Thanks a lot !
2011/2/27 Camaleón
> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:08:39 +0800, waterloo wrote:
>
> > 2011/2/28 Camaleón
> >
> >> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:02:16 +0800, waterloo wrote:
> >>
> >> > Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Reading early boot files
&
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 03:08:39 +0800, waterloo wrote:
> 2011/2/28 Camaleón
>
>> On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:02:16 +0800, waterloo wrote:
>>
>> > Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Reading early boot files
>>
>> A quick Google search returns that this message can be r
he logs:
>
> > Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Reading later boot files
> (...)
> > Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Reading later boot files...
> > ^[[31mfailed!^[[39;49m
> (...)
> > Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Reading early boot files
>
> A quick Google search retu
On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 02:02:16 +0800, waterloo wrote:
> Below is my /var/log/boot file . Thanks
Keeping the interesting data and removing the rest of the logs:
> Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Reading later boot files
(...)
> Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Reading later boot files...
>
;
> Mon Feb 28 01:57:44 2011: Setting console screen modes and fonts.
>
> Mon Feb 28 01:57:44 2011: ^[]R^[[9;30]^[[14;30]Setting up console font and
>> keymap...done.
>
> Mon Feb 28 01:57:45 2011: Skip starting firewall: ufw (not enabled)...done.
>
> Mon Feb 28 01:57
On Sat, 26 Feb 2011 13:00:10 +0800, waterloo wrote:
> when boot , I see an error : Reading later boot files failed . What is
> the matter ?
Enable boot log and send it here.
In "/etc/default/bootlogd" file you have to set "BOOTLOGD_ENABLE=Yes".
Reboot and review
when boot , I see an error : Reading later boot files failed .
What is the matter ?
I use Debian 6 amd64 .
Thanks
At Friday, 31 December 2004, you wrote:
are there suggestions on how to get the fa311 netgear nic working
w/ 2.2.20-compact?
>>>
>>>sounds like you need to tell it to load the tulip driver for fa311
>>>
>>>and than tell i upgrade the kernel and it'd run lilo/grub
>>>and you're back in b
Harland Christofferson wrote:
> Before I created this mess, I was running the 2.4.18-bf2.4 kernel.
> I tried the rescue.bin and root.bin floppies from the Debian site
> but I was not able to boot w/ them. I was able to boot w/ the 2.2.
> 20-compact floppies however.
>
> Now, using 2.2.20-compact,
>>
>>sounds like raid is working ?? ..
>> - in the future, do NOT copy files from one disk to another
>> ( that is not how raid mirroring works )
>
>>
>>> are there suggestions on how to get the fa311 netgear nic working
>>> w/ 2.2.20-compact?
>>
>>sounds like you need to tell it to lo
At Monday, 27 December 2004, Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com> wrote:
>On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Harland Christofferson wrote:
>
>> what i did try was Alan's suggestion of the Debian rescue disk. I
>> have never used it in a capacity such as this. I used the 2.2.20-
>> compact rescue, root, driver-1 a
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Harland Christofferson wrote:
> what i did try was Alan's suggestion of the Debian rescue disk. I
> have never used it in a capacity such as this. I used the 2.2.20-
> compact rescue, root, driver-1 and driver-2 binaries. I am able to
> boot from the hard drive (woohoo) but
>
>I have never done what I am about to suggest, but try this:
>
>1. copy the whole contents of the directory /lib/modules/xxx/ from the
>computer where you got your replacement /boot onto the computer that
>you are trying to get going again. Here 'xxx' represents the kernel
version
>string of th
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 06:31:49PM -0500, Harland Christofferson wrote:
> At Monday, 27 December 2004, you wrote:
>
> >On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Harland Christofferson wrote:
> >> At Monday, 27 December 2004, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >> info> wrote:
> >>
> >> >* Harl
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004, Harland Christofferson wrote:
> while getting ready to build a raid 1 array, i accidentally deleted
> the /boot files. the partition is still there however and is still
> flagged as boot partition.
>
> although i have a boot floppy for this machine, i cou
At Monday, 27 December 2004, you wrote:
>On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Harland Christofferson wrote:
>> At Monday, 27 December 2004, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> info> wrote:
>>
>> >* Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041227
>> 17:47]:
>> >
>> >> >cat /etc/lilo.c
On Mon, Dec 27, 2004 at 01:59:53PM -0500, Harland Christofferson wrote:
> At Monday, 27 December 2004, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> info> wrote:
>
> >* Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041227
> 17:47]:
> >
> >> >cat /etc/lilo.conf
> >[..]
> >> image=/vmlinuz
> >> labe
At Monday, 27 December 2004, Alexander Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
info> wrote:
>* Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041227
17:47]:
>
>> >cat /etc/lilo.conf
>[..]
>> image=/vmlinuz
>> label=Linux
>> read-only
>> # restricted
>> # alias=1
>> initrd=/ini
* Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [041227 17:47]:
> >cat /etc/lilo.conf
[..]
> image=/vmlinuz
> label=Linux
> read-only
> # restricted
> # alias=1
> initrd=/initrd.img
You need to symlink boot/initrd.img-2.4.18-k7 to /initrd.img
signature.asc
Descr
suggestions?
>>
>>At Monday, 27 December 2004, Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>>com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>while getting ready to build a raid 1 array, i accidentally deleted
>>>the /boot files. the partition is still there however and is
VFS: Unable to mount root fs on 03:03
my root= option is set to /dev/hda3 which is the root partition.
suggestions?
At Monday, 27 December 2004, Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com> wrote:
while getting ready to build a raid 1 array, i accidentally deleted
the /boot files. th
s on 03:03
my root= option is set to /dev/hda3 which is the root partition.
suggestions?
At Monday, 27 December 2004, Harland Christofferson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
com> wrote:
>while getting ready to build a raid 1 array, i accidentally deleted
>the /boot files. the partition is still ther
while getting ready to build a raid 1 array, i accidentally deleted
the /boot files. the partition is still there however and is still
flagged as boot partition.
although i have a boot floppy for this machine, i could not retrieve
a backup of the /boot partition from another hard disk i have
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 09:41:01AM +0300, Petteri Heinonen wrote:
> Hello there.
> I'd like to know what is purpose of all those files in my /boot and if they
> are needed there or not. Files in my /boot are:
>
> System.map-2.2.15
symbol maps for kernel image 2.2.15, used mostly for debugging, bu
Hello there.
I'd like to know what is purpose of all those files in my /boot and if they
are needed there or not. Files in my /boot are:
System.map-2.2.15
boot.0300
boot.0303
boot.b
bzImage
chain.b
config-2.2.15
map
mbr.b
os2_d.b
vmlinuz-2.2.15
I know kernel files, but the rest are at least parti
On Sun, 30 Mar 1997, Robert D. Hilliard wrote:
> Is it necessary, or even useful, to have the System.map-x.x.xx
> file in the /boot directory if loadlin is used for booting?
>
> Is there any need to have a kernel in / or /boot unless lilo is
> being used?
It is, as you have surmised,
"Robert D. Hilliard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Is it necessary, or even useful, to have the System.map-x.x.xx
> file in the /boot directory if loadlin is used for booting?
Yes, there are a lot of utilities referencing it - most notably ps.
> Is there any need to have a kerne
Is it necessary, or even useful, to have the System.map-x.x.xx
file in the /boot directory if loadlin is used for booting?
Is there any need to have a kernel in / or /boot unless lilo is
being used?
Bob
28 matches
Mail list logo
