:> rsync -avzh --delete
-n
I tried it and got ~200 error messages of form:
file has vanished: "/proc/10/exe"
file has vanished: "/proc/10/task/10/exe"
file has vanished: "/proc/101/exe"
file has vanished: "/proc/101/task/101/exe"
On May 11, 2018 1:03:47 PM GMT-03:00, Helio Loureiro
wrote:
>Sério? Todo esse texto pra acabar com um ativismo de sofá? "Não fala
>mal
>do meu amigo que deu carteirada de DD que eu fico puto"?
Cara, como eu já falei, não sei o que está acontecendo contigo. Você está
On 11-05-2018 21:46, Forest Dean Feighner wrote:
> I really didn't prepare for lvm. I never used lvm before this so had
> no idea of lvm before.
>
> Snapshots sound like an awesome idea.
>
> I would like to do a configured base install, create a snapshot, and
> modify (fork), the base for
On Fri 11 May 2018 at 15:49:59 -0500, Kent West wrote:
> I no longer have a failing setup, but this Ubuntu user was seeing the exact
> same thing I was seeing, except in Debian words/colors:
>
>
>
Bonjour et merci.
Oui, c'est ce que je vais tester dès mon retour dimanche, je n'ai qu'un
portable sous la main en ce moment :)
Le 12/05/2018 à 09:58, Étienne Mollier a écrit :
Bonjour,
Au risque d'arriver un peu après la bataille, et pour en revenir
aux solutions à une seule machine, est ce
Vous n'arrivez pas sur leur smtp par la même branche réseau. Généralement
en fixe on se connecte au smtp d'un fai depuis le réseau du FAI, qui est
considéré à tort ou à raison comme zone de confiance. Depuis un mobile
c'est une autre route qui est probablement considérée comme moins sûre.
Éric
On Thu, May 10, 2018 at 06:36:46PM +0200, Yann Serre wrote:
> Le 10/05/2018 à 18:23, hamster a écrit :
> > Le 10/05/2018 à 15:09, Yann Serre a écrit :
> > > Mais deux machines quand même:)
> >
> > Je n'ai pas essayé donc je peux rien te certifier, mais je
> > parie qu'on peut faire tourner 2
Bonjour,
vu sur internet qu'il fallait mettre SSL/TLS dans "Sécurité de la
connexion" alors que depuis des lustres j'avais AUCUNE.
Depuis une semaine cela à l'air de fonctionner.
Si quelqu'un sait pourquoi avec une connexion filaire AUCUNE fonctionne
et pas en passant par un mobile. Ou cela
28 matches
Mail list logo