On Tue, 23 May 2023, Tom Reed wrote:
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 08:24:10AM +0800, Tom Reed wrote:
Sorry for my newbie question too.
If I know the network addr: 192.168.1.0
And know the broadcast addr: 192.168.1.255
Then I should have the possibility to cal the netmask addr:
255.255.255.0
Isn
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 07:48:46PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/22/23 15:04, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
[...]
> > That's right, but then they go 0 .. 2^8 - 1. 2^8 is still 256, Tim does
> > have a point there :-)
> >
> I don't see it, 255 is all 8 bits set, 256 is all 8 bits cleared and carry
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 08:26:47PM -0400, Dan Ritter wrote:
> Tom Reed wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > If I know the network addr: 192.168.1.0
> > And know the broadcast addr: 192.168.1.255
> > Then I should have the possibility to cal the netmask addr: 255.255.255.0
> >
> > Isn't it?
>
>
> No. What
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 08:08:26PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:39:21AM +0800, Tom Reed wrote:
> > For a given ipv4, if I know net addr and broadcast addr, how will I
> > calculate the netmask?
>
> I hope this is a theoretical question, because this is backwards.
> Norm
Hi,
I have an Asus Tuf Gaming laptop which has an Optimus configuration,
with an AMD GPU rather than Intel.
I'm running Debian 11.7
I do not have any of the "other" auxiliary software tools installed,
such as Primus (primusrun...).
When I run glxgears -info, I see it using the AMD GPU as e
> > Why are you asking these questions? What's your ACTUAL issue?
> >
>
> IIRC, last year my ISP gives me 8 IPv4, they said the first is network
> addr, the last is broadcast addr, then I have to calculate the netmask by
> myself.
Well, they told you the additional necessary information: 8
addr
On May 22, 2023, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/22/23 15:04, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:16:09PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> > > On 5/22/23 03:32, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > > >
> > > > number; for (human) display it is su
> On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 08:24:10AM +0800, Tom Reed wrote:
>> Sorry for my newbie question too.
>>
>> If I know the network addr: 192.168.1.0
>> And know the broadcast addr: 192.168.1.255
>> Then I should have the possibility to cal the netmask addr:
>> 255.255.255.0
>>
>> Isn't it?
>
> Not ne
It happened again (see journal entries below), so I'm going to try your
workaround and see if that helps.
On Wed, 17 May 2023 02:12:32 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
A little research shows that this is not that uncommon. A suggested
workaround is to disable the
power management for the device as
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 8:24 PM Tom Reed wrote:
>
>
> > Tom Reed wrote:
> >>
> >> >
> >> > That's right, but then they go 0 .. 2^8 - 1. 2^8 is still 256, Tim
> >> does
> >> > have a point there :-)
> >> >
> >>
> >> For a given ipv4, if I know net addr and broadcast addr, how will I
> >> calculate
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 08:24:10AM +0800, Tom Reed wrote:
> Sorry for my newbie question too.
>
> If I know the network addr: 192.168.1.0
> And know the broadcast addr: 192.168.1.255
> Then I should have the possibility to cal the netmask addr: 255.255.255.0
>
> Isn't it?
Not necessarily. PROB
Tom Reed wrote:
>
>
>
> If I know the network addr: 192.168.1.0
> And know the broadcast addr: 192.168.1.255
> Then I should have the possibility to cal the netmask addr: 255.255.255.0
>
> Isn't it?
No. What's the netmask if you have:
IP: 192.168.255.132
broadcast: 192.168.255.255 ?
-dsr-
Share with the Debian community
the X server logs of "Debian" and "systemrescuecd".
Groeten
Geert Stappers
First is the log from a session that failed. Below is a log from a
previous session that worked. Sorry, didn't get one from a
systemrescuecd session - I thought I'd copied it to a n
Tom Reed wrote:
>
> >
> > That's right, but then they go 0 .. 2^8 - 1. 2^8 is still 256, Tim does
> > have a point there :-)
> >
>
> For a given ipv4, if I know net addr and broadcast addr, how will I
> calculate the netmask?
You can't.
You can assume that the broadcast address is the last us
> Tom Reed wrote:
>>
>> >
>> > That's right, but then they go 0 .. 2^8 - 1. 2^8 is still 256, Tim
>> does
>> > have a point there :-)
>> >
>>
>> For a given ipv4, if I know net addr and broadcast addr, how will I
>> calculate the netmask?
>
>
> You can't.
>
Hello
Sorry for my newbie question t
On May 22, 2023, at 8:08 PM, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:39:21AM +0800, Tom Reed wrote:
>> For a given ipv4, if I know net addr and broadcast addr, how will I
>> calculate the netmask?
>I hope this is a theoretical question, because this is backwards.
>Normally you would sp
On Tue, May 23, 2023 at 07:39:21AM +0800, Tom Reed wrote:
> For a given ipv4, if I know net addr and broadcast addr, how will I
> calculate the netmask?
I hope this is a theoretical question, because this is backwards.
Normally you would specify the IP address and the netmask, and the
software wou
On 5/22/23 15:04, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:16:09PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
On 5/22/23 03:32, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
number; for (human) display it is subdivided into four 8 bit chunks
(called "octets" for obvious reasons
>
> That's right, but then they go 0 .. 2^8 - 1. 2^8 is still 256, Tim does
> have a point there :-)
>
For a given ipv4, if I know net addr and broadcast addr, how will I
calculate the netmask?
--
sent from https://dkinbox.com/
On 5/22/23 11:43, mick.crane wrote:
This is a request for best practice, perceived knowledge.
For one reason and another this PC/Workstation (what is the difference?)
boots in legacy mode. It was something to do with the SS usb port not
booting the installer in EFI mode.
I forget exactly.
Anywa
Felix Miata wrote on 5/19/23 11:23:
How much time did you allow the login screen to show up? I've lately seen on
Somewhere between three and five minutes, I'd say. Certainly long after the
disk light stopped flickering and the system seemed to have reached a stable
state.
system
mick.crane wrote:
> On 2023-05-22 20:10, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > mick.crane wrote:
> > > This is a request for best practice, perceived knowledge.
> > Try KVM/QEMU, which is available via the libvirt tools; the
> > primary graphical interface is virt-manager, and the primary CLI
> > is virsh.
> >
>
On 2023-05-22 20:10, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick.crane wrote:
This is a request for best practice, perceived knowledge.
For one reason and another this PC/Workstation (what is the
difference?)
boots in legacy mode. It was something to do with the SS usb port not
booting the installer in EFI mode.
I
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 02:35:52PM -0500, Mark Allums wrote:
> On 5/22/2023 2:10 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
> > mick.crane wrote:
> > > This is a request for best practice, perceived knowledge.
> > > For one reason and another this PC/Workstation (what is the difference?)
> > > boots in legacy mode. It
On 5/22/2023 2:10 PM, Dan Ritter wrote:
mick.crane wrote:
This is a request for best practice, perceived knowledge.
For one reason and another this PC/Workstation (what is the difference?)
boots in legacy mode. It was something to do with the SS usb port not
booting the installer in EFI mode.
I
mick.crane wrote:
> This is a request for best practice, perceived knowledge.
> For one reason and another this PC/Workstation (what is the difference?)
> boots in legacy mode. It was something to do with the SS usb port not
> booting the installer in EFI mode.
> I forget exactly.
> Anyway, it's a
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:16:09PM -0400, gene heskett wrote:
> On 5/22/23 03:32, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> >
> > number; for (human) display it is subdivided into four 8 bit chunks
> > > (called "octets" for obvious reasons), and those octets only can
This is a request for best practice, perceived knowledge.
For one reason and another this PC/Workstation (what is the difference?)
boots in legacy mode. It was something to do with the SS usb port not
booting the installer in EFI mode.
I forget exactly.
Anyway, it's a niggle that it is legacy mo
On 5/22/23 03:32, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
number; for (human) display it is subdivided into four 8 bit chunks
(called "octets" for obvious reasons), and those octets only can
go from 0 to 255 (since 2^8 == 255).
Nit, but 2^8 is 256.
.
The octets cou
Hi Richmond,
I found this from https://packages.debian.org/sid/nvidia-legacy-340xx-driver[1]
"Building the kernel module has been tested up to Linux 6.2."
Ok, building does not really mean, it is working, only it is buildable.
The other information I mentioned ("it segfaults with qt-libs") I c
On Mon, 22 May 2023 10:29:41 +0200
Aleix Piulachs wrote:
> I’m using a laptop ASU’s f75a i3 3110m with bullseye 11.7 and I can’t
> to activate the thermal drivers: fancontrol.service, fancontrol.pid,
> lm_sensors.service. fancontrol.pid I don’t know to configure it
Some modern computer firmware
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 06:11:50AM -0400, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
[...]
> Point-to-point links should have a mask of 255.255.255.252. This provides
> a Network, Broadcast and two host addresses.
In practice, I've seen both: /30 and /31. Wikipedia [1] quotes RFC3021,
which states /31 for th
cor...@free.fr wrote:
> On 22/05/2023 11:08, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 May 2023, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> > > In CIDR a host address is xx.xx.xx.xx/32 which means 255.255.255.255.
> > > isn't it?
> > >
> >
> > It depends on what question you're asking.
> >
> > An individual address is a
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 12:36 AM wrote:
> On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 03:16:56PM -0400, Gary Dale wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > I purged lightdm, rebooted and re-installed it but got the same errors.
> >
> > I don't believe this is a problem with lightdm because it is also
> happening
> > with gdm3 and sddm
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 6:12 AM wrote:
> On 22/05/2023 11:08, Tim Woodall wrote:
> > On Mon, 22 May 2023, cor...@free.fr wrote:
> >
>
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> In CIDR a host address is xx.xx.xx.xx/32 which means 255.255.255.255.
> >> isn't it?
> >>
> >
> > It depends on what question you're ask
On Mon, 22 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:41?AM Tim Woodall
wrote:
On Sun, 21 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
The only address that should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255 is the
Loopback interface.
I don't much use ipv4 any more if I can avoid i
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:32 AM Tim Woodall
wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> number; for (human) display it is subdivided into four 8 bit chunks
> > (called "octets" for obvious reasons), and those octets only can
> > go from 0 to 255 (since 2^8 == 255).
> >
> Nit, but
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 3:41 AM Tim Woodall
wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
> > The only address that should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255 is the
> > Loopback interface.
> >
>
> I don't much use ipv4 any more if I can avoid it but isn't it normal for
> point-to-po
On 22/05/2023 11:08, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Mon, 22 May 2023, cor...@free.fr wrote:
Hello,
In CIDR a host address is xx.xx.xx.xx/32 which means 255.255.255.255.
isn't it?
It depends on what question you're asking.
An individual address is a /32, but a host address might be listed as a
/2
On Mon, 22 May 2023, cor...@free.fr wrote:
On 22/05/2023 09:41, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 21 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
The only address that should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255 is the
Loopback interface.
I don't much use ipv4 any more if I can avoid it but isn't it norma
My dear illustrious leaders and senior list members of Debian user list,
I now use OpenBox extensively. Learning its ways. Growing comfortable with it.
I had the following interactions with OpenBox List members on the subject:
[quote]
[openbox] How can I add an arbitrary String with an associate
On 22/05/2023 09:41, Tim Woodall wrote:
On Sun, 21 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
The only address that should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255 is the
Loopback interface.
I don't much use ipv4 any more if I can avoid it but isn't it normal
for
point-to-point links to have a netmas
On 22/05/2023 09:32, Aleix Piulachs wrote:
-- Mensaje reenviado -
De: *Aleix Piulachs* mailto:ap77@gmail.com>>
Fecha: El lun, 22 may 2023 a las 10:29
Asunto: thermal drivers
Para: mailto:debian-user@lists.debian.org>>
I’m using a laptop ASU’s f75a i3 3110m with bullseye 11
-- Mensaje reenviado -
De: Aleix Piulachs
Fecha: El lun, 22 may 2023 a las 10:29
Asunto: thermal drivers
Para:
I’m using a laptop ASU’s f75a i3 3110m with bullseye 11.7 and I can’t to
activate the thermal drivers: fancontrol.service, fancontrol.pid,
lm_sensors.service. fancontro
I’m using a laptop ASU’s f75a i3 3110m with bullseye 11.7 and I can’t to
activate the thermal drivers: fancontrol.service, fancontrol.pid,
lm_sensors.service. fancontrol.pid I don’t know to configure it
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 08:41:13AM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Sun, 21 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
>
> > The only address that should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255 is the
> > Loopback interface.
> >
>
> I don't much use ipv4 any more if I can avoid it but isn't it normal for
>
On Mon, May 22, 2023 at 08:32:14AM +0100, Tim Woodall wrote:
> On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
>
> number; for (human) display it is subdivided into four 8 bit chunks
> > (called "octets" for obvious reasons), and those octets only can
> > go from 0 to 255 (since 2^8 == 255).
> >
>
On Sun, 21 May 2023, Timothy M Butterworth wrote:
The only address that should have a netmask of 255.255.255.255 is the
Loopback interface.
I don't much use ipv4 any more if I can avoid it but isn't it normal for
point-to-point links to have a netmask of 255.255.255.255?
It definitely can be
On Mon, 22 May 2023, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
number; for (human) display it is subdivided into four 8 bit chunks
(called "octets" for obvious reasons), and those octets only can
go from 0 to 255 (since 2^8 == 255).
Nit, but 2^8 is 256.
On 5/20/23 20:17, Tomasz Wolak wrote:
On 5/20/23 19:49, Tomasz Wolak wrote:
On 5/20/23 19:17, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I will not go to further details here, anyone interested can go to:
https://t-w.github.io/debian/2022/03/09/diskless_debian_11_pxe_nbd/
for details.
Have you reported a bug
On 5/21/23 21:48, Greg Wooledge wrote:
On Sun, May 21, 2023 at 05:40:06PM +0200, Klaus Jantzen wrote:
Setting up python3-uno (1:7.0.4-4+deb11u6) ...
+ [ configure = configure ]
+ ucf --three-way /usr/lib/libreoffice/share/.registry/pyuno.xcd
/etc/libreoffice/registry/pyuno.xcd
+ ucfr --force pyt
51 matches
Mail list logo
