Hi guys,
Anybody know where I can get up to date amavisd-new packages for Debian
(running Etch)? The packages referred to on the amavisd-new site are
the same ons that ship with Etch/Sid, which are old (2003 vintage).
Any links or pointers on how to build a debianized amavisd-new package
would
Siju George wrote:
I have downloaded sarge today and am going to install it so I'll let
you know the details soon.
I happened to see something strange though!
You should probably start a new thread with your new topic. You have a
better chance of getting a response from people other than
Title: RE: Bug in command date?
Thanks for you reply.
Looks like a beginner error: not ready the (right) doc :-)
Richard
PS: I will soon start a new thread with what seems to me a much more complex problem, if you could answer as fast as you did ... :-)
> -Original Mess
le. If that's not possible it helps to get a better email
program. ;) I'll put that header in now and see if that helps.
Putting yourself in a Cc: field may help as well.
> I recently wrote scripts that relies on relative dates (they do "intensive"
> date manipulations). I e
Title: Bug in command date?
Hello,
That my first post in this mailing list. Please note I am not subscribed and I would like to get your replies sent back to me, thanks.
I recently wrote scripts that relies on relative dates (they do "intensive" date manipulations). I encou
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:18:02 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) wrote:
> William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module
> > > Dat
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 07:18:02PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Sorry I don't use apt and "dpkg -S Parse.pm", which probably is the same
> as "apt-file search Parse.pm" doesn't find anything.
dpkg -S only searches already installed packages.
apt-file does the same thing but includes not-installed pac
Jacob S <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse
> > is hidden?
>
> According to packages.debian.org, it's in the package libtimedate-perl.
>
Thanks a lot. It didn't occurred to me to look at packa
William Ballard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> > Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse is
> > hidden?
>
> apt-get install apt-file
> apt-file update
> apt-file search Pa
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:18:34 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Otto Wyss) wrote:
> Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse
> is hidden?
According to packages.debian.org, it's in the package libtimedate-perl.
HTH,
Jacob
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECT
On Wed, Dec 29, 2004 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Otto Wyss wrote:
> Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse is
> hidden?
apt-get install apt-file
apt-file update
apt-file search Parse.pm
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "
Does anyone know in which Debian package the perl module Date::Parse is
hidden?
O. Wyss
--
Development of frame buffer drivers: http://linux-fbdev.sf.net
Sample code snippets for wxWidgets: http://wxcode.sf.net
How to build well-designed applications: http://wxguide.sf.net
Desktop with a
Ralph Aichinger wrote:
Hello!
I had the problem today that I wanted to get some information out
of my wtmp file about system usage, and I needed logins
categorized by year. In Debian, "last" gives output like
ralphpts/1monk Mon Nov 15 14:32 still logged
in
ralphpts/0
Hello!
I had the problem today that I wanted to get some information out
of my wtmp file about system usage, and I needed logins
categorized by year. In Debian, "last" gives output like
ralphpts/1monk Mon Nov 15 14:32 still logged
in
ralphpts/0monk
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:10:51 +0200, bing yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> where to find docs to recover my data if there is a way go get my data
> back. and is the process too hard to master by newbie like me?
I have done it on ext2 file systems, but never 1 gig's worth of stuff.
Ignore the morons
Robert Storey wrote:
There's no simple solution for recovering the data you've already lost.
However, there is a very good way to prevent such a thing from happening
again.
There is an even better way, make backups.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
There's no simple solution for recovering the data you've already lost.
However, there is a very good way to prevent such a thing from happening
again. Install Libtrash. It makes a trashcan which works no matter how
you delete files (either from command line or with some point-and-click
utility). Y
On Sat, 13 Nov 2004 21:10:51 +0200, bing yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This question might have been asked before. I just want to know Is it
> possible to recover data after rm -rf.
>
> filesystem is xfs
>
> where to find docs to recover my data if there is a way go get my data
> back. and is t
This question might have been asked before. I just want to know Is it
possible to recover data after rm -rf.
filesystem is xfs
where to find docs to recover my data if there is a way go get my data
back. and is the process too hard to master by newbie like me?
and again sorry to ask such a stup
I've been out of touch for a while.
A couple of questions.
What's the latest projection as to the new release?
If I need to build a system before then, would unstable
be my best bet? Would this make the upgrade to the new release
the most ainless?
If that's the case, are there any issues I shou
Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - Sun, Oct 24, 2004:
> There are debs for 1.4.2 which take care of setting up the plugin, etc.
> I just have to integrate them into the pool on ftp.tux.org somehow,
> are any tools to generate a pool structure?
I think dpkg-scanpackages (dpkg-dev) might do w
Ross Boylan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Instead, follow the more manual route of getting a regular binary
> (e.g.,ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/JDK-1.4.2/i386/fcs/j2re-1.4.2-fcs-linux-i586-gcc3.2.bin)
> and follow the instructions, for example, in
There are debs for 1.4.2 which take care of settin
The j2re1.4 Debian package available from BlackDown (e.g.,
deb ftp://ftp.tux.org/pub/java/debian unstable main non-free) is not as
current as other versions available from BlackDown. It's over two years
old. Judging from the fact I couldn't get it to work with mozilla
firefox 0.9.3-5, my guess is
Jacob S wrote:
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 23:13:15 +0200
"Dan Roozemond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
While we're at it - suppose someone is the only administrator of a
debian(stable) system connected to the internet permanently, with SSH,
Postfix and Bind exposed to the 'big bad' world. Say that someone
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004 03:38:18 -0400, Kevin Mark
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:05:31PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> > On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:18:02 -0500
> > JW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > I was reading the secur
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Oct 08, 2004 at 04:05:31PM -0500, Jacob S wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:18:02 -0500
> JW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I was reading the security FAQ and am somewhat alarmed to find (if I
> > understand correctly) that Testing is no
k.debian.org/debian sarge main contrib non-free
deb http://security.debian.org/ sarge/updates main contrib non-free
>
> It seems to me that the best thing for me to do is keep all the installed
> software up to date. For one thing, new packages are more likely to contain
> security fixe
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 23:13:15 +0200
"Dan Roozemond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The only thing that might cause a problem would be if it
> > updates a large
> > package (say Apache or Perl) and has a small configuration bug that
> > makes you run around and pull your hair out trying to figure
> The only thing that might cause a problem would be if it
> updates a large
> package (say Apache or Perl) and has a small configuration bug that
> makes you run around and pull your hair out trying to figure
> out what's
> changed and how to fix it. This is when reading the Debian-user list
>
pecifically
thinking of the fact that the security team doesn't put out updates for
stable -- I didn't mean securing as in settings and configuration. My fault,
I wasn't clear.
So what I meant was, what method do people using Testing use to stay up to
date when a security patch is r
(Woody). Sarge is expected to be released as the new
stable 'any day now'.
> Could anyone confirm that "upgrade" is the right way to stay up to
> date. I'm not going to run it automatically, and I'll always do a test
> run first to make sure nothing disastro
Hi,
> I am wondering what the best way is to go about staying up to
> date. If I run
> apt-get -s upgrade I'm told that apt wants to upgrade about
> 15 packages, most
> of which seem to be related to X (we won't ever be using X on
> this server. it
> wasn'
-- Original Message -
Subject: New user Q: Best way to stay up to date on "testing"?
Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:18:02 -0500
From: JW <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
Sorry to bother everyone with newbie questions, but I'm struggling to
It seems to me that the best thing for me to do is keep all the installed
software up to date. For one thing, new packages are more likely to contain
security fixes (even if they aren't official security patches), and also, I'm
hoping that some day in the future Sage will be declared sta
Hi Debian!
Any DWI users out there? The homepage
http://www.linas.org/linux/dwi/
does not indicate a mailinglist.
I have some questions on getting it(them) to run...
It seems such a neat idea.
Hugo
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMA
On Sun, 12 Sep 2004 03:50:03 +0200, Craig Jackson wrote:
> On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:29:42 -0500
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Questions:
>>
>> 1. How do I install DHCP Client?
>
> apt-get install dhcp-client
This will get you the now-obsolete "dhcp-client" package.
ay, September 11, 2004 8:38 PM
Subject: Re: Help with DHCP and Date Question
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Questions:
1. How do I install DHCP Client?
on Sarge,
you can install dhcp3
2. The date in my system doesnt go beyond 1999, is there a way I can
fix it?.
and chrony
hth,
Jerome
Th
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Questions:
1. How do I install DHCP Client?
on Sarge,
you can install dhcp3
2. The date in my system doesnt go beyond 1999, is there a way I can
fix it?.
and chrony
hth,
Jerome
Thanks & Regards,
AARON ROY
Austin, TX, USA
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai
all dhcp-client
^
I--- insert your favored dhcp client here
usually does the trick. Usually it's already included in a base
install so you wouldn't really need to do this...
>2. The date in my system doesnt go beyond 1999, is
>there a way I can fix it?.
Do you refer
On Sat, 11 Sep 2004 20:29:42 -0500
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Questions:
>
> 1. How do I install DHCP Client?
apt-get install dhcp-client
> 2. The date in my system doesnt go beyond 1999, is there a way I can
> fix it?.
>
man
Questions:
1. How do I install DHCP Client?
2. The date in my system doesnt go
beyond 1999, is there a way I can fix it?.
Thanks & Regards,
AARON ROY
Austin, TX, USA
On Saturday 11 September 2004 06:57 pm, Wesley J Landaker wrote:
> I don't know if it was in KMail 1.6.7 or not, but in KMail 1.7 (part of
> KDE 3.3) you can click the "date" column a couple times to switch
> between:
Ah, excellent; I'd never noticed. The default
On Saturday, 11 September 2004 15:46, Kevin Murphy wrote:
> I just popped in on this thread, so I may be off-topic here, but it
> really irritates me that the kmail date column corresponds to the
> 'Date' header field, and that there is apparently no way to make the
> Date
On Saturday 11 September 2004 05:19 pm, Adam Aube wrote:
> > Date of arrival COMPLETELY EMPTY, no date in the field.
> Under Settings -> Configure Kmail -> Appearance -> Headers tab, is Date
> Display set to "Custom Format"? If so, try changing it.
I just popped in
Vittorio De Martino wrote:
> Under debian testing & kde in the messages pane I see the following
> columns: Subject
> Size
> Sender
> Date of arrival COMPLETELY EMPTY, no date in the field.
Under Settings -> Configure Kmail -> Appearance -> Headers tab, is Date
Displa
Under debian testing & kde in the messages pane I see the following columns:
Subject
Size
Sender
Date of arrival COMPLETELY EMPTY, no date in the field.
How can I tell kmail to show the date in the right field?
Ciao
Vittorio
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subjec
> The mail server 's date and time has gone one day ahead and it has
> debian unstable installed on it.
> it shows Wed Aug 18 10:25:59 IST 2004
> but the actual time and date now is Tue Aug 17 12:21:04 IST 2004
> how do i get it right
Use 'date' as root to set
hI,
THANKS I GOT IT UP BY USING DATE AND HWCLOCK COMMAND
VIJAYA
Kevin Mark wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:27:53PM +0530, Vijaya S wrote:
> >
> > Hi all,
> > The mail server 's date and time has gone one day ahead and it has
> > debian unstable installed on i
On Tue, 2004-08-17 at 18:51, Vijaya S wrote:
> Hi all,
> The mail server 's date and time has gone one day ahead and it has
> debian unstable installed on it.
> it shows Wed Aug 18 10:25:59 IST 2004
> but the actual time and date now is Tue Aug 17 12:21:04 IST 2004
> how do
On Tue, Aug 17, 2004 at 12:27:53PM +0530, Vijaya S wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> The mail server 's date and time has gone one day ahead and it has
> debian unstable installed on it.
> it shows Wed Aug 18 10:25:59 IST 2004
> but the actual time and date now is Tue Aug 17 12:21:04
Hi all,
The mail server 's date and time has gone one day ahead and it has
debian unstable installed on it.
it shows Wed Aug 18 10:25:59 IST 2004
but the actual time and date now is Tue Aug 17 12:21:04 IST 2004
how do i get it right
Regards,
Vijaya
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [
Hi all,
The mail server 's date and time has gone one day ahead and it has
debian unstable installed on it.
it shows Wed Aug 18 10:25:59 IST 2004
but the actual time and date now is Tue Aug 17 12:21:04 IST 2004
how do i get it right
Regards,
Vijaya
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROT
Seen the debian installer is now rc1 (having just tried it again, it a
100% improvement of the woody installer), and having read a few posts
from Steve Langasek, with regards to the installer hopefully going
officially live around September, can we expect that sarge goes from
testing to stable?
Hi,
This works for me, when you have to rotate a lot of different logs, writing a simple
script isnt as easy as getting logrotate to handle it all for you.
lastaction
DATE=`date +%F`; mv /var/log/messages.1.gz /var/log/messages-$DATE.gz
endscript
this is of cource asuming that you
I have apache log files rotated with logrotate, I want to add date to
the log file, so I thought adding:
extension `date "+.%m-%d-%Y"`
Would solve, but this doesn't work. What am I doing wrong?
Thanks,
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "u
Incoming from Will Trillich:
> On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:07:26PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> > Incoming from Danny O'Brien:
> > >
> > > We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by
> > > apt-get . However, uname-a delivers the following response:
> > >
> > > Linux mail 2.4
On Tue, May 11, 2004 at 04:07:26PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> Incoming from Danny O'Brien:
> >
> > We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by
> > apt-get . However, uname-a delivers the following response:
> >
> > Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i68
Yes, it works! thanks
On Mon, 2004-05-13 at 13:46 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 08:32:50PM +0800, cantona wrote:
> > However "LC_TIME=C date" still display the zh_HK date
> > "LC_ALL=C date" works, but it change all locate to C..
>
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 08:32:50PM +0800, cantona wrote:
> However "LC_TIME=C date" still display the zh_HK date
> "LC_ALL=C date" works, but it change all locate to C..
> I dont want like that.
Have you set LC_ALL=zh_HK? Don't - use the LANG variable instead o
Hi,
However "LC_TIME=C date" still display the zh_HK date
"LC_ALL=C date" works, but it change all locate to C..
I dont want like that.
Regards,
cantona
On 四, 2004-05-13 at 12:17 +0100, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 02:33:17AM +0800, cantona wrote:
>
On Thu, May 13, 2004 at 02:33:17AM +0800, cantona wrote:
> I am using locale zh_HK, the date is displaying in Chinese. (å 5æ 13
> 02:26:03 HKT 2004)
> I want to display the 'date' in C (Thu May 13 02:28:59 HKT 2004)
Set LC_TIME=C in your environment. See locale(7).
Cheers
Hi all
I am using locale zh_HK, the date is displaying in Chinese. (四 5月 13
02:26:03 HKT 2004)
I want to display the 'date' in C (Thu May 13 02:28:59 HKT 2004) but
dont change the locale zh_HK to locale C or other,
so any file is handle the date/time locale eg. "xxx.mo"
so I
2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown
>>
>> Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version?
>
> That's the build date. Remember that the last stable release was
> released in July 2002 ...
>
There are more recent builds (with
Incoming from Danny O'Brien:
>
> We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by
> apt-get . However, uname-a delivers the following response:
>
> Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown
>
> Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most re
Danny O'Brien <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by
> apt-get . However, uname-a delivers the following response:
>
> Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown
>
> Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the
hy is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version?
That's the build date. Remember that the last stable release was
released in July 2002 ...
--
Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subje
We updated the kernel this weekend using apt-get update followed by
apt-get . However, uname-a delivers the following response:
Linux mail 2.4.18-686 #1 Sun Apr 14 11:32:47 EST 2002 i686 unknown
Why is this kernel dated April, 2002? Is this the most recent version?
TIA,
Danny O'Brien
--
To UN
Former Representative G. Spencer Coggs became the Senator for the 6th
district on November 26, 2003. To reach Senator Coggs, please resend the
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Email addresses for the 17th Assembly district will be posted on the
Legislature's website at
http://www.legis.state.wi.us/leg
I upgraded to KDE 3.2 a few weeks ago and everything seemed fine, but
tonight I noticed something odd: I can't set the Date/Time within KDE.
When I try to do that, I get an error that seems to indicate the following:
/usr/bin/kcmshell clock --lang en_US
doesn't run... I get a &qu
On Sat, 6 Mar 2004 10:53:34 -0500
"S.D.A." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry, can't help with your Evolution problem, [...]
Actually, I just tried evolution. I exported the KDE addressbook to
LDIF, evolution crashed om import and never started again. So much for
"Evolution problem".
Mozilla Thu
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 10:08:47AM +0200, Aryan Ameri wrote:
> Does anyone have any idea when Debian Sarge will be released as stable?
> I know, it will be released when it's ready, but I am setting up a
> schedule here for my tasks, and even if I could have an approximate
Hi there:
Does anyone have any idea when Debian Sarge will be released as stable?
I know, it will be released when it's ready, but I am setting up a
schedule here for my tasks, and even if I could have an approximate
date of it's release, it would help alot.
Cheers
--
Aryan Amer
Nicos Gollan wrote:
I'm still looking for a MUA that I really like. So far, I've tried
KMail, Mozilla Mail and sylpheed-claws.
apt-get install mozilla-thunderbird.
I just switched from sylpheed-claws, which I really liked, but you're
right, - too buggy. Past versions have actually been better.
I d
On Saturday 06 March 2004 9:35 am, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> I'm still looking for a MUA that I really like. So far, I've tried
> KMail, Mozilla Mail and sylpheed-claws.
>
> KMail is right out because it is a pain to get proper GPG handling with
> the Aegypten plugins which don't seem to be in debian.
Try Thunderbird. If you add the enigmail plugin you get good gpg
support and can have s/mime as well.
Regards
Tony Middleton
Nicos Gollan wrote:
I'm still looking for a MUA that I really like. So far, I've tried
KMail, Mozilla Mail and sylpheed-claws.
KMail is right out because it is a pain to
On Sat, Mar 06, 2004 at 04:35:33PM +0100 or thereabouts, Nicos Gollan wrote:
> I don't like Mozilla mail for *some* reason, it's personal ;-)
Sorry, can't help with your Evolution problem, but have you tried out
Thunderbird? It's based on the Mozilla client, (it only contains the
capbility for
I'm still looking for a MUA that I really like. So far, I've tried
KMail, Mozilla Mail and sylpheed-claws.
KMail is right out because it is a pain to get proper GPG handling with
the Aegypten plugins which don't seem to be in debian.
sylpheed-claws is much better but the debian packages are sever
and try upgrading again but the same message reappear, anyway around
this? I really need 7.4 running because one of the software uses 7.4.
If you have made an up to date dump, run dpkg-reconfigure and say yes to
the question.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a
4.
If you have made an up to date dump, run dpkg-reconfigure and say yes to
the question.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
, Cinly Ooi wrote:
Dear all,
While trying to upgrade from 7.3->7.4, I cannot get around the problem of
"You must have an up to date dump before upgrading to PostgreSQL 7.4"
eventhough I tried pg_dumpall > dumpfile
See bug #230681
.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to
On Mon, 2004-02-23 at 16:55, Cinly Ooi wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> While trying to upgrade from 7.3->7.4, I cannot get around the problem of
> "You must have an up to date dump before upgrading to PostgreSQL 7.4"
> eventhough I tried pg_dumpall > dumpfile
See bug #23068
Dear all,
While trying to upgrade from 7.3->7.4, I cannot get around the problem of
"You must have an up to date dump before upgrading to PostgreSQL 7.4"
eventhough I tried pg_dumpall > dumpfile
What I did is as below:
root# postgre dpkg -i postgresql_7.4.1-3_i386.deb
(
test
Recipient: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Please ensure that your Anti Virus software is right up to date and that you run a
sweep of all files immediately
=
Attachment information:
27;dman' Hudson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 10:55 AM
Subject: Re: /etc/mail/aliases.db out of date
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:23:13PM -0500, Frederic Lavoie wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have this error :
>
> Dec 20 04:00:04 eglantin sm-mta[15923]: alias database /etc/mail/aliases.db out of
> date
>
>
> Even if I do a newaliases the error still there. Is
On Fri, Jan 02, 2004 at 11:23:13PM -0500, Frederic Lavoie wrote:
| Hello,
|
| I have this error :
|
| Dec 20 04:00:04 eglantin sm-mta[15923]: alias database /etc/mail/aliases.db out of
date
| Even if I do a newaliases the error still there. Is is logical?
| What is the problem
Hello,
I have this error :
Dec 20
04:00:04 eglantin sm-mta[15923]: alias database /etc/mail/aliases.db out of
date
Even if I do a newaliases the error still
there. Is is logical? What is the problem? The file itself has a good
date. If you have any feel free to contact me
On Wednesday December 31 at 08:29pm
Adam Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for the help. I am more than reassured enough to move my Debian
>
> box into service now. This is good news because I could do with a
> Linux box at home.
>
> A cron job has been set to do the updating via apt, a
People,
Thanks for the help. I am more than reassured enough to move my Debian
box into service now. This is good news because I could do with a Linux
box at home.
A cron job has been set to do the updating via apt, and I will check
apt-check-sic (I assume this is the apt-check-sic.pl script I
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 18:19, Adam Barton wrote:
> Are the packages verified that they are indeed a genuine debian update?
Others have answered your other questions, so I figured I'd hit this.
Yes, they are. While each individual package isn't signed, there's a
Release file downloaded with apt-get
On Tue, 2003-12-30 at 20:19, wynn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:19:24PM +, Adam Barton wrote:
> > Guys,
> what about us 'non-guys'?
>
> wynn
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Rowr, and now I have your email address too!
--
Stephen Touset <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
signature.asc
Descrip
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:19:24PM +, Adam Barton wrote:
> However, how should I be keeping Debian up to date to the latest stable
> release and also with the latest security patches? I am kind of looking
> for a 'redhat networ
sing apt-get install and dselect).
>
> However, how should I be keeping Debian up to date to the latest stable
> release and also with the latest security patches? I am kind of looking
> for a 'redhat network' or 'windows update' equivalent.
>
> Is simpl
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 05:19:53PM -0800, wynn wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:19:24PM +, Adam Barton wrote:
> > Guys,
> what about us 'non-guys'?
I think we are all guys.
Unless you are something that we don't know about.
www.dictionary.com
4 entries found for guys.
1. guy: Info
On Tue, Dec 30, 2003 at 11:19:24PM +, Adam Barton wrote:
> Guys,
what about us 'non-guys'?
wynn
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Debian up to date to the latest stable
release and also with the latest security patches? I am kind of looking
for a 'redhat network' or 'windows update' equivalent.
Is simply 'apt-get update && apt-get dist-upgrade' as root sufficient?
Are the packages verified
I'm running my developed windows application under WINE 20031212 and KDE2
I want to know which date format is set in KDE
I have set date format in KDE to dd.mm.
but WINE still returns the date format mm/dd/
In which file KDE2 stores the date format ?
Is it possible to read
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 16:04:05 -0700, Monique Y. Herman wrote:
>
> Thank you so much! This is exactly what I was looking for, and your
> example made it very easy to understand.
My pleasure. I'm not that good at much, but I'm fairly good with SQL
stuff.
--
paul
Guy: "Would
On Mon, 22 Dec 2003 at 21:30 GMT, Paul Morgan penned:
>
> Monique, you're using the to_date function the wrong way round, which is
> not an uncommon mistake.
>
> to_date() converts a string to a date, *not* a date to a string. So your
> working example works because
>
> You have to tell PostgreSQL the format of the string date you are
> passing to to_timestamp (or to to_date) by parameter.
Ah, shoot. I think I see the problem now.
I was hoping that to_date would let me take an existing date field and
print it out in some format -- kind of like co
901 - 1000 of 1391 matches
Mail list logo
