Re: iptables string support in Woody?

--On Monday, December 13, 2004 21:22 +0100 stefan kuttler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi, trying to load this rule: % iptables -A INPUT -i eth0 -p tcp -d 0/0 --dport http -m string --string /default.ida? -j LOG SQUID (inverse) transparent proxy might be a better solution too BTW. -- To

Re: M$ Frontpage Replacement ?

--On Wednesday, December 15, 2004 11:20 +0500 Nayyar Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello All, Is there any as good as M$ Frontpage and flexible website development tool, which could give all those luxarires present in Frontpage. I'd say there are dozens. PHP on your server (using LAMP or

Re: Knoppix Swap

--On Saturday, December 11, 2004 11:58 + Jean-Michel Hiver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi List, I have installed knoppix with knx2hd but it doesn't seem to be using swap. I was wondering: - What tool can I use to make sure the swap partition exists? Two things must be in order for knoppix to

Re: Conversion PDF-WMF

--On Friday, December 10, 2004 18:36 -0500 Gregory Seidman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Because of unpleasant requirements at work, I am producing diagrams in a Windows program that has no export capabilities at all. I can print, however, and I am using the free PDFCreator project from sourceforge

Re: DVD: can't burn dual layer or at 4x

--On Saturday, December 11, 2004 01:46 -0500 Andrew Schulman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... (1) Is the burn speed restriction a limitation of the current ATA implementation (libata?)? Related to the no DMA warning? Yes. In PIO mode you'll be lucky to push more than 1800kbyte/sec, and your

Re: KVM recommendation (with USB keyboard and mouse)

--On Friday, December 10, 2004 13:29 -0800 ThanhVu Nguyen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, anyone using USB Keyboard and mouse for 2 computers using a KVM switch (one of my computer is a laptop so no ps/2)? I use units by Belkin. Rose, Raritan, anc Cybex also make good units tho they are far more

Re: how to track down dns SERVFAIL?

A good visuial/web based tool for this sort of thing is DNS Bajaj -- http://www.zonecut.net/dns/ --On Friday, December 10, 2004 10:15 +1030 David Purton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I'm having trouble looking up a certain domain (not hostsed by my dns server) and I'm not sure if it is a

Re: how to track down dns SERVFAIL?

--On Friday, December 10, 2004 10:34 +1030 David Purton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hmm - so if it returns No nameservers found for sydneyanglicans.net then I can probably assume that its not my fault right? No that usually means something is pretty wrong..I poked around in that zone,

Re: 200GB firewire drives and bios drive size limits

BIOS does not and will not have anythign to do with firewire support of any kind. No BIOS supports (yet) booting off of firewire devices. Linux treats them as a sCSI device so you should be fine. --On Thursday, August 19, 2004 19:15 +0100 Jim Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi all, I am

Re: IMAP server with fast search

Response inline... --On Friday, September 10, 2004 11:30 -0700 Vadik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I run my own email server which support 5 accounts, but a few of the accounts have a lot of messages (4000 in the a single sub-folder is not uncommon), in addition to this I often need to run search for

Re: IMAP server with fast search

--On Friday, September 10, 2004 20:20 -0300 Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 10 Sep 2004, Vadik wrote: I run my own email server which support 5 accounts, but a few of the accounts have a lot of messages (4000 in the a single sub-folder is not uncommon), in addition

Re: fsck very slow

--On Friday, June 11, 2004 14:30 +0200 Christian Christmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I am using Kernel 2.6.5 and Debia Sarge. During the boot process fsck 1.35 is checking my filesystems when they have been mounted couple times. When my linux installation was fresh this process took just

Re: OT: sed -n vs. sed

It doesn't' make it a different program at all. IT just says I want to expressly ask to print out my pattern space. Don't do it for me. Nothing bad or evil about that. Doesn't violate the 'philosophy' at all. Which do you think is better, sed/sed -n or two entirely separate tools differing

Re: system wide fix for 'max user processes'/RLIMIT_NPROC?

screwed up like this. --On Friday, April 16, 2004 11:19 +0100 Brian Brazil [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 02:10:37PM -0600, Michael Loftis wrote: For whatever reason debian stable somewhere somehow defaults to a RLIMIT_NPROC (max user processes) of 256. This is fine for a desktop

system wide fix for 'max user processes'/RLIMIT_NPROC?

For whatever reason debian stable somewhere somehow defaults to a RLIMIT_NPROC (max user processes) of 256. This is fine for a desktop but absurd for a server. I have yet to find a good way to fix this, but I still don't see what is changing it. It should be something like 7000 on the