Hi Evelyn,
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 06:00:08PM +0200, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote:
> E: The repository 'http://security.debian.org/debian-security
> bullseye/updates Release' does not have a Release file.
A few people have by now pointed out the specific cause of your
problem, but the root cause is
> deb http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates main contrib
> non-free
> deb-src http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates main
> contrib non-free
I think you are missing bullseye-security. I have this:
deb http://mirrors.linode.com/debian-security/ bulls
On Sun, Aug 15, 2021 at 12:06:18PM -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > apt-get update
> > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease
> > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates
Am Sonntag, 15. August 2021, 18:00:08 CEST schrieb Evelyn Pereira Souza:
Hi Evelyn,
the entry in sources.list has changed, it is now:
deb http://deb.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main contrib
non-free
deb-src http://deb.debian.org/debian-security bullseye-security main contrib
On Sun 15 Aug 2021 at 12:06:18 -0400, The Wanderer wrote:
> On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > apt-get update
> > Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease
> > Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates Re
On 2021-08-15 at 12:00, Evelyn Pereira Souza wrote:
> Hi
>
> apt-get update
> Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease
> Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates Release
>404 Not Found [IP: 199.232.138.132 80]
> deb http://security
Hi
apt-get update
Ign:1 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates InRelease
Err:2 http://security.debian.org/debian-security bullseye/updates Release
404 Not Found [IP: 199.232.138.132 80]
Hit:3 http://mirror.init7.net/debian bullseye InRelease
Hit:4 http://mirror.init7.net/d
On Sun, Aug 23, 2020 at 07:44:36AM +0100, mick crane wrote:
The OP is asking to encrypt a document (presumably)
I didn't presume so; that's probably where the difference of opinion
comes from, different presumptions. The ZIP solution would work in
either case, though.
--
Please do not CC me,
?
If these are documents what's wrong with open office protected with
passphrase ?
Q: What should we eat today?
A: What's wrong with Chinese food?
Q: What novel do you suggest me to read next?
A: What's wrong with The Three-Body Problem by Liu Cixin?
Is there a culture where &qu
Teemu Likonen wrote:
> Q: What should we eat today?
> A: What's wrong with Chinese food?
>
> Q: What novel do you suggest me to read next?
> A: What's wrong with The Three-Body Problem by Liu Cixin?
>
>
> Is there a culture where "what's wrong with
ese are documents what's wrong with open office protected with
> passphrase ?
Q: What should we eat today?
A: What's wrong with Chinese food?
Q: What novel do you suggest me to read next?
A: What's wrong with The Three-Body Problem by Liu Cixin?
Is there a culture where "what
Hi,
I want to conclude this thread with a summary. I hope some may
benefit from this.
First many thanks to Gregory Nowak, Jonathan Dowland, Chris Davies,
and Curt, who helped me along the way.
My purpose:
I wanted that the system mail notifications (cron failed jobs, etc.)
to end up in my
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0200, Itay wrote:
Newbie's question: is it a problem? Is there a risk?
Not really, but some people may prefer that their internal host names
and suchlike are not exposed to the outside world. I first noticed it
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 10:45:56AM +0200, Itay wrote:
> Newbie's question: is it a problem? Is there a risk?
Not really, but some people may prefer that their internal host names
and suchlike are not exposed to the outside world. I first noticed it
when trying to configure my MUA to recognise my o
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On 12 Nov 2013, at 22:06, Gregory Nowak wrote:
This name won't appear on From: lines of outgoing messages if
rewriting
is enabled.
It does leak out in message-Id strings however.
Newbie's question: is it a problem? Is there a risk?
[I was goi
> On 12 Nov 2013, at 22:06, Gregory Nowak wrote:
>
> This name won't appear on From: lines of outgoing messages if
> rewriting
> is enabled.
It does leak out in message-Id strings however.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe"
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 09:39:55AM +0200, Itay wrote:
> I don't remember editing /etc/mailname by hand; 'dpkg -S' says it's
> not owned by any debian package.
> So how this file gets its content?
It was created when you installed exim, and would be changed when
running dpkg-reconfigure exim4-confi
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Gregory Nowak wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Itay wrote:
I was using 465 because that's how my email client (alpine) uses the
provider's SMTP. It was configured some years ago, and I was not
aware that a change is required.
Yes, mail.messagingengine.com
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Gregory Nowak wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Itay wrote:
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
It looks like your mail configuration is now fixed.
I agree, for the most part anyway.
Finally -- I don't know if it is significant -- but I note in
Thanks to Jonathan and Greg, and others, it seems that the cause for
the problem was found.
See below.
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:33:22 +
From: Jonathan Dowland
To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: [OT?] What's wrong with my
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Gregory Nowak wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:28:31AM +0200, Itay wrote:
I don't understand why ':25' is appended, and what is the meaning of
that.
There are a number of things I want to reply to in this thread. So,
I'm going to do this in each relevant message, since t
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Itay wrote:
> On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
> >It looks like your mail configuration is now fixed.
I agree, for the most part anyway.
> Finally -- I don't know if it is significant -- but I note in the
> output below, for example 3 lines fr
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:50:33AM +0200, Itay wrote:
> I was using 465 because that's how my email client (alpine) uses the
> provider's SMTP. It was configured some years ago, and I was not
> aware that a change is required.
Yes, mail.messagingengine.com still seems to accept connections on tcp
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 08:28:31AM +0200, Itay wrote:
> I don't understand why ':25' is appended, and what is the meaning of
> that.
There are a number of things I want to reply to in this thread. So,
I'm going to do this in each relevant message, since that will be
easier for me. Apologies if the
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:33:46PM +0200, Itay wrote:
> I tried several times, including re-issuing 'exim4 -qff'.
> It hangs and I have to kill it.
> The output is appended below.
OK I wouldn't worry about the hanging from this output. I suspect it's
just the SMTP client and/or server keeping the
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Jonathan Dowland wrote:
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:20:18AM +0200, Itay wrote:
3) The last command I isssued:
# echo This is a test message. | exim -v -i root
is still hanging.
This was the behavior I was seeing yesterday as well.
Try killing it and re-issuing it since you
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 09:20:18AM +0200, Itay wrote:
> 3) The last command I isssued:
> # echo This is a test message. | exim -v -i root
> is still hanging.
> This was the behavior I was seeing yesterday as well.
Try killing it and re-issuing it since you've made the other changes.
It looks like
On Mon, 11 Nov 2013, Itay wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Gregory Nowak wrote:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +, Chris Davies wrote:
> > IP address or host name of the outgoing smarthost
> > => "mail.messagingengine.com::NNN".
>
> Should be a single colon, not double. For example,
mail.
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Gregory Nowak wrote:
By mistake I sent my reply directly to the responder (sorry Greg) and
not to the list. Here is a copy:
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +, Chris Davies wrote:
> > IP address or host name of the outgoing smarthost
> > => "mail.messagingengine.co
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Curt wrote:
On 2013-11-10, Itay wrote:
R: smarthost for r...@fastmail.fm
T: remote_smtp_smarthost for r...@fastmail.fm
Connecting to mail.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.52]:25 ... failed:
**?
Connection refused
I th
On Sun, Nov 10, 2013 at 01:15:26PM +, Chris Davies wrote:
> > IP address or host name of the outgoing smarthost
> > => "mail.messagingengine.com::NNN".
>
> Should be a single colon, not double. For example, mail.example.net:587
No, this is incorrect. When you run dpkg-reconfigure exim4-config
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Roger B.A. Klorese wrote:
On Nov 10, 2013, at 10:07 AM, Itay wrote:
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Chris Davies wrote:
Itay wrote:
IP address or host name of the outgoing smarthost
=> "mail.messagingengine.com::NNN".
Should be a single colon, not double. For example, mail.e
On 2013-11-10, Itay wrote:
> R: smarthost for r...@fastmail.fm
> T: remote_smtp_smarthost for r...@fastmail.fm
> Connecting to mail.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.52]:25 ... failed:
**?
> Connection refused
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Curt wrote:
On 2013-11-10, Itay wrote:
4. Insert in /etc/exim4/passwd.client the following line:
smtp.mail.provider:myem...@fastmail.fm:ClearTextPassWord
This part I don't understand. I thought you were supposed to put fastmail.fm's
smtp server in the first field?
You
On Sun, 10 Nov 2013, Chris Davies wrote:
Chris: thanks for helping me out.
Itay wrote:
I am struggling to configure exim4 on my home desktop to send system
notifications to my public email address [...]
[I replaced smtp's port with NNN. Also, assume 'machine' is output of
command 'hostname
Itay wrote:
> I am struggling to configure exim4 on my home desktop to send system
> notifications to my public email address [...]
> [I replaced smtp's port with NNN. Also, assume 'machine' is output of
> command 'hostname', while 'machine.homenetwork' is output of 'hostname
> -f']
> IP address
On 2013-11-10, Itay wrote:
> 4. Insert in /etc/exim4/passwd.client the following line:
> smtp.mail.provider:myem...@fastmail.fm:ClearTextPassWord
This part I don't understand. I thought you were supposed to put fastmail.fm's
smtp server in the first field?
curty@einstein:~$ host mail.messaginge
Hi,
I apologize for the long post.
I thought it's best to put as much information including stuff inserted into
configuration files and relevant parts of log file.
I am struggling to configure exim4 on my home desktop to send system
notifications to my public email address. So far with no suc
On Mon Mar 01, 2010 at 23:11:50 +0100, Jack Knowlton wrote:
> dsrv:~# ls -alh /var/mail/virtual/domain.com/jo0atj50/
> total 0
> drwxrwsrwx 5 vmail vmail 120 2010-03-01 21:16 .
> drwx--S--- 3 vmail vmail 72 2010-03-01 21:16 ..
> drwxrwsrwx 2 vmail vmail 48 2010-03-01 21:16 cur
> drwxrwsrwx 2 vma
Hi all,
I am having permissions problems with my debian box and every solution I
have tried didn't change the situation.
I have a php application that has to read Maildir folders&files but fails
no matter how I set the permissions. Apache2 runs under www-data:www-data
and Postfix creates the Maild
Jon Dowland debian.org> writes:
>
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:42:57PM +0200, Aioanei Rares
> wrote:
> > A more practical approach : what should the average user
> > do in order to get his/her Debian back after this GRUB
> > bug?
>
> Stick to stable in future, that's what.
This happened to me
> OK, maybe I misunderstood. For some reason, I thought the OP was running
> pure testing and a broken package migrated from sid to testing, causing
> his boot loader to break. Apparently he was running sid, and I somehow
> missed that detail.
No probs. Anyway your point about finding more than
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:11:09 -0500 (EST), Tom H wrote:
> That's why I said "+1" to your previous email and said "in this case"
> because it is possible to do so for grub given its dependencies.
> Unstable and testing currently have just one version of grub2 each so
> if someone wants to downgrade un
>> In this case, I would back up sources.list, create a new, one-line
>> sources.list pointing at the main section of testing, purge unstable's
>> grub-common and grub-pc, apt-get update, install testing's grub-common
>> and grub-pc, delete the temporary sources.list, reinstate the original
>> sour
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:09:42PM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> If you can *find* it, yes. For example, if you are running "sid", and
> a new upload breaks, you may be able to find an older version in
> "testing" that still works. But if you are running "testing" and an
> upload breaks, where
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:56:06 -0500 (EST), Tom H wrote:
> In this case, I would back up sources.list, create a new, one-line
> sources.list pointing at the main section of testing, purge unstable's
> grub-common and grub-pc, apt-get update, install testing's grub-common
> and grub-pc, delete the temp
> If you can *find* it, yes. For example, if you are running "sid", and
> a new upload breaks, you may be able to find an older version in
> "testing" that still works. But if you are running "testing" and an
> upload breaks, where are you going to find a down-level version that
> you can install?
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 13:09:42 Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:59:31 -0500 (EST), Tom Furie wrote:
> > In general I agree with you, but in this case it should be fairly
> > trivial since very little depends on grub, and the dependencies between
> > the versions haven't changed,
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 12:59:31 -0500 (EST), Tom Furie wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:47:17AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
>> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:18:30 -0500 (EST), Tom Furie wrote:
>>> One option would be to boot from a CD (installer, liveCD, whatever),
>>> chroot into Debian and revert grub to
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 11:59:31 Tom Furie wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:47:17AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:18:30 -0500 (EST), Tom Furie wrote:
> > > One option would be to boot from a CD (installer, liveCD, whatever),
> > > chroot into Debian and revert grub t
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:47:17AM -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:18:30 -0500 (EST), Tom Furie wrote:
> > One option would be to boot from a CD (installer, liveCD, whatever),
> > chroot into Debian and revert grub to an earlier version.
>
> As has been addressed in other rece
On Tue, 2 Feb 2010 09:18:30 -0500 (EST), Tom Furie wrote:
> One option would be to boot from a CD (installer, liveCD, whatever),
> chroot into Debian and revert grub to an earlier version.
As has been addressed in other recent posts, downgrading a package
to a previous version once a newer version
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:42:57PM +0200, Aioanei Rares
wrote:
> A more practical approach : what should the average user
> do in order to get his/her Debian back after this GRUB
> bug?
Stick to stable in future, that's what.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 07:24:58AM -0800, Brian Denheyer wrote:
> Is there any good reason for a system to use grub instead of lilo ?
Yes.
Lilo loads kernel by its sector address on harddisk. So if you update
its image while with the same file name, you need to update pointer data
for lilo.
Gru
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:42:57PM +0200, Aioanei Rares wrote:
> A more practical approach : what should the average user do in order to get
> his/her Debian back after this GRUB bug?
One option would be to boot from a CD (installer, liveCD, whatever),
chroot into Debian and revert grub to an ear
A more practical approach : what should the average user do in order to get
his/her Debian back after this GRUB bug?
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
On Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:24:58 -0500 (EST), Brian Denheyer wrote:
> Imagine by surprise when I finished upgrading unstable and ended up
> with a system that wouldn't boot.
> And I'm not the only one, judging from the bug list.
> So notice to those running unstable, DON'T UPGRADE GRUB !
> So you're pro
On Monday 01 February 2010 10:06:50 Jens Van Broeckhoven wrote:
> Debian needs a default and grub is more suitable in most cases.
It's only the default if you are using d-i. Oft times, I will install Debian
through the debootstrap method, from whatever live CD/DVD I have sitting
around. In tha
On Monday 01 February 2010 16:24:58 Brian Denheyer wrote:
> Imagine by surprise when I finished upgrading unstable and ended up
> with a system that wouldn't boot.
>
> And I'm not the only one, judging from the bug list.
>
> So notice to those running unstable, DON'T UPGRADE GRUB !
>
> So you're
On Monday 01 February 2010 16:24:58 Brian Denheyer wrote:
> Imagine by surprise when I finished upgrading unstable and ended up
> with a system that wouldn't boot.
>
> And I'm not the only one, judging from the bug list.
>
> So notice to those running unstable, DON'T UPGRADE GRUB !
>
> So you're
Imagine by surprise when I finished upgrading unstable and ended up
with a system that wouldn't boot.
And I'm not the only one, judging from the bug list.
So notice to those running unstable, DON'T UPGRADE GRUB !
So you're probably wondering what my question is :-)
Is there any good reason for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the reply. I solved the problem the usual way in those
situations (at least for me). Waiting for a few hours (until the
repository is updated) and updating/upgrading again solved the problem.
Cheers,
Ivan
Michael Marsh wrot
On 2008-03-10 10:30 +0100, Ivan Glushkov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> today after upgrade i realize that I cannot install open office on my
> debian anymore. Any idea how to overcome that?
This is quite normal with the openoffice.org packages. The reason is
that the architecture dependent packages have not
On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 5:30 AM, Ivan Glushkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> today after upgrade i realize that I cannot install open office on my
> debian anymore. Any idea how to overcome that?
The version of OpenOffice.org in sid is uninstallable on most
platforms. openoffice.org-common was b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ivan Glushkov wrote:
| Hi,
|
| today after upgrade i realize that I cannot install open office on my
| debian anymore. Any idea how to overcome that?
|
| Cheers,
| Ivan
|
| ~# apt-get install openoffice.org
| Reading package lists... Done
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
today after upgrade i realize that I cannot install open office on my
debian anymore. Any idea how to overcome that?
Cheers,
Ivan
~# apt-get install openoffice.org
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree
Reading st
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:03:29PM -0600, Bob Goldberg wrote:
> nevermind - I finally figured it out...
do tell Bob!
A
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
nevermind - I finally figured it out...
;.
I tried appending an "endpass", but that did nothing.
what's wrong with my accept / condition statements?
TIA - Bob
Learning to use new software takes time. Last time I used mencoder and
ffmpeg, they have video/audio synchronization problem, according their
manual.
Now I'm happy with real producer and player.
--- Kelly Clowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Nov 30, 2007 8:55 PM, Serena Cantor <[EMAIL PROTE
On Nov 30, 2007 8:55 PM, Serena Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I follow links at real.com,
> No matter how hard I try, I can't download it.
In my opinion, even better than using the RealPlayer at
debian-multimedia, would be to get a recent mplayer,
ffmpeg and w32codecs from the same place. I
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007 13:18:32 + (UTC)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I follow links at real.com,
> No matter how hard I try, I can't download it.
I would forget about the links at real.com, and instead, (assuming
you're using Etch), add "deb http://www.debian-multimedia.org etch
main" to your /etc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/01/07 04:03, Serena Cantor wrote:
> You can go to:
>
> http://www.real.com/linux/
>
> and click download link there to see if there's problem.
It works on Saturday at 10:30AM CST.
I was having problems last night for a few hourse accessing
or
You can go to:
http://www.real.com/linux/
and click download link there to see if there's problem.
--- Ron Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 11/30/07 22:55, Serena Cantor wrote:
> > I follow links at real.com,
> > No matter how hard I
Thanks!
--- David Fox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 11/30/07, Serena Cantor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I follow links at real.com,
> > No matter how hard I try, I can't download it.
>
> Why not get it from a Debian repository (debian-multimedia.org)
>
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/30/07 22:55, Serena Cantor wrote:
> I follow links at real.com,
> No matter how hard I try, I can't download it.
You're probably frustrated and aggrivated. I would be too.
But we can't assist you without more details.
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Je
I follow links at real.com,
No matter how hard I try, I can't download it.
Be a better sports nut! Let your teams follow you
with Yahoo Mobile. Try it now.
http://mobile.yahoo.com/sports;_ylt=At9_qDKvt
please don't top post. thanks.
On Wed, Jan 10, 2007 at 09:51:15AM +0800, Ken Hu wrote:
> well...
>
> The only reason that I did not provide ant error message is I didn't
> have one.
> I tried to start abiword in console mode before I posted my question ,
> but there's no error message at all.
>
well...
The only reason that I did not provide ant error message is I didn't
have one.
I tried to start abiword in console mode before I posted my question ,
but there's no error message at all.
After issueing the "abiword" command to start abiword , I can only see
the logo image of abiword , the
> After upgrade to etch , the abiword won't start anymore.
> (I've tried to reinstall it , but that doesn't help)
Perhaps purging it, and then reinstalling, would work.
Mark
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:33:00AM +0800, Ken Hu wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> Although openoffice,org is great , I still need to use abiword because I
> have a lot of existed documents edited by abiword.
> After upgrade to etch , the abiword won't start anymore.
> (I've tried to reinstall it , but that
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:33:00AM +0800, Ken Hu wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> Although openoffice,org is great , I still need to use abiword because I
> have a lot of existed documents edited by abiword.
> After upgrade to etch , the abiword won't start anymore.
> (I've tried to reinstall it , but that
On Tue, Jan 09, 2007 at 10:33:00AM +0800, Ken Hu wrote:
> Dear All:
>
> Although openoffice,org is great , I still need to use abiword because I
> have a lot of existed documents edited by abiword.
> After upgrade to etch , the abiword won't start anymore.
> (I've tried to reinstall it , but that
Dear All:
Although openoffice,org is great , I still need to use abiword because I
have a lot of existed documents edited by abiword.
After upgrade to etch , the abiword won't start anymore.
(I've tried to reinstall it , but that doesn't help)
Does anyone know what's going on for abiword on etch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday 06 July 2006 13:05, Brian C wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I must be missing something. The standard Sarge 2.6.8.2 kernel with
> initrd boots fine on this ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe Motherboard with a single
> 500GB IDE Hard drive as /dev/hda, but the config I
Hi,
I must be missing something. The standard Sarge 2.6.8.2 kernel with
initrd boots fine on this ASUS P4C800-E Deluxe Motherboard with a single
500GB IDE Hard drive as /dev/hda, but the config I made for 2.6.17.3
kernel panics at the point where it is looking for the hard disk (which
it cannot fi
On Mon, Apr 10, 2006 at 12:21:04PM +0200, Christian Pernegger wrote:
| Hi!
| Is X11's network transparency a thing of the past and not supposed to
| work anymore?
No, it still works. I use it fairly frequently.
| X forwarding of single apps via ssh:
| - win32 (wine) programs crash on startup
Hello Christian,
I'm doing remote X over ssh all the day without your described problems, so
something seems to be broken with your setup/applications.
Christian Pernegger wrote:
>
> I hadn't used X for anything but local logins in a few years, but back
> in the day X forwarding or logging in
On Mon, 10 Apr 2006, Christian Pernegger wrote:
Is X11's network transparency a thing of the past and not supposed to
No way. I use it every day of the week (and the weekend) as I'm sitting
on an XTerminal right now. Network transparency is the basis of the LTSP
project and others.
You n
> I'm doing remote X over ssh all the day without your described problems, so
> something seems to be broken with your setup/applications.
Ok, so something is broken. I half feared someone would come forward
and say gnome or wine apps can't be forwarded by design.
> [Why testing?]
My personal bo
Hi!
Recently I setup a new machine that was to have GUI remote login and
control. The machine had previously been running Windows XP and
TightVNC but was getting a little Cygwin happy and nobody was too
happy with VNC blocking the local display.
I hadn't used X for anything but local logins in a
On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 12:05:57AM -0400, Carl Fink wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:18:23PM -0500, John Fleming wrote:
> > >Well you can use sarge, seems stable enough, however no
> > >security. Thats a major issue in my mind.
> >
> > Could you explain that in newbie-ease? I seem to be gettin
On Saturday 16 July 2005 21:18, John Fleming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
>> Well you can use sarge, seems stable enough, however no
>> security. Thats a major issue in my mind.
>
> Could you explain that in newbie-ease?
Sure.
> I seem to be getting updates for sarge from se
On Sun, 17 Jul 2005 05:40:06 +0200, in linux.debian.user you wrote:
>> Well you can use sarge, seems stable enough, however no
>> security. Thats a major issue in my mind.
>
>Could you explain that in newbie-ease? I seem to be getting updates for
>sarge from security.debain.org. Why do you say
On Saturday 16 July 2005 06:35 pm, Robert Brockway wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Glenn English wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 18:02 -0700, mike wrote:
> > > FWIW, I would pay for a subscription if it meant faster time to
> > > market for package updates.
> >
> > I'd pay for a subscription for not
people would be so sensitive < ... snip ... >
>
And _that's_ what's wrong with top-posting.
(Sorry; just had to say it.)
--
Kent
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 10:18:23PM -0500, John Fleming wrote:
> >Well you can use sarge, seems stable enough, however no
> >security. Thats a major issue in my mind.
>
> Could you explain that in newbie-ease? I seem to be getting updates for
> sarge from security.debain.org. Why do you say "no
Well you can use sarge, seems stable enough, however no
security. Thats a major issue in my mind.
Could you explain that in newbie-ease? I seem to be getting updates for
sarge from security.debain.org. Why do you say "no security"? I elected to
stay with sarge as it went stable FOR the secu
On Sat, 16 Jul 2005, Glenn English wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 18:02 -0700, mike wrote:
> > FWIW, I would pay for a subscription if it meant faster time to market
> > for package updates.
>
> I'd pay for a subscription for not much reason at all -- just to help
> keep Debian fat and happy.
H
On Sat, 2005-07-16 at 18:02 -0700, mike wrote:
> FWIW, I would pay for a subscription if it meant faster time to market
> for package updates.
I'd pay for a subscription for not much reason at all -- just to help
keep Debian fat and happy.
And I'd gladly chip in a one timer to get murphy.debian.
1 - 100 of 138 matches
Mail list logo
