Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-28 Thread Sven Hartge
Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:51:18AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Mark Fletcher wrote: >>> Possibly stupid question -- this is Jessie, does this mechanism of >>> dropping the files in trusted.gpg.d work properly in Jessie or is it

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-28 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 01:24:59PM +0200, Frank wrote: > Op 28-03-17 om 07:48 schreef Frank: > Mark, > > As it turns out the ID 1397BC53640DB551 refers to a subkey of key > 7721F63BD38B4796. Both seem to be present in google's key file, so I can't > explain why apt ignores one of them. > I'll

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-28 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Tue, Mar 28, 2017 at 09:51:18AM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: > Mark Fletcher wrote: > > > Possibly stupid question -- this is Jessie, does this mechanism of > > dropping the files in trusted.gpg.d work properly in Jessie or is it > > new? > > It works properly. I have

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-28 Thread Frank
Op 28-03-17 om 07:48 schreef Frank: Op 28-03-17 om 00:57 schreef Mark Fletcher: Right, for the key issue, that has taken me right back to where I started: W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: 1397BC53640DB551 Odd. If you do a web search with that number, you'll find

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-28 Thread Frank
Op 28-03-17 om 09:54 schreef Sven Hartge: in this case we know this is the ID of Googles key, but my argument still holds in general In general, yes.

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-28 Thread Sven Hartge
Frank wrote: > Op 28-03-17 om 00:57 schreef Mark Fletcher: >> Right, for the key issue, that has taken me right back to where I started: >> >> W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: >> 1397BC53640DB551 > Odd. If you do a web search with that number,

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-28 Thread Sven Hartge
Mark Fletcher wrote: > Possibly stupid question -- this is Jessie, does this mechanism of > dropping the files in trusted.gpg.d work properly in Jessie or is it > new? It works properly. I have several hundred servers as proof. Grüße, Sven. -- Sigmentation fault. Core

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-27 Thread Frank
Op 28-03-17 om 00:57 schreef Mark Fletcher: Right, for the key issue, that has taken me right back to where I started: W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: 1397BC53640DB551 Odd. If you do a web search with that number, you'll find a lot of posts mentioning this

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-27 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 06:06:05PM +0200, Frank wrote: > Op 27-03-17 om 17:14 schreef Mark Fletcher: > >Well, switching from http.debian.net to deb.debian.org seems to have > >fixed that one. The error relating to that has gone away. > > Don't be surprised if it comes back. I think it may just

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-27 Thread Frank
Op 27-03-17 om 17:14 schreef Mark Fletcher: Well, switching from http.debian.net to deb.debian.org seems to have fixed that one. The error relating to that has gone away. Don't be surprised if it comes back. I think it may just have selected a different mirror now, but you can't be certain it

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-27 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:51:55PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: > Frank wrote: > > > The hash sum mismatch is usually a passing issue: updating while the > > repository/mirror itself is in the process of updating. If it keeps > > showing up, that mirror is probably borked. Try

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-27 Thread Sven Hartge
Mark Fletcher wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:51:55PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Frank wrote: >>> The hash sum mismatch is usually a passing issue: updating while the >>> repository/mirror itself is in the process of updating. If it keeps >>>

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Frank
Op 27-03-17 om 01:23 schreef Mark Fletcher: On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:51:55PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: Frank wrote: The hash sum mismatch is usually a passing issue: updating while the repository/mirror itself is in the process of updating. If it keeps showing up, that

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Mark Fletcher
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 08:51:55PM +0200, Sven Hartge wrote: > Frank wrote: > > > The hash sum mismatch is usually a passing issue: updating while the > > repository/mirror itself is in the process of updating. If it keeps > > showing up, that mirror is probably borked. Try

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Sven Hartge
Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Nicholas Geovanis wrote: >> > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: No, please do NOT use "apt-key add"

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > >> No, please do NOT use "apt-key add" but instead download the key and > >> put it as a file

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Sven Hartge
Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: >> Frank wrote: >> No, please do NOT use "apt-key add" but instead download the key and >> put it as a file with the suffix ".gpg" into the directory

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Reco
Hi. On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 13:56:54 -0500 Nicholas Geovanis wrote: > On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > > > Frank wrote: > > > > > wget -qO- https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub | sudo > > >

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Nicholas Geovanis
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Sven Hartge wrote: > Frank wrote: > > > wget -qO- https://dl.google.com/linux/linux_signing_key.pub | sudo > > apt-key add - > > No, please do NOT use "apt-key add" but instead download the key and put > it as a file with

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Sven Hartge
Frank wrote: > The hash sum mismatch is usually a passing issue: updating while the > repository/mirror itself is in the process of updating. If it keeps > showing up, that mirror is probably borked. Try deb.debian.org instead > of http.debian.net. deb.debian.org,

Re: Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Frank
Op 26-03-17 om 18:01 schreef Mark Fletcher: Hello When I run aptitude update I get, amongst the successful update reports, the following error messages: W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: 1397BC53640DB551 W: Failed to fetch

Anyone know what this means when running aptitude update?

2017-03-26 Thread Mark Fletcher
Hello When I run aptitude update I get, amongst the successful update reports, the following error messages: W: There is no public key available for the following key IDs: 1397BC53640DB551 W: Failed to fetch http://http.debian.net/debian/dists/jessie-backports/main/i18n/Translation-enIndex: