Re: Linux Novice needs help with SPARC install

On Tue, Oct 17, 2000 at 12:12:25PM -0400, Mark Mohrmann wrote: |Good Afternoon: | |Anyone care to help me with the install on a SPARCstation 5. |I've had exactly 6 days experience with Linux software and |SUN hardware. | |Any help will be appreciated. Thanks. It works well. I did this and

Re: inetd in netbase package

On Wed, Oct 11, 2000 at 02:10:58PM +0200, Magnus Sandberg wrote: |Hi, | |Maybe my question should be sent to another list, let me know then. | |I know that this is a very active maillist so I'm not part of it, please |send a CC to me too, if you reply to this mail. | |My question is why inetd is

Re: security update using ftp

On Sat, Oct 07, 2000 at 03:07:43PM +0400, Rino Mardo wrote: |Is there a way to get security updates using ftp instead of http via |apt-get? | man sources.list

Re: upgraded libc6 and libc6 and broke my system (Woody)

On Wed, Sep 27, 2000 at 08:16:29AM -0700, Joey Hess wrote: |Pollywog wrote: | It first broke Postfix here. | |Details, please? I've been sitting comfy with the new libc since I use |postfix and I'd only heard of it breaking exim and sendmail. What |breakage are you seeing? My postfix is working

Re: Printing : Kernel 2.2.17 problems ?

I have a very strange problem with woody lprng and not with potato lprng With potato lprng this was working lp|hplj1100|HP LaserJet 1100:\ :sd=/var/spool/lpd/hplj1100:\

Somebody using MuPAD on Debian potato/woody?

Hi! Is there somebody using 1.4.2 version of MuPAD (www.mupad.de) on debian Potato/Woody. The glibc2.1 version from their ftp is very strange. Xmupad works only when I start it under olvwm AND only if it is not started from Eterm. Not on Windowmaker or Enlightenment in any way!!! :-|

Re: text editor for the rest of us

On Thu, Apr 06, 2000 at 10:26:54AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: |I need a text editor I can use in a telnet session that doesn't require a Unix course to operate. I liked Pico OK but it's not included on my system, nor on the Debian site. Any suggestions? Pico can be rebuilt from pine396-src But

Re: HELP: 3Com 509B(or 900B TP0) Network Problem

with disabled PnP. Look at http://infodeli.3com.com/infodeli/tools/nic/index.htm for software. Hope this helps... --Julian Stoev On Tue, 24 Aug 1999, Marcin Kurc wrote: I never had any problems with 3coms. I always compile the support into kernel. 509 works: eth0: 3c509 at 0x300 tag

Re: Kernel Header Files

software it should be safe to grab glibc-2.1 from potato and upgrade. Apparently libc-2.1 is binary compatible with glibc-2.0. But I still don't want to try this:( --Julian Stoev On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Smith, Tim wrote: I have not been able to find any documentation on how to upgrade the /usr

Re: compiling pine

This will create the binary pine package in /usr/src --Julian Stoev On Tue, 10 Aug 1999, Lazar Fleysher wrote: Hi Everyone, I am experiencing a problem compiling pine/pico and I do not know how to handle it. I have installed pine396-diffs_2.deb and pine396-src_2.deb from the stable and this is what I

Is it safe to upgrade slink to libc-2.1 from potato

this, so I think the best way is to install libc-dev-2.1, which is dependent on libc-2.1. What do you think? --Julian Stoev

Re: Is it safe to upgrade slink to libc-2.1 from potato

On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote: On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Julian Stoev wrote: Hi! I installed kernel 2.2.10 and I would like to be able to grab some sources from potato and compile them. But some package sources depend on kernel headers for 2.2.x and don't compile

Re: Is it safe to upgrade slink to libc-2.1 from potato

On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote: On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Julian Stoev wrote: Do you want run 2.2.10 in slink? Or you want other packages from potato, that aren't related to kernel? If you want just 2.2.10, go to Debian page and look for Installation instructions

Re: Is it safe to upgrade slink to libc-2.1 from potato

Thank you. This is OK for me. BTW, which applications you use, which depend on libc20? Is it matlab or what? Mathematica people were wise to compile their 3.0 version static. --JS On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Guilherme Soares Zahn wrote: I want to ask if it is safe to upgrade slink's libc-2.0 to

Re: 2.2.x kernel and PCI eth0 problem

I am using such a system. I compiled the kernel with module autoloading, but I also have /etc/modules like this #auto ne2k-pci It works fine. My network card is automatically detected

Re: Samba 2.0x on Slink

/smbfsx_2.1.0alpha0.19990412-1_i386.deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/smbwrapper_2.1.0alpha0.19990412-1_i386.deb ftp://ftp.debian.org/debian/project/experimental/swat_2.1.0alpha0.19990412-1_i386.deb --Julian Stoev On Wed, 7 Jul 1999, Mario Olimpio de Menezes wrote: Hi, I need Samba